CIBC, a Canadian investment bank, has published last week a research note (pdf, 6 pages) which provides extremely strong arguments to support the opinion that oil prices will keep on rising.
The jist of it: oil supply is simply not able to follow expected demand, and thus higher prices will be required to tame that demand:
with the following price expectations:
Let’s see how strong this argument is:
The obvious questions are about how realistic the hypotheses for both demand and supply are.
On the supply side, it is actually fairly easy to predict future production, as oil projects have a lag time of (at least) a few years, so most of the oil assets that will come into production between now and 2010 are already known today. The CIBC analysts have examined all the known development projects and came up with the following newq production to come on stream:
You will note that the stright line in that graph is the expected depletion for existing production, i.e. the decrease in their production. The CIBC analysts suggest that depletion will amount to only 1.5% of current production, which appears to be conservative (for instance, it has been suggested that the Cantarell field in Mexico, the second largest producing asset in the world, could see its production drop by half in the newt few years. North Sea production is declining at an accelerating pace). Further improvements in technology and better reservoir management can be expected to slow the decline of many fields, but the CIBC numbers still seem to be very conservative.
Which means that oil production will barely grow in the next few years.
Meanwhile, demand growth has surpassed all expectations, despite the rising prices (remember, oil prices have increased by 60% in one year, and by 400% since their lows in 1999), and has been repeatedly reevaluated, as this graph shows:
Now, it is quite likely that a slowdown in world growth caused by rising oil prices or by other economic imbalances would also bring about a slowdown in such growth, but it is highly unlikely that it would stop the growth altogether, as it is part of a very long term trend, with less developped economies catching up on the West. Note that for Asia, a slowdown means 4-6% growth instead of 7-10%, so it is still growth, and significant chunks of the population in these countries are close to GDP levels where it has been shown repeatedly that car ownership (and thus fuel demand) skyrockets, and this would happen even with an economic slowdown.
Do note that the scales are very different on the two graphs. The room for catching up is stil huge. Note also how demand in the US has been creeping up in the past 20 years – and that’s demand per capita, not absolute demand, which has increased even more as population itself grows
So where does that lead us? Here’s the CIBC estimate:
Thus:
As a final note, here’s an additional graph that shows that the oil markets do NOT believe that it is only speculation that brings the oil prices up: long term future have gone up as well in an wholly unprecedented manner:
The market expects prices to remain above 50$/bbl all the way to 2010 – and the increase in price expectations for 2010 has been bigger than the price expectation for short term oil.
So get ready for durably more expensive oil. It will get expensive enough to force us to reduce our consumption, so we might as well start right away, before we are forced to.
Burn me…oh maybe 9 times? I want to see the graphs with conformed assumptions (variable on these); date ranges; and demand and usage numbers. Lies, damn lies and statistics. The projected “Additions to Gross Supply” chart shows a one million bbl/day spike in production for this year over last, with an exact reduction next. Huh?
As I’ve argued before, when confronted by crises, the actual humans making up the basis of assumptions will respond. In the years following the “oil crisis” we in the U.S. realized a substantial drop in demand (10-20%). In California, the 6th largest economy in the world, we mandated energy efficiency in all building projects, subsidized retrofits, and funded alternative energy projects. Where are the charts showing historical reactions to similar crises?
Snapshots of current market conditions projected forward based on current patterns of usage serve only to promote the source authority’s agenda. And not to put to fine a point on it, but this report comes from an investment bank. Which as you’ve pointed out, is the main player in the game, and the entity “most likely to resemble Gipetto”. Pinnochio’s nose is growing.
My assumption is that there is a very small group of corporations and individuals who have vastly increased their wealth over the past year by pulling the strings on that puppet. This administration came into office packed with a “who’s who” of corporate and oil interests. Their unconcealed disdain for any energy source other than oil has been apparent since day one. Their view of “alternative energy” is five hundred people farting into a vacuum. (Their version of “wind energy”).
Screw it. I’m going to build a still in my backyard to make ethanol, put the damn photovoltaics on my roof, change my electrical system to 12 VDC, and process my own damn waste to recapture the methane. Oh yeah, and call for a National Asswind for Energy day. The voices would change, but the smell would be the same.
All i know is that I’m paying $2.49/gal for gas now…. it’s a big hardship. Every trip is thought out carefully. And it’s having a big impact elsewhere — in grocery store prices, in shipping costs, school bus transport, and on and on.
I grew up in a place where it was about $4.oo/gal. Somehow I think that’s right considering the environmental damage we cause burning fuel. It’s sad that it impacts people who have little control. We raised taxes for cigarettes, which is a self abuse issue, but are unwilling to accept a raise in gasoline. Hopefully it will have an impact on alternative fuel sources, and we can get big oil where it hurts. (yeah, right.)
I think the price increases in all the other areas are also a result of not getting the funding we need from the government as a result of its war for big oil.
point of view, how much of this expected price increase is already built into the share prices of oil companies?
And how will high prices effect lower consumption?
What is the medium term outlook for energy companies profitability?
Oil company shares have not increased that much, considering the huge profits they have been making. There are two reasons to that:
The fist one could change and lead to a change in perceptions, but the second one is here to stay.