– excerpted from Crimes Against Nature by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to be published in July by HarperPerennial.
Vanity Fair has an extensive excerpt from RFK Jr.’s book in its May 2005 issue. I recommend taking a look. He explains Bush’s re-election as the result of “a breakdown in our national media.” He cites some amazing statistics from the Program on International Policy Attitudes. See below the fold.
75% of Bush supporters believed Iraq was providing substantial support to al-Qaeda. Thirty percent of Kerry voters did.
82% of Bush supporters erroneously believed either that the rest of the world felt better about the U.S. thanks to its invasion of Iraq, or that views were evenly divided. 86% of Kerry voters accurately understood that a majority of the world felt worse about our country.
Most Bush supporters believed the Iraq war had strong support in the Islamic world. Kerry voters accurately estimated the low level of support in Islamic countries. Even Turkey, the most Westernized Islamic country, was 87% against the invasion.
Most significant, the majority of Bush voters agreed with Kerry supporters that if Iraq did not have WMD and was not providing assistance to al-Qaeda the U.S. should not have gone to war. Furthermore, most Bush supporters, according to PIPA, favored the Kyoto Protocol to fight global warming, the Mine Ban Treaty to ban land mines, and strong labor and environmental standards in trade agreements, and wrongly believed that their candidate favored these things. In other words, the values and principles were the same. Bush voters made their choice based on bad information.
I’ll say they did. Conservatives don’t spend all that money on losing ventures, like the Moonie Times and the New York Post, because they are bad businesspeople. They do it to deceive the American public. They play on our worst instincts, our latent xenophobia and homophobia. They appeal to our love of our country by pushing a pig-headed jingoistic parochialism. They undermine the work of scientists by publishing junk-science and pseudo-religious bullshit. And they do it because it works.
Even with bush admitting that there were no WMD’s at campaign stops, the likes of Rush, Faux News, and the Moonie times were still able to convince that many republicans otherwise. It drives me nuts that we can’t have an honest discussion in this country because these people are out spreading lies.
It’s amazing that they only got 51% of the electorate with all they had behind them. They had power, a ton of money, media control, quirky voting machines, voting errors that mostly favored Bush, giant direct mail operation, Texas redistricting, crass exploitation of 9/11 and “much much more.”
Or just a willfully ignorant portion of the body politic? I think that it’s actually a uniquely American, particularly virulent strain of anti-intellectualism that is ultimately to blame. Among these sorts of people, I suspect, Bush is subconsciously admired for his knack for ignoring bothersome facts and just doing what he wants to do.
The optimist in me sees yet another opportunity in some of those poll numbers (except for the selfish attitudes on Iraq)–that maybe these people could be brought around if they were educated on these issues.
But my inner pessimist, who gains ground all the time, says these people don’t want the truth, not really. I just can’t buy that all these people missed Bush’s statement that Iraq didn’t have WMD, or his opposition to the Kyoto protocols. Rather, I think they want to have it both ways: all the small-minded pettiness, intolerance, jingoism, and economic selfishness conservatism offers, without wrestling with any of the cognitive dissonance and guilt that might accompany it were they to face the facts and admit that all those highfalutin’ “ivory tower intellectual” progressives might be right.
Because let’s face it: down that path lies a fundamental critique of the “American dream”. Many people say that it goes against blue collar “red staters'” economic interests to vote Democratic. But that’s only so if we on the left engage in a little bit of self-delusion ourselves. As long as we look at the U.S. and its people in artificial isolation from the rest of the world (except for a select group of similarly wealthy democracies), that holds up okay. But an honest progressive has to admit that on a worldwide scale, all Americans are an affluent elite, the global equivalent of Bush’s rich tax cut recipients. If we stuck to our principles on that worldwide basis, we’d have to focus less on keeping high-paying jobs here, and more about sharing our often ill-gotten wealth with poorer countries.
Viewed that way, it’s not hard to see why the same people who view Iraq through a selfish prism might prefer to pretend that their guy Bush favours progressive, compassionate policies, while benefiting from his “America first and foremost” policies.
Alan
Maverick Leftist
I’ll believe that there are some people who don’t want the truth because it’s too confronting for them. There’s also a significant number, I think, who will blindly support the views that accord with their programming, whether this has come from fundamentalist christian sources or from being a lifetime Republican. At least one diary has been written in recent weeks (whether here or at DKos I can’t remember) about the inability of these people to deal with facts that prove their ‘programmed’ views wrong. If you can show them that something they fundamentally believe is impossible, in their mind this is confirmation that there is something wrong with you.
Now combine these phenomena with:
Put these factors together, and what do you get? Bush’s second term.
a bit OT: RFK Jr. was fantastic on Bill Maher’s show Friday night. He’s a master at making points clearly and interestingly.
I’ve heard some great interviews with RFK Jr., he’s a smart and dedicated man. I know it’s been said a thousand times by now but getting some decent media is a must. While it’s true that a lot of people don’t want to be “confused by the facts”, some really would like to get the information to make a good choice. The problem I’m running into is that a lot of these people seem to have come to the conclusion that if Fox lies constantly then so do all news sources. So none can be trusted and no one can get at the truth anyway, so why bother? This attitude is the hardest to deal with for me-even when I can point to links to the original sources I get a shrug. I wish I knew how to get around this, it’s not going to help us any in the future.