There’s a moment driving the morning commute over the San Francisco Bay Bridge that exemplifies who we are and where we are at as a civilization.
Driving through the tunnel on Yerba Buena Island in five lanes of traffic (the bridge is crossed by 280,000 vehicles a day) one can see opening up along the entire length of the first part of the western span…in one gulp…a little over one mile of jam-packed traffic sitting 300 ft. above the surface of the Bay. Before one’s eyes creeps a sea of steel and rubber riding on a suspension bridge of steel and concrete…powered, built, fabricated and maintained by the burning of fossil fuels. It’s something to see. And something to think about.
I just finished reading Jared Diamond’s book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Here in the Bay Area commuters on the Bay Bridge have that word….collapse…both burned in our memories, and literally present to us in the ongoing $6 Billion construction of a new eastern span of the Bay Bridge which has resulted in a forest of cranes and towers running alongside the vulnerable, and due-to-be-replaced, old bridge. Of course, it is seismic realities that drive this new bridge, but viewing that daily sea of cars and trucks, one could just as easily think about sprawl, water use, smog, fossil fuel dependence, and the increasing atomization of our society into market-driven consumers who lack communal input into the long-term health and sustainability of our environment and economy.
You see, us morning commuters on the bridge are just getting to our jobs and making ends meet. However, as a society, we are driving into a future shaped by our current policies and assumptions. We are literally building our future out of the raw materials of our daily lives. Have we given that the thought it deserves? That’s the core question that Diamond asks. In light of the fact that today, December 3rd, marks a world-wide day of action about Global Warming, I’d like to echo Diamond, and join the ongoing discussion of how we put long term thinking and sustainability on the political table.
Collapse is a solid and highly readable book that asks critical questions. Diamond asks himself why societies, past and present, have left themselves vulnerable to failure. Why did past cultures act in what now seem to be short-sighted or ignorant ways? Malcolm Gladwell, in an excellent review of Collapse in the New Yorker summarized Diamond’s analysis of the failure of Greenland Norse society and the Polynesian settlement on Easter Island. You can get an in-depth flavor of the book in Gladwell’s analysis, I highly recommend reading it. Diamond’s book, however, covers a wide range of modern and ancient examples. His writing on strip-mining in Montana, resource-management in China, and the introduction of non-native species in Australia, while not telling anything entirely new, collectively paints a picture of the unthinking ways we have made long term impacts on our environment in the last two hundred years. Diamond’s analysis of Rwanda, and his comparative study of Haiti and the Dominican Republic, while short on positive ideas, shine the light on very real and present ways in which societal failure has occured in the present day, and what little has been done about it. (For a discussion of quibbles and critiques of the book try here)
Of course, the effect of Hurrican Katrina on the city of New Orleans…a city left vulnerable to devastation by local and national leaders…has brought this concept home here in the United States. It goes without saying that the devastation and abandonment of an entire major U.S. city represents a powerful example of how we have failed to plan for long term eventualities, and are ill-prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences of that failure. The fact that there has been so little discussion of that failure in New Orleans is utterly breathtaking. (Even mentioning the possibility that global warming had a hand in Katrina was taboo…why was that?) Predictably, models for an Eco New Orleans have been waylaid for discussions of the latest political scandal or crisis.
Diamond’s book, especially in light of Katrina, points up the ways in which we simply don’t think about long term environmental consequences much in our political and economic lives. Anyone who has read Jerome á Paris remarkable series of environmental analyses, or Michael Klare’s work on Znet understands how little of that kind of thinking gets reported in the mainstream press…if not how little of it gets addressed in the political discourse of the two main political parties in the United States. That must change.
We need to have a discussion of why our national political system has utterly failed our citizens in leading a discussion about the long term environmental consequences of our current practices. Our citizens get it. Our localities get it. But our government doesn’t. In fact, our current corrupt, scandal-plagued GOP-led Congress, exemplified by Rep. Richard Pombo is based on selling our resources and our future to the highest bidder. Environmentalists spend a great deal of energy just combatting the GOP election cycle to election cycle. In that environment, there’s not much of a chance for long term thinking to get discussed.
One of the critical points that Diamond makes is that societies that “fail” oftentimes were obessesed or distracted with other issues. They just didn’t see the impending disaster until it was too late. Our political system is supposed to provide us with “small d” democratic venues where all of these issues are put on the table…where clear-thinking individuals and leaders are given a chance to break out of short term and “crisis mode” thinking and plan in a rational way. That isn’t happening. Our system has been bought and sold. The situation now is worse than it was two decades ago.
Oftentimes, shifts away from from long term planning and sustainability happen gradually. As a student of Diamond’s asked…”What was the person who cut down the last tree on Easter Island thinking?” Almost certainly, they weren’t thinking much differently than the people who cut down the earlier trees; environmental devastation happened gradually. The consequences, however, were permanent.
One of the powerful realities expressed in the morning commute over the Bay Bridge is how easy it is to simply follow the vehicle in front of you wherever it is headed. That morning commute is a clear symbol of how our individual lives plug into a much larger reality. Yes, with the rise in gas prices, car pools and bus use have gone up. (You can see that every morning on the bridge..fwiw, I carpool and BART whenever possible.) But having seen that same commute during the dotcom boom I can say…nothing substantially is different. We are making change around the edges. We aren’t facing facts.
Jared Diamond’s book may be a bit of a “best seller”…but it is, nevertheless, essential reading. The picture he paints of Easter Island and Norse Greenland…societies cut off from the rest of the world, without a fallback…is exactly the situation we find ourselves in here on our planet Earth.
We’re all living on Easter Island. Most of us just haven’t realized that yet.
but you are cordially invited to read my blog, k/o at a frequency of your choosing.
I’d love to think that I’d get discussions of pieces like this there…but that’s been slow lately, hence my decision to cross post a bit more. To me, the discussions are an essential part of the writing.
I look forward to your comments either here or there!
peace to you,
kid o.
ko, I’d love to, but blogspot is one of those blocked sites where I am at the moment. I will have a look now and then via a proxy, but . . . how about your own domain?
kid o, I have read your stuff and appreciated your viewpoint and skills as a writer. I appreciate the current post and concur with your assessment. The history of Easter Island is a bleak, but apt, comparison to our current situation. I personally think we still have something of a chance to avoid the fate of the Easter Islanders, but I’m less convinced of my position every day. Thanks for pointing out the book to us.
Also, I just tracked through your blog to some of your photos online, and I am floored that “kid oakland” is who you are. I know of your work and your name and I’m once again in awe of the many talented, nay gifted, people that this site counts among its contributors. I’ve been a serious semi-pro photographer for a long time and I’m finally taking the chance on publishing some work. I’ll let BT’ers know when I get my first book done.
I’ve bookmarked your sites and will check in from time to time, but I hope you’ll keep cross-posting here.
Thanks for your contributions.
We seem intent on chopping down that last grove of palm trees (oil), ruining the surrounding reefs (environment), and expending our energy in erecting giant statues (wars).
Our whole society is like a giant teenager — we think we’re somehow immortal. We grasp at any straw to believe we’re no longer subject to the rules that have limited all other nations.
I think doubt plays a very big role as to why we are in the sorry state we find ourselves in as a society. We are certain that we will never face a collapse, despite evidence to the contrary. And if you don’t believe a collapse can happen, you’ll never do anything to prevent it from happening. If you plan for the worst, you have doubt–which means you don’t believe.
Have mercy!
You and KO have definitely written two very thought-provoking–and chillingly complementary–diaries.
They were probably thinking; “If I don’t cut it down someone else will so I may as well get the short term benefit of it for myself.”
This sort of “Malthus-inspired” rationale, (that there’s really not enough to go around for everyone no matter what we do so therefore we need to compete with our neighbors for the things we think we need); this sort of rationale is at the heart of the selfishness our society embodies on so many levels. And this selfishness requires unhealthy levels of denial to maintain itself, and that state of denial doesn’t allow for any meaningful “long-term” perspective, because such longer views inevitably require that we displace the “me” in our calculus and replace it with “we”. And “we” implies cooperation and common interest with our neighbors, rather than “me”, which makes it easier to compete against our neighbor.
We’ve now gone retrograde to such an extent that even the concept of long-term perspective is being disparaged by the “looter-wing”, (i.e the corporatist, Grover Norquist gang) of our society. They want us to believe that the big problems “really can’t be as big as they’re made out to be because if they were everyone would already be working on them”; and “problems of this scale always work themselve’s out so not to worry”.
And people buy it because they’re afraid and because they need to find ways to legitimize their own acts of rapacious selfishness that such fear inspires.
Just yesterday, the Wall Street Journal ran an odious article saying that hybrids didn’t really save any gas because “someone else will just use it instead.”
That kind of logic does nothing but elevate selfishness to a virtue.
I read that too. It’s like the Ayn Rand style Cato Institute academic “loot the economy” types op-edding their none-too-clever sophistry that “Price gouging is good”.
The fractured logic of these people works because it’s organized around exploiting the people’s ignorance and catering to their selfishness rather than seeking to inform and enlighten and encourage the kind of common interest cooperation that is central to any society’s growth toward sustainability and enlightenment.
Their greed and selfishness is at the heart of the very problems they rail against, causal to most of the long term difficulties facing us.
Stossel on the merits of “price gouging”here.
Thank you, KO. You are always worth my reading….
I do understand your thoughts and our problems here. It has got to come to a stop someplace. Yes we must make our government understand this dilemma. Lots of hugs to you….
Nice summary of the book. It seemed to me that he was forcing his way toward optimism at the end; really, nothing in the book supported optimism, nor do I see any reason for it, not that I think that means we ought to stop trying.
The trib’s book club selection that we’re discussing today is a combination novel/non-fiction work that brings the whole atomic energy history into the picture of “collapse.” Talk about not looking at long range effects. In many places we have not only cut down the last tree, we have annihilated the ground it stood on.
It’s so frustrating because taking care of the natural world doesn’t require much money – e.g. avoiding gas-guzzlers actually takes less money – and payoffs are fairly quick and visible – e.g. the 25 years of habitat protection by the Nature Conservancy in Arkansas have paid off in the recent rediscovery of an ivory-billed woodpecker.
I think that people are scared to stop doing what they are doing and to “pay attention.” They don’t want to take personal responsibility, they don’t want to think on a larger scale, they are afraid to look back and see – something – gaining on them.
Here are many people jumping up and down, waving arms, saying, really, this is simple, it isn’t painful, it will do you good, it will benefit others – please, please, pay attention and do several small things, none of which will require large sacrifices.
And many people won’t do it. They resolutely turn away and say, “I’m not going to think about this. I won’t, I won’t! I have too many other things. Don’t ask me. There’s nothing I can do.”
It’s easier to think about missing white girls than about issues that one could personally do something about!
I loved Collapse. Constantly reminded of it. I listened to it on CD about one year ago. And I bet I’ve brought it up in conversation at least once a month (and I hardly ever talk to people, so that is like almost every time I talk).
I think it is hopeless. We are like a bacteria colony in a dish. We’re going to explode, crash and burn. I think it all the time. Most recently today, walking through the crowded mall, as my fellow Americans bought as much plastic Chinese shit they could get their hands around. We’ll take our species to near extinction along with the Emperor Penguins and all the other quirky-cool life on this planet so we can let our kids play with Dora the Explorer Talking Houses. Among other wants that we fulfill despite their inanity.
Thanks for this reminder of what’s important rather than noticeable or exciting, KO.
In addition to Jared Diamond’s book, I’d like to thoroughly recommend a book I’m reading at the moment: The Weather Makers: The History & Future Impact of Climate Change by Tim Flannery.
This is a fantastic survey of the history of climate change, and a great summary of the hardening scientific consensus about the impact of global warming over the next few decades. Flannery has a great ability to present the science simply and to draw out vivid examples to illustrate the points he makes.
I know the subject sounds a bit technical/scientific, but it really is a very readable and interesting book, which will arm you with lots of simple factual info to use in arguments with sceptics.
In the US it will be published with the title The Weather Makers : How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth.
I gather from Powell’s ($25) and Amazon ($16.50) websites that the book will only be published next March in the US, but you can order now.
Perhaps the place I get most angry is sitting in a traffic jam waiting to pay the toll to cross the Bay Bridge.
It is when I feel the most stupid. When I feel the human society is actually irredeemable.
Its about feeling, not thinking.
I wonder if I will feel better thinking KO is in that sea of smog somewhere, too.
(thanks for the tip about the book.)