Everyone knows, or should know, just how secretive the Federal Government has become under the Bush Administration.
The Freedom of Information Act is a tool with which Citizens can obtain first-hand information being generated by the bureaucracy, to use this information to lay bare the inner workings of OUR Republic.
Now, I live out here in the middle of the woods…because I hold my privacy penultimate, any snoops, lost citizens, or Jehovahs are announced by my “band of mutts”, long before they are even half way down this old dead end road.
The first European part of of my family arrived in 1630 (known as the “Planters”, for you History buffs). The other branch of my family were already here. So, I would have to say to any Republican who dared to call what I believe, treason, well, I wouldn’t say, I’ld probably just deck him (boomans not the only one with a strong sense of personal justice).
But, I don’t trust the bastards. And I own this government. I want to know just what they are doing, at ALL times.
The FOIA request is not all that complicated to do. Anyone with even a limited ability to fill in paperwork, wait a long time, and be able to write a check, can file one.
But what has occurred over the past few years, is subtle, and not so subtle sabotage of these requests, by Federal Departments.
“Since September 11, 2001, several important trends have affected access to federal documents and information. First and foremost, the federal government is keeping more information away from the public. In July 2005, The New York Times reported that the government in a single year (2004) classified more than 15 million pages, while declassifying only 28 million pages.”
This alone would be a big reason why our Traditional Media have made limited use of these requests. After all, what’s the point, everything’s a secret! (Mostly though, I just think it’s lazy “jurnaralism”.)
The second reason these requests have been a frustrating experience is plain and simple bureacratic backlog.
“the number of requests that agencies received increased by 71 percent from 2002 to 2004.” Agencies also reported that “they have been processing more requests — 68 percent more from 2002 to 2004…. For 92 percent of requests processed in 2004, agencies reported that responsive records were provided in full to requesters.”9 However, the GAO report noted that “the number of pending requests carried over from year to year — known as the backlog — has been increasing, rising 14 percent since 2002.”
But there is a third impediment now thrown into the mix.
When it comes to FOIA requests, many government agencies employ a delaying strategy. And the strategy seems to be effective. Reports, articles, documentaries, news reports must be written and filed without requested FOIA information. The agencies can embrace this practice and suffer no penalties or consequences, even when the requests come from the press.
But Wait! There’s a fourth way to bottle up these Citizens.
The removal of unclassified documents has led to a fourth trend. More and more unclassified documents previously available “are now barred to the public and identified as `sensitive but unclassified’ or `for official use only.
Now before you think I’m some sort of federal practice wonk, the article to trigger this writing can be found here
But the most excellent part of this article is the footnotes, and humongus list of “Web sites, blogs, listservs, and newsletters that could help clients needing access to government documents but who might experience difficulty locating that information.”
I stopped counting them after about thirty or so, and I was only half way through….!
So no great prescient thoughts here, no call for direct actions, just lending some tools to the neighbors. And now to bed.
I’ll second your comments about FOIAs – I filed a FOIA request many moons ago (Has it really been – gasp – 22 years?!?) and predigested the information (a big box of EPA’s chemical test results from a chemically-contaminated park in Kansas City) before leaking it to the press.
Since at least the Bush Sr. administration, it’s been harder to get data out of EPA; they now only provide sanitized “summary data” from their computerized database, rather than the big box full of raw lab results that you need to review to see if the tests were done correctly and if the numbers are worth the paper they’re printed on. (Maybe I spooked them with my FOIA request.)
Unfortunately, and disappointingly, this situation did not improve under Clinton/Gore, as far as I could tell.
So I’d echo your comments about FOIAs, but I’d add a warning and a hint:
The warning – be extremely specific and comprehensive in your request. Don’t just ask for “the data related to the dump on 23rd street” or you’ll just get the summary data from the computer. Ask for “all raw and summary chemical data related to the dump on 23rd street, including all raw and summary QC results, including instrument calibration and performance checks, analysis of blanks, analysis of reference samples or laboratory control samples, analysis of matrix spike samples, analysis of laboratory duplicates, percent recovery for surrogates and internal standards,…” you get the idea, even if you have no idea what all that technobabble means. (Reviewing that arcana is how I make money consulting on the side, LOL.)
The hint – if you are a representative of a registered (incorporated?) not-for-profit group, rather than just Joe Citizen, they used to have to absorb at least some of the cost of photocopying, which they otherwise bill you for. Be sure to mention this in your cover letter and specifically ask for all costs related to the FOIA to be waived. The worst that can happen is that they’ll say no, and you’re none the poorer than if you didn’t ask.
If you approach a local non-for-profit activist group and say “I’m interested in investigating the dump on 23rd street, and I’d like to work with your group,” they’d probably welcome you with open arms. Once in the door and having gotten to know folks, you tell them you’ll need to file a FOIA to get the research done; can you please write a letter on their letterhead… This may have to be decided at a meeting of the local board of directors, where you’ll have to go and sing all of the above in three-part harmony, but you’ll likely get buy-in if you schmooze right: “It will bring such good publicity to our group!” “I’ve already been working with Brenda Starr at the local paper, and she is depending on our help in getting this data to expose this crime; she’s confident we’ll make the Sunday paper with this story!”
It’s time consuming but a hell of a lot of fun. Go save the world – or at least your bite-size chunk of it!