On the front page of Tuesday’s NY Times (subscription required), reporter Juan Forero (and I use that term loosely) does the Bushco spin on Chavez and it’s time someone points out the spin asap.
With Venezuela’s oil revenues rising 32 percent last year, Mr. Chávez has been subsidizing samba parades in Brazil, eye surgery for poor Mexicans and even heating fuel for poor families from Maine to the Bronx to Philadelphia. By some estimates, the spending now surpasses the nearly $2 billion Washington allocates annually to pay for development programs and the drug war in western South America.
“He’s managed to do what Fidel Castro never could,” said Stephen Johnson, a scholar at the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Here we have the completely biased right wing think tank the HERITAGE Foundation as his first ‘expert’. That should signal the hatchet job yet to come.
Mega-projects, like Mr. Chávez’s utopian plan of building a gas pipeline through the Amazon from Venezuela to Argentina, are not likely to materialize.
Don’t you just love it, it’s “utopian” when a Latin America country has big plans (backed by big money don’t forget) but when the Neocons/Gas and Oil people want to run pipelines throughout the Middle East that are 10 times larger they are seen as ‘visionary’.
The Center of Economic Investigations, an economic consulting firm in Caracas, issued a study recently that said Mr. Chávez had spent more than $25 billion abroad since taking office in 1999, about $3.6 billion a year, while First Justice, a leading opposition party, put the figure at $16 billion, based on Mr. Chávez’s own declarations.
Just who is the “Center of Economic Investigations”, a CONSULTING FIRM? And of course we head right for First Jusice, a leading “opposition” party. Where is the balance here? what is the government’s number? I guess you’d have to get a real reporter for that information.
Critics see the spending as a reckless exercise in populist decadence intended to burnish Mr. Chávez’s image as the region’s leading statesmen while embarrassing the Bush administration, the Venezuelan leader’s principal obsession since American officials gave tacit support to a failed coup against him in 2002. Venezuela may be enjoying record high oil prices, they say, but it remains poor and mismanaged.
Critics do, really? What about supporters or independent analysis? Again, I guess you’d have to have someone walking around and doing reporting.
Mr. Chávez is “spending considerable sums involving himself in the political and economic life of other countries in Latin America and elsewhere, this despite the very real economic development and social needs of his own country,” said John Negroponte, the American director of national intelligence, in February at a Congressional hearing in Washington.
Negroponte? The death squads idiot now fronting for Bushco? What a great catch that he is being quoted dissing the head of a Latin American president of a democracy. How funny that he has a problem with a country sending loads abroad while things at home get slashed! Mr. Negroponte needs to shut one of his two faces here.
Antonio Ledezma, an opposition leader and one of the president’s more determined foes, said the policy’s aim was to build “a political platform with an international reach.”
Wow, another opposition leader getting a slap in, how long did he have to stand in line with the other negative commentators? The line of Venezuelan Chavez supporters is less than zero here.
Mr. Chávez celebrates the spending as revolutionary largesse, intended to further his dream of unifying Latin America in a way Simón Bolívar could only dream of.
Nice putdown Juan, Chavez as dreamer again. Why is this relevant when Bolivar didn’t have Chavez’s BILLIONS? Again, it would take a reporter to handle that story. Mix that with his very popular status in Latin America. How tough it must be to help unify Latin America when you have tons of money to help the poor and disenfranchized (the majority) and you are wildly popular on top of it.
“From a fiscal perspective,” said Michelle Billig, director of political risk at the Pira Energy Group, a New York consulting firm, “there’s a lot of concern over the lack of savings and what an expansionary fiscal policy could do to their macroeconomic outlook should there be a downturn in prices or supply.”
Thanks again Juan, how can we live without Ms. Billig’s take from the Pira Energy Group, another ‘consulting firm’ (for the Energy folks no less).
Venezuela plans this year to deposit $10 billion into a fund for social programs, Mr. Chávez said in February, up from $8 billion in 2005.
The programs, government officials contend, have helped reduce poverty to below 30 percent of the population. Social scientists in Venezuela dispute the claim, saying that poverty still hovers at well over 50 percent. Whatever the truth, polls show that Venezuelans, even those who strongly support Mr. Chávez, are increasingly concerned about the spending abroad.
These numbers are staggeringly fantastic for a country of only 25 million people! Then we get another slap about concerned Venezuelans from a ‘poll’. Whose polls Juan? The opposition party’s?
Big deals — often announced on Mr. Chávez’s weekly nationwide television and radio broadcast — go to the heart of the president’s persona, that of a revolutionary out to remake a region he says has suffered under Washington’s thumb. In the process, critics note, the Venezuelan government has fallen short on the more mundane aspects of governing, like fixing bridges, building homes or running hospitals. “I do think this is a vulnerability of Chávez, that he prefers the grandiose to the pedestrian,” said Michael Shifter, a policy analyst at the Inter-American Dialogue, a Washington-based policy group, who recently visited Caracas.
Critics note? And what do his supporters say you ask? Considering Chavez’s poll numbers are much more than double George Bush’s you don’t get to hear them! Stunning.
But if you read to the end of the article (which how many people really do when this part gets buried off the front page) guess who loves dear Hugo Chavez? Read here:
In the Bronx this past winter, Citgo, a subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela, provided heating fuel at a 40 percent discount to some 8,000 low-income residents of 75 apartment buildings.
Even in Philadelphia, where thousands of households are benefiting from a program by Citgo to provide heating oil at a significant discount, people were won over, despite Mr. Chávez’s antagonism toward Mr. Bush.
“All I can say is thank God for him for being able to help me and some others get some oil,” said Geraldine Shields, a homeowner who received 200 gallons of free oil in January and will be able to buy fuel at a 40 percent discount. “It’s time somebody starting thinking of the little guy.”
Mr. Forero and the New York Times, you are on notice. We are watching you and your bias.
Fantastic analysis, wilfred! I’ll never understand these hack’s aversion to a politician willing to invest in infrastructure that is designed to help build up the people financially and morale-wise. (I know why they oppose it, but it doesn’t mean I understand it).
Thanks again, highly recommended!
you’re more than welcome Manny.
I just about hurled the paper across the room when i saw this piece of pathetic reporting on the front page of the Times.
How stupid do they think we are? Yeah, I know the answer to that one already.
The NY Times link works for me. I just recently signed up for free.
I doubt I’m on some special list although I had a free account at one time before they started the subscription policy.
Great Diary, btw. I buy all my gas at the local CITGO.
Neither the NYT or the WP can be trusted to ever report accurately on Pres. Chavez. And it’s not because of incompetence, but because of pure hackery.
The Weakly Standard oughta be real jealous over this one.
I agree, wilfred, and have to say that Juan Ferero is one of the worst reporters ever. So Chavez is using the monies from oil to set up clinics for the poor and cheaper heating oil, and all of this is presented as provoking the US, not as humanitarian aid that it really is. Quoting the supporters of Chavez only from the US apparently makes this point clear–the aid is meant only to provoke.
And of course there are no people that this reporter (who has been in the area for the last 4 years,at least) could find in Cuba, Mexico, or Venezuela, who support what Chavez is doing for them.
…the NYT published two whole letters responding to the article.
I’m sure these letters were the kindest to the hack.
Thanks for that link Peachy.
I haven’t picked up the Times yet. I’m glad both letters are highly critical of the article and both also point out the bias.
The letter I wrote to the Times yesterday was equally critical, but alas was not published.
Keep at it, this is exactly the type of bunking the Times is famous for, and exactly why I haven’t read the Times since 2000. I’m sick of them trendsetting knowledge about situations which is entirely fabricated as a hatchet job.
Thanks for the debunking, and we appreciate your desire to keep watching this hack.
Thanks Isis.
If it wasn’t for the documentary “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” I wouldn’t have had the background about Chavez years ago in which to see all the lies printed about Venezuela and it’s leader.
Since that doc I have been intrigued by Mr. Chavez and I have kept up on what’s going on there so it’s quite easy to see when it’s a hatchet job. Chavez isn’t perfect but he’s a helluva lot better than anything they have had before and deserves a fair shake instead of all the lies they tell.
The Administration can’t STAND the idea that there’s something more to do with oil profits than … well, get obscenely rich.
If ordinary Americans realize the benefits to society from nationalizing the oil industry and supporting social programs at home and abroad… well, they might get Ideas. Dangerous Ideas….
Socialism is Bad. Your Corporate Government Says So.
Chavez isn’t perfect, but there’s a REASON he’s so popular in his country… especially with the poor, many of whom are now getting access to things like healthcare and educational opportunities for the first time. Many among his opposition are those who would be far, far richer were the government in Venezuela still doing business the old fashioned “American” way.
Nice piece! I’m afraid it’s near impossible to keep track of all the ‘reporters’ carrying Washington’s propoganda water these days. The demonization of Chávez falls right in line with that of Castro, Arisitide & Morales (for starters). I’m surprised that the writer didn’t manage to work in the quote from Rumsfeld about how Chávez, “like Hitler,” was elected.
I don’t have any problem with this one sentence though:
That seems accurate to me. Yes, it was Bolívar’s dream, as well as Che’s. What they can not stand is that Chávez is poised politically & economically to be in a position to realize some of that dream & challenge US hegemony in the region. What most US writers fail to notice though, is that the single person who has helped to bring Latin America solidarity to the forefront, whose visage is plastered on posters wherever people gather to protest neo-liberalism, isn’t Bolívar, Che, or Chávez, but one George W. Bush.
One other ‘fun fact’: Venezuela is trying to get OPEC to st oil prices at a steady $50/barrel. This is significant, because above $40/barrel heavy crude (which V has lots of) becomes economically viable to refine. Should that come about, Venezuela would be able to re-figure their reserve holdings & own the largest oil holdings in the world, enabling it in turn to increase production (& thus revenues).
Thanks!
And the only reason I had a problem with that phrase was that the writer was trying to make it sound like Chavez is a dreamer and a talker and doesn’t produce results.
I agree completely that what unifies Latin America even more than “pro-Chavez” is the “anti-Bush” sentiments.
Thanks for that heavy crude fact, i didn’t know that.
.
Fallen into complete amazement when a few days ago, the Dutch daily headlines presented ::
Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez used his ‘traditional’ Saturday television talk at the weekend to lash out at Dutch Defence Minister Henk Kamp, calling him a “pawn of Washington”, who allegedly helped spread the lie that Venezuela is planning to launch an attack on the Netherlands Antilles in the Caribbean. Mr Chavez said Mr Kamp’s comments are part of a US-led campaign to put his country in a bad light.
Now to the truth of this bushfire ...
Regions and territories: Netherlands Antilles
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
i loved this Oui.
Can’t imagine the Netherlands and Venezeula would have real differences here and the article points that out. Of course the wingers will add it to their list of false notes.
Hello, my friend!
This man can’t be serious. I mean, this is just utterly preposterous.
I didn’t know we were exporting the worst of this Admin to you.
I have read somewhere that out of the 10 to 8.000 kilometers of this pipeline, 3.000Km already exist.Furthermore, the Russians would like to participate in it.
I think big oil companies dont like the fact that they will not kparticipate in a project that will provide gas to 7 countries.
By the way, I tried to place a photo of the pipeline, but could not do it. Something is wrong with photobucket. Anyone knows what is up??!!
Cruz I haven’t tried to post one, but I’ll go and find out if mine will
Be back in a second.
[IMG]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b273/cruzdelsur/_41395950_060302gasmapa1.jpg[/IMG]
Best I could do 🙁
if it’s already 30% there, it’s not a pipe dream (sorry, couldn’t resist that one).
George the Wonder Dog.
It worked, but again I find myself not where I think I was. I thought you were posting in the cafe for some reason.
You were Family Man, just at Wilfred’s Bar and Grill 🙂
I have to admit Wilfred’s Bar and Grill has an over abundance of class and style.
Need a bartender? The cafe just lowered my salary and gave George more beer on the house.
Nothing is worse than a drunk dog.
Nothing is worse than a drunk dog.
you haven’t seen me after sunday margarita’s!
i could always use a hand, come on in.
I thought some of you might want to see the diary I did earlier tonight on Daily Kos – it refers to a British Channel 4 News story that has many of the same talking points from the NY Times story about Venezuela and Chavez.
Thanks Rico, I can’t believe Channel 4 is doing this too and now it’s plain to see it is coordinated. These people must be stopped. They have no political captial left but are determined to start another war to stay in power.
BushCo wants to use the military threats–imagined or otherwise–“terrorism,” Iraq, Iran, and now Venezuela to keep a stranglehold on the American electorate.
Why? Because BushCo’s No. 1 sponsor is: *drumroll*
The Pentagon!
Who’s the real bully on the block? Everybody in the world knows the US-UK axis is militaristic, expansionist and exploitative. The only people being fooled by this propaganda dissing Chavez are blockheaded Americans who don’t read blogs and can’t speak foreign languages.
It’s just another foot to the mouth of BushCo, and everybody knows they buy news.
What makes Chavez’s program exciting is that yes, he’s overspending abroad, but he’s doing it with the understanding that other Latin American countries will step in to support the Bolivarian revolution once the initial Venezuelan capital starts to dry up. It’s a good faith, cooperative international economic program, unlike The WTO & World Bank. That’s why BushCo and their sponsors hate Chavez so much.
My guess is that before Chavez succeeds, though, BushCo, or whoever the Pentagon is “sponsoring” as our “freely elected democratic executive and congressional representatives” will take military action against Venezuela and her allies.
Otherwise, the Pentagon’s hegemony will be threatened–not only in Latin America–but here in the US, too.
Flood the Pentagon: join the 2006 revolution of 1,000,000 shovels! “We dig the Potomac”