Peter Daou contrasts the coverge in the blogosphere with its counterpart in the “traditional media”-
The White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner was televised on C-Span Saturday evening. Featured entertainer Stephen Colbert delivered a biting rebuke of George W. Bush and the lily-livered press corps. He did it to Bush’s face, unflinching and unbowed by the audience’s muted, humorless response. Democratic Underground members commented in real time (here, here, and here). TMV posted a wrap-up.
Mash at dKos says, “Standing at the podium only a few feet from President Bush, Colbert launched an all out assault on the policies of this Administration. It was remarkable, though painful at times, to watch. It may also have been the first time that anyone has been this blunt with this President. By the end of Colbert’s routine, Bush was visibly uncomfortable. Colbert ended with a video featuring Helen Thomas repeatedly asking why we invaded Iraq. That is a question President Bush has yet to answer to the American public. I am not sure what kind of review Stephen Colbert’s performance will get in the press. One thing is however certain – his performance was important and will reverberate.
The AP’s first stab at it and pieces from Reuters and the Chicago Tribune tell us everything we need to know: Colbert’s performance is sidestepped and marginalized while Bush is treated as light-hearted, humble, and funny. Expect nothing less from the cowardly American media. The story could just as well have been Bush and Laura’s discomfort and the crowd’s semi-hostile reaction to Colbert’s razor-sharp barbs. In fact, I would guess that from the perspective of newsworthiness and public interest, Bush-the-playful-president is far less compelling than a comedy sketch gone awry, a pissed-off prez, and a shell-shocked audience.
This is the power of the media to choose the news, to decide when and how to shield Bush from negative publicity. Sins of omission can be just as bad as sins of commission.
Howie questions: Can we ever hope to put some limits on this administration if the media isn’t doing its job? Or, if we can see video of the Naked Emporer, is that enough? Courtesy of Seattle’s Stranger, here’s “the video everybody—everybody who doesn’t watch C-SPAN on Saturday evenings, anyway—is dying to see.”
A tribute site, ThankYouStephenColbert, has videos, links and a place to say “thank you.” You will observe a lot of nervous laughter as well as blank stares from the First Family. However, if you read Monday’s story in the New York Times about the event, you will observe that Colbert has been completely airbrushed out of their account.
Say thank you to Stephen here, if you haven’t already:
http://thankyoustephencolbert.org/
It’s now 17,757 thank yous.
Just signed it.
Just signed it too, using my real name. Colbert has more courage than the entire Washington press corps put together.
I am starting to question who actually won the cold war. Maybe we missed the enemy within.
I have reported this!
It doesn’t matter one whit that the corporate media ignores what Steven Colbert did the other night. He was doing it for the people at the event and he hit the target dead on. There are lots of other much more important things the media have ignored over the last few years. The fact that they don’t acknowledge the turd in the punchbowl is just more of the same. I think we all can hope that Colbert’s political reincarnation of the sainted Andy Kaufmann will begin to bore its way into their febrile little brains and like an earwig of truth begin to devour the truthiness. The Dear Leader, born on third base… thought he hit a triple, was peeved but that’s about as deep as it went with him. The wife can give her Barbara lite withering stares, but they think their position can’t be threatened by a TV comic. The fact that they had to sit there and take it right in the puss, no response possible, while their enablers watched them squirm was delicious, and a lesson to the press corps. Hopefully some of them will run with it.
Sigh.
Once again.
The media ignore real news?
Ignore THEM in return.
Boycott their asses.
The only language the media speaks is money.
Speak BACK to them!!!
In their language.
NEWSTRIKE!!!
It is the ONLY solution.
AG
I don’t often agree with you, but you are completely right that media has been purchased by corporate interests.
I saw it first hand when AFTRA and SAG were on strike about six years ago. We striking against advertisers — which meant we were striking against corporate America — which means we were striking against the owners of the media. Needless to say the strike got no coverage. The Chicago Branch showed up outside the Tribune and Sun Times with black electrical tape across our mouths and signs challenging them to report on the strike. We got enough attention from passersby that one or two short, lame stories appeared.
For this to work, we might have to boycott not only the news, but also its advertisers. And the boycott would have to be done on a massive scale to be effective. There is also the issue of “collateral damage” during a boycott. Workers who in no way set policy can be hurt during the process.
I don’t know if you usually disagree with me or Daou, but either way, glad we can unite on this.
Shoot. I still haven’t figured out how these comments line up. Actually I meant Arthur.
I understand completely. About Arthur, I mean.