Here is how they are going to sell it. This Plan A Lite. This continuance of economic imperialism by other means.
Straight from the horse’s ass.
The New York Times. 2008 May Test Clinton’s Bond With McCain
Delighted, the leader of the delegation, Senator John McCain, quickly agreed. The after-dinner drinks went so well — memories are a bit hazy on who drank how much — that Mr. McCain, an Arizona Republican, later told people how unexpectedly engaging he found Mrs. Clinton to be. “One of the guys” was the way he described Mrs. Clinton, a New York Democrat, to some Republican colleagues.
This article goes on, and so shall I.
After the break.
“They are SO cute!!! These two. Why…either ONE would make a great president, Mabel!!!”
Win/win. Or…lose/lose, depending on where you live and how you see things.
The PermaGov has chosen. BOTH sides, as usual. And now it goes about the business of selling its choice to the American people.
Mrs. Clinton and Mr. McCain, however, share not just a title, but also a general approach to politics. Both strive to be seen as willing to break with ideological orthodoxy from time to time and to work across the aisle. Both emerged from nasty political battles — Whitewater and her husband’s impeachment in her case, the 2000 Republican primaries in his — declaring their hatred of the “politics of personal destruction,” as former President Bill Clinton called it.
“They would run a completely different campaign than we’ve seen in recent memory,” said Marshall Wittman, a former aide to Mr. McCain who has worked with Mrs. Clinton.
“Both of them realize there is a desire in the country for a different politics of national unity that transcends the current polarization,” Mr. Wittman said.
And there you have it. The plot of THIS season’s new political situation comedy.
Will their pas de deaux end up in bed?
Or…are they sleeping together already? (Metaphorically speaking, of course. Right? Riiiiight.)
“Yeah, you’re breaking up,” Mr. McCain added, laughing. But then he said: “I happen to be a Republican and would support, obviously, a Republican nominee, but I have no doubt that Senator Clinton would make a good president.”
Asked the same question about him, Mrs. Clinton replied without skipping a beat: “Absolutely.”
Gag me with a spoon.
SO cute!!!
Now I am not one to diss political theater, and I personally believe that Hillary Clinton is some sort of political genius. McCain’s no slouch, either. But in this case it is being used to foist the continuance of a GIGANTIC mistake upon this country.
We are outnumbered in the world and will soon be outgunned as well. We CANNOT continue to impose our economic will by ANY means on the rest of the world, and if we continue to try to do so…by trickery and deceit, by sheer economic force and/or by military might…we ARE going to get our asses kicked. Anything short of a total pullout from Iraq and extensive reparations coupled with a real drawback from our current meddlesome policies throughout the world will be taken by the less developed countries and people of the world as tantamount to simply a change in tactics rather than a true strategic shift, and there is no sign that either of these candidates either truly believe in those kinds of moves or, if they do, are not so indebted to PermaGov money and power brokers that they would have no chance whatsoever of successfully implementing them.
But the beat goes on.
But Mr. Reines said Mrs. Clinton’s advisers had not noticed any recent changes in her relationship with Mr. McCain, and he declined to elaborate on the rounds of vodka.
“What happens in Estonia stays in Estonia,” Mr. Reines said.
Gag me with a BIG spoon.
What happens in non-smoke filled rooms STAYS in non-smoke filled rooms.
I admire both of these candidates’ political abilities. They have real talent.
Talent with legs.
But their legs are taking us down the wrong road. At best, their policies will buy us more time.
At worst…and most likely, as far as I can see…some fool is still going to light a nuclear cap under Detroit or someplace, and the whole neighborhood is going to go up in flames. Only a TOTAL change of strategic policies and goals is going to convince the rest of the world that we have changed course, and even if THAT happened we would be doubted for years.
Feingold or bust.
I see no other choice.
Later…
AG
Tips, recs…
How do we get Feingold in gear?
In play.
NOW.
AG
…willing to break with ideological orthodoxy from time to time and to work across the aisle.
This is exactly the type of candidate you’d expect the Big Business PermaGov to support. Profits are what matter, not ideology. They thought they had such a puppet in W, but after 9-11 he discovered religion in a big-time way and went off on Crusade. Their project was hijacked, except for those in the defense and resource extraction businesses. (Unless the whole 9-11 WOT thing was to centralize presidential power for the next president. Hmmmm….)
The one advantage to doing business with the PermaGov, versus the zealots, is that they have to be “reality-based” as profits don’t lie. And therein lies an opening to demonstrate that progressive ideas are the best investment in the long run.
With the zealots you can talk yourself blue in the face, but reality has no impact on the vacuum in their skulls. Fortunately, nature abhors a vacuum, and in time, being disconnected from reality, they pile up enough fatal errors that their system crashes. As W demonstrates more clearly each day.
As you point out, the big question is whether the system (for there always is a system; wipe this one out and another will arise) will adopt enough progressive ideas in time to keep the cities from burning again: from without via nukes, or domestically, the old-fashioned 1960’s way.
Given how “W World” is performing in the marketplace of ideas, I think this is the minimum of what we can achieve in the upcoming historical moment. The door is open for someone with balls to pull the conversation seriously back in a progressive direction. And it may be that if the time is really right, such a person will arise, whether Feingold or someone else.
Politicians are like surfers in that regard, always on the alert for the next big wave to take them higher and farther than their competitors.
The worse BushCo fails, the greater our opportunities.
you’ve been on fire lately, Knox.
The problem with your surfer metaphor, Knox, is this. The media has learned how to control the weather. The weather inside of people’s minds. When and if conditions appear that are in any way conducive to producing big waves other than those desired by the PermaGov, the media is used to damp down the action.
Case in point?
“ARRRRRGH!!!”
Dean was riding one HELL of a wave.
Suddenly, as if by magic…the wave disappeared. Along with the wind that created it. It seemed as if it happened literally overnight. Next thing we knew, there was Small K kerry paddling along in the kiddie pool.
“And now the weather. It’s calm today. We’re going to be just fine. I can see for MILES!!!”
Riiiiiiight…
Surf surf surf surf surfin’, USA.
Mark Twain said “Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.”
This will be the epitaph of Blogworld ’06 unless we get busy and create some REAL weather.
So…once again, I ask:
In play.
NOW.
Later…
AG
are personal, and all politics are local.
In Idaho, we have one very influencial man. Simplot. He is a multi Billionare, of Micron Technology (computer stuff) and Simplot fertilizers and other air polluting ventures. Thirty years ago he was asked WHO he supported in the Senatorial races and the Governors race. . .a Republican (of course), Mr. Simplot smiled and said it did not matter to him who won. . .in Idaho, no one runs for office without his approval (In essence, he owns both sides so who cares who wins).
No different than the National model, is it? I am not even sure any more if there is anyone that is not OWNED by big Biz. I hope we can find them and fund them and elect them, but it is not very encouraging to know if that can be done.
These are very tenuous times. It may be a case of having to elect (should we actually be able to count the votes this time, and people actually be able to vote)the least beholden candidates.
I have to go look for my tinfoil hat now. . . .