It didn’t use to be the case that one needed to explain to college students why white people wearing black face was considered offensive and degrading to African Americans, much less publishing a picture of someone in black face in the school newspaper. Nor was it necessary to explain that many people would consider hanging a noose to be a threat, not a joke. Used to be …
CORVALLIS, Ore., Nov. 18 (UPI) — Oregon State University is taking steps to address racism on campus, including a noose left at a Halloween party and racist content in the school newspaper.
There are fewer than 300 black students among the student body of 27,000 at the Corvallis campus. Two of them — Shannon Warren and Roshawn Davis — joined other black students in a protest after the campus paper published a photograph of a student in blackface as part of a story on a fan “blackout” at a football game, The (Portland) Oregonian reported Sunday.
White students involved in the incident — and in the hanging of a noose at a Halloween party — said they hadn’t meant to offend anyone, the Oregonian said.
But we live in a new era, now. The Post-Reagan age, one where young conservatives revere and burnish the image of the man perhaps most responsible for making nakedly racist appeals part of our political culture. True, Rush Limbaugh and hordes of right wing talk radio hosts took what Ronnie gave them (the eradication of the Fairness Doctrine) and pushed the outer edges of the “how low can we go” envelope to get us to this point. And let’s not dismiss the efforts of people like Lee Atwater who taught us all that nothing can place an albatross around a politician’s neck quite like the accusation that he loves him some black criminals.
Yet, I believe that more than any single person, is was Ronald Reagan who created the America in which we now live. His constant use of the false “welfare queen” narrative, the one he repeatedly told of a woman (her race never mentioned, merely implied) who drove a Cadillac purchased with welfare dollars was just one example of the change in tone and attitude he ushered onto the American political stage, after such rhetoric and open appeals to racism had been absent from the national political scene for two decades. “Saint Ronnie” rode the wave of an angry white backlash to two terms as President, and paved the way for the Presidency of George W. Bush, one where what used to be hidden is now openly (some would say nakedly) on display.
So it has been amusing to watch all the Reagan hagiographers attempt to paper over his many efforts to enable racists during the 1980’s with their half-hearted responses to Paul Krugman’s and Bob Herbert’s respective smackdowns of David Brook’s ludicrous column which claimed that Reagan didn’t intend to appeal to the racist sentiments of whites when he began his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, the town notorious for the murders of three young civil rights workers in 1964, and where he proudly proclaimed his support for “States Rights” long a rallying cry for white segregationists, Klu Klux Klan members and other assorted racists.
You see the fall out in a generation of young people, particularly young suburban white people, who grew up with the myth that Reagan was the greatest President ever. The man who stood down the Soviets and won the Cold War single handedly, who restored fairness to our political discourse and who beat back the screaming hordes of tax and spend liberals who just wanted to give our hard earned tax dollars away to lazy, shiftless losers on welfare. In their minds he has no faults, no flaws, no humanity. And that image will likely stay permanently etched in their brains, seeing as they were children who were told fairy tales about some heroic conservative warrior rather than the truth about the man, himself. And don’t count on our “liberally biased” press to do much to disenfranchise them of their cherished beliefs, either.
Which is why we will continue to see nooses hung, and jokes about wetbacks, and illegal alien hunts, and black face parties by this crowd. It’s also why we will continue to see Republicans vie with one another to see who can be the most openly racist, bigoted candidate running for President, whether the issue is affirmative action, Latino immigration or the rights of Muslims in America. And it’s why a Republican woman calling Hillary Clinton a bitch will be used by the lucky recipient of her nasty turn of phrase in his campaign fundraising efforts. All thanks to Ronnie Reagan, the patron saint of bigots, racists and misogynists everywhere.
What is it with the nooses? It’s one thing for the idiots who leave them around, but WHY do these people feel the need to defend the noose-makers?
We just don’t get the humor in them I guess.
I’m a bit older than these kids, maybe about a decade or so. My first “political” memory is watching the big US map on the 1984 election, cause I loved geography, and of my dad cursing loudly from the other room every time Sam Donaldson announced another state for Reagan. It made an impression.
My parents (and grandparents) made sure that my younger siblings and I never fell for such egregious fairy tales about the “greatness” of Ronald Reagan. Just the opposite, in fact- which makes it super creepy, every time, to see accounts of all these zombified children.
We weren’t the only liberal family in Orange County, not by a long shot, but it sure felt like it sometimes, though.
My experience was the exact opposite. Reagan gave me the creeps every time he spoke, but everyone around me absolutely loved him. I never did figure out how everyone else couldn’t see that he was a manipulatve liar.
I personally owe Ronald Reagan a tremendous debt of gratitude. I was a politically naive 21 year old when Reagan was elected for his first term. Like most people at that age, I was trying to figure out just where I was in the political spectrum. Lots of conflicts and more than a little confusion.
Well, thanks to what I saw and experienced in those early Reagan days, it become increasingly clear to me that, though I was surrounded by Reagan lovers, I was not “feeling the love”. I didn’t understand how my family, Reagan supporters all, could seem like such strangers to me.
I discovered then, without a doubt, that I was a liberal. Without Reagan’s unwitting help I might have drifted aimlessly for years in that vast gray centrist fog so many suffer through, even today.
Thanks Ron and keep up the good work! Hopefully George Bush and the Republican Party are doing the same thing for a lot of young people right now that you did for me.
More racism in Oregon.
http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2007/11/oregon-peace-group-to-host-anti-elie.html
http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2007/11/oregon-peace-group-to-mark.html
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Oregon “Peace” Group to Mark Kristallnacht with Holocaust Denial Conference
Here’s another story concerning what appears to be a trend: purported “peace activists” promoting Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. In this case, a University of Oregon peace organization called Pacifica Forum, which was founded and is led by a retired professor and a retired administrator from that university, is marking Kristallnacht with two days of speeches and conferences this weekend conducted by Mark Weber director of the Holocaust denial group Institute for Historical Review. Weber, the former editor of the National Vanguard, the main publication of the neo-Nazi National Alliance Party, has spent the past 30 years as a professional advocate of Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism. His opening lecture on Friday is entitled: “Free Speech vs. Zionist Power”. Advertisements for the event feature the image of a snake in the shape of a Star of David with the legend “The Israel Lobby: How Powerful Is It?” November 9 marks the 69th anniversary of Kristallnacht, which is considered by many historians to be the beginning of the Holocaust. (Pacifica Forum schedule available here.)
In 2006, the Pacifica Forum sponsored multiple talks by Valdas Anelauskas. Anelauskas, who was born in Lithuania, is an author and internet journalist who calls himself a “white separatist and racialist”, and has affiliations on both the far left and far right. In an email to a reporter for the Eugene, Oregon Register-Guard, he stated “I believe people have to live among their own kind … I feel no supremacy – I just want to be separate and live in my own environment.” In October, 2006, Anelauskas gave a lecture on “Zionism and Russia” in which he blamed Jews for the Bolshevik Revolution, calling them “the greatest killing machine in history” and stating that American Jews suppress dissemination of this information through their control of academia and the media. He dedicated this lecture to Holocaust denier Germar Rudolf. (Read here; more here and here).
According to a news report (read here):
During a question-and-answer period, Aviva Sainz called Anelauskas’ lecture “anti-Jewish garbage in a tradition that has lasted for centuries.” His talk, she told him, “is in the tradition of Hitler’s `Mein Kampf.’ “”There’s a lot of truth in `Mein Kampf,’ ” Anelauskas responded. Afterward, (Pacifica Forum co-leader Orval) Etter said he was “unable to say” if Anelauskas’ lecture could be characterized as anti-Semitic.
Anelauskas is a friend and supporter of Ward Churchill, who assisted Anelauskas with his book Discovering America As It Is. He has endorsed in print Churchill’s statement calling 9/11 victims “little Eichmanns”, going so far as to use the same phrase with respect to the administration of the University of Oregon when they rescinded an invitation for Churchill to lecture there (read here). [By the way, America As It Is has been endorsed by Howard Zinn, David G. Gil, and Ward Churchill (read here).]
The founders and leaders of Pacifica Forum are Orval Etter and George Beres. Beres, who was the manager of the UO Speakers Bureau and was UO Sports Information Director, has retired from those positions and is currently a columnist for a number of internet publications including Counterpunch and is a member of the Oregon Interreligious Committee for Peace in the Middle East. Just two days ago, a pro-free speech piece he authored was published on the anti-Semitic ziopidia.com. (Read here) In the midst of his piece is a fund raising ad reading:
“Help us increase awareness of Jewish supremacism (sic)and the sick(ening) evilness of Zionism. Donate US$10 US$20 US$50 US$100 US$200 more…. or send us an email [email address deleted] with the details of your pledge.”
Beres’ Counterpunch writings include one (read here) which, along with some seriously deficient historical background (he writes that Muslim anti-Christianity began in response to the Crusades, ignoring several hundred years of Muslim conquest and oppression of Christians), details some of his reasons for being anti-Israel. He says that he personally feels himself to be a victim of Israel. He says that he is of Greek extraction and grew up with many Arab Eastern Orthodox Christians. “Few in America realizes (sic) how the Eastern Church, along with innocent Muslims, is under attack in Lebanon and Palestine by (a) rare alliance between Judaism and fundamentalist Christianity. I also am a target, and am overdue in speaking out.” Just how he has been a target of Judaism, he doesn’t make clear.
With respect to Orval Etter, who is a 90 year old emeritus professor of public affairs and administration, the Eugene, Oregon Register-Guard reports (read here) that
he organized the forum after he “became convinced that Israel was a very tyrannical state.” He said he recalls reading a pamphlet that asserted that “what Israel is doing to Palestine is a holocaust.”
That same article states that
Pacifica Forum topics (in 2006) included a lecture by Etter on British historian David Irving, a Holocaust denier who in February was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment in Austria for his views. Critics say they attended another forum that featured a videotape on William Luther Pierce, founder of the National Alliance white separatist group.
It was the lecture on David Irving which first attracted Anelauskas to the group.
I have previously recently written about “9/11 truth” advocates and (alleged) peaceniks in the Aspen, Colorado area promoting Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism (read here and here and here and here). I found that story of small-town bigotry shocking, but I consider this one to be more so. While both stories deal with crackpots seeking attention for themselves on the peripheries between far left and far right, the Pacifica Forum story involves academics legitimizing those peripheries by providing the most extreme forms of anti-Semitism and conspiratorial paranoia a forum within a major university (albeit in an unofficial forum). They have done this with the assistance of friends and allies on both the far left and far right and the tacit approval of those who do nothing to oppose them.
My concern with all these stories is that we must not allow racism and anti-Semitism to be legitimized in our public discourse. If we ignore these people because they’re crackpots, they may or may not just go away, but the ideas they promote won’t. We must expose them and counter their lies forcefully with the truth.
Thankfully, I am not alone in this thinking. According to the Register-Guard:
Local critics affiliated with Community Alliance of Lane County have scheduled a free speech vigil to be held just outside the UO hall where Weber will speak. “We are operating under the theory that the best response to hate speech is more speech,” volunteer Michael Williams said. “We want an opportunity for the community to show its opposition to the kinds of things that Mark Weber stands for.”
Williams said opponents don’t plan to shout slogans or prevent people from hearing Weber’s talk. “We will have a presence that is unavoidable but not obstructionist.”
David Frank, a professor in the Honors College at the UO, said he and two faculty members are planning a Holocaust symposium in response to Weber’s talk.
Weber “has the right to come to campus and make preposterous statements,” Frank said. “But we have a responsibility as scholars to demonstrate the expertise and research that shows his claims are not only false but dangerous.”
Now that’s sound thinking.
Read more about this story here: Foes target Pacifica Forum: The Register-Guard, Eugene, Ore.
Institute for Historical Research promos for the event in pdf here and here [WARNING- HOLOCAUST DENIAL WEBSITE]
Posted by Adam Holland at 1:20 AM
Labels: “9/11 Truth”, Academia, Holocaust Denial / Historical Revisionism, Nazism, Ward Churchill, Zionism
3 comments:
menshevik said…
Kudos on your blog which I found via Solomonia.
Clicking one of your embedded URL’s in that blog post to the Pacifica Forum, I saw the names of two anti-Zionists in the Veterans for Peace org. Having posted on various VfP lists on yahoogroups, I knew that not only the two noted, Jack Dresser and Gordon Storrock in that org. to hold extreme anti-Semitic pov’s but, others in that org.
Take a look at these,
http://vfpdissident.blogspot.com/2006/07/vfp-resolution-submitted_14.html
http://vfpdissident.blogspot.com/2006/08/vfp-palestine-resolution-defeated.html
Having had a “discussion” w/ a Veterans for Peace member at a denver anti-war demo last Sat. who expressed explicitly Stalinist ideas, I am not surprised about the presence of other wackoids in that org.
Thursday, November 01, 2007
Anonymous said…
http://eugeneweekly.com/2007/11/01/views3.html
has a commentary decrying the “Pacifica Forum” neo-Nazi presentation
Thursday, November 01, 2007
Chaya said…
I took a look at their forum and saw that they had had a ‘comemmoration’ for Martin Luther King. So, I did a search and found King’s speech that said if you are an anti-Zionist you are an anti-Semite. I copied it and pasted it onto an e-mail I sent to this Pacifica Forum. I called them anti-Semites dressed up in ‘liberal’ clothing. I told them that King would have had nothing to do with them!!
Friday, November 02, 2007
Do you really believe that anyone on this site would believe you nonsense?
You tried to pull this crap recently in regard to an essay by Eileen Fleming, which was totally deceptive and dishonest.
Get thee back to Charles Johnson’s world of racism again Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians.
This is a left wing, liberal site, not a right wing racist site that supports Islamophobia as a prerequisite for blogging at Charlies place. Want to understand what you are into? Look up LGF Watch where people on the web are monitoring Charlie’s (and maybe now your own) bigotry.
where’s the quote by King?
Thanks Steven for reminding us that at least since Reagan, the Republican party has depended on racism to win elections.
Only in America. Hard to believe that it is still a factor in the elections of state officials and presidents. Poor Obama. Whether you like him or not, he is carrying a weight on his shoulders to overcome additional baggage, for which he really was not born with, but he was latter laden with.
Goodness gracious, is it only calvin who remember St. Ronnie’s visit to the SS cemetery in Bittberg? If that wasn’t calculated, what was? Ronnie smiled and looked presidential, but he represented the philosophy of his rich, white supporters who dare not reveal their real agenda in public. Oh, yes and they used the government as their piggy bank during his administration.
Sound familiar?
It’s like, “Whoops, they killed civil rights workers here? Whoops, they buried Nazi war heroes here?”
People should find the Ramones’ “Bonzo Goes To Bitburg.”
Bitburg…was that senility, stubbornness, or a nod to the Klan?
I always wondered about that also…I’d guess it was senility on his part and more calculated on whoever did itinerary of places to visit.
Steven, you wouldn’t think these terrible thoughts if you had watched the funeral coverage. Then you’d know!!
The Reagan hagiography escapes me completely. The press dubbed him the ‘great communicator’, though he had nothing to communicate. His way of talking was embarrassing, unctuous, slimy, sottovoce as if he was trying to seduce the latest young lady to display her charms on the silver screen that Mr. Reagan so avidly tried to claim as his territory. And his wife was a complete loon. Looking back, we see that the Reagans were a trustworthy sign of things to come. And they’ve come with a vengeance. Mrs. Tatcher loved him and still does. So, need more be said?