In one of the most petulant columns in recent history, Charles Krauthammer made a begrudging admission yesterday:
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously said of Franklin Roosevelt that he had a “second-class intellect, but a first-class temperament.” Obama has shown that he is a man of limited experience, questionable convictions, deeply troubling associations (Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko) and an alarming lack of self-definition — do you really know who he is and what he believes? Nonetheless, he’s got both a first-class intellect and a first-class temperament. That will likely be enough to make him president.
When even Charles Krauthammer is forced to admit that Barack Obama possesses a ‘first-class intellect and a first-class temperament’ and, in that regard, is superior to Franklin Roosevelt, it’s a pretty good argument that Sen. Obama is a good man for the job of president. But, notice also, that Krauthammer mentioned his ‘associations’, because that is where McCain now plans to go. The Washington Post reports:
“We’re going to get a little tougher,” a senior Republican operative said, indicating that a fresh batch of television ads is coming. “We’ve got to question this guy’s associations. Very soon. There’s no question that we have to change the subject here,” said the operative, who was not authorized to discuss strategy and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Now, John McCain talks a lot about honor and the concept seems to be quite important to him. John McCain would be doing us all a service if he raised questions about truly troubling associations that might lead to legitimate questions about Obama’s judgment and fitness for office. But Obama’s acquaintance with William Ayers is the worst kind of reach. His relationship with Tony Rezko has been thoroughly vetted. And the nation has already rendered its judgment about the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Even Charles Krauthammer concedes Barack Obama’s excellent qualities of mind and temperament.
I’m sympathetic to the concept that a political campaign’s number one job is to win. I understand that campaigns will occasionally stretch the truth. Politics isn’t a civil sporting event. But, even in politics, there is sportsmanship and there is integrity and there is, I hope, honor. Is this honorable?
Two other top Republicans said the new ads are likely to hammer the senator from Illinois on his connections to convicted Chicago developer Antoin “Tony” Rezko and former radical William Ayres, whom the McCain campaign regularly calls a domestic terrorist because of his acts of violence against the U.S. government in the 1960s.
As for Jeremiah Wright, he won’t be appearing in commercials (at least, not from the campaign directly), but not for any reasons of fair play.
The Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. appears to be off limits after McCain condemned the North Carolina Republican Party in April for an ad that linked Obama to his former pastor, saying, “Unfortunately, all I can do is, in as visible a way as possible, disassociate myself from that kind of campaigning.”
You might remember that Hillary Clinton brought up William Ayers and Tony Rezko, to little effect. And I don’t think a reprise by John McCain will save his bacon. McCain has been successfully painted as a man with a bad temper and a nasty ‘get-off-my-lawn’ disposition. He’s suffering from a 41%-46% favoribility rating, which is only slightly better than the 41%-51% favoribility rating of his running mate. Negative attacks raise your opponents unfavorables, but they also do the same to you. Considering that Obama enjoys a rating of 58%-31%, McCain probably cannot afford to be relentlessly negative.
Likewise, the American people are unlikely to reward a diversionary tactic aimed at moving the conversation off their main concern, the economy. McCain would be lucky to see foreign policy become a focus, but people are not interested in strained personal attacks.
It looks to me like John McCain is going to make the last month of this campaign as unpleasant and dishonorable as possible. And that is going to leave a mark on his legacy almost as large as his decision to select a beauty contestant as his running mate.
It’s been interesting to watch the frantic gyrations of the McCain campaign. His party seems to have been scared from the very beginning and ready to pull out the political dirty bag of tricks at a moment’s notice. His honor has been devaluated to nil. He seems like a parody now and with Sarah Palin as the VP candidate, his people are doing a quickstep to keep them out of the hole.
I never cared for McCain; I thought he debased himself a long time ago when he embraced Bush after Bush humiliated him and dragged his record though the garbage. McCain hasn’t been the same since. He’s angry, and I suspect it’s because he blames Obama for daring to challenge him and because he’s watched his “turn” at the Presidency shrivel away to nothing. Funny that he would cry out about youth and lack of experience in Obama as a terrible thing, but can’t acknowledge it in his own running mate. No wonder he’s pissed. Too conflicted!
McCain was never “the same”. He’s been a con artist going back decades. I say this from personal experience.
As for guilt by association, it doesn’t work very well unless one or the other party have benefited from the association. I see little chance of McCain showing that Obama has benefited materially from his associations, or that any of the three whom McCain would like to make an issue have benefited from associating with Obama.
Now, it will be pretty easy for Obama to torpedo these attacks simply by raising the topic of Charles Keating, who rather incredibly has been absent from the entire campaign. Keating is the elephant in the room nobody has wanted to talk about.
I’ve been wondering for some time why at least one of our 527’s hasn’t picked up on Keating, especially given the current popularity of such subjects. The information is plentiful.
From azcentral:
Honor? Naah! business as usual inside the beltway.
I’m thinking they’re holding the Keating scandal for when McCain goes enough over the line.
Keating and Cindy McCain were business partners. Also, Keating gave the McCain family free vacations overseas (which McCain later pretended he’d meant to repay Keating for, after the Keating scandal blew up in his face).
McCain has never had a legitimate claim to honor.
Never.
Are you still stunned?
This Reuters New Service article will stoke enthusiasm.
The focus over the next three weeks will be the financial disaster. There’s a limit to how much Market (oil & $$$) manipulation BushPaulson can muster. Their agenda to help McCain will fail.
his VP choice has a WITCH HUNTER as a minister, and they wanna bring up Jeremiah Wright?
I agree with the above poster: The Keating Five is an ad somewhere on ice. And when the time is right, it will be pulled.
Yeah, I think this is the real reason that the Wright stuff is off-limits. That and the campaign probably thinks the “secret Muslim” idiocy plays better than the “radical Christian” idiocy would.
You’d think a person would get used to it after while, and just take for granted that Krauthammer will be a childish stupid person again today, just like he’s been every other day. He bats zero in the game of getting it right. And yet the spectacle of his public embarrassments brings a cringe of disbelief every time he finds a new way to prove the worthlessness of his every thought.
The WaPo still has the power to stun by its embrace of a writer so predictably eager to prostitute himself and the profession of journalism by serving as a dedicated PR hack, not for an idea or a worldview, but for any wingnut that the GOP happens to hang its hopes on. This column sets up the new McCain strategy: quit fighting Obama as unprepared and start flinging specious crap about his “associations”. That is, after all, what riles up the base more than anything — it’s uncomplicated enough for them to understand.
In a way I hope the Reps do go all-out dirty because it will justify finally pulling the drapery off the rotted corpse of McCain’s “honor”. Obama, like everyone else, has had his share of unfortunate “associations” (among which I wouldn’t include Wright), but McCain has been an actual participant in serial venalities, most famously the act of economic terrorism now known as the S&L scandal. He escaped criminal prosecution through political clout and the sheer ordinariness of his behavior by DC standards. It’s past time he is judged guilty in the court of public opinion and deprived of his facade of “honor” for once and for all. So, McCain, bring it on. Maybe your cautionary example will scare other aspiring con artists straight.
Huh?!
“He’s suffering from a 41%-46% favoribility rating, which is only slightly better than the 41%-51% favoribility rating of his running mate.“
Did something change? Last time I checked 41-46% is worse, not better than 41-51%.
“Considering that Obama enjoys a rating of 58%-31%“
That doesn’t look right at all.
When you say 41%-46% favoribility rating, the two numbers are favorable-unfavorable, not a range.
So McCain is 41% favorable, 46% unfavorable while Palin is 41% favorable, 51% unfavorable.
Obama meanwhile is 58% favorable, 31% unfavorable.
So Booman’s right – McCain’s favorable/unfavorable matchup is slightly better than his running mate’s because people like them about the same, but more people dislike her than dislike McCain (an amazing turnaround from just a few weeks ago – but she had a lot of skeletons in her closet and some really bad interviews in that timespan).
Ah – OK, got it. Thanks.
Even if I believed that Obama was as sleazy as most Chicago Aldermen, I would support him, because John McCain would make an even worse President than George Bush. After four years of McCain, we would be calling Bush wise and honorable.