by Jeff Huber
Navy skippers immemorial wrote “He hit the deck running” on their new junior officers’ fitness reports until the phrase became, well, ship-worn. You mean that the officer just checked aboard, seems eager, if a bit much so, has done a nice thing or two, but it’s not time to recommend him either for your job or for immediate transfer to civilian command. In other words, it’s an expression that sounds impressive but doesn’t really mean anything, something common to at least 95 percent of Navy writing.
But the expression appears to mean something in the case of Barack Obama, whose orders just showed up on the message board, as we say in the NAV, and who doesn’t even check aboard for two more months. In the past week he’s made three significant interrelated foreign policy moves that involve Iraq, Iran and Russia that have potential to look good, go bad or turn ugly, depending on how he follows up on them.
Cleaning Up the Mesopotamia
Obama’s move on Iraq, as far as I can see, is all good, mostly. He has said that any bilateral agreement of the status of U.S. forces in Iraq has to be run through Congress, or deferred for the new administration so it can “negotiate an agreement that has bipartisan support here at home and makes absolutely clear that the U.S. will not maintain permanent bases in Iraq.”
In one stroke, Obama has served notice that he will not sit by and watch the Bush administration dig an even deeper hole for him to climb out of, he’s insisted on limiting executive power, and he’s declared an end to the neoconservative agenda.
He’s not only telling the warmongery that he won’t stand for a slap job forces agreement in Iraq, but that he doesn’t want to see any more wars started, most notably with Iran or Syria.
Some time ago, I don’t know how far back, I wouldn’t have expected even Bush to unilaterally stick his successor with a stink job treaty for a so-long-sucker present, but there’s no doubt in my mind today that he’d do it in a heartbeat if he thought he could get away with it. To my thinking, any agreement on how we occupy Iraq amounts to a treaty, which the Constitution requires to be ratified by two thirds of the Senate. The administration’s ambulance chasers would argue that when Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, it sanctioned Bush to do whatever he wanted in Iraq from then until kingdom come without giving them so much as a courtesy reach around.
If Bush decided to ram a bad agreement down everyone’s throat, Congress wouldn’t likely grow a spine overnight and stand up to him, and challenging the agreement in the courts would take so long we might as well defer the matter to the next life.
Obama’s insistence that the agreement be approved in some fashion or other by Congress more or less ties Bush’s hands. Obama probably doesn’t have any legal clout right now, but Bush is no doubt worried about his legacy, and maybe about a legal issue or two that might be lurking for him when the guy who owns the pardon wand isn’t a Republican, and maybe, just maybe, he’s starting to think there might be something to that “hell stuff” everybody talks about.
By insisting on congressional review of any bilateral agreement with Iraq, Obama has also sent a clear signal that he’s not interested in duplicating Bush’s “plenary powers” shenanigans, especially in light of recent revelations that in 2004, Bush authorized Donald Rumsfeld to start wars darn near wherever he wanted to, in some instances without even having to tell Bush about it.
Goodbye, Cruel Arab World
The neocon paper trail, specifically the Project for the New American Century’s September 2000 manifesto Rebuilding America’s Defenses, makes it abundantly clear that the plan all along–before Colin Powell sold his soul at the UN, before 9/11, even before the Supreme Court made young Mr. Bush president–was to invade and permanently occupy Iraq. Geo-strategically, Iraq is the perfect military base of operations from which to physically bully the entire Middle East. Its central location allows for direct projection of land power into Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. The rest of the region’s countries are in reach of tactical air power from Iraq. Logistics wise, Iraq has sufficient sea access to sustain a major force indefinitely, and its flat terrain allows for nearly perfect interior lines of communication. No other country in the region comes close to filling the bill, including and especially Iran.
The neocons’ objective, of course, was to control the flow of oil through the gulf. Make no mistake; control of the global energy market is the lebensraum of the Brave New World Order, and if you don’t think our woebegone war on terror hasn’t been conducted for the benefit of Dick and Dubya’s Big Oil buddies, ask you self why, seven years and change into it, the world teeters on the brink of an economic Gotterdammerung but Exxon Mobil just broke its own record for the largest quarterly profit ever by a U.S. corporation.
Whether Obama’s abandonment of the neocons’ objectives for Iraq means he’s showing Big Oil to the servants’ door remains to be seen. Dropping out of the game for control of Middle East oil won’t necessarily change bad energy habits home. To say we’re addicted to Middle East oil is like saying someone is addicted to Colombian cocaine. If Obama is serious about allowing Big Oil to open its raincoat offshore and in ANWR, it doesn’t seem like anyone interested in making money will be motivated to build a car that runs on spit and boogers.
But let’s burn that fuel dump when we come to it. For now, it’s heartening enough that Obama pulling the plug on Iraq has done something not too many folks are noticing: namely, he’s cancelled the Second Cold War we were on the brink of entering into with Russia, China, Iran and the rest of the Axis of Energy.
Next: From fissile to missile to epistle and back.
Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes at Pen and Sword . Jeff’s novel Bathtub Admirals (Kunati Books), a lampoon on America’s rise to global dominance, is on sale now. Also catch Scott Horton’s interview with Jeff at Antiwar Radio.
Pour yourself another cuppa brew;
Items of note – or we’re in the PR advocacy setup:
It’s a religion…the U.S. miulitary…and Change is forbidden.
Well, I expect to be writing on this subject for many, many years. Right now, I’d say in Gates stays Petraeus definitely has to go.
Jeff
I can see why Gates has to go, but if Obama gets rid of Saint David of Our Lady Of The Surge, the GOP and the Blue Dogs will riot.
Even as you’ve made several posts justifying exactly why he does have to go, there’s no way anyone will listen.
It’s not a fight Obama can pick without ending up having to blow all of his clout on this one battle while losing the greater war to change what Bush left behind.
Who the Hell is he? MacArthur? I can’t see the country falling on Obama because of Petraeus.
Yes Petraeus is MacArthur. Next question.
Jeff, I have a question on Petraeus, if you don’t mind.
Does his meteoric rise through the flag ranks strike you as suspicious? He started OIF as a two-star and is now a four-star and CENTCOM commander. I am puzzled as to how he’s made it so far so fast. Can you shed some light on that?
I’ve written extensively about him. He’s your basic butt shark, a genius of self promotion and giving the boss what he wants. Bad news.
Not just Change is coming — this is a major departure::
FWIW – in The Telegraph, UK
there are reconciable Talibans many factions….a point made by Albright in a recent BloombergTV interview.
As for Binny. Imho he’s pushing daisies…long, long ago. Bhutto said to Sir David Frost..”bin Laden is dead.” Musharraf uttered the same words to BBC.
But alive, OBL serves the Neocon fear-mongering. We missed his endorsement… he sent us no tape this cycle. Hmmmmm.
Hope this bears out, bears us a resolution so we can bring troops home…cut the killing and the expenditures.
The Independent, UK
He’s got one hell of a tightrope to walk, doesn’t he?
Big oil, big finance and big military/industrial do not generally take very kindly to being told what to do, but they have all three messed up royally over the past 8 years and they are not so stupid as to not realize this. The bottom line is always their teacher in these matters, and even big oil must realize that if the country tanks, so does their ongoing racket.
Obama has been hired to straighten things out.
But he has not been given carte blanche. I suspect that he understands full well what must be done…a literal energy and financial revolution just for starters, complete with a new job description for the heretofore armed forces/economic imperialist cops for big oil…but he also realizes that if he moves too fast it will be four failed years and out.
Or even worse if he gets aggressive about it.
And then there is always Israel to worry about. I am quite sure that some sort of message is in place that reads “If you even HINT of abandoning us we will nuke Iran and start W. W. III. If we are going to go down we will goddamned well take the rest of the world down with us. ‘Never again’ means precisely that. Never again. Bet on it.”
Bet on it.
He is…on the evidence of his campaign…a greatly talented politician and executive.
Man…he’s gonna need that talent!
Let us pray that he has enough.
And that he’s luckier than hell as well.
Let us pray.
Later…
AG
Here’s the thingy. It’s the three-leg problem. It’s a new day, a new era as we walk through the total destruction now unfolding.
Big Oil, Big Military, Big Finance went greedy for decades. Eleven hundred and forty trillion dollars worth. Where did all that fiat money go and what did it produce? No new factories. No new jobs.
The Queen of England is not happy..her bank is feeling some pain: “The Queen asked me: ‘If these things were so large, how come everyone missed them? Why did nobody notice it’?”
I’ll answer that, it was an OTC derivatives scam. All of it. Sheer greed.
There comes a time when the greedy shall not be fed. And in their own self-interests, the three will step down…because what’s ahead is total financial destruction and a Weimar experience. Global GDP is only $50 trillion. Central Banks will go broke. All their combined attempts to save eleven hundred and forty trillion dollars of debt will fail.
Ahead is a new world order and a new world currency, a new lifestyle to be set in place. Big Oil, Big Finance, Big Military have self-destructed. They too will feel the pain or be destroyed by the revolution of the poor. It’s coming…Summer 2009…and it will take five years.
The global zombie economy will become totally owned by taxpayers. We can’t afford big oil, big finance, big military.
And what of Israel? Israel shall fall in line…as they’re deeply embedded in ALL of the three legs. They too will no longer be Masters. Like the Queen, Israel won’t be happy in their retreat. Forget an Iran attack..the deception uncovered. Israel will be told what is or is not permitted. As you write AG, Bet on it.
It’s a new day.
Learn Mandarin, Arabic and Portuguese (BR) so you can speak the languages of the new bosses.
Haha haha wheeee.
at “every stage, someone was relying on somebody else and everyone thought they were doing the right thing”,
No. Not quite.
at “every stage, someone was relying on somebody else and everyone knew they were NOT doing the right thing, and they did not care”
We’re all in the same canoe now..one big global canoe.
obama and the dems better grow a serious spine, and quickly, especially in regard to the PNAC neoCONs and thier machinations. via tom hayden, at TPM:
Was Georgia a Neo-Con Conspiracy? A Lesson for Obama
keeping gates around is likely to be a major mistake in retrospect. he needs to clean house and start with a fresh slate. imo, there’s no one, and l mean that quite literally, that can be trusted in the the outgoing administration.
like hayden poses…were his [obama’s] comments and actions during the campaign based on a “political” calculation, or are we seeing early signs of “comity” in the form of continued acquiescence to the existing paradigm?
the first 100 days are gonna be interesting.
he needs to clean house and start with a fresh slate
A start would be to stop talking about “the war on terror”. (I don’t expect him to explicitly repudiate it: just stop using the phrase.)
Thanks for all the comments, folks. I’ll have more up on the Iran piece of this Thursday morning.
J
j, there have been several good articles at asia times re: iran in the past week or so that may be worthwhile reading as you prepare the next installment:
and,
as well as general articles concerning the situation in syria, the middle east in general, and a very interesting take on the sentiments in india, following their perceived snub by obama:
interesting indeed.
Great reference material, thanks!
Jeff
Once when I was with NAVSEA, a California Congressman sent us a letter demanding to know why a constituent’s company didn’t get a certain contract. I suggested the truth (I was a callow youth), the company was not the low bidder and built junk besides. Of course, the office was aghast. Our branch manager, a GS-15 and former Navy Quartermaster, wrote the reply. It was a three page masterpiece that seemed to be servile and groveling, but actually didn’t say a damn thing! For decades, I kept that letter as a superb example of bureaucratic writing.
Sorry to hijack the thread, but you jogged my memory.
That’s the way it works. Is it any wonder we never get a straight story on anything from DOD?
Jeff