I recently heard that there are an estimated 250 million guns in the United States. There are an estimated 111 million households in America. Using these numbers that would mean there are 2.2 guns for every household in America. That seems like a lot of guns to me. As I began to ponder these numbers I wondered with all of these guns are we a safer nation? Have all of these guns provided us with the security many of us are seeking?
I began researching the facts concerning gun violence in America in relation to the rest of the industrialized world. What I found was shocking not in what it said about guns but what it said about our culture. With or without guns we live in a violent culture. Confrontation and violence seems to be ingrained in our national psyche. In America, violence appears to be the first remedy to situations both by the government and its people. Do I believe there are too many guns in America? Yes I do, but I don’t believe that the problem for all the violence in America is guns. I believe in trying to reduce the number of guns not because I believe it will make us less violent of a society but because guns make killing and violence too easy. Guns make killing too quick and too efficient. People kill today without thinking and without remorse and with guns you can do that. Imagine if there were fewer guns killing would become more difficult. Guns make killing too detached. Without guns you would have to face down your intended target and it would be messier.
I want to provide some figures to illustrate but the problem with the NRA and other gun lobbyists is that any talk of restricting guns is immediately met with hyperbole and demagoguery. The problem with not considering the arguments and opinions of others is that you begin to seem irrational and foolish. By the way the armed militia argument being necessary to prevent tyranny is wrong on many levels. We aren’t providing arms to minutemen soldiers but to any idiot that can get one. Also an armed society has proven to be no safer a democracy than a non armed society. The US has 90 guns for every 100 people making it the most heavily armed country in the world. The second most armed nation is Yemen, that bastion of democracy. Are the people in England, Canada, or Greece more in danger of losing their democracies because they are not as armed as the US?
On the list of murders per capita in the world the United States ranks 24th. We rank higher than any of the industrialized nations except Russia. We trail countries like Columbia, Mexico, and Zimbabwe; not bad company for the richest nation on earth.
* In 2005 there were 30,694 gun deaths in the US.
* In 1998 gun homicides in the rest of the industrialized world were as follows :
o 373 – Germany
o 151 – Canada
o 57 – Australia
o 19 – Japan
o 54 – England
o 11,789 – US
More guns have obviously not made us safer. However guns alone are not the problem. We must begin to adopt ways to reduce the level of violence in our culture and in our society at large. This will be extremely difficult in a society that glamorizes violence and disseminates it through all forms of media. The economic crisis and the election of Barack Obama have led to an increase in the number of requests for background checks for gun purchases. In November they were up 40% over the previous year and in December they were up by 25%. People are feeling less secure about the future and showing this unease by purchasing more guns.
We have made killing too easy in our country and have not addressed the underlying culture of violence. You cannot glorify violence and then have easy access to guns. Somehow we must tone down the aggression and teach our children that violence is not the answer to all of life’s challenges and difficulties. We must develop a responsible and comprehensive way of reducing the number of guns or none of us will be safe. Just as the drug kingpin Carlos Escobar was held responsible for flooding our streets with dangerous drugs so the gun manufacturers must be held accountable for flooding our streets with guns. We can no longer decide arbitrarily which dangers we seek to address and which ones we don’t. Where there is arbitrary power, there is tyranny.
Nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud, is the only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people. – John Adams
I’m all for gun control and happy that Australia has strict gun licensing laws (even if I routinely bend them by borrowing a friend’s 22 rifle to shoot the pest rabbits on our property).
But the irony of Australian culture is that we are almost as good at killing each other without guns. When I first moved here (in 2003), I was appalled at the daily news items about men beating, glassing (braking a pub glass or a bottle and using it as a weapon), kicking, and yes occasionally knifing, each other to death outside a pub or during some other alcohol fueled altercation.
Yes, the murder rate in the US is higher, but the manslaughter rate here is higher, and when you add the two categories together, you find that Americans are only marginally more likely to die at the hands of a fellow human being than Australians are.
This is not an argument against gun control, only my personal shock at the amount of devastating violence that can happen without guns – in a culture where “brawling” is considered normal. Even more alarming is the recent evolution of gangs of young men who go out looking for a complete stranger to bash – which thus far hasn’t usually even had racial or ethnic implications. Any victim will do.
I often joke about how lucky we are to have gun control, because we’d be slaughtering each other in droves if we made killing any easier.
I’m with keres on this one – what drives all the violence is FEAR, not the weapon itself. Michael Moore’s OUTSTANDING documentary “Bowling for Columbine” addressed this far more eloquently than I ever could.
The example I think of from my own life was when my African-American boss used to have his eyes pop out of his head when he found out I was walking home through a “bad” neighborhood that was predominantly African-American.
He was positively, absolutely convinced not only that I was in terrible danger but also that HE would be and told me point blank that he wouldn’t set foot in that neighborhood without being armed to the teeth (and he usually WAS armed when in public).
He let his fear drive him while I did not – and I was perfectly fine and I probably walked home through there every day for over 2 years without the slightest problem yet he NEVER STOPPED being afraid.
Meanwhile he almost shot a grocery store clerk one time (on accident) when his gun fell out of his pocket while getting out his wallet. The gun hit the counter and “cocked” the hammer but luckily didn’t depress the trigger.
That to me is a snapshot of how the culture of fear is what perpetrates violence, not necessarily the weapons used. After all, there are bombs falling on people’s heads from Gaza to Kandahar right now due to that FEAR.
Pax
Although I agree with you Soj, that most violence is driven by fear, I think you examples point to the fear of violence as the motivation for hitting/shooting/etc. first, before the other guy gets you.
Whereas I’d say the vast majority violence in Australia stems from the fear of being shown up as a less of a man in some way, shape, or form. Obviously, pub fights are about having to prove you’re no sissy, and that you don’t take shite from anybody.
In terms of racially motivated violence, which we’re seeing more of, it’s the white mans fear of losing some sort of privileged status (territory).
For economically degraded men everywhere, violence is their one sure claim to masculine power. And, despite protestations to the contrary, it’s the one “anti-social” behavior that is universally accepted, embraced even, as a necessary glue that binds men to patriarchy and each other.
I think I can agree with that!
Pax