There’s a diary in Booman Tribune’s recommended list I’d like you to read if you haven’t already done so by Arthur Gilroy, The Teabaggers and the Truth of the Matter. I don’t always agree with Arthur (does anyone AG?), and he can be quite blunt, but the truth is the truth, and he states it here better than anyone that the Tea Party is all about Racism:
I can travel 10 to 15 minutes in any direction (by any mode of transportation from walking to automobile) from my mixed-race, working class Bronx neighborhood and be right in the middle of Tea Party Central.
Hell…all I have to do is drop into one of the many remaining Irish bars…almost all cop bars and fireman bars now…along Broadway from about 180 St. right on up into Yonkers to be be surrounded by Tea Party sympathizers. Most of them armed and allowed by law to use those arms.
Or walk into any police station or firehouse.
Or hang out with any construction crew.
Or walk into almost any diner/truck stop.
Just for fucking starters!
In a 100 mile radius, there are innumerable all-white neighborhoods.
Italian neighborhoods.
Irish neighborhoods.
Polish neighborhoods.
Catholic neighborhoods.
Literally millions of people live in those neighborhoods, and the most active among them are Tea Partiers either by action or by sympathy and vote.
Let me elaborate on AG’s point from my experience.
If the Tea Party movement was simply about opposition to “progressive issues” like re-regulating the Financial industry after it almost tanked the world’s economy, and we wouldn’t have fought over and passed a health care reform bill that, as David Frum, former Bush speechwriter noted, was essentially the Republican health care plan circa 1993.
The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.
Got that? Frum says Obamacare is founded upon what The Conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation and the GOP proposed in opposition to what they derisively smeared as “Hilarycare” the last time a Democrat in the White House was elected to the Oval Office. He says “Obamacare” had Republican and Conservative movement fingerprints all over it, and he ought to know.
So what are we left with as an answer to the question what motivates the raw hatred and venom of the Tea Party? Sadly, I think we know the answer, and it isn’t pretty. Here’s only one very recent example (you know so many of them one will suffice) of what we’ve witnessed over the last fourteen months:
House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) received racist faxes Monday in the wake of Sunday’s House vote approving health care reform legislation.
Clyburn, a veteran of the civil rights movement, told Keith Olbermann Monday that faxes sent to his office had racist images including a noose. “If you look at some of the faxes that I got today, racial slurs, nooses on gallows, and I’m telling you, some very vicious language. This stuff is not all that isolated. It’s pretty widespread. I hope it’s not too deep.”
Representative Clyburn was being generous. The racist bigotry and bile he to which he was exposed runs very deep among many white Americans.
As a child growing up in an all white suburb in the 60’s and 70’s, I heard lots of racial epithets from the kids with whom I played and hung out. The only Jewish family in our neighborhood were a “buncha dirty kikes.” Mexican American kids I went to school with were always called spics and wetbacks behind their backs if not to their face. And African Americans? Well let’s just say the N word wasn’t just for rappers back then.
Of course, once I went away to college, become a white collar professional (lawyer in my cae) in the 80’s and 90’s and worked with African American and other minority professionals I heard fewer and fewer racial slurs. But they never completely went away. Racist jokes were still told behind closed doors among all white (usually male) lawyers and corporate clients.
Yet, most of the time it wasn’t an active part of my experience. In my circle of college educated people, it was considered crude and lower class to express such sentiments. So it was easy to believe that society was changing; that race played a lesser role. easy to ignore the signs that racism was still out there as strong as ever. Until my children were born, my half Japanese/half Northern European heritage children.
It started when we traveled in the South Carolina to Myrtle Beach to play golf and were met with hostile stares and antagonism from local whites anytime we strayed off the beaten tourist path. (I’ll forego the details in the interest of some brevity). The open disdain in the eyes of many lower and middle class white people we met was palpable. And my wife and kids were the members of “safe minority” — Asian Americans. But I told myself, well, this is South Carolina after all, the first state to secede from the nation. Not a representative sample.
What was less easy to accept, however, were the racial slurs that one of my son’s soccer coaches directed at him and another Chinese American boy back in Western New York when he was eight or nine. We confronted the coach and he apologized, but it was half-hearted and disingenuous walk back of his use of racial slurs to describe my son. One of those “I’m sorry if I offended you” mea culpas you hear all the time. In his view, what he’d called my son was actually a “compliment” because he had been praising the athletic ability of kids who were stereotyped as “smart” (i.e, nerds who were supposed to be better in the classroom than on the athletic field). It was a lame excuse, but I let it pass.
But then came my great eyeopener. In 2000 John McCain ran for President, and believe or not I was attracted to his candidacy, especially his pledge for campaign reform. I naively believed he was different. Until he used the racial slur “gooks” and refused to apologize for it. I couldn’t believe this “man of conscience” would do such a thing. I tried to start a campaign on internet political forums to get people to email him asking politely that he retract his comments because regardless of his intentions, they were a racist slur which applied to my wife and children.
I was surprised by the lack of empathy I met by most people in those online forums, but even more surprised by the bile and hate that was directed at me for daring to express my opinion, for daring to demand that McCain do the right thing and admit he had been wrong by using a racist epithet. I was called a cry baby and a whiny-assed pinko and far, far worse.
People told me I had no right to criticize a war hero who had been tortured by the North Vietnamese. And this at a time when I was still professing to be a McCain supporter. All I wanted was a polite acceptance that his use of a word that slurs all Asian Americans was wrong. What McCain essentially did instead was tell anyone who complained about his comment to go “F” themselves. he wasn’t sorry in the least.
What was even more galling was the lack of coverage by the mainstream media covering McCain’s campaign. They basically ignored the story, giving McCain a pass on his (let’s be generous) egregious remarks. It got very little press coverage (compared to say the Trent Lott episode a few years later). Aside from a few op-eds in cities with large Asian populations, all those white reporters on his bus let it slide. They would have killed him for using the N word, so why not the same treatment for the G word?
So I wrote a 750 word essay for my local paper that inexplicably was accepted for publication. I was polite. I stated my admiration for Senator McCain and his status as a “war hero” and stated I understood his great anger at his captors. But then i tried to explain that regardless, his choice of language, his use of a racial slur like gooks, was wrong. That it hurt my family, my children and millions of other good Americans. I pointed out how the units pf Japanese-American soldiers in WWII suffered the greatest casualties and received the most citations for valor per capita of any other unit during that war, and the using racial slurs in 2000 dishonored them and their memory. And I asked him politely (as well as all the other candidates including Bush and Gore) to refrain from using racial remarks in their campaigns.
My response was a bunch of hate mail ( I was named in the op-ed piece I wrote) and numerous harassing, threatening, hate filled angry phone calls. One guy in particular kept calling implying he he was going to cause me physical harm. His calls stopped only after I told him I was going to report him to the police. I expected some of that, but I also expected letters and calls supporting my reasonable and politic response to McCain. I received none. Nadfa. Zip.
Well that was my wake-up call. I learned over the next few years of the Bush era just how enabled many people felt by Bush’s victory to spew hatred toward minorities (principally Muslims, African Americans and Latinos). And when Obama won, I even heard remarks from family members that shocked me about how Obama only intended to help blacks and that he was out to get revenge on white people. Where did this come from? It certainly had no basis in reality.
Where did it come from? From conservative emails filled with lies and libels, Republican astroturf organizations (such as Freedom Works, Fox news and radio talk show hosts such as Limbaugh and Beck and Hannity, et al, and from opportunistic GOP politicians like Sarah Palin and Michelle Buchanan who played the white race card like there was no tomorrow, both during the 2008 campaign and in the years since then. FOR God’s sake, Joe the Plumber, a complete ass and an idiot became a national symbol of white working class pride for standing up to Obama who treated him with far more dignity and respect than he deserved.
So, yes, America, The Tea Party is filled with racists. Millions of them. And they aren’t going away. How large a group they represent I don’t know. But it’s too large, much too large. I know that much.
Racism has been at the core of the modern Republican party at least since Nixon and the Southern Strategy, which was perfected by Reagan. It was largely a reaction to the Kennedy-Johnson Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, and was not only behind the political transformation of the south, but also affected party affiliation in the north, e.g., the Reagan Democrats. Although Bush-Rove later veered the party into religious right causes and attempted to sway the Hispanic vote, it remained a white party with racism at its core. We will soon see it raise its ugly head when Obama confronts immigration reform, which is focused on the Hispanic, especially the Mexican immigrant, community.
That the Tea Party movement is based on Republican white racism is therefore almost a tautology and not something to be surprised at, and it obviously comes out of white rather than minority or Black communities.
SO what’s new, I ask?
The Republican Party is an apt vehicle for the forces of racial and ethnic hatred in these increasingly troubled times. One cannot condemn the GOP enough for its unprincipled attack upon the core values of our culture; tolerance and fair play. Instead of leading their constituents to a more balanced and even tempered society, the Republicans continue to stoke the fires of racial prejudice and economic differences. They do a great disservice to what America is all about.
i think ‘lack of apathy’ should read ‘lack of empathy.’
Yep
I absolutely agree with the essay.
Now in California we have a race for governor. With the exception of Jerry Brown for eight years and Gray Davis, who was quickly thrown out on recall only to be replaced by our current idiot, California has only had Republican governors since 1967. The state is bankrupt, in large part because of the badly flawed Prop 13 that gave huge permanent tax breaks to large landowners. Because of a 2/3 requirement for passing a budget or raising taxes the state is incapable of producing enough revenue to cover its costs.
So what are the Republican candidates talking about? Illegal aliens, something that a governor has no real control in stopping, something that farmowners actually like. Every four years the Republicans trot out the “other” to scare the white folks. Oh, and the Republicans are blaming budget crisis on unions, because breaking unions is always a good target.
Look back at Nazi Germany. If you exchange Jews and Slavs for Mexicans you’ve got the same roadmap. Oh, there’s a dark part of human nature that fears the other but there are people who love to whip up that hate and use it for their own ends, over and over.
First of all, as a native of South Carolina I apologize for the bad manners of my fellow South Carolinians who are crude, afraid of everyone (including “their own kind”), and resent very deeply the changes that Jim Clyburn brought to the state. And for the South Carolinians who think the same way but don’t “act ugly”. It really has little to do directly about the Civil War and more to do with never having grieved over the tremendous loss of innocence that slavery represented. Germans, whose parents or grandparents were part of the Nazi Wehrmacht have an understanding of this because the Allies forced them to go through “de-Nazification”. And one day a lot of Americans will understand this if we ever go through acknowledgement of the crimes of the Bush administration, from a war of choice to torture. The crudeness is about denial pure and simple. It’s psychological or spiritual, not historical despite the attempts of Southerners to wrap it in the romanticism of the post-Civil War Confederate “knighthood”.
Second, there are multiple Tea Party movements. The largest and most active are those people stirred up by Dick Armey’s Freedomworks astroturf lobbying organization and supported by the rightwing talkers and Congressional GOP crazies. They are about tapping anger against the Obama administration as a motivating vehicle for turnout in an essentially policy-less campaign in November. And per the usual GOP playbook, they have framed the issue as “liberty” and “freedom from big government” because “freedom from big government” is what corporations really want. But the very rhetoric that they use has brought other folks out to try to peel off some of the attendees into the John Birch Society, the Lyndon Larouche organization, a whole host of neo-Confederate and nativist organizations, and second-amendment absolutists. And they work as a coalition, with support from GOP and rightwing new media groups.
Third, the incidents in the Capitol were a transparent attempt to provoke the Capitol Police to suppression of the protesters, which would have given ammunition to the “big government destroying your liberties” narrative. The media reports of the incident included the fact that there were “high-end video cameras” recording the event. Those “high-end video cameras” were brought in by the protesters.
Finally. The efforts at intimidation and at creating a mass movement of Tea Party folks failed and, despite the close vote on healthcare reform, failed miserably. Bingo. Another “lost cause” to fan the fire. And cause another round of crude emails, faxes, web sites, and other acting out.
All of this is independent of but reliant on the fact that racism permeates American culture, from Key West to Honolulu to Point Barrow to San Diego to the Dakotas, to Calais, Maine. The targets might be different, but the racism is the same. A pervading assumption that America is only for white Americans.
And why do you think the Lincoln Chafee’s have left the party? Hell, I wonder why Colin Powell hasn’t left yet. I got to believe he’s not happy with what he’s been seeing.
You are making the point that Obama made at his schooling of Republican House members. Their tactics in appealing to crazies is painting them into a corner, and the unpainted floor to stand on is getting ever smaller.
And I would add — even in South Carolina. November should be interesting in South Carolina.
The pertinent phrase here is White Supremacy – it fully explains their foreign policy and their fidelity to American Exceptionalism.
The astroturf factor suggests we be cautious about numbers, however. I think many teabaggers are unemployed people being paid to astroturf (at least their expenses) – they have no idea of the issues beyond yelling slogans. people I talk with who disagree with hcr on a personal basis have reasons, however misinformed. Also, not to underestimate people’s capacity for change when they encounter a more diverse constituency, something I have seen often enough.