After the NAACP called on the Tea Party to condemn the racism in its midst, Andrew Breitbart promised to produce a tape of “racism…at a NAACP dinner” and told the president of the NAACP to “go to hell.” He then produced a video that showed Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod admitting to a NAACP audience that she had once withheld help from a white farmer because of his race. Ms. Sherrod, who worked for the USDA in Georgia, was promptly fired by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
Yesterday, I asked for and accepted Ms. Sherrod’s resignation for two reasons. First, for the past 18 months, we have been working to turn the page on the sordid civil rights record at USDA and this controversy could make it more difficult to move forward on correcting injustices. Second, state rural development directors make many decisions and are often called to use their discretion. The controversy surrounding her comments would create situations where her decisions, rightly or wrongly, would be called into question making it difficult for her to bring jobs to Georgia.
Our policy is clear. There is zero tolerance for discrimination at USDA and we strongly condemn any act of discrimination against any person. We have a duty to ensure that when we provide services to the American people we do so in an equitable manner. But equally important is our duty to instill confidence in the American people that we are fair service providers.
The problem is that Tom Vilsack just got punk’d. Think Progress explains:
Within less than a day, Sherrod resigned from her USDA post under heavy pressure from the White House, saying she received “at least three” frantic phone calls from superiors demanding her resignation. At first glance, the forced resignation seemed fair — even the NAACP endorsed it, calling her comments “shameful.”
However, new evidence suggests that BigGovernment selectively edited the video to grossly distort what actually happened.
Here’s what Ms. Sherrod told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
Sherrod [told the Atlanta Journal Constitution] that what online viewers weren’t told in reports posted throughout the day Monday was that the tale she told at the banquet happened 24 years ago — before she got the USDA job — when she worked with the Georgia field office for the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund.
Sherrod said the short video clip excluded the breadth of the story about how she eventually worked with the man over a two-year period to help ward off foreclosure of his farm, and how she eventually became friends with the farmer and his wife. […]
“The story helped me realize that race is not the issue, it’s about the people who have and the people who don’t. When I speak to groups, I try to speak about getting beyond the issue of race.“
Indeed, after nearly a quarter century, Ms. Sherrod remains close friends with this family.
Indeed, the wife of the white farmer in question, 82-year-old Eloise Spooner, confirmed the story and called Sherrod a “friend for life.” She told CNN that Sherrod “treated us really good and got us all we could.” “She’s the one I give credit to with helping us save our farm.”
So, Tom Vilsack just forced an employee to resign based on a doctored video recounting a 24 year old event that occurred before she was even employed by the Department of Agriculture. She was sacked for explaining how she unlearned racism (a quarter of a century ago). And, Vilsack’s explanation is that “right or wrong” these allegations would make it difficult to do her job effectively.
If this stands then the administration has no spine and no brain. Andrew Breitbart was also the brain that destroyed ACORN using doctored video, and he has a long history of playing the media.
One thing Breitbart will say about [Matt] Drudge, though, is that his mentor introduced him to Arianna Huffington, then a right-wing pundit and Drudge confidant. Breitbart became her researcher and Web guru. By her side, he learned that the media could be more than scooped — it could be hacked. The first exploit was almost an accident: In September 1998, he suggested that Drudge and Huffington go to the embezzlement trial of former Clinton business associate Susan McDougal. The Los Angeles Times took note of their attendance the next day in a headline and a few sentences in the Metro section. Publicists have been pulling similar tricks since silent-movie days, sending celebrity clients to public events. But to Breitbart, the move was a revelation. “You can play the media. You can force them to cover things,” he says. “This is not just stenography. There’s a performance art to it.”
In this case, the performance art made Vilsack make a very poor decision and cost a fine women her job and her reputation. The NAACP has now backtracked on their condemnation and admitted they were ‘snookered.’
With regard to the initial media coverage of the resignation of USDA official Shirley Sherrod, we have come to the conclusion we were snookered by Fox News and Tea Party Activist Andrew Breitbart into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias.
Having reviewed the full tape, spoken to Ms. Sherrod, and most importantly heard the testimony of the white farmers mentioned in this story, we now believe the organization that edited the documents did so with the intention of deceiving millions of Americans.
The fact is Ms. Sherrod did help the white farmers mentioned in her speech. They personally credit her with helping to save their family farm.
It’s time for Vilsack to make the same admission and reinstate her. If he hesitates out of embarrassment, then Obama should reinstate her himself. No leader worth a damn can allow his employees to get victimized by a dirty trickster like Breitbart.
Update [2010-7-20 21:58:2 by BooMan]: Here is the unedited video of her speech.
Vilsack should resign. I understand that politically he felt he had to make a quick decision, but knowing where this attack came from he should have paused and looked at the full video. Or he could have spoken to Sherrod to get the full story. At this point Vilsack looks like a Breitbart minion.
Vilsack doesn’t need to resign, he needs to do exactly what the NAACP did and admit he was taken in by the story and made a rash decision. If he fixes it, it’s over.
No, Booman. It isn’t over. I hit bottom today over this today. I feel confident I’m not the only one. I can only imagine what African Americans feel, after taking hope in the democratic process after centuries of knowing their participation didn’t matter.
This administration is without principle, gumption or even common sense. This had nothing to do with a recalcitrant Congress or the mess left by Bush. It was unadulterated cowardice and stupidity. He’s afraid of known demagogic liars? The far right guides his administration?
The enthusiasm gap just widened into a chasm.
Southern White Progressives have as much depression over this as you expect African Americans to have. A lot of Southern White Progressives have worked a half century to end racism in the South, with waxing and waning interest in the issue from the rest of the country. To have an American president of African descent leave unemployed an African-American civil servant who has devoted her life to the uplift of her local community would be a great loss. To do it because of Vilsack’s state concern that she might be perceived as unfair is a slap in the face to the African-Americans and Southern White Progressives who have voted yellow dog for half a century.
As for enthusiasm gap, Southern progressives don’t have the luxury of having an enthusiasm gap. It’s yellow dog or the deluge and so far in this century we’ve been treading water a lot.
The 2010 election is an election that Republicans must lose just to change the narrative and send cockroaches like Breitbart back into their crevices.
I hear you. But I keep reviewing in my head the really powerful stories, especially of older and elderly African Americans about how they felt during the primaries and run up to the election and Obama’s inauguration. The hurt must be pretty deep.
And hat’s off to you for fighting the good fight. We can’t afford an enthusiasm gap anywhere, but I sense it’s widening. I realize what we could get in the next couple years if we lose Congress and Obama’s hands are even more tied, but the only real selling point we seem to have now is, “It could be worse.” That’s not how you generate enthusiasm, although the fear of what we could get will motivate me.
I’ve been telling you that, but you keep slamming me for “negativity”.
I think Ms Sherrod’s story is beautiful, a soul-cleansing story of racism learned – then rejected. I don’t know if she is black or white. I feel the same about the story either way, because it is a story of losing learned prejudices and the opening of eyes and human growth.
Ms. Sherrod is well out of that Blue Dog snakepit and the POS that that heads Agriculture.
Uh, she does have to black to have prejudiced about white farmers, doesn’t she? Well the story would have worked in reverse anyway. Because it’s not a black or white story, it’s a human story.
Never work for a jerk, Shirley.
Not only is she black but, according to Rachel Maddow, her father was killed by a klansman.
Enough reason to hate white men. Makes her story of overcoming prejudice even more compelling.
Got to apologize for not being sure of her race. It was plainly stated, not to mention the video (which I didn’t watch at the time). Trying to wrap up for supper is my excuse. Mrs. Voice gets very upset if I blog while supper is cooling. Dinner time is highly variable to boot, but hey! I don’t have to cook it!
This is now a lose-lose situation for the Obama administration. If they change their mind, they look indecisive and hasty in coming to the original solution. If they stick with their position, they look cruel and heartless. Yet another blunder by Team Obama.
They should take the mulligan and hire her back. Then they should figure out how to deal with FoxNews and Glenn Beck. They still have the naive opinion that policy victories will make these folks go away and they can safely ignore them.
Vilsack must go. Obama must get someone in the USDA who understands its history of racism and will bust chops to get it dealt with. Vilsack was too close to corporate midwestern large farmers.
Check out Digby’s information about the organization that Sherrod founded.
The history of this scandal looks a lot like the Van Jones resignation.
And any tonedeaf political staff need to go as well.
Kudos to Jealous and the NAACP for walking back, digging up the full video. NAACP would be an appropriate legal instrument to take down Breitbart. The Village media won’t do it.
I had the same thought re: Jones. One wonders if they would have bothered with Sherrod at all had they not learned, via the Van Jones affair, that the Obama administration could be bullied on these types of accusations. And if they don’t reverse themselves on Sherrod, there’ll be someone else in a few weeks. As AG would say, count on it.
The irony, of course, is that this shows just how cynical all the Fox Noise bleating about the tyrannical, fascistic nature of Obama is. Any truly top-down, public-be-damned government wouldn’t respond at all to these types of media-hyped bleatings (except maybe to jail the perpetrators…) The right-wing echo chamber knows perfectly well that’s not what will happen when they fire up the neo-McCarthy machine.
One other thought: I’ll bet somewhere, someone who manipulates video a lot better than I do is creating the video of Breibart, Drudge, and their Fox buddies sitting in a room cackling while AB crows about “one less n****r in DC” or somesuch. It’d be totally false and malicious, of course, but that’s the point – Breibart’s playing a game a lot of other people can play. The difference is, progressive hackers and hackettes don’t have a national network and echo chamber that will deliberately lie for them in order to score political points.
Someone seriously needs to ask the question about how it was that Sherrod became Breitbart’s latest target.
Probably someone with a grudge against her sold him the video.
I don’t think the specific person mattered to Breitbart so long as he had “evidence” of NASTY BLACK RACISTS! to shout about thus obscuring the far greater number of white racists, particularly in the conservative ranks.
Understanding how Georgia works, I realized it was someone with a grudge. But how did Breitbart connect up with them or they with Breitbart? And what motivated the timing, other than the rightwing is desperate for proof of “black racism” to create a he-said-she-said environment for their own white racism.
Maddow (and possibly Sherrod herself) thinks that Breitbart was combing NAACP videos for evidence of racism in retaliation for their calling out the Teabaggers’ racism.
That makes sense.
Can Obama reinstate her himself? Is she at the level of a presidential appointee or would this be an unconstitutional/illegal action in regards to the bureaucracy? I have the same type of question over reports the WH had some influence in Vilsack sacking. Why would the WH concern itself over so minor a matter.
But I guess we’ll see what happens.
Well, in reality, they’d tell Vilsack to do it if he doesn’t offer to do it himself.
That’s what I mean. There’s a level beyond which the president can’t interfere with the administrative agencies. Sherrod might be a low level enough that telling Vilsack to rehire her might breach that.
Well so far they are considering it but Vilsack’s statement shows he still doesn’t get it, because he’s talking about the situation being one of people getting fair and equitable services.
To this administration, an issue from FoxNews that creates a distraction is not a “minor matter”.
Cowards. What else can you say? Didn’t even have the decency to verify the facts before reflexively jumping for Breitbart’s ratfucking act.
Here’s the unedited video:
BOO — add it to the main story. More visibility there.
I missed all the coverage of this yesterday and today. How bad did the Fox News video look?
That`s what I don`t get.
Didn`t anyone think it would be a good idea to get her side of the story, or check into the story itself, before embarrassing a nice lady, & then themselves, especially considering the source of the story.
One should check & verify with friends, before enemies.
Breitbart was on Hannity tonight. I thought he was going to blow a vein. Is he always apoplectic? Anyway he says this isn’t about Sherrod. It is about fighting back against the lies the NAACP is telling about racist in the Tea Party. And it didn’t matter that she may have been making a different point the problem was that people were laughing while she described mistreating a white farmer.
Shawn didn’t point out that Breitbart lied in his attack on NAACP.
I remember seeing Breitbart on CNN a couple of months ago volunteering to lead the charge in making sure the Tea Parties didn’t display racist attitudes. Then he pulls this.
All over MSNBC and CNN. Busted.
I’ve been watching her speech for the last 25 minutes and it’s terrific and right on the money.
Why am I not surprised that Breitbart is a disciple of Arianna Huffington’s? Let’s hope that fact alone gets some play.
I agree, they have to hire her back. Breitbart can’t win this round.
Meanwhile, there were elections in Georgia tonight.
Not gonna happen. Neither man has the balls.
As a former chapter president of the NAACP, I would like to VOTE NO REINSTATEMENT for Ms. Sherrod. As a person who have been involved with the public for decades and a member of the administration of the FIRST AFRICAN AMERICAN PRESIDENT of the United States, Ms. Sherrod should have known that under no circumstances do you get up in an open public meeting and discuss intimate details of your personal experience particularly if it involves ANYTHING CONTROVERSAL. Whether your personal testament involves drugs, alcohol, past racial conflicts, or getting caught shoplifting, such revelations should only be discussed only among close friends in a private environment.
Regardless of the fact that she was simply telling how an incident in her personal life helped her recover and overcome the forces of racialism that swirled around her in Georgia and her testament was highly didactic and uplifting for black southern women, she should have realized respective of her executive position in Obama’s Department of Agriculture that her story was out of bounds for a public NAACP plenary session.
One of the things I learned early in my position as a branch President of the NAACP that anything statement that you made public could be (a) taken out of context, (b) be misquoted, (c) used to support someone else’s argument on some other non-relevant subject. When one is properly aware of the “sharks that swim” in the public media, one will highly vigilant and careful what one says. These days when the national media feeds on controversy, either real or contrived, any person holding any sort of notable political position has a duty to exercise the caution necessary to protect one’s reputation and position. Nuff said….
No, not ’nuff said.’ I just listened to her speech and it was 100% politically correct. You just compared having your father killed by klansman to having a substance abuse problem. She explained how she learned to understand that it’s poor people vs. people looking to screw poor people and not black vs. white. If that’s not acceptable, then progressive politics are not acceptable. Fuck that. She not only deserves to be reinstated, she deserves to get a promotion.
So we should always be good Negroes and never say anything?? Fuck that shit. That’s not the way. Mrs. Sherrod was telling a personal story and if you actually heard it it was the story of forgiveness and redemption. The Klan killed her father. But she was willing to overcome and look beyond race in order to help a white farmer that needed it.
The farmer in question, Spooner, is an 88 year old man who speaks lovingly of Mrs. Sherrod. It was sweet to see him on CNN.
We just have a situation where Vilsack jumped the gun. Mrs. Sherrod was an advocate for the poor, small farmer not the mega corporate farms. I believe quite a few in the USDA wanted her out including Vilsack.
Whoever you are, you should know that your comment sounds eeerily similar to that “satirical” letter Mark Williams wrote about the NAACP.
There’s no way in hell that you ever opened your mouth then. Or, if you did then you certainly didn’t say anything inspiring or worth hearing.
Obama wouldn’t have written his books if he followed the same policies. There are emails of his quotations “taken out of context, misquoted etc.”
Anyone following your advice gives victory to an enemy who will then construe your silence in some negative way.
Heads you lose. Tails they win. Hardly an effective strategy.
“If this stands then the administration has no spine and no brain.”
And no heart.
My opinion of Obama is high enough, I don’t believe in the end he’ll allow this to stand. I hope he proves me right.
I’m getting god damn sick of the media following Drudge and Breitbart down every little rabbit hole. When do these fuckers learn? Anything coming out of that fucktards mouth is a lie. Every, single, word.
The media knows exactly what they are getting. They have an agenda just as much as Drudge and Breitbart do. That’s why they propagate the lies and catapult the propaganda.
Also, fuck Arianna Huffington. Her website is nothing more than a Drudge remake. Does anyone else not trust her? I think she still holds the same Republican views that she had before, but the tea party Republican party “forced her out” so to speak. I constantly see bullshit creationists and alternative medicine being peddled, and the headlines on the front page reek of Matt Drudge.
Young grasshopper, I warned you about her months ago. 😉
Lol, well before you said something, I read on PZ Myers similar things. When I learned she was once a Republican, shortly after one of his attacks against the pseudoscience being peddled over there, I stopped trusting anything on that site.
It’s sad, too, because Froomkin is great.
Oh, there are a few readable sources there. But man, most of it is just drivel and the web ads are seriously irritating.
Maybe so, but they pay the bills. The shit is the price to pay for some excellent reporting that goes on over there.
They’re the only people who had made it work as a news site online. If you’ve got a better model, lay it on us right now.
I just read somewhere that Breitbart got his start working for….drumroll please…..Arianna Huffington.
Duh, its past my bedtime. I read that info in BooMan’s post that initiated this thread.
One part Drudge, and two parts Murdock.
Go any day and look at the more sensational British tabloids like The Sun and The Daily Mail. Then look at HuffPo. A whole lot of HP’s celebrity material comes directly from there.
I can’t say what HP’s blend was before, it it has definitely skewed more and more in recent months to look like Murdock’s nuttier papers.
Huffington Post is an aggregator. About a quarter of the content comes from AP. I don’t know who writes the headlines; they suck, but they do attract controversy, the mothers milk of journalism.
Some of the tone comes from the folks that the opinions section republishes, who can range from Robert Reich and Robert Grunewald to Newt Gingrich. Most of those are aggregated and not original material for the Huffington Post.
The original content seems to be pretty good. Sam Stein is one of the better reporters on politics. Nico Pitney deserves a Pulitzer for his Tweet and blog coverage of the Iranian opposition after their elections. Arthur Delaney’s beat is corruption in DC; his articles tend to skewer Democratic hypocrisy instead of known Republican corruption although he covers both. Shahien Nasiripour’s beat is the politics side of the business community; his reporting of the conflict between Geithner and Warren was based on inside-the-beltway rumor; there’s one lying source that he needs to expose. Dan Froomkin’s opinions are consistently taking the Obama administration to task for not delivering on the promises Dan Froomkin thought they made.
Most of the stuff that Arianna herself writes is easily ignored. The health and style and education and… sections vary in quality depending on their original source. But they tend to be trendy, New Age-sy sort of stuff. And of course, there is the Rupert Murdoch page B girl formula of “who’s going nude now”.
For journalism overall I give it a C-.
.
WASHINGTON — Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said Wednesday he will reconsider the department’s decision to oust a black employee over racially tinged remarks after learning more about what she said.
“I am of course willing and will conduct a thorough review and consider additional facts to ensure to the American people we are providing services in a fair and equitable manner,” Vilsack said.
Vilsack’s statement came after the NAACP posted the full video of Sherrod’s comments Tuesday night.
The Obama administration’s move to reconsider her employment was an absolute reversal from hours earlier, when a White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said President Barack Obama had been briefed on Sherrod’s resignation after the fact and stood by the Agriculture Department’s handling of it.
But growing calls for the administration to reconsider the decision put pressure on Vilsack, who stressed that the decision to ask for her resignation was his alone.
NAACP statement
USDA, White House Deny White House Involvement In Sherrod’s Forced Resignation
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
Anyone know more of Mrs. Sherrod’s history?
Charles Sherrod was a legendary SNCC organizer in the 1960s. He played an important role in the Albany Movement and in Selma.
That’s the one.