I’m beginning to wonder if the editors at the New York Times and the Washington Post ever bother to do more than spellcheck their columnists’ work. I continue to see columns published in both newspapers that lack any kind of clarity or proper structure. Kathleen Parker is today’s example. She starts out by asking facetiously why the “Republicans hate art, the elderly and children?”
But she never answers the question. She takes a jab at the premise of the question and says we need a new metaphor to describe the demonization of Republicans, but she doesn’t provide the new metaphor. Instead, she lists a couple of examples of what she considers “hysterical” accusations of cruelty leveled by Democrats and commentators and then dismisses those accusations by changing the subject.
In the midst of so much hysteria, even some Republicans seem to have lost sight of the big picture. They’ve been scrambling over relative peanuts — a few billion dollars in a $3.8 trillion budget — while Democrats were setting the table for a feast. How delicious to blame Republicans for shutting down government.
From here, she meanders into some musings on John Boehner’s strategic good-sense, Chuck Schumer’s talking-points, Paul Ryan’s budget proposal, and whether anyone other than her is really getting the point. But no one can get the point because she doesn’t have one. Or, rather, she has ten points, none of which are neatly tied together.
If this were a high-school essay, she’d be told that it’s incoherent and to rewrite it. Peggy Noonan writes in this same stream-of-consciousness style for the Wall Street Journal. Writing a column for a newspaper should be as simple as breathing and using the toilet. It should be second nature. After you’ve written a few dozen of them, you can do it on your sleep. A lot of the older columnists actually seem to write their columns on auto-pilot, but at least they conform to the style. More and more, though, I see columns that simply don’t pass the minimum standard for construction. We have a lot of talented writers in this country. Some of them ought to be given the space that is being wasted by people like Kathleen Parker.
It’s like the mafia system.
Once you’re “made” in The Village, you can do anything, absolutely anything, and people still defer to you. Are we surprised that one of the most common results is this sort of arrogant gibberish?
With all of the people in the country, why does the NYT have such lousy op ed writers that haven’t graduated from crayon scribbling?
I haven’t read the op ed page in a long time. I just can’t stand it.
Yes, there are people who can write a column. They just don’t work for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Washington Post.
Call it the triumph of the Tom Wolfe school of journalism.
The quality of writing in those papers might be directly correlated (if not responsible for) the quality of thinking on Wall Street, in American corporations, and in the Village-and-Congress complex.
Here are two who still know how to write:
Cynthia Tucker, Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Hal Crowther, The Independent Weekly
I still miss Russell Baker, who ended his Times column in 1998. I wonder if he’s writing anything these days.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Baker
Glenn W. Smith (see The Big Lacuna) is not bad either. There are other journalists-now-bloggers who are like this: Meteor Blades being another good one.
If you want to get into columnists missed, Izzy Stone is the top of the list.
She was such a disaster on the CNN program “Parker Spitzer” and actually since she left the show is now respectable. Both she and Noonan remind of of the Stepford Wives when their little robot computer chips blew and they kept going forward a step, back a step, forward a step…all the while continuing to look beautiful as they mindlessly cleaned the house.
Anyone remember the “Infinite Monkey Theorem”? Apparently, that didn’t prove well either.
That we’ve all probably felt like doing the same to our own keyboards on occasion could prove to be a variable relevant to the experiment.