Recently, Jonathan Cymberknopf wrote a very upbeat article where he makes it sound like third party presidential candidates in 2012 achieved remarkable, even historic, success. He provides considerable data on how a number of third party candidates did better in 2012 than in the previous presidential election. For many years I strongly advocated third party options and even was a state chairperson for a major third party. But over time I realized what a fool’s effort third parties are for presidential elections and also for nearly all congressional ones. Why? Because anyone who thinks clearly and understands the US electoral system should know that the system is so rigged against third parties that they are mostly a wasted effort. Worse even, and this is my major point, because third parties provide a kind of high pressure escape valve for very unhappy Americans to express their anger and frustration. In so doing, they perversely help to sustain the very corrupt, dysfunctional two-party system they reject and want to change but cannot possibly do.
Let me further explain. As someone who worked within the federal and state political system for a long time I am totally convinced that the American political system has become a farce, actually an evil system for the vast majority of Americans. Why? Because this political system has become the tool for sustaining the upper, wealthy class and is destroying the middle class and succeeding in creating a two-class society. Economic inequality is now at its highest level. This has resulted because the rich, upper class controls the political system through money that more than earns a terrific return on the funds invested, because the political system has also corrupted the economic system.
We desperately need a second American revolution. But it will not and cannot come through elections. Elections merely represent a delusional notion that American democracy still works, when in fact it is nothing more now than a delusional democracy. Beyond the top 1 percent so talked about as the very wealthy grabbing nearly all the increases in economic growth and prosperity, it is probably the top 10 percent or more that enjoys fabulous lives. There really are two economies. The one for the top on the economic ladder is working wonderfully. They are gobbling up luxury cars, jewelry and all kinds of products, eating expensive foods at home and in fancy restaurants, getting the very best medical care, and experiencing the joys of luxury travel and entertainment. The lives of some 30 million Americans are truly wonderful. But the remaining vast majority of Americans who constitute most of the voters are leading very, very different economic lives with much diminished quality of lives and considerable economic insecurity.
So, rather than celebrate that less than 2 percent of voters supported third party presidential candidates and, in so doing, legitimized the US electoral system, what the country really needs are millions of Americans more forcefully attacking the status quo that the two-party plutocracy uses to serve and protect the upper, wealthy class. Americans who happily and proudly vote and work for third party candidates are delusional if they think that their actions are helping to bring down our corrupt political system. They need to realize that in a perverse way they are protecting and sustaining the status quo political system. It would be far better if many millions of Americans who, as expressed in virtually all surveys and polls, have no trust and confidence in both major political parties and all the elected politicians chose to express their discontent by NOT voting in elections. Yes, that is what we need. We need to concretely show our rejection of the political system by not honoring it through voting.
The sad joke is that not much more than half of eligible voters actually vote, far worse than in other advanced, industrialized nations. What the goal of Americans who correctly see both major parties as rigidly corrupt and useless for most citizens should be is to attack the legitimacy of the political system by cutting voter turnout substantially.
Stop feel-good voting for third party candidates and reject the current electoral system altogether. Do that and think more about other ways to destroy this system. Think in terms of a political boycott just as you would an economic boycott against a company. Never delude yourself that by electing Republicans or Democrats you will see the many necessary, fundamental changes for restoring true democracy and honoring the values of the Constitution. The one most powerful tactic to restore democracy and economic freedom is removing all private money from the entire political system. That requires a constitutional amendment, and that can only happen through an Article V convention that recently Mark Levin so powerfully advocated in his new book, but which he, sadly, failed to present the full truth about, namely that Congress has already failed to obey the Constitution and recognize the sufficient number of state applications for a convention.
This failure of Congress, like so many other circumstances, decisions and events, only further proves just how awful American democracy has become. And it shows just how much we need millions of Americans to fight for what is necessary, rather than think that third party candidates are the answer. Interestingly, third party presidential candidates have not made the Article V convention option a major campaign issue, just as Republicans and Democrats have ignored this constitutional option.
I admire your balls for posting this in partisan bloggo world… but correct premises matter.
first, we do not have a “two party” system. what we have is two branches of the same corporate oligarchy supporting congress. one party is not as blatant with their corporate ass-kissing but it’s still ass-kissing.
long ago I saw an interview with CO congresswoman Patricia Schroeder.. the interviewer asked her what she “thought about third party candidates”. she immediately shot back “I question whether we have a two party system”.
this was something like 25 years ago. so the game was up long ago for the more honest, progressive among us.
what it’s all about now is sophomoric nonsense which is getting us nowhere fast.
The other thing is that while saying that things suck and that people should boycott sounds all well and good insofar as it goes, before I’d get on-board, I’d want to have a very specific idea of what the endgame was. What would change? What sort of organizational infrastructure would be in place to make what you’re proposing more than an exercise in futility? What positive proposals for a replacement social/political order are being proposed? Who’s calling the shots?
It’s very easy to be against something. I know – I’ve been there. Comes down to, what are we struggling for?
I don’t agree but I recommended this diary because I think it needs to discussed.
A very good first diary, but then I see you are a professional writer.
Your Mumia sweatshirt won’t get you into heaven anymore.
This is a very good piece. Thank you.
I have always…since the late ’60s…refused to vote for the lesser of several evils. Thus my votes have been few and far between. This was done as a matter of principle rather than as a political weapon or statement. Gandhi had his own “experiments with truth,” and I have mine.
I question the efficacy of your not-voting premise as a political action. As you say above, “The sad joke is that not much more than half of eligible voters actually vote, far worse than in other advanced, industrialized nations.” The even sadder joke is that this system would roll merrily along…just as it is if not even more corrupted…should substantially less voters show up at the polls come Election Day. The old line “What if they threw a war and nobody showed up?” pertains here. The 1% that controls the overseer 10%…that’s what they are, your 10% that is enjoying such “fabulous lives.” They are the overseers in this particular slave system and the 1% are the plantation owners. Would that 11% worry if the slaves simply stopped grumbling and surrendered? I think not.
There has to be more, not less. More bothering. Lots more.
But…how? Voting is obviously not the answer. Not two parties, not three, not a hundred.
I spent a number of years on various leftiness blogs trying to drum up support for an idea that I originally called “NEWSTRIKE!!!” and eventually expanded to “MEDIASTRIKE!!! and “CULTURESTRIKE!!!” Long story short, I wanted some portion of the American people…preferably a large segment of the demographic most targeted by the advertising media, those to whom we now laughingly refer as “the middle class”…to stop consuming the media that are the real enforcers for this techno-fascist system in which we now all live. Hit the corporations in the pocketbook. Stop buying their product. Stop believing their product.
I hit a solid stone wall. I was kicked off of several blogs…dKos first of all…for arguing this point perhaps a little too forcefully, and on the ones that did not nonperson me I finally realized that the media drug that has been sold to the consumer junkies of America since early infancy…mostly through trance-producing television although more recently the internet has done its share of the job as well…has its claws so deep inside of the American psyche that it makes heroin look like a recreational drug. I mean…at least with heroin one knows that one is hooked.With this media drugging system? Not a clue.
Break the media stranglehold on the sleeping American mind and things can be done.
Until then?
Nada.
How to do that?
Damned if I know.
I do know this though…
Not voting ain’t gonna get it done.
In fact…unless that stranglehold is somehow broken, even your not-voting idea will come to naught.
Bet on it.
Good luck with it, though.
See ya on down the road.
Thanks for caring.
Later…
AG
Your link’s not working.
AG