The Des Moines Register has done a deep dive into the early voting voter files and discovered that the Republicans are indeed eating into their election day margins by encouraging more people to vote by absentee. However, it’s very valuable to bank your voters early so you can focus your election day turnout efforts on less reliable people.
What’s consistently missing from these kinds of analyses is that the main contest in Iowa on Tuesday is the governor’s race, and all the polls show that the incumbent Republican governor has an overwhelming lead, perhaps exceeding twenty percentage points. So, given that the biggest race on the ballot is not remotely competitive, we shouldn’t expect the early voting numbers to look good at all for the Democrats.
And they do look pretty bad if you look at just the raw numbers of registered Democrats who have voted relative to registered Republicans and compare the difference to past elections. Normally, the Democrats bank a much bigger advantage during early voting. But, as I have already said, the Register‘s analysis shows that the Republicans have cut into this advantage to a significant degree by getting their Election Day voters to cast their votes early. Democrats are doing a better job of getting new voters to the polls.
The real story out of Iowa is that there is a very large universe of voters who are going to vote for the Republican governor despite not being registered Republicans, and a very large segment of these Branstad voters are not going to vote for the lunatic Joni Ernst. This set of pro-Branstad anti-Ernst voters is made up of independent and Democratic registrants, and their size will determine the winner of the Senate race. There will even be a few registered Republicans in this group, albeit Iowa is not Kansas.
When the leader of the state party in a very popular incumbent governor, all other candidates from that party who are running for statewide office should be able to win easily unless there is something desperately wrong with them, and there are definitely a few things desperately wrong with Joni Ernst. Her lunacy is putting what should be a slam dunk election at risk. She’s literally on the verge of blowing it in humiliating fashion.
But is this how the press is reporting on this race?
In any case, with the Dems on the verge of getting crushed in the governor’s race, the numbers on early voting start to look pretty damn good. Yes, they look shitty compared to the past, but they look great in the context of getting beat like a drum in the most important statewide race. Obviously, a lot of independents and Democrats (and even some Republicans) who have voted early for Branstad have also voted early for Braley.
Braley could pull this out after all.
Polls never account for ticket-splitters. Those are the folks that normally are just lumped as independents. And contrary to Third Way/No Labels/moderate assertions, they really do not have a common ideology or approach to government; there are many different reasons for this ticket-splitting. One common one is voter attempts to eliminate financially corrupt officials.
Maybe it’s not an ideology, but many independents have a preference for divided government or one GOP and one DEM. That’s what Iowa has had: Grassley and Harkin. They may be comfortable with that “balance” and decline to pair a conservative Grassley with a far right wacko.
That is one type of ticket-splitter indeed. But often of late it was cover for former Democrats voting for Republicans. And Democrats adopting Republican policies.
The fallacy in that position is assuming that both parties are equally interested in the general public interest at large. And they are capable of negotiating a practical and appropriate solution to public issues. What once was close enough to true now is considered dreaming.
Braley may only need a vote swing from the polls as small as Franken managed in 2008: 2.9%
Or Bennet in 2010: 3.9%
Or Tester in 2012: 4.1%
It would be nice if he pulls a bigger upset on the order of Heitcamp’s: 6.6%.
None in the small league as Reid’s 8.3%. But have been told that nothing like that will happen this year; so, won’t bother with that dream.
The biggest ticket splitter I encountered on an anecdotal level in 2008 was the president and Mark Warner. I never did check their vote differences, but while canvassing I met a lot of “McCain Warner” voters.
Well, let’s hope you’re right.
The polls indicate that we are behind, but not by a lot, in Iowa, Colorado, and Alaska. To retain control, we need the polls to be wrong in 2 out of these 3 states, and the polls to be right in NH, NC, and KS. That gets us to 50. Alternatively, if we win 1 of the 3, that gets us to 49, and we will need to win the run-off in either Georgia or Louisiana. I’m assuming that Arkansas and Kentucky are lost.
Whistling in the dark.
Better than running toward 3 carloads of rednecks with a rifle that had no firing pin … which I did … and survived.
I have to admit, it WAS embarrassing.
I’ll bet!
As my old friend, a Korean War Marine veteran, is fond of saying, “You can’t hurt a Marine by hitting him on the head.”
Why would registered Democrats vote for the Republican Governor?
Gale Courey Toensing, Indian Country Today Media Network: NC’s Newest Voting Bloc: State Tribes Support Hagan
Does not include the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians or the Haliwa-Saponi tribal council.
Could affect some legislative races in addition to the US Senate.
Stephanie Woodard, Indian Country Today Media Network: Who Called the Sheriff? Pine Ridge Voter Turnout Plummets, Then Rebounds
The white community enclaves of Shannon County run the elections for South Dakota. One of the items on the ballot is changing the name from Shannon County to Lakota County. And then there’s the race for county sheriff, which has a Native American candidate.
What mystifies me about the Iowa race is that Braley is perhaps the stupidest Senate candidate the Democrats have right now, and somehow Joni Ernst hasn’t pulled away. This is a man I had never heard of until he said something denigrating about farmers (specifically a popular Iowa “farmer” who doesn’t really do much farming, if I’m not mistaken)…in comparison to lawyers…while running for the Senate in Iowa. At the time I thought, “Well, he just lost his chance at being Senator.” Somehow, he failed to lose the primary, and the man is still neck and neck? Wonders never cease.
If that gaffe didn’t sink the Braley campaign for good, then there’s always hope right up until the polls close.
Yeah, because this is smart:
Wonder if all those old folks in Iowa get that Medicare Part B, other than beneficiary premiums, deductibles and co-pays, is paid for through general tax revenues. IOW taxpayer subsidies.
Nope, sunk. 7 behind.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/joni-ernst-final-des-moines-register-poll-iowa
Margin of error just deals with the randomness of the sample vs. total population. Any GOTV effects will not be random. It remains to be seen whether they can bridge 4%-10% of what the expected value from polling is. Nate Silver’s model shows a 28% chance of the result falling over the 50% line and an R+2 margin.
South Dakota is the big test of brute GOTV effort. Nate Silver’s polling shows it at R+12 and a less than 1% chance that randomly the results could be a Demcratic win.
GOTV efforts depart from the historical data incorporated into polling models. And in this year the allocation of the effort means they depart dramatically from previous years’ behavior.
If South Dakota comes out a Democratic win, the balance of media and GOTV in campaigns will change and GOP advantage in high-priced media (and free media bias) will also change as the media companies will know that GOTV activities are substitutes for their services.
I hope you’re right. I will be astonished if GOTV is responsible for more than a 2% change in outcomes.