"President Obama Is Going To Have To Decide!!!???" Fitzmas, v. 17b

Posted by Arthur Gilroy | Feb 27, 2008 | 17 |

Booman recently posted a piece titled Cleaning Up After the Bushes.

In it he stated:

I confess that the Bush administration’s brazen criminality even has me beaten down. I have simply gotten used to them breaking the law. However, President Obama is going to have to decide how much of this criminality to prosecute. He can’t possibly prosecute it all. His Justice Department will have to pick and choose.

and

Obama is not going to come into office and start indicting Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Tenet, etc. So, what is reasonable to expect?

I guess the second question depends on your own definition of reason.

I would use the word “possible” instead.

Given the criminality and/or essential cowardice that has been evinced by the DemRat Party leaders since the 2006 elections, I think that the only thing that is going to be really possible will be business as usual plus a sort of cosmetic, fallguy sort of “cleaning up”.

A few suckers will hit the dirt and the rest will continue sucking off the fat of the land.

So it goes.

Read on for more.
That is of course if Obama actually wins the election.

And survives any appreciable amount of time.

The Ratpubs have apparently succeeded in helping to get rid of Hillary…with the help of the kneejerk left and the male supremacy vote, of course (including the many male-dominated women)… because they think that he will be easier to beat and further that if he DOES win he will not have the knives out with the same sort of experienced political in-fighter ferocity that Ms. “There Is A Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” would have employed in attacking them.

Maybe, maybe not.

Plus…black males can be killed with less ensuing public uproar than can white females if push REALLY comes to shove.

Think not?

Bet on it.

I seem to hear the roar of beginnings of the biggest of ALL leftiness Fitzmas disappointments as it starts its inevitable roll down the hill.

Timebomb McCain awaits.

Watch.

That image of Obama in Islamic garb?

Youi an’t seen NUTHIN’ yet.

Stay tuned.

It ain’t gonna be as easy as y’all think it is going to be.

However, President Obama is going to have to decide how much of this criminality to prosecute!!!???

Yeah, Malcolm X said that the chickens always come home to roost eventually.

What he did not say…he SO overestimated Americans of all races in many respects…is that FIRST THE DAMNED CHICKENS HAVE TO HATCH!!!

The single most objectionable lick that I have ever heard by a Presidential candidate…one that I have been hearing since the ’60s and most certainly predates my own political awareness?

When I am elected President.

How many hundred assholes have run THAT line in the last 100 years?

And now here you are doing it?

Lord, what fools these mortals be!!!

Do you realize the single and only way that such a lick can be valid regarding Obama?

Only if he has TOTALLY AND FOREVER sold his ass to the PermaGovernors. (Zbig Brzezinski’s involvement in his inner circle of advisors…to name just one of many…suggests that this may be EXACTLY the case.)

And if that is the case…then see the above “cosmetic, fallguy sort of ‘cleaning up’ ” statement.

Yup.

Station WTFU once again signing off the air.

Wake The Fuck Up!!!

(Or, of course…make Fitzmas a national leftiness holiday. Your choice.)

About The Author

Arthur Gilroy

Born. Still working on it.

17 Comments

BooMan on February 27, 2008 at 2:00 pm

This is probably the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen you write:

The Ratpubs have apparently succeeded in helping to get rid of Hillary…with the help of the kneejerk left and the male supremacy vote, of course (including the many male-dominated women)… because they think that he will be easier to beat and further that if he DOES win he will not have the knives out with the same sort of experienced political in-fighter ferocity that Ms. “There Is A Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” would have employed in attacking them.

That’s wrong in every particular.
- Oui on February 27, 2008 at 2:28 pm
  
  .
  You need a touch of music in which I dare not advise!
  
  Obama a lefty!
  
  "But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
  - Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 3:07 pm
    
    He has done what he must to win.
    
    As does every successful Presidential candidate.
    
    In fact, I believe that he show great promise.
    
    Nevertheless, his win over HRC will be good news for the RatPubs.
    
    They may be wrong.
    
    I hope so.
    
    AG
- Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 3:03 pm
  
  Do you EVER look at Drudge?
  
  Y’oughta try it. It’s the real Rovian deal.
  
  Bet on it.
  
  And it has been pro-Obama/anti-Hillary for months. Only now that she is pretty much beaten do the anti-Obama memes begin to appear there.
  
  Hillary has a hardon for the people who screwed with her plans in the late ’90s. She is BushCo’s worst nightmare.
  
  Lucklily…thanks in no small part to the kneejerk left of which you are so proud a member…they won’t have her to be kicking them around anymore.
  
  So it goes.
  
  I hope that Obama survives long enough… politically and/or physically…to learn the hard lessons that she learned a decade or more ago.
  
  We shall see.
  
  AG
  - BooMan on February 27, 2008 at 3:10 pm
    
    Lessons learned? Perhaps we should listen to a man who, while the opposite of impartial, at least has had the bad fortune to roll around in the pig sty with the Clintons.
    
    Whether one likes, dislikes, loves, hates, admires, fears, despises, or envies them, every Clinton watcher has this in common: They are dumbfounded both by the incompetence with which Hillary has run for president and her intransigence at sticking to a failed message. In a demonstration of inability and inflexibility reminiscent of her healthcare debacle of 1993-94, Mrs. Clinton seems destined to fulfill Voltaire’s description of the Bourbon kings of France: “They learn nothing. They forget nothing.”
    
    Even now, with her back against the wall, fighting for her political career, Hillary, presumably with Bill’s acquiescence, insists on making the same mistakes that landed her in the soup. No new tactics, no new strategy, no new message emerges.
    
    Incredibly, both Clintons are harping, once more, on the theme of experience to carry the day. No matter that it hasn’t worked since before Iowa; they repeat the same mantra endlessly — that Hillary can “hit the ground running” on “Day One.” Will they ever realize that voters grasp two essential facts:
    
    (a) That Hillary’s experience is derivative of Bill’s and her claims to his achievements are largely invented and spurious, and
    
    (b) That the real edge she has in experience is her ability to repeat the strategies, tactics, message, fundraising models and campaign style of the 1990s, something modern voters reject emphatically?
    
    Why, after losing 24 states, do Hillary and Bill fail to get these messages? Are they saving up these insights for their memoirs?
    
    And why do the Clintons persist in running a negative campaign even when they can’t find anything to be negative about? Alienating voters with their abrasive attacks without attracting them with their content, they throw pitty-pat punches accusing Obama one day of plagiarism for borrowing speech lines from his close and consenting friend and the next day for accurately describing Hillary’s healthcare plan as requiring sanctions to make those who do not wish to sign up do so against their will (albeit for policies Mrs. Clinton deems to be “affordable”).
    
    If you are going to pay the price of going negative, throw real punches. Hit Obama with big negatives. You take the backlash for going negative in order to pass the lethal message on to the voters. But if you don’t have any negatives to throw and your detectives have, indeed, come up empty, then stop trying to go negative. Stop alienating people to no purpose.
    
    But as obvious as these observations are, they seem to be lost on Bill and Hillary and the geniuses who are running her campaign. Despite defeat after defeat, we still hear about experience and still get a daily dose of so-what attacks on Obama.
    
    The deeper reality of this campaign is that Obama has shown, by his incredible skill in the way he is waging it, an ability to handle himself and a talent for the demands of center stage that show, experienced or not, he is better able to be president than the inept Hillary.
    
    We are watching a grim re-enactment of all of the character traits that led Hillary to decompose in the healthcare debate of her husband’s first term. The blind reliance on a guru-delivered strategy, the religious insistence on following the same rhetorical line even when it obviously isn’t working, the inflexibility in adapting to one’s opposition, and the inability to formulate new strategies or to improvise tactics when her pre-conceptions are found to be so obviously faulty — this is Hillary at her worst.
    
    As citizens, we are entitled to watch Obama’s skill, leadership style, and savvy sophistication and contrast it with Hillary’s doctrinaire insistence on approaches that aren’t working and to conclude that Hillary would be a disaster as president and that Obama would be pretty good. We can, at least, conclude that the same tenacity that led Johnson into Vietnam and may be inducing Bush to risk his party, his reputation and the attitudes of a generation in Iraq may be abundantly present in Hillary.
    
    But we are driven to wonder: Does Hillary’s rigidity stem from a false conviction or from an absence of sufficient imagination and creativity to formulate an alternative course?
    
    That’s how I see it, too. Bet on it.
    - Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 3:24 pm
      
      You quote Dick Morris?
      
      With a straight face?
      
      And you call ME dumb?
      
      Unbelievable.
      
      I am not defending the Clinton campaign. It has been a failure. But all the crowing from the left!!! SO stupid.
      
      Watch.
      
      Obama will have a hard time in the election, and a HARDER time in DC if he wins. The Clinton results would have been just the opposite.
      
      They are inside players.
      
      They know where the ratholes are and how to get at the rats who live there, too. They share some of the same characteristics. You know the old saying…”Send a thief to catch a thief?”
      
      Yeah.
      
      Like that.
      
      So it goes.
      
      Best of luck in the future.
      
      We’re all gonna need it.
      
      AG
      - BooMan on February 27, 2008 at 3:32 pm
        
        send a thief to catch a thief…
        
        that’s exactly why Dick Morris makes sense.
      - Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 4:02 pm
        
        Which side of the street do you think MORRIS is working these days?
        
        (Hint, hint…it ain’t for the good guys, bro’.)
        
        Chjeck out DickMorris.com for all you need to know about that.
        
        Eight articles up.
        
        5 anti-Clinton, 3 pro-Obama.
        
        tell me the truth.
        
        Do you actually think that a Dick Morris website on which the only paid political ad is an Ann Coulter blurb really wants Barack Obama to win Presidency???
        
        C’mon, Booman.
        
        An Coulter’s thing about voting for Obama, the pro-Obama stances of websites like Drudge and DickMorris.com, Rove’s advice to Obama on how to beat Hillary Clinton which was given in a well publicized speech a couple of months ago…have you no sense of the depths of trickery going on here?
        
        Your innocence is overwhelming.
        
        Grow up.
        
        It is quite plain that a number of Rat hustlers decided months ago to try to help Obama win.
        
        Why?
        
        I suppose it was their overall goodheartedness.
        
        Lord help us all.
        
        AG
      - diane101 on February 28, 2008 at 12:21 pm
        
        Thank you for posting this comment, a point I’ve been trying to make for weeks/months now, I’ve lost track cause it seems forever, but I totally agree with you, who’s helping who here, funny how some things have just happened to work out and funny also how many “clear thinking” people were taken in by it. Of course by any measure and no matter the source, it was brilliant, in a converse sort of way. It was also interesting how many lefties were so willing to push the bandwagon on down the street, with great hurrahs and fanfare, we’ve defeated the evil witch..da dum, ta du, ta dum.
        So you just have to say that the Reps. won that one, they finally did what they set out to do many years ago, and “our side” was so wonderful in the assistance they gave.
        Speaking of Dick Morris, have you ever watched him in interviews, his mouth goes into contortion that drag his lip in clockwise motion all around his face, till it comes full circle and you wait to see it begin all again, it’s facinating to watch and body linguists must have fun intrepreting that.
        I will end with never have I seen so many wooden soldiers fall with such a domino effect, strange isn’t it. that’s why I think it must be so, to have a transformative effect and for whatever reason, it had to be done and Obama is the only one to rise up that could even appempt it, so I am taking it as a good sign, for the future of this country and the world. I do believe! When a great leader is needed, one will rise up and it looks like one did, just wish it didn’t have to destroy HRC in the process, but maybe that was necessary to in the greater scheme of things.
        Let us think a peaceful earth into being!
      - Arthur Gilroy on February 29, 2008 at 4:14 pm
        
        Lord what fools these leftinesses be.
        
        AG
- boran2 on February 27, 2008 at 3:14 pm
  
  Nah, he’s posted way dumber stuff than that.
  - Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 3:25 pm
    
    Dumb, huh?
    
    Watch.
    
    AG
Oui on February 27, 2008 at 2:05 pm

.

Puck:
Captain of our fairy band,
Helena is here at hand,
And the youth, mistook by me,
Pleading for a lover’s fee.
Shall we their fond pageant see?
Lord, what fools these mortals be!

"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
- Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 2:55 pm
  
  Shall we their fond pageant see?
  Lord, what fools these mortals be!
  
  Ooooohhh yes!!!
  
  This fond pageant we will soon enough see.
  ‘Twill more than aplenty for me and for thee.
  
  See ya, Oui…
  
  AG
  - Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 4:06 pm
    
    This fond pageant we will soon enough see.
    ‘Twill be more than aplenty for me and for thee.
    
    I swear…if Shakespeare had tried to write Hamlet on a computer, “To be or not to be” would never have come out right.
    
    AG
    - BooMan on February 27, 2008 at 4:17 pm
      
      You wanted Pompey and got Caesar instead. Wherefore, you are petulant.
      
      MARULLUS
      
      Wherefore rejoice? What conquest brings he home?
      What tributaries follow him to Rome,
      To grace in captive bonds his chariot-wheels?
      You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!
      O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,
      Knew you not Pompey? Many a time and oft
      Have you climb’d up to walls and battlements,
      To towers and windows, yea, to chimney-tops,
      Your infants in your arms, and there have sat
      The livelong day, with patient expectation,
      To see great Pompey pass the streets of Rome:
      And when you saw his chariot but appear,
      Have you not made an universal shout,
      That Tiber trembled underneath her banks,
      To hear the replication of your sounds
      Made in her concave shores?
      And do you now put on your best attire?
      And do you now cull out a holiday?
      And do you now strew flowers in his way
      That comes in triumph over Pompey’s blood? Be gone!
      Run to your houses, fall upon your knees,
      Pray to the gods to intermit the plague
      That needs must light on this ingratitude.
      - Arthur Gilroy on February 27, 2008 at 4:37 pm
        
        Dick Morris!!!???
        
        Not petulant.
        
        More like importunate.
        
        I repeat…The Rats want Obama as an opponent.
        
        And you have have a hand in giving them exactly that.
        
        Wherefore rejoice? What conquest bring you home?
        
        We shall see.
        
        November is a long way away.
        
        Remember Fitzmas?
        
        Remember Gannongate?
        
        Remember the Downing Street papers?
        
        Remember?
        
        Try to remember when it comes November
        When life was slow and oh so mellow
        Try to remember the kind of November
        When grass was green and grain so yellow
        Try to remember the kind of November
        When you were a young and a callow fellow
        Try to remember and if you remember…
        
        Then pray for a fucking miracle.
        
        Because by then the Rats will have played the race and anti-Islamic card on Obama’s ass so many times it’ll be spawn insane and pray for rain.
        
        Bet on it.
        
        Hope it doesn’t go to the courts.
        
        AG

"President Obama Is Going To Have To Decide!!!???" Fitzmas, v. 17b

About The Author

Arthur Gilroy

17 Comments

Recent Posts

Recent Comments