Joshua Treviño co-founded Red State. For a while he even teamed up with Armando LLorens of Daily Kos on a now (pretty much) defunct project called Swords Crossed. He wrote speeches for the George W. Bush administration. He used to be known by the pseudonym Tacitus, in honor of the legendary 1st and 2nd-Century Roman historian of the same name.
If you’ve been around the blogosphere for long enough, you probably remember Tacitus-Treviño. You may even remember that he pioneered something called Online Integrity, but almost all direct (linkable) evidence of it has been converted to porn sites or Chinese spam. Much like it is necessary to read Origen if you want to read Celsus, it is necessary to use secondary sources like Thers if you want to remember Online Integrity. In any case, the long and short of it was that Tacitus did things like “coquettishly” let slip Billmon’s last name, then call all such behavior monstrous and then shove petitions to ban all such behavior in the faces of bloggers like Chris Bowers. Of course, if you want to read about that, you must rely on another secondary source (this time, HTML Mencken). It seems as if 2006 was covered in volcanic ash or suffered some other catastrophe favored by the ancients.
So, anyway, Tacitus-Treviño was savaged by a broad swath of the blogosphere from the folks at Lawyers Guns & Money to Jane Hamsher to Retardo Montalban. (According to my archives, I have only mentioned Josh Treviño once, and that was a favor to Armando).
I was never suckered into thinking that Josh Trevino had integrity, online or anywhere else. Quite obviously, he was a nonentity to me. But future blogosphere archeologists will be looking for secondary sources on how this all turned out. Tacitus eventually got a job with the Guardian, proceeded to say some discouraging things about the coolness of Israelis killing Americans on flotillas, and then got fired for undisclosed relationships with Malaysian business interests. After that, he denied everything. Then this happened.
A range of mainstream American publications printed paid propaganda for the government of Malaysia, much of it focused on the campaign against a pro-democracy figure there.
The payments to conservative American opinion writers — whose work appeared in outlets from the Huffington Post and San Francisco Examiner to the Washington Times to National Review and RedState — emerged in a filing this week to the Department of Justice. The filing under the Foreign Agent Registration Act outlines a campaign spanning May 2008 to April 2011 and led by Joshua Trevino, a conservative pundit, who received $389,724.70 under the contract and paid smaller sums to a series of conservative writers.
Trevino lost his column at the Guardian last year after allegations that his relationship with Malaysian business interests wasn’t being disclosed in columns dealing with Malaysia. Trevino told Politico in 2011 that “I was never on any 'Malaysian entity's payroll,' and I resent your assumption that I was.”
According to Trevino's belated federal filing, the interests paying Trevino were in fact the government of Malaysia, “its ruling party, or interests closely aligned with either.” The Malaysian government has been accused of multiple human rights abuses and restricting the press and personal freedoms. Anwar, the opposition leader, has faced prosecution for sodomy, a prosecution widely denounced in the West which Trevino defended as more “nuanced” than American observers realized.
Shilling for an oppressive anti-Democratic government after asking bloggers to have some integrity? That’s pretty rich. And who were his co-consprirators?
Trevino’s subcontractors included conservative writer Ben Domenech, who made $36,000 from the arrangement, and Rachel Ehrenfeld, the director of the American Center for Democracy, who made $30,000. Seth Mandel, an editor at Commentary, made $5,500 (his byline is attached to the National Review item linked to above). Brad Jackson, writing at the time for RedState, made $24,700. Overall, 10 writers were part of the arrangement.
You might remember Ben Domenech. He’s another co-founder of Red State, who the Washington Post actually hired to blog for them (as some kind of balance for the great Dan Froomkin) but who had to resign after three days because he’s a plagiarist.
All this time I thought the Wingnut Welfare rightwing bloggers rely on was coming from rich white dudes in America. Why would Muslim autocrats pay the editor of Commentary?
Oh, who the fuck cares?
Gee whiz, conservatives writing against somebody who is pro-deomcracy and getting paid by a foreign government to do so. Who woulda thunk it?
After all, in this country they are doing erverything they can to promote democ…oh wait.
All while promoting Bush’s War on Terror and smearing Muslims at every opportunity.
Not only writing for foreign governments, but Israel-firsters taking money from anti-Semitic regimes!!
Another tale of the Grift Old Party.
Apparently since money seems to be their god, there’s no need for forgiveness, only next week’s wire transfer.
In above link, article has been removed. For now, WayBack Archive has article in cache memory – What Anwar’s Trial Really Means .
A number of webpages have been scrubbed @SC, I found this one –
Swords Crossed contributors and moderators – 2009
this part is entertaining.
OT:
State Department Releases Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on the Proposed Keystone XL Pipeline
Draft Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)
Comments to EPA during 45-day time period. Really, I think we need 150 milllion or so comments. Nonetheless, read what you can digest. And go comment. It’s your right as a citizen and you can bet that the oil industry will make sure that their comments get registered.
grotesque, unbelievable, bizarre and unprecedented
People who rise to the top in conservative circles do so because they have less integrity, sincerity or soul than their competitors.
Tacitus was blogging at his own site at least as far back as 2002 when he advocated a war with Iraq. Wonder who was paying him then and when the hell did he write speeches for GWB? Fortunately have no recollection of ever having tangled with the guy in those early days of the blogosphere.
I don’t think he wrote speeches for the president. Just someone(s) in his administration. I could be wrong, but Bush’s writers were fairly well known.
Not that he would ever set the record straight on that. Then again he could have written speeches for lots of people on spec and none of them ever saw anything but the round filing cabinet.
Booman…you write:
Are you so naive as to think that this sort of hustle is not played on both sides of the PermaGov owned and operated so-called “two party system?” Daily Kos stinks of it, and the only difference real difference between the two sides is one of competence. This Treviño fool is just too stupid, not subtle enough to fool most people.
And Armando!!!???
Kos’s (erstwhile) right-hand man?
Please.
The hustle is on.
You either buy into it and choose sides or step away from the media with your brains in the air.
The rot is endemic to the corporate imperial system.
WTFU.
AG
Armando thinks you are insane. Not for this comment. I doubt that he’s seen it. He just thinks that in general.
Armando was smitten with shiny four-stars for POTUS in 2003; so, his grasp of reality is inconsistent.
Indeed?
A better compliment rarely appears.
Please thank him for me.
AG
The main thing I remember from Tacitus’ early days is what a frickin’ troll he is. Man. He got in on every thread out there. Even in the early days of the intertubes, that was a lot of trolling.
The one and only time I willfully changed channels on Chris Hayes was when he had Trollin’ Josh Treviño on.
Yeah, it’s important to understand that Chris Hayes had Josh Trevino on “Up” last week.
Also, this week Ezra Klein brought Ben Domenech to pontificate during one his prime time MSNBC guest gigs.
There are plenty of conservative people who will go on these programs and give their movement’s POV. People who have histories of lying cannot be trusted to bring good faith to these discussions. They must be shunned by decent people, and ignored by broadcast programs with integrity.
Maybe this new news will rebury them. I hope for that to happen, but I’m not counting on it.
I’d wondered what happened to Tacticus. In the very early days at Daily Kos, Kos and Tacticus had each other on their blog-rolls and had kind of a “cross-fire” partnership in which each linked to and commented on each other’s posts.
I look back on that now as evidence that even after the impeachment and Florida 2000 there was still a general idea that the left could actually dialog with and cooperate and work with the group we now know as wingnuts. And for most of the New Deal era that had been true. For a while we hoped it would be true … I remember by 2004 it seemed that every leftie blog had a well-behaved house troll, like “Poker Player (aka Jim)” at TalkLeft … no reasoning was possible but we could pretend there was.
One of the many contributions Krugman made was that he was one of the first to realize that the post-1994 conservative was essentially a John Bircher who a) was advocating policies so extreme that no one in the middle was willing to believe that this really was their intent, and b) that because of (a) it was impossible to compromise or reason with them in any way at all.
Of course.
They both work for the same UniParty.
Get real.
Nothing…nothing, GC…gets by the Dkos topic wolves that in any serious way threatens the UniParty PermaGov fix.
Nothing.
It’s an empty bag full of nothing but hot air, and when the UniParty needs to shift gears…which will happen eventually, because the fix in favor of the DemRats cannot last forever…Dkos and the whole leftiness shill will go down just as Fox and the rest of the rightiness shill is going down now.
The UniParty slogan?
Bet on it
AG
If it were true that they “work for the same UniParty”, Kos and Tacitus would still be dealing with each other with comity. But they’re not.
Hell, with the level of scorn you frequently toss BooMan’s way for what you view as his softness, why don’t we see him working in cooperation with conservative bloggers? Why don’t we see more GOP supporters on the Frog Pond?
AG, you see the actions of the modern GOP and believe the Democrats are part of “the same UniParty”? Man, you are wrong.
Let’s start by comparing the actions of the Governor and State Legislature of California with the actions of GOP-controlled Michigan’s State leadership. Or Wisconsin’s. Or Kansas’. Or Alabama’s. Or Arizona’s. Or…