Open Thread
The voting ends on Friday. Act Blue will eventually move into every state, but you should vote for the states that you feel are the most pressing needs for Democrats nationwide.
Take the Act Blue poll. This is an open thread.
Posted by BooMan | Oct 12, 2005 |
The voting ends on Friday. Act Blue will eventually move into every state, but you should vote for the states that you feel are the most pressing needs for Democrats nationwide.
Take the Act Blue poll. This is an open thread.
Posted by BooMan | Oct 11, 2005 |
Roll Call (subscription) reports that the Dems are about to roll out their modern-day counterpoint to the GOP’s Contract on America:
Among the proposals are: “real security” for America through stronger investments in U.S. armed forces and benchmarks for determining when to bring troops home from Iraq; affordable health insurance for all Americans; energy independence in 10 years; an economic package that includes an increase in the minimum wage and budget restrictions to end deficit spending; and universal college education through scholarships and grants as well as funding for the No Child Left Behind act.
Democrats will also promise to return ethical standards to Washington through bipartisan ethics oversight and tighter lobbying restrictions, increase assistance to Katrina disaster victims through Medicaid and housing vouchers, save Social Security from privatization and tighten pension laws.
It is a good idea to create a positive agenda for Democrats to campaign on, but it is a little depressing to realize that we are already half drowned in Grover’s bathtub. But, we can’t exactly campaign on massive new spending programs, while deploring the deficit spending of the GOP. Or can we? We could if we had no shame and always stayed on message. Alas, we are Democrats and that won’t happen.
When we talk about stronger investments in our armed forces, I hope that translates into more support for our troops’ training, pay, benefits, and equipment, and not to more massive spending on unneeded aircraft, anti-missile programs, and foreign expeditions.
I am particularly fond of the decision to focus on energy independence within ten years. I think Americans can understand that goal and get behind it. And I think it is probably the single best thing we can do to improve both our security and the global climate.
Universal college is an interesting concept. I suppose we will need to continue to be extremely lax in our immigration policy to fill all the jobs a nation of college grads refuses to do. And I expect immigration to be a tricky issue in the upcoming elections (for both parties).
In any case, I’m glad the Dems are putting forth a positive agenda, and that they have coalesced around a timetable (with benchmarks) for withdrawal from Iraq. Maybe the party won’t split in half after all. Maybe.
Read MorePosted by BooMan | Oct 11, 2005 |
Are members suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder or pre-plamegate indictment anxiety?
One person writes a rant about our military and sets off a chain of events that are still rippling the pond. Oh well.
Here’s one piece of advice: One diary doesn’t represent this site or its culture. No one can make you angry unless you let yourself get angry. It takes two people to start a flamewar. And someone, somewhere, said something about turning the other cheek.
In any case, Judy Miller talks to Fitzgerald again tomorrow, “a discrepancy between the grand jury testimony of Karl Rove and Time Magazine reporter Matthew Cooper is the reason Rove will testify again” and Cheney is cancelling speaking engagements.
And as Daniel Schorr points out:
It may be remembered that the Watergate grand jury wanted to indict President Nixon for obstruction of justice. When advised that a sitting president could not be prosecuted, the grand jury named him as an unindicted coconspirator.
Sorting out flamewars is sometimes a part of my job, but it is not one of my keen interests.
This is:
Posted by BooMan | Oct 10, 2005 |
From the Macon Telegraph:
Mr. Bush hopes to kill the measure in the House, where the administration is lobbying the leadership. But failing that, he threatens to use the first veto of his presidency to bring down the measure.
It would be more than a shame; it would be nothing less than a national disgrace, if it comes to this. The thought of the president of the United States fighting tooth and nail to maintain the right for our military and the CIA to torture prisoners flies in the face of everything this country stands for.
If they get it down in southern Georgia, they get it everywhere. The President has been infatuated with torture since he was a child:
:::flip:::
Read MorePosted by BooMan | Oct 10, 2005 |
It feels like 1973-74 all over again:
The members of the Class of 1974 were young, relatively new to public office and remarkably certain they could remake Washington in their own image. They viewed Congress as ossified, beholden to powerful interests, unresponsive to the people and ripe for the taking.
The Class of 1974 had 75 Democrats to just 17 Republicans (the “Contract” Class of 1994 would have 73 Republicans and just 13 Democrats). This huge influx of Democrats was known as the “Watergate babies.” The label derived from the scandal that, less than three months earlier, had caused President Richard M. Nixon to resign under threat of impeachment.
So strong was the tide running that fall — especially after Nixon was pardoned by successor President Gerald R. Ford — that Democrats were elected in districts all over the Northeast, the Midwest and the West that had voted Republican for generations.
The two most senior members of the then-minority Republicans were defeated. In Massachusetts, Paul E. Tsongas became the first Democrat elected to the House from his district in the 20th century. The bookish Andrew Maguire in New Jersey and the street-savvy organizer Toby Moffett in Connecticut captured suburban Republican districts.
In the West, Timothy E. Wirth won the Colorado district based in Boulder, Les AuCoin became the first Democrat from Oregon’s northwest corner since the 1800s and California elected a crop of young legislators that included George Miller, Henry A. Waxman and Norman Y. Mineta.
The new victors were a Kiddie Corps, half of them under 40. Tom Downey of New York, just 25, was the youngest member of Congress since the early 1800s. “We were young, we looked weird. I can’t even believe we got elected,” Moffett would say two decades later.
:::flip:::
Read More