“Widely used industrial compounds, called phthalates,” reports today’s Los Angeles Times, “are linked by researchers to changes in the reproductive organs of male infants” and reduced sperm count in developed countries.
Why? Phthalates are “hormone-mimicking chemicals” that may “mimic estrogen or block testosterone.”
Where are phthalates found? In plastics and beauty products. The “ubiquitous compounds [are] used as softeners in plastics and to maintain color and fragrance in beauty products such as nail polish and perfume.” I found the Environmental Working Group site which also tells us that the compounds are found in “shampoo, hair spray, nail polish, deodorant, and lotion.”
Thing is, in the U.S. we can’t find out which plastic and cosmetic products have phthalates since, unlike Europe, there are no restrictions. Phthalates are often not listed on product labels. I also found the corporate-sponsored Phthalate Information Center, which tells us, “Silly! There’s no problem!” More below:
Practically speakng, I think we all should avoid plastic as much as possible. For example, the cat shelter where I volunteer no longer uses plastic bowls for food or water. What else can we do?
[………………..]
Mothers with the highest levels of chemicals in their urine late in their pregnancies had babies with a cluster of effects. The span between anus and penis, called anogenital distance, was comparatively short, and the infants had smaller penises and scrotums and more instances of incomplete descent of testicles.
Medical experts do not know whether babies with those physical characteristics will later develop reproductive problems. But in newborn animals, laboratory studies show that that combination of effects can lead to lower sperm counts, infertility, reduced testosterone and testicular abnormalities when they mature.
“In rats, it’s called the phthalate syndrome. What we found for the first time is evidence for this syndrome in humans,” said Dr. Shanna Swan, the study’s lead researcher and a professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. “Animals [exposed to phthalates] definitely have decreased testosterone, so it is likely that this is happening in humans too.”
The study is the strongest evidence yet that man-made chemicals in the environment can feminize male babies in the womb.
Yet scientists say a larger study of babies should be conducted, and that they should be followed into adulthood to see whether they develop low sperm counts or any other reproductive problems.
“It’s such an important observation, you’d like to see this done again with more children and another population,” said Earl Gray, a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reproductive toxicologist whose research has found that phthalates feminize male rodents.
“And we would like to see what the consequences are when they reach adulthood,” Gray said. “We don’t know the significance of this effect on the children later in life, but we do know the effect on rats.”
[………….]
Reproductive biologists say that a shorter anogenital distance is a female-like effect in animals, a telltale sign of decreased male hormones, and that it is likely that the human effects are similar, because hormones function the same in animals and people.
If a child has a shorter anogenital distance, “you are very likely going to see changes in every other aspect of masculinization as well,” said Frederick vom Saal, a reproductive toxicologist at the University of Missouri at Columbia.
Toxicologists have known since the early 1990s that some pesticides and industrial compounds, including phthalates, can mimic estrogen or block testosterone, the female and male sex hormones that control reproductive development. While they have found effects on the genitalia of laboratory animals and wildlife, they have been uncertain whether exposure to the fake hormones affects humans.
Some medical experts suspect that chemicals are responsible for reduced sperm counts that have been reported in much of the developed world, as well as increases in testicular cancer and cryptorchidism, or undescended testes. Three previous studies of men, two in the Boston area and one in India, linked phthalates to low sperm quality.
As might be expected, FDA says “there is no evidence phthalates are unsafe.”
The California Senate is expected next week to hear a bill that would require cosmetics manufacturers to disclose to state health officials whether their product contained carcinogens or reproductive toxins. Another bill to ban phthalates and another compound called bisphenol A in children’s products is pending in the Assembly’s Appropriations Committee. …
Read more at today’s LAT. And check out the number of environmental groups and news articles warning of the dangers of these compounds.
you can bet your last viagra this will be on a fast, verging on premature track… Anybody know if they’ve seen an increased instance of Steven’s Johnson syndrome… ; )
You’re so funny 🙂
But, if that’s what it takes to get something done in this country, let’s go for it.
Given all the shampoo, hand lotion, deodorant, etc. that I’ve used over a lifetime, I am probably a walking chemical compound.
Remember when Bill Moyers, on NOW, subjected himself to a test of the chemicals present in his body? truly freaky … must find that show archive and link it here.
Breaking News: The FDA is to investigate Viagra and Cialis in regards to possible increased risk for a rare form of blindness!
Man, I would hate to be the person tasked with trying to set up and investigate this one… after all, erections themselves have been associated with many more common forms of blindness…
Once again, peni are involved, and I’m sure this will be fast-tracked as well…
Numbers… too blury… I can’t… OH MY GOD!!! It’s awful… this is a national emergency!
Wait… should we now re-examine that recent policy amendment of denying ED drugs to sex offenders?! Boy, now that would be a real punishment of Old Testament proportions… to have an erection and not be able to see… “If thine penis offends thee, rip out an eye…”
Oh, the humanity…. ; )
Well, bood abides got there first. I was going to say that your research and scholarship are wonderful, Susan, but the headline does offer some serious snark opportunities for the fairer sex.
On shampoos and lotions and so on: It’s not just the bottles, it’s the contents. Read the fine print. All those polysyllabic words that end in things like “-xene” are petroleum derivatives. You are, in essence, washing yourself in extracts of coal tar.
You can make your own lotions quite easily, or check for organic cosmetic companies. That way, you’re supporting local economies, not gigantic multinationals.
One I like is Indian Meadow Herbals. Ingredients in skin cream include, from the label: olive oil, comfrey, aloe, grapeseed oil, rosewater, rosemary, and vitamin E.
Lots of other similar small businesses in other parts of the country.
Was my first thought too.
I was just about to write something like this.
This must be consifered on the same level as NATIONAL DEFENSE…Phthalates are insurgent terrorists that must be stopped at all CO$T$$$$$
This is a COMPELETLY different story than those whining special interest feminazis….
that New Car Smell would turn out to be male birth control?
Sorry to be indifferent, but I’m enjoying the prospect of reproduction being limited to stinky people with bad hair. Ya gets yer justice where ya finds it.
some time, I think.
As I understand it, they are added to plastics to make plastics softer or more flexible.
My partner and I, who had worries about fertility, were aware some years back that it was unwise to expose ourselves to phthalates. Let me suggest to anyone reading that it is unwise to ever heat your food in a microwave oven in a plastic container, as the phthalates are liable to transfer into the food. Here’s some info from an Australian Government site:
Deadly stuff.
That’s why Europe has banned its use in children’s toys.
FYI: Cross-posted at DKos.
And i should add that Soonergrunt posted about his son’s condition which he thinks may be related: hypospadius: “Hypospadius is the name of the condition in which the opening of the penis (the meatus) is located some place other than the tip.” This can cause difficulty with urination and more.
The writer’s first sentence in the article leaves the impression this was a large scientific study. It was not:
= = = = = =
“The main thing is this is a very small group of subjects. It is too early to say whether there are long-term effects, and whether this [anogenital] measure is important or not in humans,” said Dr. Catherine Mao, a co-author and pediatric endocrinologist at the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
There is a huge difference between “erring on the side of caution” and “THIS STUFF TURNS A ROOSTER TO A HEN!!!”. Ongoing research and legislation suggests the former; the article implies the latter, even thought the researchers themselves do not.
The two bills are AB 319 [Children’s Toys]; and AB 908 [Cosmetics].
I think the more stuff we just pump into our systems is going to increase the instances of mutations, disease and so on. We are fragile beings, who’s systems are based on a history of life on this planet. The 20th century has seen an explosion of various things (drugs, pollution etc) that our bodies, and nature in general have had no prior contact with, and therefore it seems logical that we will react negatively to these things.
Insects, which breed really fast, develop immunities to things quite quickly, but not much else does.
No argument. In a class lo’ these many years ago (30) the prof drew a growth map projecting trends of plants, insects, and mammals. Fastest/highest was plants, followed closely by insects, with mammals actually falling over time. Old joke: the only things left on the planet will be cockroaches and Keith Richards.
I would give you a 5 for your critical thinking if I could!
There have been countless studies … the article, in fairness, draws on that one but also mentions many more, as do lots of other sources.
I guess I’m really lucky. I am allergic to most plastics, found out the hard way in the hospital, but ever since then I have limited its use. Same with most soaps – I’ve been reduced to buying expensive, unscented Goats milk substances.
Do you know if the body gets rid of phthalates, or if they just accumulate?
Environmental allergies are growing exponentially it seems. Had a customer that wouldn’t allow me to use any chemicals – including latex paint – because her daughters would react. Those of us in the trades develop weird reactions to different chemicals: I can smell Acetone from anywhere in the house; painter friend can’t be around anything containing laquer.
Want to get rich? Become an environmental toxicologist. 🙂
Allergies are a funny thing – they can happen at birth (which may have something to do with what the mother has consumed during pregnancy, or not), they can be caused by underexposure or overexposure.
I was just recently reading about Polio – I never knew, though it has been around for a long time, that it only hit epidemic proportions in the previous century, primarily NY and Sweden. The researchers claim this had to do with improved hygiene and the lack of babies being gradually exposed. With many allergies they are now saying the same thing (allergies such as hay fever and animal dander, etc..).
Thanks for the article. I’d heard about this — this is a good reminder. I want my two little guys and the one about to arrive to grow up to be what nature intended them to be, and not as they might end up by getting reprogrammed by the plastics industry.
No, no, I think it is ultimately the fault of feminism. </snark>