Growing up in the seventies, I had a distorted view of where core American values lay. Nixon had been disgraced, his shock troops were thrown in jail, our President was a straight talking man, best known for pursuing peace in the Middle East.
The government had been exposed for illegal searches, illegal bugging, assassinations of foreign leaders, using American citizens as guinea pigs, and worse. The country had rejected those actions, and Deep Throat was the man who had made it all possible. Or so it seemed.
But as Jeff Greenfield pointed out in a 2003 Time Magazine article, the mid to late seventies were nothing more than an aberration:
In the long term, however, Watergate proved to be more of a boon for Republicans as it helped convince Americans of a bedrock conservative tenet: government is not to be trusted, the people in power in Washington are up to no good. When President Reagan told us in his 1981 Inaugural Address that “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem,” it was the memory of Watergate that had many in his audience saying “Amen.”
:::flip:::
President Carter came to power at a difficult time for the country. The economy was stagnant, interest rates were extraordinarily high, our military was in shambles, trusted institutions lay in disgrace. Carter was unable to rally the country or to provide the leadership and confidence that the nation craved.
With the election of Reagan an era of progressive government that had lasted nearly fifty years came to an end. The transition was all the more jarring because the country had just lurched to hard to the left in 1974 and 1976.
But the most important change brought on by Reagan’s ascension was the rolling back of clean government bills and sentiment among the American public. Reagan didn’t sing the praises of open and accountable government, he disputed the possibility of clean and accountable government. Government was the problem, not because it was run by crooks, but because it would always be run by crooks. The sheer quantity of Reagan officials that would be indicted, imprisoned, forced to resign, or pardoned, seemed to prove the point.
Yet, it was only in 2000 that the Nixon jackboots made their full recovery. Retreads like Cheney and Rumsfeld (and, of course, the Bush family itself) would set out to systematically roll-back every reform enacted in the post-Watergate era. Black-bag jobs are back, the Freedom of Information Act is being weakened, the executive is less accountable, the intelligence agencies are back to using propaganda. It’s like someone rewound the tape to 1973.
Deep Throat did a service to the nation. But the nation did not learn the lessons of Watergate. We need a new Deep Throat and a new commitment from the electorate for the principles of open government, seperation of powers, and the sanctity of civil rights.
I’ve wondered, as I’ve listened to Pat Buchanan last night and this morning call Deep Throat a traitor, if that’s meant to discourage any would-be new Deep Throat. As if there weren’t already enough discouragements.
I suppose you saw the story of what happened to that general who dared to speak the truth about the # of troops needed in Iraq.
A group of 40 retired military personnel – including many retired generals – are campaigning for the Pentagon to reverse last year’s demotion of General John Riggs. The three-star general was demoted after he warned that the U.S. military was overstretched in Iraq and Afghanistan. In an interview with the Baltimore Sun, he said that the Army would need to be substantially increased in order to meet its global commitments.
This made him the first senior active-duty officer to publicly urge for a larger Army. Within months he was demoted. According to the Pentagon, he was demoted because he allowed outside contractors to perform work they were not supposed to do. But many believe the motivation behind his demotion was politics and the fact that he publicly disagreed with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
The Baltimore Sun points out that a senior officer’s loss of a star is a punishment seldom used, and then usually only for the most serious offenses. In recent years generals and admirals faced with far more serious official findings including the scandals at the Navy’s Tailhook Convention, the Air Force Academy and Abu Ghraib prison have continued in their careers or retired with no loss of rank. Democracy Now!, May 31, 2005
The likes of Berrigan, who was willing to go to prison, aren’t often seen.
Here i go again, talking to myself.
But I just got this in my Inbox, and thought it very relevant:
“We desperately need more Mark Felts right now, and we needed them back in 1964. He played an important part in holding the government accountable, and should receive an honorary Nobel Prize. At the same time, I think he has lots more to tell, and I hope he tells it.”
— Salon
THE PERSON WHO SAID THAT: Daniel Ellsberg. The title of the Salon piece: ”Ellsberg on Deep Throat Revelation”
Buchanan said something last night that made my jaw drop. Paraphrasing:
He said that Deep Throat had caused millions of deaths in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, and that the hippies protestors were far worse people than Nixon.
This explains the attitude toward truth vs. power of the lughead wingnuts.
He’s gone bonkers. ‘course you just know that all the wingnuts sittin’ in their easy chairs are goin’, “YEAH MAN!”
Their theory is that the Vietnam War should have been continued until a win was possible, which is their error of thinking; in my view a win was never possible. That has led to the same type of thinking today regards Iraq, we must stay till we win (whatever it is we are trying to win and regardless of the cost in men or dollars). The falacies of the argument are the same today as then.
The only ray of hope is that we did overcome this type of administration before and will again, I have the greatest hope in that.
Rock a bye baby, the cradle will fall.
Amen!
Carter was the first president I really remember, being born in 1968. I knew Ford because I hail in Michigan, but then I had no sense of Republican or Democrats. I did have a strong sense of Right and Wrong however, and felt a profound sadness when Carter was defeated in 1980. Turns out that even a twelve year old can see what is wrong with the Republicans.
Carter was ahead of his time I think, and wonder if things would have been different except for sand swept helicopters in Iran.
Add in the stagnant economy, fuel crunch, and return of gas guzzlers and it is strangely like 1973.
The nation cycles, and as people begin to see the horrors of our current misguided policies, I will encourage the return of sensibility. It will come back left, and go back again right. I’m not sure if it is more like a teeter totter or merry go round, but we sure are having fun.
The notion that not trusting the federal government is a bedrock conservative principal doesn’t pan out. The conservative Federalist society doesn’t like to remind us of the fact, but the Federalists, who were the conservative party of the early Republic, against the liberal Jeffersonian Democrats, favored a stronger federal government. Only after the Federalist party was dead and buried in the run up to the Civil War, did “states rights” become a conservative battle cry. And then, in the 1930s, during the Lochner Court’s primacy, the federal courts were repeatedly used to strike down liberal state legislation in favor of labor. The civil rights movement saw a return of conservatives to states rights and a return of liberal support for a strong federal government.
Right now, we are seeing an era of ambivalence. States rights advocates on the right saw the Schiavo case as a slap in the face. Liberals are advancing states rights in the medical marijuana case. Conservatives embraces states rights when it comes to permitting states to destroy the environment. Liberals want federal CAFE standards strengthened.
In politics, policy always trumps process.
I think the nation did learn the lesson of Watergate: do whatever you can if you can get away with it. Carried to the extreme by Reagan, et. al., along with a compliant group of democrats in congress. It’s all about the money. Always has been.