This AP story did not appear in the NY Times or the Washington Post, today (that I could find). There was a crackdown in Baghdad which began last Sunday, 29 May. The US named it Operation Lightning. 40,000 Iraqi security forces hit the streets of Baghdad. Riverbend of Baghdad Burning was worried that there would be house raids. She wrote on May 30,
And there were, shown on tv that night. Women and children crouched on the floor, pressed up against walls of their homes, while the men in the family were handcuffed and pushed out the doors. There has not been much news from my usual sources like, Baghdad Burning, Occupation Watch, al Jazeera in the last week. I found this story in the
Jeffersonville Evening News: The Tribune. More below the fold.
By SAMEER N. YACOUB
BAGHDAD, Iraq – The Shiite-led Iraqi government acknowledged Sunday that its forces may have targeted innocent Sunni Muslims in a drive to crush the insurgency in southwestern Baghdad and its suburbs.
[…]
“There is an improvement in security and in the performance of the security forces, but members of the army and police do cause mistakes, which do happen,” said Laith Kuba, a spokesman for Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari.
There were also some claims that “soldiers took advantage and helped themselves to cash and other items. One doesn’t rule it out. I think the army needs more disciplinary measures in these cases,” Kuba said.
In recent days, Sunni Muslim organizations charged that many innocent Iraqis were arrested and most were Sunni’s, the minority that dominated the country during Saddam’s rule and are believed to form the backbone of the viiolent insurgency.
The biggest mistake was arresting and temporarily detaining “the leader of Iraq’s largest Sunni Arab political party.” Let’s give the person a name, and a face.

From the London Telegraph
Firing stun grenades, American soldiers burst into the home of Mohsen Abdul-Hamid, head of the largest Sunni Arab political party, shortly after dawn. They forced a hood over his head and dragged him away along with his three sons.[…]
It appeared that the Americans had not sought permission for the raid from the Iraqi government, again raising questions about its supposed sovereignty. It also threatened the most serious rift between Washington and Baghdad since the administration was sworn in a month ago.
Abdul-Hamid is a moderate Sunni. He is a man the Occupation should want on their side in order to secure the participation of Sunnis in the new government. He refused the US apology and said that he had to lie on the ground with a soldier’s boot on his head for twenty minutes. Since this leader was well known to the US Occupation, there is some doubt that this arrest was really a ‘mistake.’
These raids are meant to secure Baghdad for the trial of Saddam Hussein. This trial is supposed to quell the violence but many think it will be divisive. Time will tell as residents of Baghdad, especially Sunnis, live in fear of more house raids, looting, and unjust arrests in addition to the drive-by shootings and bombings from the insurgents. Operation Lightning has cut down on the bombings within Baghdad so far. Unfortunately the violence from Iraqi insurgents continues all through other sections of Iraq with a grevious death toll.
Well at least their gov’t can admit when they do an injustice, huh?
They especially admit the mistake of the US targeting
a moderate Sunni leader. A translator in the group
that arrested him was heard to yell out to his wife,
“This is what happens to people who boycott the election.”
There is so much bad news today…<sigh!>
Even CNN is having a hard time faking it
with their cheery smiles and quips.
So, now it’s almost official. By removing Saddam Hussein, the US has managed to destabilize the region (Saddam did serve a purpose to some extent), setting the stage for civil war, that will only lead to the eventual victory of an Islamist regime. And, that Islamist regime will be sitting on top of a large supply of oil. Way to go, Dick and George!
Let’s hear it for regime change…
Thx for this important diary sybil, I’ve been trying to play catch-up on my reading around here. The pace quickened while I was away for the weekend.
The Yahoo frontpage mentions that 900 Suspected Militants were rounded up. This is very agravating to me considering the amount of innocents we have already rounded up and thrown in the torture-laden prisons. If they are trying to send a signal for the Saddam trial, they certainly didn’t send a positive one. Then again, it’s consistent with all the other eff-ups during the post-war “planning”.
In January, Newsweek reported that the El Salvador Death Squad Option was on the table.
Innocent Sunni civilians were specifically mentioned as targets to instill terror among the populace.
Hal C.
Any Sunni male is a suspect. Above age 12, let’s say.
What a disgusting and counterproductive comment by al-Shahwani.
And hey, what a coincidence, Bush just went down to the Organization of American States (OAS) meeting and lectured them on why they should grant the OAS the right to intervene in any country if there’s an abrogation of “freedom”! History may be bunk, but that bunk sure repeats itself…
Now, granted, Bush said that to pressure Venezuela and to pressure OAS countries into accepting the CAFTA trade agreement. But the sordid connections between El Salvadoran death squads, recent Iraqi gov’t “drain the swamp” tactics, and United States intervention in both Latin America and the Middle East is quite something.
I don’t want any Iraqi-based Massacre at El Mozote clones on the bookshelves in a few years. But when will we stop supporting terror to fight terror? When will we see that’s never worked out well for us or anyone else?
It isn’t even just that the Shiite-led government was targeting Sunnis. That would actually not be such a bad idea — in terms of stopping the anti-government portion of the insurgency — though it would of course bode ill for averting a civil war. They weren’t just admitting to some potentially dangerous, if effective, racial profiling.
“Targeted innocent Sunni Muslims.” So the worst part isn’t that the Iraqi gov’t went after the main insurgent sect instead of the whole insurgency rainbow — though that’s important too considering past conflicts and the Shiite’s leadership position — it’s that the gov’t is now engaging in the harassment and oppression of the very civilians who are most crucial in the fight to stop popular support for the insurgents. Dumb.