I knew it. People kept saying it was going to be Renquist. Actually I will bet that Renquist goes soon too. Now we have to fight two nut case appointments from Bush.
Go to PFAW and sign up for their action network. They have a BIG push planned to protect the court.
www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/
June 16, 2005
To: Journalists
Fr: Ralph G. Neas
Re: Supreme Court Vacancies: Bush Should Choose Consensus Not ConfrontationWithin the next few weeks, President George W. Bush may have the opportunity to make his first nomination or nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court, an opportunity that will be a defining moment of his presidency.
President Bush will face the choice of whether to honor the spirit of bipartisan cooperation that emerged in the Senate to avert the nuclear option – and follow the precedent set when each of his three most recent predecessors made their first Supreme Court selection – and nominate someone who will be supported by most senators in both political parties, or to heed the demands of his party’s ideologues and embroil the nation in further partisanship, controversy and division, distracting the country from other pressing issues. For the good of the country and the Supreme Court, President Bush should choose bipartisan consensus over confrontation.
www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=18941
And join in the meetings with your representatives:
onstituent Meetings with U.S. Senators:
The Future of the Supreme Court and Our Rights
Your senator needs to hear from YOU, and the July 4th recess is the perfect opportunity for you to speak up in person. PFAW is organizing meetings at the state offices of your senator(s) so you can meet with them or their staff to let them know you would like them to:* Preserve Checks and Balances – Protect the minority right to filibuster
* Reject extremist judicial nominations, and insist the president consult with both parties and choose consensus Supreme Court justices who have broad bipartisan support
* Hold the president to his constitutional obligation to seek “advice and consent” on ALL judicial nominationsRegister to join a meeting delegation in your state and urge senators to vote against an extreme right-wing Supreme Court nominee, to demand consultation and consensus in the judicial nominations process, and to continue to protect the filibuster from the Radical Right’s attacks. Start by filling out this form. Please remember to sign up individually, even if you are participating with someone else.
Click here: savethecort.org
Everything feels so overwhelming, I mean I knew it was coming but GOD!! Iraq is such an important issue for me but so is this! I feel like I’m going to take to the streets any minute now. I just hope I’m not alone. If lots of people are with me then it is a protest. If it’s just me alone with as pissed as I am then I am that sane person in an insane world and they will have a special jacket for me.
Tracy, go to http://www.savethecourt.org
This is the PFAW site to become an activist to fight for reasonable judges. You can be an online activist and you can also get mroe involved.
They just sent me a cell phone text message to let me know about the web site.
What they are doing is text messaging you when something happens and giving everyone an assignment. It might be flooding the White house or the senate with calls or emails. It may be some other action.
http://www.savethecourt.org
I am just sick over this. It seems like one step forward (ie, more people know Bush is a liar now), two steps back (Dobson must be filled woth glee over this)…
It is scary, but we can do something. If enough people will join in we can force bush to nominate a moderate.
I’ll be doing my part! Thanks for the link!
oh wait… you’re not talking about maryscott o’connor? whew. had me scared.
I like it over here-there’s only a few diaries on this topic. It’s wall-to-wall over on dkos.
I wish she had waited. But we’ll see what happens.
Yes there are a hundred diaries all with no replies. Sometimes I think they should just chance to a message board format.
I guess we have to be grateful she waited this long.
She told us so years ago — five years ago, as I recall, but decided to wait after the Election 2000 decision to help calm the attacks at that time. So we’ve gained five more years of having Roe v. Wade, such as it is with all the destruction of it at the state level.
I found my copy of Jane to reread, as we have to get ready to go underground again within the next five years, I fear. I really do.