The lack of blog news has had no apparent effect, yet. But, I suppose the blissfully ignorant don’t really have much of a suspicion on what they are missing. Finished the NYTs (or at least those parts I felt like reading) by 8:30 a.m. It is going to be a long, newsless day.
What does one do in the absence of current, real news, you might ask? Well, I have already had my morning toast, so I have the bread part out of the way. And there is a minor league day game with the family and a visiting mascot that reminds me of the San Diego chicken. So that probably suffices for the circuses part of the equation.
But really, having all the non-Internet time is not all bad. Had time for a very productive work day yesterday, and still was able to read a good bit of Naomi Klein’s “No Logo.” More on that and how it relates to the NYTs at the end.
The Times. My old friend. Page one for two days running is that old familiar story – Boy meets Classified Information, Boy loves idea of using Classified Information against political enemies, Boy leaks Classified Information. Today’s installment – The President Backtracks. I am sure you all blogged the hell out of this yesterday. Bush modifies stance so that he will only fire Rove is Rove “committed a crime.” Okay chimpy.
Page five. Scorching Heat in Europe. Temperatures have soared to unusual levels. “Furnace-like weather” is the worst since the ’40s. No mention of global warming or climate change though. Huh? Bet someone writing on dKos or BMT would have drawn the connection. But, the Times – they like to make you work for your own connections.
The War in Iraq was moved to page 11, and 16 respectively, and only mentioned tangentially. Silly little war. Page 11 – From Britain – Events in Iraq act as motivation for terror against the UK. Government dismisses the report. And page 16 – the feel good story of the war – Iraqi boy has flown to US in attempt to have his blinded eye repaired by our wonderful health care system. Bad news though. His eye is beyond repair, and his good eye has damage that may lead to blindness without medical attention. And his eye – got they way because of an American cluster bomb. The little terrorist in training. Any red-blooded American would be glad he is blinded (for those of you who don’t know me, this said with dark sarcasm – I don’t hate Iraqis – I think we should stop bombing them altogether).
What bumped Iraq off the front page. Page one – Are You Tired of Prying Stickers Off Your Fruit. If this wasn’t so gawd-awful, I would laugh. Page one of the NYTs. The horror of having sticky tags on your fruit, and the industry cure you have been waiting for. The story just stinks. Includes the heart-wrenching tale of an old woman from Texas who had to spend a half-hour (that’s right – a whole half-hour) taking sticky labels off her fruit. And then, some of the fruit was injured, so she had to use that fruit for fruit salad. Gasp. And worse, one morning she got up and actually had sticky tags in her hair. The menace. The industry has responded to this mammoth inconvenience. They have invented laser and dye labeling for our fruit and vegetables. Your fruit will be tattooed in the near future, and the little-old ladies of the world will be safer. And get this, the process has been “government approved and called safe by the industry.” Phew. I feel better already. No problems with this scheme. Laser label all my food. Hell, while you are at it, laser label me. Laser labeling will help track the food from its cradle in the field to its grave in your stomach. And they might even be able to sell advertising space on the non-labeled portion of the fruit and vegetables. Yee-haw.
Bringing me at long last to Naomi Klein and “No Logo.” I was reading last night about the ascendency of branding by corporations. And the extremes it is being taken to. Brand products are just a start. Branded stores. Branded vacations. Branded take-overs and synergy (f.k.a. anti-trust violations). And its ultimate extreme. Branded lives. Living in Disney-town USA – Celebration, Florida. Klein made the most excellent point that had never quite dawned on me. The thing Disney is capturing in Celebration, Florida is the very thing that Branding and Disney have worked to destroy throughout America. That simple ’50-esque village, with much (pseudo) public space and very little exposure to billboards, big-box stores and brand marketing. Good read if you are interested. I can’t wait to get to the chapters on how to fight back – because I am blown away by the power of these corporations.
Anyway, the NYTs article on branding our fruit and vegetables makes only scant mention to what I perceive to be the real reason for the movement to laser-label our food. I would bet you dollars to doughnuts that it is either cheaper for the producers to label in this way, or it provides them sufficient branding value to more than offset any price difference. Or, have I just grown paranoid? I don’t know. But, riddle me this? How does this story rise to page one of the NYTs, if it is not part of some industry pushed design to stuff this down our throats. Seriously, was someone at the editorial board sitting around weighing this story against say other stories on War or High Crimes and Misdemeanors. What a fucking joke. All right. That said. I have another slice of toast, and a minor league game complete with a comic chicken, to attend to.
After you finish Klein’s book, you might want to read Advertising at the Edge of the Apocalypse by Sut Jhally. He’s a communications prof at UMass. Here’s the first paragraph:
Over the top? Some would say so, I’m sure. But I think he makes a good case. It’s certainly changed the way I see advertising.
And hats off to you for this experiment – I think we can learn a lot from it. I’ll be following it and look forward to your insights when it’s over.
It’s disheartening that the war has been pushed to the daily papers’ back pages, unless more than 30 people blow up at one time. Last week on the PBS News Hour — my main source of TV news — there was a video essay in which the commentator claimed that America has forgotten the war in Iraq, moved on. I was so upset to hear that, didn’t want to believe it. But I guess it’s true. Many of my anti-war friends do not want to read about the war. It’s too “depressing.”
That’s depressing in itself…no one wants to hear about war huh, well who does? I’m picturing those 3 monkey’s…see no evil-hear no evil-speak no evil..maybe it’s just me but since we are at war I think it’s the duty of every dam American to see and hear every day what our troops are going through and what is happening to all the Iraqi civilians and so many other civilians also over there getting killed. And we should have daily reports on returning vets who are crippled up or can’t get help…well I guess you get the drift here of my little rant…
while looking for something completely different:
Hence page 16, out of sight-out of mind. Were it not so…
Peace
I’d hate to think even bush was ‘delighted’ about war however I will venture to say I believe he thoroughly delights in calling himself a ‘War President’ and Commander-in-Chief. No matter how he tries to gussie it up by saying it’s hard work. Then again he may well be delighted considering the kind of news briefs he is getting as to what is supposedly happening in Iraq..all the new building, medicines, education going on there and all because of him.
My reading of “delightful” is this context is that it is “agreeable”, i.e. sanitized and unthreatening…esp. to those who have no “personal” experiences of it. Certainly no one in a position of power in this administration, from Chimpy on down, has any concept of the horror of combat and its consequences.
Peace
I wonder just how many Iraqi’s have to be blown up in one day to make front page news? I suspect this misbegotten criminal war is only going to get any sustained front page news only if more than several of our troops get blown to bits in one fell swoop. Maybe not even then. It’s like how to fight a war yet heaven forbid the public sees to much bad news cause it might offend our delicate sensibilities…since this country is so grounded in anti-violence and our peaceful ways.
Speaking of cluster bombs, I thought at first we denied we were using them? Yeah, that’s really a ‘feel good’ story alright. I’m sure that young kid is feeling real good about now.
Ok I’m working my way to the ‘sticky tags on fruit’ exclusive..jesus joe are you sure you’re not pulling our leg just to see if we’re paying attention? Are you sure you didn’t pick up ‘The Onion’ by mistake? The only thing left out of the story was how this probably is going to help fight the war on terror, right?
Big corporations are sucking the life out of this country with their greed/outsourcing/low wages and paying exec’s monstrous salaries, not paying taxes on top of getting all their corporate welfare from the taxpayers and all the while trying to brainwash us with their advertising about what great companies they are.
Gee can’t wait for tomorrow’s big front pager. Maybe it will be false advertising for pound cake that only weighs 6 oz or some equally hard hitting news story.
Random thought here — I’m a lactivist; promoting/supporting breastfeeding is an issue very dear to my heart. And I’ve been thinking for years about how/why the formula companies have been so successful in all but eradicating the practice of breastfeeding.
It seems to me, upon reading your diary, that the issue of branding must play a role here too. It isn’t only that nobody major spends money promoting breastfeeding. It’s that all the formula companies are competing for consumers to buy THEIR brand. And formula is one product with incredibly intense brand loyalty, so you have to hook ’em right off the bat.
I wonder (shifting into pie-in-the-sky visionary mode now) what would happen to breastfeeding rates if we outlawed brand-specific formula adverts? Require the corporations to advertise together, as an industry, the way the beef and cheese industries do, for example. I wonder, IOW, if the branding element was removed, how many families would still be suckered into formula-feeding.
The crime against (non-white) humanity perpetrated by formula makers takes the form of product “dumping” in third-world countries.
Women who, for cultural and/or financial reasons, would never even consider formula are “given” supplies of baby formula and told that it can provide their babies with nutrients unavailable in the mother’s milk (I’ll say!). It’s alleged to be for the purpose of giving the babies a healthy start, but – oops! – nobody tells the mothers their milk will dry up if they’re only feeding formula for those first critical weeks. By the time they discover it – oops again – it’s too late.
Since the vast majority of these babies are born into households without the means to pay for formula, they end up drinking goat milk or extremely diluted formula, watered-down with contaminated water. Then they get diarrhea, then they die.
Yes, we’re talking murder. At least that’s what you and I would call it. Nestle (remember the boycott?) and other formula makers call it market expansion.
Here is the diary where BostonJoe explains his summer experiment. He’s a brave guy, I would probably shrivel up and die without internet access. Addicted much?
Isn’t this a cool idea…I’m really looking forward to every day to see what makes the front page each day and how different it may be from what we read here on the net. But I’m glad I’m not doing it..think I’m addicted much..as you say.
Hey Joe,
The fact that you bought Bronson Arroyo’s CD great erodes your credibility. LOL
All kidding aside: Brilliant Diary!!!
Thank you. Recommended.
The laser branding of fruit reminded me of that James Bond movie where he’s tied to the table and the industrial laser is slowly inching upwards to cut him in half, starting with the parts Moneypenny never got any of… Which movie was that?
Seriously, though, if a laser can burn a brand into a piece of fruit, it may not be too safe for farmworkers to be around. Remember OSHA? Those were the days…
That is the big question any newspaper must ask themselves. The following topics could all be worthy of page 1:
Judge Roberts
Guantanamo Bay
Plamegate
Nuclear option
Corprate laser-labeling
Genetically modified foods
The Israel-Palestine conflict
The Media Shield Bill
Conflict in Chechnya
Suicide bombings
The San Diego City Council scandal
Anybody who has an active interest in one of these topics could justifiably rant at their issue not making page 1.