You thought the Republicans scored a coup when then managed to turn the Estate Tax into the “Death Tax?” Think they pulled the wool over America’s eyes with tax cuts for the super wealthy? Think again. That was just the warm up.
Having delivered on the Estate Tax, having easily picked off insane tax cuts for the billionaire boy’s club, having tossed mega-bucks to oil companies currently raking in record profits, the Republican hyper-privileged are not going to stop. They’re swinging for the fences.
With 2006 elections practically on us, and every justification of the Neocon revolution in tatters, they’re going to be looking for a new causus belli – another sharp stick to poke in the eye of Democrats everywhere. Like the Grinch, they’re going to “think up a lie, and think it up quick.” And buddy, this one is going to be a whooper.
The Republicans are going to run on eliminating the Income Tax. And stopping them is not going to be easy.
A decade ago, no one would have thought the Estate Tax would fall like rotten fruit. After all, it had been in place for most of a century, worked well, and affected only a tiny percentage of the nation. Why should ordinary citizens take a hit so silver-spoon babies could keep more of daddykins billions? Even most Republicans didn’t think this tax was vulnerable. But never underestimate the effect of a good PR campaign. By re-labeling this as the “Death Tax,” and through careful phrasing, the wealthy elite managed to convince even average citizens that the tax was unfair.
True, the public is awake enough now that making the cuts permanent is going to be a little harder than passing the original hornswoggle, but they’ll wait for the right moment of distraction, or tack it onto the next “you have to support the troops” bill to fund the Iraqi fiasco. Then they’ll get serious.
What’s next? Tax cuts are so passé. A Flat Tax is so Steve Forbes. No, they’re going to push for a complete and total scrapping of the tax system.
Frankly, the Republicans were going to take this step anyway. If Iraq had worked out according to their rosy predictions, they would have ridden the coattails of that victory straight to the steam rollers smashing the IRS. But just because they’ve been wrong on every important issue of the last decade, don’t expect them to even stop for breath. After all, look at the Bush approach. Tax surplus? Why cuts are the answer. Tax deficit? Even more cuts!
Besides, the party of Halliburton is in need of a major-league distraction. And what better distraction than promising the most massive “something for nothing” deal in all of history?
If you want a preview of the 2006 Republican platform, you need look no further than the bestsellers at Amazon.com. Specifically, look at The Fair Tax Book by Neal Boortz and John Linder. John Linder would be Congressman John Linder, R-GA. Neal Boortz is a syndicated radio host on the Cox Network with a pitch that’s a good-ole-boy mish-mash of radical libertarian and terminal stage rabies. What do these two intellectual giants promise in their book? Everything. At a discount.
Keep all the money in your paycheck …
Pay taxes on what you spend, not what you earn …
And eliminate all the fraud, hassle, and waste of our current system?
In other words, in the 2006 elections, the Right is going to offer Free Money. They’re going to tell the average middle-class American that they can get a 20% raise, and all they have to do is vote Republican. It’s going to be the biggest bribe ever offered to the American public.
And explaining why this is nonsense, is going to be hard.
In a nutshell, here’s the Boortz-Linder thesis:
- We eliminate the IRS – including not only personal taxes, but all corporate and business taxes as well.
- We replace the income tax with a 23% sales tax.
Wait a minute, now. If we replace the income tax with a sales tax, doesn’t that just shift the tax burden from one transaction to another? No, say Monsieurs Boortz and Linder, because by freeing the corporations of their tax burden, they will immediately pass on the savings to their customers. They promise that companies will be able to cut the prices of goods enough to eat all the increase in sales tax. In other words, if you’re paying $40 for a toaster today, you’ll be paying $40 for a toaster tomorrow. Only you’ll have more money to buy toasters.
With this miracle achieved, the economy will grow like never before. Citizens will find themselves stuffed with tax savings, more confident, and ready to buy more goods of all sorts. At the same time, American companies, freed of taxes, will be able to make goods so cheaply that they’ll be able to out compete factories overseas. Manufacturing jobs will return even faster than they left. In fact, as the world’s new tax haven, corporations will flock to America. With all the new jobs brought in by this influx, Americans will have their choice of plum jobs at hefty salaries. There will also be a huge increase in revenue as many of the industries now forced underground by “crushing tax burdens” pop up to play (vote Republican and make those prostitutes and drug deals pay their fair share!)
All this, and they promise that for the government the tax will initially be revenue neutral, matching the current income tax. Long term, what with that expanding economy buoyed by new jobs and fat wallets, the tax base will actually grow.
They don’t exactly promise that their proposal will turn water into wine and make every woman look like Diane Lane, but then, I didn’t get through the last couple of chapters. Oh, I forgot to mention that the plan includes an amendment to the Constitution, outlawing any future income tax. Nice, huh?
Of course, there are major problems with this fairy tale. To shine a spotlight on the more obvious points:
- Most goods sold in the United States are not made here (remember that goofy Perot guy and his “giant sucking sound? Score one for the man with the ears). So cutting the taxes that corporations pay will have next to no effect on what you load in the shopping cart. Put on a 30% sales tax, things are going to cost 30% more. Period. (The book says 23%, but Mr. Boortz and Congressman Linder seem to have missed the 6th grade class on calculating percentages – they did it backwards.)
- Taxes are a tiny fraction of the cost of goods. The major costs are materials, energy, and labor. Having no taxes will not bring corporations back to America so long as they can find the mix of those three components at lower prices outside our borders.
- The book does not appear to address state taxes at all. If the same tactic were applied there, expect the sales tax (the “it’s not a VAT!” VAT) to rise north of 40%.
- Instead of “drawing money into the light,” this system would be much easier to avoid than the IRS. Many transaction would be moved off the books, or converted into barter transactions to avoid paying this huge sales tax.
- There would be a huge sales tax on homes, cars, and other large goods. It might be nice to pretend that the cost of a toaster is going to magically decline, but does anyone really believe home prices will sink 30% and then some to make up the difference? This plan promises to directly attack the one industry that’s been driving the economy for the last five years.
- Say bye-bye to charities, as there’s no way to handle deductions under this plan.
- While getting rid of the IRS might free up some D.C. office space, Boortz and Linder actually just replace the IRS with a new bureaucracy to handle the sales tax.
- The plan would indeed make the US a tax refuge – and a spending wasteland. Every incentive would be for companies and individuals who can afford it to make money here, and spend it elsewhere.
What the whole thing amounts to is nothing less than removing the tax burden completely from corporations, and almost as completely from the rich. CEOs can make your money on the backs of US labor that pays 30% on every loaf of bread, then spend the dough in Monaco and laugh all the way to the bank.
For all that, this is going to be a hard fight. A much harder fight than you might realize. Boortz and Linder’s book is only the latest of several shots meant to soften up the public to this idea.
While this might not end up as a major part of the 2006 campaign, it shows every sign of being this year’s model from the people who brought you such fine products as Iraq 2002 and Supply Side Economics 1980. Right now, these ideas are all over right wing radio. Right now, Republican pollsters are working “Fair Tax” questions into the spin they’re cooking for next season. If they get any sign of traction, expect them to step on the gas.
The idea of killing the IRS and seeing your paycheck balloon will make fine 30 second sound bites. As always, explaining why this is an absolute lie will be harder.
Praise Dean and pass the ammunition, because this fight is coming.
Even though I’ve stopped posting at kos until I get my book finished. Really. I…
Well, I’ve stopped posted every day. That’s something.
While you’re right in calling Boortz a rabid libertarian, his show is on the radio here (and in a lot of other markets) just before Rush Limbaugh, so he gets that red-meat audience too.
I’ve been wondering if “our side” was ever going to notice this. He claims his book is #2 on the amazon.com bestseller list behind Harry Potter, so apparently someone is reading him.
“Abolishing the IRS” will be hard to run against in 2006 if the mainstream GOP gets on board with the idea.
Does anyone know what people like Greenspan – i.e. folks who are listened to by the “corporate masters” – think of this idea? Might be a good indication as to whether the corporate wing of the GOP will buy in, or whether this will be something like abortion that the GOP dangles before the radical fringe for a generation to get out the vote without intending to do anything (and thus lose the turnout-promoting machine)…
Thanks for being Paul Revere for us.
Uh, DITTO. heh. couldn’t resist.
I can’t believe this is real.
I have a very bad feeling about this. This idea came up in conversation with a friend who isn’t normally a lunatic but on this one, she slid right off into the abyss. It was impossible to get through to her on any common sense level. I wish I could scrape up enough money to emigrate but I fear I’m doomed.
I’ve had Democrats who, when talking about this, immediately jumped to the Boortz talking points. And when you try to explain why he’s wrong, they get that glazed-over, mental fingers in the ears expression that I normally see on Repubicans explaining why Reagan hung the stars.
The idea of eliminating taxes — of getting something for nothing — is so appealing that people really, really want to believe it’s possible.
I’ve had Democrats who, when talking about this, immediately jumped to the Boortz talking points. And when you try to explain why he’s wrong, they get that glazed-over, mental fingers in the ears expression that I normally see on Repubicans explaining why Reagan hung the stars.
The idea of eliminating taxes — of getting something for nothing — is so appealing that people really, really want to believe it’s possible.
of course, it’s a French invention…
As a sole proprietor of a small business, my first reaction to this is “What the he–? There go my business expense deductions, plus I’ll have to pay more tax on them!” A definite loss of income!
If they do run on this premise and succeed in abolishing the current tax system completely, everyone but the corporations will be living in the streets, wishing they could afford healthcare, and begging for food in pretty short order.
Why are the Repblicans so determined to return to a feudal economy?
To those who consider it possible that they themselves might wind up among the serfs.
To those who are convinced beyond the CONCEPT of doubt that God ™ is on their side and that they will wind up the Barons and Knights and Princes of the new nobility, a modern technological feudalism would be the best of all possible worlds…
Well, I’ve always believed them when they talk about an “Ownership Society”, ’cause I know they’re talking about owning all of us…
I said exactly the same thing to my husband the other night. It’s one thing Bush can sound completely sincere about, because he’s always thought he owned us poor serfs.
Who knows. Maybe this is what it will take to wake people up. Maybe when red state Americans go to pick up a pack of cigs and bag of chips, they need to choke on their bill. I can’t imagine a more graphic way to encounter a tax hike, than everytime you go to the store. But, then again, if there is enough reality TV on when they go home, perhaps they’ll just suck it up and forget about it. The punchline here, is so obvious. It’s the poor and lower middle class who spend everything they earn. It’s a massive tax increase on the people who can least afford it. I’m a total math dummy, and I can see that.
Regressive Taxes and most people are clueless. I buy a loaf of bread for $2.50 and a rich person buys a loaf of bread for $2.50 and we both pay a sales tax of 95 cents most people don’t seem to get that as a percentage of my income the loaf of bread is a much bigger cost to me than to the rich guy.
So, the question is how do you explain regressive taxes in such a way that you don’t sound like John Kerry running at the mouth and have people get it? This is essentially a basic marketing question. So, what’s the answer?
Great diary!
In practice it would no doubt be even worse than we imagine.
One of the tricks of tax policy is defining “income” for purposes of taxation. As an obvious case, though a dollar of capital gains may be tax-free, the same dollar subsequently tipped to a waitperson is subject to taxation. This invariably works to the advantage of the moneyed class, from whose ranks the tax-policy writers come.
This phenomenon will surely affect the dirty details of any VAT system. We’ll see exemptions for luxury items before we’ll see it for bare necessities. Remember how we were implored not to let the poor yacht-makers go out of business? Did Boortz and Linder discuss any exemptions that would benefit the least-well-off, such as food, pharmaceuticals, school supplies?
The VAT push is indeed inevitable. I mean, they have to do something! They’ve pretty much wrung all the advantage they can out of the current system, and having already pocketed the Clinton surplus they’ve reached into the future to transfer even more money to themselves. Halliburton and big Pharma have to eat, after all.
We already have a system whereby, magically, the less you earn, the more you tend to pay for the same stuff – restricted options, lack of information, or (the biggie) being saddled with interest due to the inability to pay cash. VAT will be a regressive nightmare.
Is to continously define those at the top of the income ladder as the “producers of jobs” and those at the bottom as mere consumers. Once you believe you owe everything to those at the top…