This is the letter I sent to my local weekly paper. I’ll have to wait till tomorrow to see if they decided to print it. I was trying to encourage more people to think about the events of the past week in a global rather than simply a national context.
I’ve never posted anything here before even though I’ve been lurking for months; I just posted this on DKos (where I’m not exactly a regular either) and thought that people here might conceivably be interested too. I love this site, so thank you to anyone who has the time to have a look.
The Third World Comes Home
In _The Origins of Totalitarianism_, Hannah Arendt persuasively argued that mid-twentieth century European fascism was essentially an importation of the brutal and dehumanizing population control techniques that European governments had long used in their colonies back into their home countries. For over fifty years, successive U.S. governments have employed similar techniques in the so-called third world, usually by proxy, without ever formally proclaiming our own nation to be an empire. During the administration of George W. Bush, however, we have witnessed the direct application of imperial violence on a scale unprecedented since the Vietnam War, specifically in the unprovoked invasion and occupation of Iraq. While no reasonable person has suggested that the administration has deliberately intended to kill Iraqi civilians, its criminally misguided, negligent and incompetent policies have nevertheless led to tens of thousands of Iraqi civilian deaths. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the primary reason for these needless deaths is that the lives of ordinary Iraqis are simply not a priority for the men and women currently running our government, relative to their various geopolitical and economic objectives. The massive death and destruction have simply been collateral damage.
While these words may sound harsh to some, what the events of the past week have shown us is that these same men and women appear to care as little about the lives of ordinary United States citizens as they do about the lives of ordinary Iraqi citizens, at least if they are poor and black. From its unconscionable budget cuts to levee reinforcement projects, to its crippling of FEMA, to its criminally negligent and incompetent failure to rescue drowning and dehydrating human beings in a timely manner, the policies of this administration have caused massive but still uncounted numbers of needless deaths, especially in the city of New Orleans. I have been shocked and sick to my stomach since the day after Hurricane Katrina struck, knowing that more human beings were dying every minute that passed while our government failed to do everything in its power to save them. One of my best friend’s uncle remains missing. Every boat, bus and helicopter in the United States could and should have been deployed to a massive rescue operation from the moment the flooding began if not sooner. The President of the United States had the power to do this. Instead, the American Red Cross was prevented from delivering food, water and medical supplies to those trapped inside the city. The only conclusion I can draw from this is that to George W. Bush and his associates, the lives of poor black people in the United States are as expendable as the lives of poor black people in Haiti, or poor brown people in Iraq, or poor white people in Bosnia and Kosovo. Like the people of Fallujah, the people of New Orleans were not a priority.
And sadly, this has been the underlying logic of the disastrous trickle-down economic policies that have been pursued in this country for the past twenty-five years, which have hollowed out our republic from within and increasingly replaced it with something resembling a neo-feudal country club for the rich. While bodies remain unrecovered and survivors may yet be found, the legislative priority of the Republican Party this week is the permanent abolition of the estate tax for multimillionaires. In this emerging new society, the value of human life is determined by net worth, and beneath the rhetoric, those who lack net worth lack value. The third world has come home. Like the people of New Orleans, almost all of us in this country and elsewhere could ultimately become collateral damage, beginning but not ending with the most marginalized and vulnerable. For the sake of humanity, I pray that we are able to turn back this tide before it is too late.
And despite this, as long as the new lords grant favors of money and protection and speak platitudes that endorse certain “morals”, they’ll be able to buy 1/2 of the country off with the taxes taken from the other half.
I hope it gets published in some form.
I think it can probably still be stopped, but first more people have to see it for what it is. I don’t think that most people really want an authoritarian government or society, but I doubt that this is what most people outside "the movement" think they’re getting.
I certainly hope your local paper is searching for filler. I can’t possibly read that block of text until it’s broken out into paragraphs. But, on a more serious note, my experience writing letters to papers has been this: if you can’t make a succinct point in under 250 words, your letter will be ignored, or, possibly worse, edited to fit.
Sorry to be so harsh. I’m not trying to troll. I probably agree with you anyway.
There are supposed to be paragraph breaks in there, but I can’t get them to show up, even on preview. They initially did. What am I doing wrong?
(The letter to the paper DID have paragraph breaks. And since it’s a local weekly, it often runs letters longer than 250-words.)
OK, I think I fixed it. Thanks for the heads up.
Awesome, and awesome. I hope this gets wide circulation. I try to keep my criticism constructive, but it’s not always seen that way!
Nice diary human. It’s been really wonderful to read people’s LTEs and paraphrases of phone calls to representatives.
Interesting perspective, with the global focus. We don’t live in a vacuum … even though at times it may appear that way. I’ve heard a number of people outside the internet community, comment on the abismal treatment by Bush of American citizens. That is a big shock to some I think.
Let us know if your piece gets printed.
And btw, welcome to BooTrib. Now that you’ve posted your first diary, hope you’ll come out from lurker mode. And if you get a chance, stop into the Cafe tomorrow and introduce yourself.
Well done. Keep talking.
great diary Human! Welcome to Booman and hope to see more diaries and comments from you.
I would like permission form you to copy this and send to all my papers in the greater San Diego area. How would you feel about that?
Sure. I’m honored. I was a little wary about revealing too much personal info on a public site, but you can use the name Pat Sand if they want attribution.
Great letter, but I can tell you, we have been discussing, for years now, this country’s move towards totalitarianism.
I refer everone to the diary entitled “What in the hell else can we do now” by North Dakota Dem. Please recommend it. We need this discussion.
We need a movement to unseat this corrupt, murderous regime. What do we do now?
Great letter!
We haven’t been living in a functioning Democracy in this country since the advent of the electronic voting machines and the rise of the Bush regime’s anti-democracy violations of due process and transparency in government.
Hannah Arendt’s attribution of the origins of totalitarianism to European colonizers is off by many thousands of years. The fear induced urge to dominate and exert control over others is almost as old as mankind itself. The desire to dominate, to “lord over” others is a mutation of whatever we might have posessed as a species as a survival instinct. Somewhere along the way some distant ancestor of ours became afraid in advance that he/she was not going to have enough to sustain his life, so he decided it was justifiable to take sustenance from others by force if necessary.
Modern man has merely institutionalized this ancient transgressional idea.
On a letter writing note, I’ve been fortunate to have many many LTE’s published over the last 3-4 years. As another commenter here remarked, brevity, (250 words or less, [NYT requests 150 word maximum]), is essential for publication. (One editor reminded me that Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address was less that 250 words. She was wrong,[it’s actually 267 words], but I took her point well anyway.) Out of 60 or so printed letters of mine in the last couple of years, only 4 or 5 of them were over the 250 limit.
Also, because of the homogenized nature of the mainstream press in general, one is often dismayed that your absolute best letters, your strongest arguments, are frequently ignored. So learning how to write in a way that gets your point across without setting off alarm bells in the editors’ minds is an important skill to cultivate. Admittedly such strategizing is a trade-off of sorts,and one has to weigh the relative importance of reaching a broad audience with a somewhat cautiously stated perspective as opposed to stating one’s case in the strongest possible terms and risk having, in effect, no audience at all. A tricky balancing act and one I’m frequently disturbed about.
While no reasonable person has suggested that the administration has deliberately intended to kill Iraqi civilians […]
That’s the key concept here. Excluding the occasional major conflagration like WW2, war is a relatively minor killer. It is the other killers, always on the loose and certainly exacerbated by war, that account for most unnecessary human suffering and death: disease and hunger. Some death by disease is inevitable, but much of it is preventable and most of it comes earlier than it should. All deaths from hunger are preventable.
It is not hatred that causes people to die of cholera or starve to death. It is indifference. Hatred is a minor issue, really, and one which sometimes has a happy ending — your worst enemy can become your best friend, but someone who is indifferent to your fate will probably always remain so.
Consider the relationships between the US and Japan or Germany and France. These countries, within living memory, stopped at absolutely nothing to destroy each other. Today, despite present disputes and differences, the Axis and Allied powers of WW2 are very closely aligned. And while we flubbed our big chance to bring Russia into the fold, the relationship between Russia and the other great powers is generally cordial.
What didn’t change in the last century is that people are dying of hunger and disease in most of the same places they were a hundred years ago. Not because no one can do anything about it, but simply because not enough people care to do anything about it. It is certainly not an issue of scale: the body count from disease and starvation over the last century makes WW2 look like a minor incident by comparison.
To be completely, pathetically honest, I truly don’t understand why this should be. Why should people who recoil in horror from a single intentional killing be completely unmoved by the deaths of tens and hundreds of millions of people from neglect? Why do so many more people volunteer to face death in armies than volunteer to distribute food and teach agricultural techniques in the third world?
Whatever the reason, we’re seeing it play out in our own backyard this month.
But the indifference you refer to is deliberately inculcated into the minds ofthe people. It’s an esential part of the war and conqest rubric to demonize the “enemy”, to ultimately characterize him as somehow less than human, and as a result less deserving of our consideration.
This is the mechanics of the strategy whereby indifference is weaponized. The Bush regime has employed this very effectively up until now, but the irrationality of their ideology is causing their facade to collapse under it’s own weight. They’ll still be able to do a lot more damage and we should do all we can to stop them, but they are on the declining slope of their ambitious, failed agenda.