by Larry C. Johnson (bio below)
I guess if we keep saying the moon is made of green cheese it will become so.
George W. Bush may have been a mediocre student in college, but he clearly mastered Orwell’s works, especially 1984 and Animal Farm. How else to explain his reliance on repeating catch phrases that are misleading and, at times, outright false, while trying to shape and mold American public opinion to support his policies?
Previously Bush juxtaposed the phrase “9-11” with Saddam and convinced a majority of Americans that Hussein was somehow involved in the attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center towers. Even though there was no truth to the charge, the President, even to this day, continues to use the 9-11 attack to justify the war in Iraq.
Now we are confronted with a new phrase,”the war on terror is a different kind of war and must be fought outside the normal conventions of war”. This rationale is being offered up to the American people by the President, along with Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and other Republican mouthpieces to justify violations of habeas corpus, torture and wiretaps outside the FISA process.
So, how is this war different?
Let’s start with casualties. While terrorism is a threat it does not begin to compare with real war. Fewer than 10,000 people have died in that last four years from international terrorist attacks. During the same period of time in World War Two more than 52 million people perished. How about the Korean war? More than 55,000 UN troops died there during a four year period. North Korean and Chinese losses were much higher.
So, let me see if I have this logic straight–we justify violating the conventions of war in order to fight an uncoventional threat that has not come close to killing the number of people who died in the so-called conventional wars?
Well, we must admit that the enemy is sneaky and does not congregate in mass formations like conventional armies. That is true. But this fact calls into question the President’s claim that in contrast to the Clinton Administration, who relied upon law enforcement and intelligence tools, he is going to use military power to fight the terrorists. Sounds great on a campaign stop, but the reality is quite different.
Since Donald Rumsfeld authorized the U.S. military in January of 2003 to “find, fix, and finish” Al Qaeda and other extremist Islamic groups around the world, the U.S. military has not bagged a single major target. Instead, the key terrorist leaders, such as Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who have been captured or killed were nabbed through intelligence and law enforcement efforts. Our military is too big, too bulky, and too slow to effectively attack and destroy the existing terrorist networks around the world. The terrorists do not offer “good” military targets, i.e. well organized commands with massive infrastructure. They operate in cells and fully integrate themselves with civilian populations. As we saw with the destruction of Fallujah, even wiping out a city does not wipe out terrorism.
President Bush is using fear to scare Americans into looking the other way as he tries to justify his declaration of an imperial Presidency entitled to do whatever he wants as long as he can say, “I’m protecting Americans from terrorism”. If we continue to allow our fear of terrorism to be used as an excuse for torture, unconstitutional imprisonment, and domestic spying without judicial review, we are on the precipice of the totalitarian world feared by George Orwell and offered to us by the amiable George W. Bush.
……………………………………………………..
Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm that helps corporations and governments manage threats posed by terrorism and money laundering. Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism (as a Deputy Director), is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management. Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC’s Nightline, NBC’s Today Show, the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world. Further bio details.
Personal Blog: No Quarter || Bio
Recommended Book List || More BoomanTribune Posts
The big question is how do we stop it? WHo will help us in this climate we are living in? Is all lost and we should just stop wasting our efforts? I do not want to lose hope but if he can justify spying on the American people and get away with it we are in deep shit folks.
That’s my biggest fear also Lee, that the general public is going to say well if it helps make us safer than thats ok-stupid justification I know but I think that is what is going to happen. Constitution-what’s that right?
It’s the “We have to destroy the village to save it” meme revisited.
The propagation of the idea that we must choose to give up our liberties and the rule of law in order to be safe is an essential part of the process in every instance where democracies have been overturned from within and replaced by dictatorships.
We stop him by whichever of these two methods happens first:
(Barring him dying of a heart attack or something else first)
Thanks Larry for putting up that perspective on casualty(by the way I hate the term casualty…nothing casual about dead family members or any of the dead) numbers for various wars vs our ‘war on terror’ –I’m going to keep that in mind to hopefully use on some unsuspecting idiot who next talks about this ‘different war’.
with the ethereal enemy. We might as well be chasing nightfall or dust.
We’ve turned the corner… we will be fighting the enemy for the rest of our lives. Victory. The war can never be won. That is why we must win at all cost. Victory. The Constitution is only a piece of paper. We must celebrate the new Iraqi Constitution, it has the power to transform the region. Democracy is dead. All hail democracy!
march, march, march, march…
One of these days Bush just may look back on all the corners he has “turned” & finally realize he’s been wandering in a maze — one of his own confused making.
While we think with language, there is considerable evidence language often unconsciously directs & shapes our thought.
Is anyone here familiar with the work of Victor Klemperer? I want to get hold of a copy of his Language Of The Third Reich: Lti, Lingua Tertii Imperii : A Philologist’s Notebook, an informal study of language use in Nazi Germany from the diaries of Jew living in wartime Dresden that looks at how propaganda, euphemism, understatement and other linguistic phenomena we consider “Orwellian” combined to permeate German culture & enabled the regime.
He takes for an epigraph Franz Rosenzweig’s epithet: Language is more than blood
from a July of 1941, entry:
He takes for an epigraph Franz Rosenzweig’s epithet: Language is more than blood
Slip sliding away on a sea of words . . .
I seriously doubt the Imbecile in Chief will ever realize anything substantive about this mess his regime is responsible for. Like Pinochet and many others in the “lunatic world leader club”, he’ll likely go to the end of his days never grasping the destructiveness he wrought upon the world.
I’m not familiar with Klemperer’s work, but here’s a link to a site that deals with the Nazi propaganda machine fairly extensively.
As to the dynamics of how language is deliberately manipulated to undermine people’s psychological autonomy and steer them into a guided group think pattern of behavior, the best sources for info on this I’ve found to be in books dealing with the dynamics of cultic issues. titles such as “Cults in Our Midst” by Margaret Thaler Singer and Janja Lalich; “Recovery From Cults” by Dr. Michael Langone; and a pioneering work by Robert Jay Lifton entitled “Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism; A Study of Brainwashing in China”.
A common factor recognized as a key element of virtually all cultic manipulative programs is a tactic desribed in all these books as “loading the language”.
Excerpted from “Cults in Our Midst” is the following, talking about how cults develop their own jargon;
This is a pretty good basic analysis of howcareful manipulative language is used to undermine critical thinking skills and condition people to apply often idiotically simplistic concepts in order to fashion theirown grasp of complex events.
BushCo uses this rubric more effectively than any previous Presidential administration in the history of the US and the damage being wrought is incalculable. Of course Hitler, Pol Pot, Pinochet, and even Mao Tse Tung and Kim Il Sung were quite successful with this sort of stuff too, and it is in the company of these murderous tyrants that the Bush regime’s legacy is likely to reside when history is written a hundred or more years from now.
Thanks for that! I haven’t loooked at any of the cult-speak lit, but can see how it could be nice little petrie dish for larger cultural & media issues. The “loading” concept echoes nicely with other work I’ve read & applies quite neatly when thinking baout how “Talking Points” work.
. . . & no, George isn’t likely to realize anything; afraid I’m overly prone to rhetorical questions sometimes.
Just to throw out another book title, Robin Lakoff published this back in 1990, & it’s a great, easy-to-read take on language manipulation in popular culture, politics, death penalty trials, psychotherapy and more.
The Chapter “Projecting an Image: Ronald Reagan and George Bush” is not to be missed.
Talking Power sounds quite good.
The most usefiul book I’ve found that deals with the issue of “influence” is the seminal work by Dr. Robert Cialdini titled “Influence; The Psychology of Persuasion”.
If we could add classes to elementary and secondary school curriculae based on this book we’d really be doing a lot to help empower our youth to better defend themselves from being duped and conned by all the tricksters out there, both overt and covert.
Just imagine an entire new generation grown to a point where they’re able to recognize bullshit before the bullshitters even get halfway into their spiel. Creatures like Scott McClellan and Mehlman and the entire FoxNews network would have no new audience. The new generation would simply denounce them and move on.
The Maze of Conservative Confusion
You must get from Point A (The Illegal Invasion of Iraq)
TO
Point B (Winning the War On Terror)
Are you up to the challenge?
Click on to play…
It ain’t easy being cheesy!
ha, exactly! though maybe it needs a few more dead-ends?
If I had added all of the dead ends that the bush regime has backed into there would have been no room to write “Point A” in there. I would have had to put the entire community in blockquotes…
Consider it just representative of the situuation, but not a complete and honest one. lol
Please…let us ALL stop referring to Bush as having “done” anything.
He is done TO.
Run by others.
And his only power comes from our belief that he is indeed the President.
Do not CALL him the President.
Do not ascribe any powers to him at all besides those of a front man on a quiz show.
“You Bet Your Life” v.2.02.
Only without Groucho running things.
He’s a fucking PATSY, Larry.
All blown up and set up there to take the heat.
Mr. Lee Harvey Goes To Washington.
What a load of crap.
Turn him off.
Off off OFF!!!
AG
P.S. For more on this, go to my diary Virtual Preznit Butch. Turn him off off OFF!!!
Credit him with NOTHING, and his line of credit will run out.
BET on it.
Certainly Bush is not the architect of any of this crap being done in his name.
I posited years ago, before 9/11/01 even, that if we could get the media to ignore Bush when it came to getting any real information and instead dog the heels of Cheney, the real architect, relentlessly in an attempt to keep him in the spotlight, that we might have a chance to reduce the scale of the catastrophe this regime was certain to inflict on the world. My rationale was that Cheney is a creature of darkness and if kept under the glare and scrutiny of lights at center stage, he’d be less able to implement his insane plans across such a wide spectrum.
I was underno illusions that the media wiuld do such a thing, but it was crystal clear to me then just as it is now that speaking to Bush is like interviewing a tape recorder, an exercise in futility all the way around.
Yeah, precisely.
But…
Now WE are the media.
Have it YOUR way.
I have steadfastly refused to use his name or title in any of the writing that I have done over the past year or so without a qualifier.
Butch.
Semi-President Bush
The Unelected Co-Conspiritor
And so on.
Yet all OVER left blogworld it is possible to find quite straight-faced discussions…like Mr. Johnson’s…regarding what Butch has or has not “done”.
And it is bullshit.
The word lines with which conscienceless geniuses like Karl Rove have hogtied much of America need to be cut, and cut NOW.
They are illusory, but no less strong, powerful or effective than if they had been been made of braided steel.
And the cutting has to start on the left.
If Small K kerry had possessed the courage and insight to understand this, he would have won in a landslide by simply refusing to refer to Butch as “the President” or take his bumbling attempts at debate seriously. Had he done so, Butch would have been laughed out of office after the very first debate.
It’s President Pro Tem (For the term, if my latin is correct) Cheney and Semi-Preznit Butch from here on out as far as I’m concerned.
Let’s get real here, before we all get dead.
AG
“War on Terror” ranks right up there with the “War on Poverty” – with the same results. Absent any action taken to deal with root causes, the problem persists.
I’ve always felt that the way to deal with an organized, global, criminal enterprise, is to treat it as such. The definitions under the terrorist statutes could have been cut and pasted from the RICO statutes. Terrorists for the most part, derive their income from smuggling, drugs, and diamonds; have an established (but loose) hierarchy; launder money; engage (by proxy) in human trafficking and prostitution; and conspire to commit murders all over the planet.
The common thread is crime. They do not engage in acts of violence for religion, political gain, or advancement of a people. They are neither revolutionary nor evolutionary: they are throwbacks, Luddites of the Near and Middle East.
The “true crime” of this administration – and Congress – is in expending nearly $300 billion swatting a petty dictator at the expense of bringing down that global criminal enterprise.
Only one question George: seen Osama lately?
Just like all their dictatorial and tyrannical predecessors all down through the ages, the Bush gang knows that you don’t achieve control over your citizens by giving them social services and personal freedoms, you control them, you weaponize their ignorance, by giving them a scary enemy and telling them only you can protect them.
Virtually all democracies that have been subverted by fascism have experienced this institutionalized scam.
.
Animal Farm envisions a totalitarian state like the Soviet Union under dictatorship of Lenin, Stalin and vision of Trotsky. It’s well known Saddam Hussein devoured all books on Stalin, focusing on domestic terror and security forces. This is not quite the modus operandi of the Bush cabal.
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
I’ve written about this at Pen and Sword and elswhere many times. This “new war” mantra is bunk. There is nothing about our “war on terror” that the Greek general and historian Thucycides didn’t write about in 400 B.C.
And none of it was new then, either
what about the difference between actual war, declared by congress, and a metaphorical war? wouldn’t the “war on terra” absent actual declaration of war, be just as metaphorical as “war on poverty” or “war on drugs”? – so what special powers does the “war on poverty” allow to the commander in chief?