It looks like we are royally fucked in Iraq.
Five days of interviews with Kurdish leaders and troops in the region suggest that U.S. plans to bring unity to Iraq before withdrawing American troops by training and equipping a national army aren’t gaining traction. Instead, some troops that are formally under U.S. and Iraqi national command are preparing to protect territory and ethnic and religious interests in the event of Iraq’s fragmentation, which many of them think is inevitable.
The soldiers said that while they wore Iraqi army uniforms they still considered themselves members of the Peshmerga – the Kurdish militia – and were awaiting orders from Kurdish leaders to break ranks. Many said they wouldn’t hesitate to kill their Iraqi army comrades, especially Arabs, if a fight for an independent Kurdistan erupted.
“It doesn’t matter if we have to fight the Arabs in our own battalion,” said Gabriel Mohammed, a Kurdish soldier in the Iraqi army who was escorting a Knight Ridder reporter through Kirkuk. “Kirkuk will be ours.”
The Kurds have readied their troops not only because they’ve long yearned to establish an independent state but also because their leaders expect Iraq to disintegrate, senior leaders in the Peshmerga – literally, “those who face death” – told Knight Ridder. The Kurds are mostly secular Sunni Muslims, and are ethnically distinct from Arabs.
Their strategy mirrors that of Shiite Muslim parties in southern Iraq, which have stocked Iraqi army and police units with members of their own militias and have maintained a separate militia presence throughout Iraq’s central and southern provinces. The militias now are illegal under Iraqi law but operate openly in many areas. Peshmerga leaders said in interviews that they expected the Shiites to create a semi-autonomous and then independent state in the south as they would do in the north.
The Bush administration – and Iraq’s neighbors – oppose the nation’s fragmentation, fearing that it could lead to regional collapse. To keep Iraq together, U.S. plans to withdraw significant numbers of American troops in 2006 will depend on turning U.S.-trained Kurdish and Shiite militiamen into a national army.
The interviews with Kurdish troops, however, suggested that as the American military transfers more bases and areas of control to Iraqi units, it may be handing the nation to militias that are bent more on advancing ethnic and religious interests than on defeating the insurgency and preserving national unity.
A U.S. military officer in Baghdad with knowledge of Iraqi army operations said he was frustrated to hear of the Iraqi soldiers’ comments but that he had seen no reports suggesting that they would acted improperly in the field.
“There’s talk and there’s acts, and their actions are that they follow the orders of the Iraqi chain of command and they secure their sectors well,” said the officer, who refused to be identified because he’s not authorized to speak on the subject.
The rest of this Knight-Ridder article is even more depressing. Essentially, it gives the lie to the idea that the national elections would tamp down the insurgency and begin the process of bringing stability to Iraq.
In reality it appears the elections have served to eliminate the last obstacle to a wholesale descent into ethnic and sectarian violence.
“All of the Sunnis are facilitating the terrorists. They have little influence compared with the Kurds and Shiites, so they allow the terrorists to operate to create pressure and get political concessions,” Saleem said. “So they should be killed, too … the Sunni political leaders in Baghdad are supporting the insurgency, too, and there will be a day when they are tried for it.”
The Kurds expect us to cut and run, and they are fully prepared to make their move at the appropriate time. They may succeed in crushing the insurgency where we have failed. But don’t expect the Turks, and Sunni Arab world to stand by idly while the Kurds engage in genocide.
To Bush and Cheney: “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive.”
This is not surprising in the least.
What’s surprising is that someone in the so-called liberal media has finally taken the time to write the story.
We have Shi’a death squad commandos, and Kurds in the Armyb ready to fight for Kurdish leaders whenever they give the word. People have known about this for a while.
But no doubt this story will die and be buried until the shit really hits the fan over there. The “happy talk” stories will return.
Back in 1976 or so Irving Wallace’s People’s Almanac voted “Kurdistan” onto its “most likely to secede” list, along with Quebec, Euzkadi (the Basque homeland) and several others. And this wasn’t news then.
The fact that this is so widely known and Bush and his crime family refused to take it into account in their rush to empire speaks volumes about their competency to be world leaders.
Turkey is going to go ape over the thought of an indepenent Kurdistan on its border, because that border has plenty of Kurds on the Turkish side and they’re worried that those Kurds won’t hesitate longer than it takes them to grab their AK-47s to attempt to secede and join up with Kurdistan.
And the Turks are right, that’s exactly what would happen. If they want to prevent it they have to come in on the side of an undivided Iraq — which despite Saddam Hussein’s best efforts is a fiction perpetrated by the British for their own reasons, and has little hope of staying together.
So we end up with a completely bloody mess in the area, with the Kurds in the North facing a possible two-front war against Turkey and what’s left of Iraq. Except that I’m not sure that the southern front would be much of a threat, because we might see Sunni-Shia civil war there.
All this might have happened anyway in a few years after Saddam Hussein went the way of the world and wasn’t holding Iraq together through terror and force of will. However, George W. Bush moved the timetable up and facilitated the whole mess, so when it happens it’s squarely on his head.
I hope he lives to see the way history judges him. And he’ll probably still blame the liberals and Democrats.
Turkey’s foresight and desire to avoid what’s happening now is the best reason I saw given for why they didn’t comply with prewar plans (airspace) and coalitioning.
.
United Nations has a problem of self-interest of six major nations sitting with veto power on the Security Council. The injustice of wars since 1945 has not diminished, although a world conflict has been avoided. We have witnessed injustice in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Middle East, African and South American strife. Most conflicts were influenced by the Cold War stand-off between the U.S., China and the Soviet Union.
The regional organizations of a continent: Asia, Africa, Middle East and Arab Nations have not been able to root out war or prevent genocide inside a sovereign country. I personally hope these regional organizations draw more power so they can make a difference on their continent. This, from recent conflicts, doesn’t look promising for the near future.
Kurds begin ‘operations’ in Iran
What no one wanted but feared from the beginning of the US invasion of Iraq, unrest in the border region of Kurdish North Iraq and Turkey.
BBC News – April 15, 2005 – Turkish security forces have killed 21 members of the Kurdish paramilitary group, the PKK, in southeast Turkey, officials in the area say.
It is reported to be the biggest clash in the area since the PKK declared a unilateral truce in 1999. Turkey’s war with the separatist PKK guerrillas in the 1980s and 1990s, left more than 30,000 people dead.
The EU has recently signed an economic partnership with Syria, despite pressure from big brother the US.
Syrian President Hails Turkish President’s Visit
ANKARA Turkish Weekly — Assad said he would discuss with Sezer the role of the United States and European countries, in the region which he said resembled “the colonial era.” “We can reduce the dangers to the minimum only if we act together. The dangers are threatening all of us… They started with Iraq and have now targeted Syria … They are trying to intervene in Turkey’s internal affairs. I believe all countries in the region are under threat. All we can do is to act together…,” the Syrian president added.
[…]
On the issue of Iraq, Assad said he still feared the breakup of the country under the pressure of its feuding ethnic and religious groups. “This could pose a direct threat to Syria and Turkey…If Iraq breaks up, we will pay a very heavy bill. It is difficult even to guess what dangers we may encounter.”
Undoubtedly, an important issue on their agenda will be the Kurds in their respective countries. Syria had great difficulties last year with Kurd uprising.
Global Security – KURDISTAN MAPS
Mon Sep 26th, 2005 at 10:56:09 AM PST
When the first intifada broke out in Israel, in 1987, the Arabs used rocks, molotov cocktails, hand grenades, and rifles. In that same year the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka began a fifteen-year campaign, which employed suicide bombers.
When the second (al-Asqa) Intifada began, the Palestinians adopted the tactics of the Tamil Tigers. During the most deadly year of the Second Intifada, 2002, there were forty-two separate suicide bombings that killed 228 people.
Added my comment ::
PKK Renegade Faction of Kurds
You made a fine analysis, but I find too many news items of border incursions. Found a source with excellent summary of Kurdistan history, written for the OSCE ::
1997 – Kurdistan: Conflicts in the OSCE Area
≈ Cross-posted from my diary — Turk Covert Agents Caught in Terror Act ¶ Semdili District in South Turkey ≈
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
.
To complete the picture of the entangled web, don’t forget the Likud/Israeli power grab in political and military sense since Sharon’s election in Februari 2001.
Conal Urquhart in Tel Aviv and Michael Howard
SULAYMANIYAH Dec. 2, 2005 — Israeli firms are carrying out military training and commercial activities in Kurdish areas of north Iraq, according to reports in an Israeli newspaper. Yedioth Ahronoth reported yesterday that dozens of former members of Israel’s elite and covert forces were training Kurdish fighters in anti-terrorism techniques.
Other companies, the newspaper said, were involved in telecommunications and infrastructure projects such as the building of an airport at Irbil.
Iraq and Israel are still officially at war, though since the 1960s Israel and the Iraqi Kurds have had a relationship. A spokesman for the Israeli foreign ministry said his country had no relationship with the new Iraq and it remained “at war”.
Plan B – Israel looks to the Kurds
The New Yorker – by Seymour M. Hersh
NEW YORK June 21, 2004 — Ehud Barak, the former Israeli Prime Minister, who supported the Bush Administration’s invasion of Iraq, took it upon himself at this point to privately warn Vice-President Dick Cheney that America had lost in Iraq. According to an American close to Barak, he said that Israel “had learned that there’s no way to win an occupation.” The only issue, Barak told Cheney, “was choosing the size of your humiliation.” Cheney did not respond to Barak’s assessment.
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
What are the NATO protocols for war between two of its members?
.
In early 2003 before the Iraq campaign, Turkey got immediate support from NATO coalition member the Netherlands for defensive Patriot missiles to protect its Southern border.
In the Middle East, Turkey is sole NATO member, which could be engaged with the Kurds of Northern Iraq backed by Israel. The U.S. will have to choose, and will ultimately support Turkey as key ally in the Caspian Sea – oil – region and important association member of the EU.
Likud Shill Daniel Pipes on MEK Terror
Reliable Intelligence Source According to John Bolton
In an appearance before a House International Relations Subcommittee a year ago, John Bolton, the controversial State Department undersecretary who Bush has nominated to become US ambassador to the United Nations, was questioned by a Congressman sympathetic to MEK about whether it was appropriate for the U.S. government to pay attention to allegations about Iran supplied by the group. Bolton said he believed that MEK “qualifies as a terrorist organization according to our criteria.” But he added that he did not think the official label had “prohibited us from getting information from them. And I certainly don’t have any inhibition about getting information about what’s going on in Iran from whatever source we can find that we deem reliable.”
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
I wrote a diary on this same issue over at DailyKos, before I had discovered Booman, about how the only organized military units in Iraq were peshmerga or Shia militia. The point was basically that Bush was the best ally Iran ever had.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/8/1/12586/25675
I think we can be pretty certain that the result of Bush’s Folly will be the destruction of the entity known as Iraq and the creation of a Shia state aligned with Iran in the south and a Kurdish state that causes all sorts of grief for Turkey in the north. The Shia will have no problem surviving; the Kurds, especially when, like his daddy at the end of the first Gulf War, this Bush president turns tail and runs for political reasons.