The NYT headline reads: “Heeding Pakistani Protest, U.N. Blocks Talk by Rape Victim.”
The story says that “Mukhtar Mai, the Pakistani woman whose defiant response to being gang-raped by order of a tribal court brought her worldwide attention, was denied a chance to speak at the United Nations on Friday after Pakistan protested that it was the same day the country’s prime minister was visiting.
“Ms. Mai had long been scheduled,” continues the NYT story, “to make an appearance called ‘An Interview With Mukhtar Mai: The Bravest Woman on Earth’ in the United Nations television studios, sponsored by the office for nongovernmental organizations, the Virtue Foundation and the Asian-American Network Against Abuse of Human Rights.”
Ms. Mai has been named by Time magazine as one of “Asia’s heroes” (that story is below the fold)
As WebIndia123 puts it sarcastically, “Aziz ensures Mai doesn’t steal his UN thunder.” And it notes that “[i]ncidentally, Mai’s visit to the UN was planned much before Aziz’s visit to the world body. (ANI).”
The NYT story notes that “[t]his was not the first time that Pakistan’s government had interfered in Ms. Mai’s travels. President Pervez Musharraf blocked her from taking a trip to the United States in June and then relented last fall when Glamour magazine honored her as its “Woman of the Year.”
And you’ll all surely recall the grossly insensitive, chauvinistic remarks of President Pervez Musharraf who, according to BBC,
“said that rape was a ‘money-making concern’:
“You must understand the environment in Pakistan. This has become a money-making concern,” he said.
“A lot of people say if you want to go abroad and get a visa for Canada or citizenship and be a millionaire, get yourself raped.”
Outrageously, at the time, the U.S. State Dept. chose to remain “neutral” on Musharraf’s remarks.
Below, Ms. Mai’s story as told by Time:
t is a measure of just how terrible what happened to Mukhtar Mai was that news of the attack on her sent shock waves across Pakistan, where sexual assault and violence against women is commonplace. Mai, a 30-year-old woman who lives in the remote hamlet of Meerwala, was brutally and publicly gang-raped in June 2002 by four volunteers on the orders of a village court, or jirga. Mai’s then 12-year-old brother Abdul Shakoor (pictured behind her) had been seen walking with a girl from the more influential Mastoi tribe; they demanded Mai’s rape to avenge their “honor.” Mai’s family sat helplessly while she was dragged into a room, even as she screamed and pleaded for mercy. To further humiliate her, and make an example of those who would defy the power of local strongmen, she was paraded naked before hundreds of onlookers. Her father covered her with a shawl and walked her home.
Mai’s case is hardly unique in Pakistan. During the first seven months of 2004, according to the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, at least 151 Pakistani women were gang-raped and 176 were killed in the name of honor. The vast majority of perpetrators go unpunished. Yet Mai refused to remain silent. She said she would rather “die at the hands of such animals” than “give up her right to justice” and pursued her case despite the threat of further violence. Against the odds, she won. Six men involved in her rape have been punished, with two of them sentenced to death (although Pakistani human-rights groups and I oppose the death penalty), and the government awarded her compensation. Mai has used the money to open a school in her village so that the force of education can wash away this crime perpetuated in the name of tradition.
As long as the state refuses to fully challenge the brutality of tribal law, the plight of Pakistani women will continue. Mukhtar Mai is a symbol of their victimhood, but in her resilience she is also a symbol of their strength. (Time Asia, which also includes remarkable photographs)
But Dubya’s winning the war on terror and Pakistan is a “great friend and ally” in said war. Gotta stay “neutral” (i.e., look the other way goddamit).
Spreading freedom and democracy?
Right.
I understand that that is the modus operandi of world leaders and that some dumb asses like Jimmy Carter got their heads handed to them on a platter when they made the big mistake of trying to reprioritize international reiations.
Yeah–ESPECIALLY after we fire-bombed 18 innocent people. Doesn’t leave us much room for moral outrage, and since Pakistan wants to silence her, this is the perfect way to do so.
This is just disgusting through and through.
C-posted at DKos
I remember when I first read about this woman and what had happened to her and so many other women as this article points out. More amazing to me was her courage against all odds to pursue justice against these men…and what she has continued to try and do with opening that school.
The U.N. barring her from speaking is simply chickenshit politics and it’s depressing also.
What happened to Mukhtar is the kind of thing that could have been prevented by education.
And an educated populace is not in the interest of any US client state, in fact in the US itself there is much that can (and has been) said on the subject of the quality of education that is considered best for the peasantry.
And in case any lurkers are unaware and need to hear it, the crimes committed against this lady are unqualifiedly, definitely and decidedly un-Islamic.
Why the UN permits the government of a military dictatorship to have any influence over it’s scheduling of events is a mystery beyond my ability to comprehend.
The UN was created by US long before it had solidified itself as a military dictatorship.
I take you’re broader point about the US being a military dictatorship in deed if not by official designation, but the cognitive dissonance involved in trashing the UN for enabling tyrannies while simultaneously pressuring the UN to allow the Pakistani dictatorship to block this woman’s appearance is so appalling that one would think there’d be at least a small handful ofprominent UN people expressing their outrage formally and vigorously.
Is there no one with integrity in the UN environment?
.
Sat May 21st, 2005 at 10:33:15 AM PST
Earlier today, reading The New York Times over my coffee, I came across a small AP story about the murder of Shaima Rezayee, a young Afghan woman who was killed, apparently, for being too “Western”.
Ms. Rezayee, 24, had been (until March) the host of “Hop”, a music video show on the station Tolo TV. She was a popular figure who proudly dressed in Westernized garb, a sign of the “new” Afghanistan. But her appearance, and her program, drew criticism from conservative clerics and other Islamic “scholars”, who effectively engineered her ouster two months ago.
Reporters Without Borders says that she is the first journalist to be killed in Afghanistan since the end of the war in 2001.
I don’t think this is an instance …
Ideally, I’d hope that Shaima Rezayee becomes as well-known as Mukhtaran Bibi/Mukhtar Mai, the Pakistani woman who was sentenced to be gang-raped by a tribal court because the actions of her 14-year-old brother had offended a … more powerful clan. The reporting on her struggle to find justice was well-covered by Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times, and also grabbed the attention of the BBC, ABC’s Primetime Live, CNN and other outlets.
To respond to your question, so long as tradition, clan behavior, and beknighted religious-based views toward women are held by more than just fringe elements of Afghan society, I suspect that more and more women there may hold themselves back from their potential for fear that living the life they would like for themselves could lead instead to disaster. Hopefully, Ms. Rezayee’s murder will become a rallying point for the rejection of the worst that the past has to offer.
By Juliette Terzieff
WeNews June 10, 2005 — In Afghanistan, a young woman’s murder leaves police wondering if the motive was political reprisal or a relative who thought she had dishonored the family. Either way, onlookers say the murder underscores the dangers of being a woman there.
Only weeks after the show’s premier in the fall of 2004, Rezayee and her co-host Shakeb Isaar began receiving death threats.
Washington DC, March 21, 2005 — With the recent flight of Dr. Shazia Khalid highlighting the lack of justice for rape victims in Pakistan, the World Sindhi Institute (WSI) announced today it would host a briefing on the case in London, entitled “Waiting for Justice: Women’s Rights in Pakistan”.
Dr. Shazia’s Story: In Her Own Words
Columns by Nicholas D. Kristof
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
▼▼▼ READ MY DIARY ▼
wish to submit to non-consensual arranged marriage.
Absurdly, some are there as punishment for this crime, others are there to protect them from harm from the family members who wished to marry them off, frequently for a benefit.
If the purpose of the crusade in Afghanistan had been to improve the plight of women, why were guns given only to men?
It is truly amazing how the west contained its outrage over conditions of life for women in Pashtunistan that have existed for thousands of years before the west discovered fire, until the Taliban, invited to Texas to be wined and dined, rejected a business proposal.
Could it be that the whole concept of “honor” is just as ingrained here as it is anywhere else?
(Check some interesting links here, here and especially here.
We just can’t get away with killing women as easily here. That does not mean the absence of that desire.
Susan, perhaps you could cross post this over at European Tribune…it is news worthy of discussion…