I’ve been holding onto this piece about Ken Mehlman because Alito is a bigger story. But I just want to throw up an extended blockquote from the article because it involves a very interesting group of observations by Grover Norquist (and none of them have a thing to do with Mehlman).
A short bullet of a man, Norquist, seems particularly wound up on this wet, wintry day. Accompanying Norquist is his chief of staff, Chris Butler, a young man with blond hair plastered flat across his broad head, a shiny porcelain complexion, and cheerless, pale eyes. I ask the Republican maverick, who heads up Americans for Tax Reform, whether Ken Mehlman can rescue the formerly invincible GOP in time for the 2006 midterm elections, and more crucially, the 2008 presidential race.
While Norquist concedes 2005 was a terrible year for the Republicans, he’s quick to point out the silver lining: “It was the perfect storm for the Democrats,” he admits, before unleashing a gloating grin, “but the wrong year!” Then it’s onto the day’s spin, washed down with ice tea. Sure, he says, losing two crucial governorships (in Virginia and New Jersey) has ramped up party anxiety, but two out of fifty is no cause for alarm “By the 2006 elections, we’ll have gas prices down, people will have forgotten about Katrina, and we’ll get the troops coming home from Iraq,” suggesting that one of Brazile’s prediction is not far off. “Trust me. They’re gonna cut and run,” said Brazile, “but they’ll call it something else.” And then for the coup de grace, says Norquist, his baby face breaking into a wide grin: “We’ll bring in al-Zarqawi and Osama Bin Ladin.”
Curiously, Norquist’s praise for Mehlman seems parsimonious. “He’s a competent manager,” he says. That’s it? “He managed the 2004 campaign very well, and he’s been rewarded for his loyalty. He speaks well and he’s very good on the chat shows. He’s trusted by state leaders and he has 2004 street cred.” I mention that his enthusiasm is less than contagious. Norquist shrugs, “Competence is a compliment,” he says. Then he adds, without any expression, “a big compliment.”
“Grover blames Rove for the Harriet Miers mess,” says one of Washington’s shrewdest readers of GOP tea leaves, “and Mehlman is Rove’s creation and minion. Grover thinks Rove should have blocked Miers and he didn’t because he was so tied up trying to save himself from Fitzgerald and jail.” Worse, Mehlman has been known to be a pragmatist and nifty dealmaker,- a facility that makes the Party’s red meat ideologues twitchy.
I ask Norquist about Beltway rumors that Mehlman will inherit Rove’s job should Bush’s consigliere be indicted by Patrick Fitzgerald. “Karl’s been whacked, but he’s fine now,” says Norquist, who ties with Abramoff go back decades – and is himself now endangered. “Look, Karl’s not going to get indicted. Fitzgerald interviewed him for 20 hours about one phone call. If you can’t get Karl to contradict himself over a twenty hour period in four interrogations about a three minute conversation, then it ain’t going to happen. He’s not going to be indicted.” Where Mehlman really matters, he adds, is as “the public face of the party,” someone to do the chat shows and interview circuit. “Karl is damaged as a spokesman because he can’t do interviews anymore – because all he gets asked about is Fitzgerald and the leak business. But Karl’s not been damaged internally.”
Having heard that Bob Woodward has been dining out for months on Dick Cheney’s “desire” to be president in 2008, I ask the big question: What if Fitzgerald’s leak investigation implicates the Vice President? For example, what if Cheney turns out to be Bob Woodward’s source? Norquist’s eyes widen but betray nothing. Quickly, he counters, sotto voce. “I heard it was [Richard] Armitage,” he says, referring to Colin Powell’s former deputy at the State Department. Then he cuts to the chase. “If Cheney is involved in any way, then [Scooter] Libby pleads guilty and stops the hemorrhaging.”
And then Bush pardons both of them? I ask.
“Sure,” says Norquist.
What part of that gave you the worst chills? Take the poll.
I’m not too chilled by that. I think these guys are spinning. Desperately spinning. He grins and says “well that was 2005” and the assumption is that it wont effect the election year of 2006.
Last I knew the bad news from 2005 was spilling into 2006. Bush still has an Iraqian quagmire, dozens of Republican scandals to contain, a faltering economy (that isn’t getting much press. I think everyone is scared that if we breath the wrong way consumer confidence will plummet to hell), and on and on, and now we have Bushy continuing to claim that wiretapping any American he wants to is totally within his prove-me-wrong-I-dare-you rights.
omg Norquist if your confident someone’s paying you to be confidant. Or your on X
In short, he’s blowing smoke up our backsides and hoping people will buy it.
Imo, blowing smoke is basically all these people have. They live by the smoke & they’re busily making sure the rest of us do as well. In other words, most of us are suffocating.
If he thinks they’re going to get the price of gas down, he’s delusional.
Interesting that is what he says first. Bush’s poll numbers directly track with gas prices. Gas up-Bush down. etc. They will do anything to get them down by November. Will be interesting to see what they can do. Nuking Iran would not help with gas. Nor even invading Venezuela.
Is it true that we breathe the same air and walk the same planet as these people?
.
Luckily our air is not poisoned by such evil.
I don’t live in a bubble.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
Just the part starting with “A short bullet of a man” and ending with “Sure, says Norquist.”
The rest of it was alright.
I love wikipedia. Read it for some of the dirt this guy has been involved in.
But this quote is funny…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Norquist#Connections_to_Jack_Abramoff
Greatest chill?
The brownshirt I kept seeing in the background.
Frankly, I’m not chilled at all by anything these people say. Nothing, but nothing, comes from their mouths that isn’t intended for some wider cumulative effect. Ergo, I can’t be bothered too much by their specific statements; it’s like chasing fleas when the dog’s dying of anemia.
What chills me is what they’ve done: it’s no longer their game alone; we’re far from the wind & now reaping the whirwind.
He can talk himself blue & grin like an idiot for anyone who’ll sit still for it, or he can drown himself in his very own bathtub — the damage is well done.
I don’t blame you, but I sense you are in somewhat of a bad mood.
Just a little sick & tired, BooMan. Nothing serious 🙂
The poll needs another choice: All of the above.
Actually, the most frightening part is that such an evil, evil person (and I use the term “person” advisedly) has so much power over the functioning of what passes for an administration these days–and he has never stood for public office, never had to present his views to the voters, never been voted into or out of any office whatsoever.
“The poll needs another choice: All of the above.”
I agree – that was the answer I was looking for on the list when I clicked into this section. But the concept of eight more years of Cheney (or Chicanery, as I call him) at the helm makes my blood run cold.
.
The repugs would need machinations behind most precincts in the U.S. to elect someone so impopular. Another eight years as VP would be a nice punishment for the American people if they don’t revolt at the polls in 2006 and 2008.
On the other hand, if the Democrats don’t get politically smart and stay glued to the evil Republican policies, there will be no true choice in the next elections as BooMan pointed out in his diaries.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY