Hamas has won a stunning landslide victory in the Palestinian elections. Here is the Wiki description for Hamas:
Hamas, acronym of Harakat al-Muqawamah al-Islamiyyah (Arabic: حركة المقاومة الاسلامية, literally “Islamic Resistance Movement” and Arabic for ‘zeal’), is a Palestinian Islamist movement and is the democratically elected representive government of the Palestinian people. Hamas is closely related to the Muslim Brotherhood and its stated goal is to “remove Israel from the map” [1], and to establish an Islamic theocracy in the area that is currently Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza strip. In pursuit of this, Hamas affirms a right to engage in military struggle. [2]
Hamas is listed as a terrorist group by the European Union, Canada, the United States, and Israel, and its attacks targeting Israeli civilians and other human rights abuses have been condemned by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. The organization is particularly popular among Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, though it also has a following in the West Bank, and, to a lesser extent, in other Middle Eastern countries and throughout the Palestinian diaspora. The movement’s popularity stems from its provision of welfare and social services to the Palestinian poor and its paramilitary activities, which includes making generous payments to the families of suicide bombers, as well as from the perceived corruption of the Fatah party. Outside the Arab world, Hamas is primarily known for its suicide bombings against civilians in busy urban areas in Israel. In an attempt to change its image in the eyes of the West, the group is currently “paying a spin doctor $180,000 (£100,000) to persuade Europeans and Americans that it is not a group of religious fanatics who relish suicide bombings and hate Jews,” according to The Guardian. [[3]
Below the fold I’ll discuss this development.
George W. Bush has articulated a foreign policy that emphasizes the potential of representative government to take the steam out of anti-American terrorism. Bush explained his vision in last year’s State of the Union address:
In the long-term, the peace we seek will only be achieved by eliminating the conditions that feed radicalism and ideologies of murder. If whole regions of the world remain in despair and grow in hatred, they will be the recruiting grounds for terror, and that terror will stalk America and other free nations for decades. The only force powerful enough to stop the rise of tyranny and terror, and replace hatred with hope, is the force of human freedom. (Applause.) Our enemies know this, and that is why the terrorist Zarqawi recently declared war on what he called the “evil principle” of democracy. And we’ve declared our own intention: America will stand with the allies of freedom to support democratic movements in the Middle East and beyond, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world. (Applause.)
The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else. That is one of the main differences between us and our enemies. They seek to impose and expand an empire of oppression, in which a tiny group of brutal, self-appointed rulers control every aspect of every life. Our aim is to build and preserve a community of free and independent nations, with governments that answer to their citizens, and reflect their own cultures. And because democracies respect their own people and their neighbors, the advance of freedom will lead to peace. (Applause.)
That advance has great momentum in our time — shown by women voting in Afghanistan, and Palestinians choosing a new direction, and the people of Ukraine asserting their democratic rights and electing a president. We are witnessing landmark events in the history of liberty. And in the coming years, we will add to that story. (Applause.)
The beginnings of reform and democracy in the Palestinian territories are now showing the power of freedom to break old patterns of violence and failure. Tomorrow morning, Secretary of State Rice departs on a trip that will take her to Israel and the West Bank for meetings with Prime Minister Sharon and President Abbas. She will discuss with them how we and our friends can help the Palestinian people end terror and build the institutions of a peaceful, independent, democratic state. To promote this democracy, I will ask Congress for $350 million to support Palestinian political, economic, and security reforms. The goal of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace, is within reach — and America will help them achieve that goal. (Applause.)
Despite some of the empty rhetoric in Bush’s speech, I agree with a lot of what he said. I agree that part of the solution to anti-American terrorism is more representative government in certain Islamic countries. We should remember that the 9/11 hijackers included 15 Saudis, an Egyptian, two citizens of the United Arab Emirates, and a citizen of Lebanon. Many of the suicide bombers in Iraq are reported to be Saudis. Ramzi Yousef and Khalid Sheikh Mohmammed were Pakistanis. Bin Ladin is a Saudi, and Zawahiri is an Egyptian.
It’s critical to understand that all of these countries were allies of the United States during the Cold War. The United States has incredibly close relationships with the governments of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan. We not only supply those countries with arms, but we trained their internal security and intelligence agencies. Therefore, in the absence of real elections, the rulers cannot be removed from power without our consent. In these circumstances. it is natural that the internal opponents of those governments will consider America as their opponents as well. This would be true for both liberal minded people and for Islamists that want a less secular society.
This is the real germ of anti-American terrorism, and a lot of it would dissipate if the people had the power to elect their own leaders. Unfortunately, the people consider America to be their enemies. So, chances are that, if they ever occur, we will not be very happy with the election results in Pakistan, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia. And we not happy with the results of elections in Iraq or Palestine.
The success of Hamas is troubling for the people of Israel. I understand that. But, I think in the long run this is going to be a good thing. My hope is that Hamas’s politicians will behave a lot like politicians do in other countries. There will a few demagogues, but at the end of the day they will want to provide constituent services and win reelection.
The Israel/Palestine conflict is most difficult problem in the world. But the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are even more troubling from the perspective of American security. Any casual observer of the House of Saud can agree that they are the most corrupt government on the face of the earth. They are probably more hypocritical and decadent than any government in the history of the world. And yet, the world is so dependent on an uninterrupted supply of Saudi oil that no developed country wants to risk seeing the House of Saud swept from power.
The government of Pakistan is really the army. And the Pakistani army does not even control a good portion of the country. Armed with nuclear weapons and a stridently anti-American populace, any prospect of true democracy in Pakistan probably consitutes the greatest existential threat to America’s safety imaginable.
Part of what Bush doesn’t understand is that we can see democracy sweep the Islamic world from Casablanca to Singapore and it won’t do a thing to appease the Saudi, Egyptian, and Pakistani terrorists unless democracy sweeps through those countries as well. And if it does, we will still be at an elevated risk for some time to come because the true expression of those countries’ populations is extremely hostile to America and American interests.
.
Such a sweeping victory for Hamas, founded in 1987 after twenty years of Israeli occupation and humiliatian, is the Palestinians vote for change against Fatah corruption and cronyism.
Hamas could make the gains because there is no U.S. route towards peace, only support for the Likud policy of Ariel Sharon, expansion of Jewish settlements on Palestinian territory for security reasons, separation barrier weaving through Palestinian landscape, targeted assassinations of dozens leaders of PLO, Hamas and Al Aqsa by F-16 or Apache helicopters.
The election as Palestinian President Abu Abbas and the new chance for peace after Arafat’s death was met by more Israeli unilateral steps to strengthen its hold on Palestinian West Jerusalem and surroundings. Abu Abbas was strangled by the U.S. and Israel, the people suffering daily from the IDF road blocks and harassment from right-wing extremist settlers as their new neighbors. See agreement with Bush at Egyptian resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh.
● View of extremist Israeli former PM Bibi Netanyahu
● Arutz Sheva – Israel National News
● Sharm el-Sheikh Fact-Finding Committee
The Mitchell Plan – April 30, 2001
See my diary on the Palestinian Parliamentary Election ::
BREAKING — HAMAS 76 vs Fatah 43 Seats in Palestinian Parliament ¶ Updated
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
.
The enemies of Israel during the Cold War period were allies of the Soviet Union: Egypt, Libya, Syria and Iraq.
The wrong choices of friends of America in the 20th Century —
Both Democrats and Republicans have made major mistakes, even today with united voices on Iraq War, invasion and occupation. The Israelis have provided a blueprint with occupation of Palestinian land, what the U.S. should have avoided instead of duplicatimg the Israeli mistakes of invasion and occupation of a people and nation.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
It is surprising that absolutely everyone is surprised that an impoverished people voted out a government that was indisputedly corrupt and ineffective at providing basic services and basic security. Let’s be honest if this were any other country in the world we would have all predicted an opposition landslide.
The problem is Palestine is rather patronisingly viewed only in terms of Israeli security.
Boo, gets some sleep!
A survey taken in early December in the Middle East proves the point. It’s all in the lede: Arabs Unimpressed by Bush Democracy Drive.
An interesting diary, but I wonder about the certainty of this statement:
The relaionship the U.S. had with Iran under the Shah could also fit the same pattern, and I don’t think that we consented to the Shah’s replacement by the Ayatollah, did we?
But that doesn’t change the rest of the paragraph. You are quite right that America is the natural enemy of any groups in the Middle East who are advocating change that reflects their history and desires.
One point that I think we need to watch out for is if Hamas works to eliminate Fatah as a political opponent. That seems to me to be a narural reaction, since it is how Hamas has been treated. It would however mean that Hamas is taking over another Arab run single party government.
This election can be a real wake-up call to Fatah. They have needed to clean up their act for over two decades, and now they will not survive without it. Hamas has acted much like the Maoist Chinese did in the late 40’s. They have offered honest government in the face of the level of corruption that Fatah has has demonstrated. As long as they have competition they will have to try to deliver it.
Yes Bush said the words, and his speech writer articulated it very well. However, the actions of Bush/Cheney give total lie to their words.
Not only do they refuse to go halfway toward understanding Arab culture, (they think learning Arabic is a major concession to the Mid-East), they continue to say and do things are are considered grievous insults in their culture, ie. Karen Hughes “listening tour” in which she tried to out talk them and lecture them.
The Arabs are tribal in nature. Their nomadic existence made them the perfect people to develop international trade and commerce. That tribal culture has a very strict hierarchy (cast system), with leaders being the final authority even over their own biological elders. Hamas was extremely clever in co-opting and becoming the social peers of tribal leaders by being able to provide basic nutrition, educational and medical services that the tribal leaders had no resources to provide. The Noblese oblige of tribal leaders is comparable to that of the “lord” for providing everything in western medieval times.
As Westerners, we see their cultures as oppressive. Actually their woman have a great deal more emotional freedom to say what they want and express their feelings in the safety of their families – no holds barred. Arab woman KNOW they do not have to work once married, and think American woman are fools for working so hard then coming home and trying to take care of children and family. In their culture the woman are responsible for the children and maintaining order and harmony in the home. Anything else is just extraneous. Believe it or not, Palestinian Women and the Saudi women’s favorite shopping place is Victoria Secret stores, now in their Malls, or a Victoria Secrets catalog. Pakistani woman display the wealth and social status of their men and families in tons of 22 carat gold jewelery and the material of their sari’s. Marriages are always arranged for compatibility of class status between families and educational parity between the bride and groom.
The down side is that a woman has less status then a stray dog if she is not married. The children are the mens’, so in the event of divorce a woman loses all access to her kids. That is why they acquiesce to multiple wives. Their freedom of movement is restricted, but this is not as bad as we think. Those woman have learned to manipulate their men very well, and male escorts seem to be readily available for trips outside the home. In fact it is the Arabian woman who taught me the value of “soft power” and they use it exquisitely.
I learned the hard way the rigidity of their social structure. As an American, I tended to take the side of what I perceived as the “underdog”, not originally understanding their cast system. The victim I had recently defended would then turn on me, and be upset because I had offended their “better”. I learned to bite my tongue, except in extreme circumstances.
The only hope I perceive to alleviate the bitter resentment and anger our Government has generated, are people to people programs, sort of family exchanges instead of student exchanges. Governments may fund, but absolutely have NO say in the running and organizing of the programs. Revenge is an intrinsic part of Arab thinking. As the old saying goes “War ends when there is justice”. And they have developed a perseverance for waiting centuries, if necessary, to get what they perceive as their just do for wrongs against them.
As to the supposed friendship with our Government – The US has been buying their friendship, so there are no real ties of loyalty. The training we provide, once again, insults their cultural norms, so is useful in helping the individuals attain more status as “government employees”, but does not engender feelings of warmth toward us. In fact, our support of their governments via funding, only furthers the corruption endemic in their societies.
Hamas knows this well, and has solid support among the people they care for. As Lord Acton said, “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. It will be interesting to see if Hamas can maintain their roots, have learned from their long years of struggle, and resist the corruption that comes with power, as they try to define themselves as rulers of a country.
George Washington said in his first inaugural address “The foundations of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens, and command the respect of the world.” So until our government respects the traditions and cultures of other lands, gives up their bullying, and use of “black ops” to rearrange THEIR governmental policies to OUR liking, there are many many grievances against the West, and Israel itself, the Arabs feel must be redressed fairly.
What makes Hamas’ victory even more ironically hilarious is that they got a last minute surge at the polls when it was revealed that USAID had been sending lots of cash to Fatah, but not one dime to Hamas. And that money was to help Fatah “improve its image”. I kid you not.
Pax
Of course that was an unintentional leak . . .
This could certainly be “a good thing” if the Israeli’s & Palestinians were to take up the opportunity, esp. with Sharon no longer an operative force. Unfortunately it’s unlikely to happen, even though Hamas has shown a pragamatic side and has maintained a truce now for some time (1 1/2 yrs?) depsite provocations.
Important to keep in mind in the hysteria over ‘terorists in power’ is that just because a population is asked to choose between two sides hardly means full support for the side chosen. A simple self-test of political belief/hope & votes “chosen” should make the point.
I was re-reading last night an article on Hamas by Israeli peace activist Uri Avnery, written before the election. He argues that Israel really wanted to weaken Abbas, pointing out that:
All across the media now one hears the lament that there’s no one to negotiate with . . . as if! A commentator on Jim Lehrer last night said this will put the peace process back by 30 years.
Avnery points out that:
Let’s hope the process can be speeded up; that would be in our interest as well.
Robert Dreyfuss (author of Devil’s Game: how the United States Unleashed Fundamnetalist Islam:
UPI reporter Richard Sale, writing in 2002:
Funny, isn’t it, how no one wants to mention this now?
Justin Raimondo has more.
So you are saying that the Hamas win is blowback. Right?
Yea, in a deliberate, intentional way.
I don’t know if Hamas’ victory was actually desired, or if they expected Fatah to maintain control, albeit in a weakened condition & partnered with “terrorist elements” which would enable them to resist any calls for negotiation, & allow further unilateral action.
this, from Ira Chernus:
.
Cross-posted from earlier comment ::
Israelis Want Hamas Dialogue – Poll
Israel started funding the fledgling Hamas nearly 30 years ago. Ever since, Israel has supported Hamas.
Hamas was founded in 1987
In 1987, the Arabs living in the territories occupied by Israeli in the 6-Day war began a series of riots and violent confrontations known as the Intifadeh, a movement quite independent from PLO leadership. Soon thereafter, Islamic militants founded the Hamas movement, which was at first given some encouragement by Israel, as a means of countering the influence of the PLO. And perhaps because the opposition of the Hamas to an international conference that would adjudicate the problem of Palestine, coincided with the policies of the Shamir government.
The Hamas has a ‘military’ wing or wings that engages in terrorist acts and a ‘civilian’ wing that supposedly confines itself to education and ‘good works,’ under the leadership at present (1999) of the aging and ailing Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
.
First Reflections on the Electoral Victory of Hamas
by Gilbert Achcar – January 27, 2006
§6. Ariel Sharon played skillfully on the dialectics between himself and his Palestinian true opposite number, Hamas. His calculation was simple: in order to be able to carry through unilaterally his own hard-line version of the Zionist interpretation of a “settlement” with the Palestinians, he needed two conditions, to
a. minimize international pressure upon him — or rather U.S. pressure, the only one that really matters to Israel, and
b. to demonstrate that there is no Palestinian leadership with which Israel could “do business.”
For this, he needed to emphasize the weakness and unreliability of the PA by fanning the expansion of the Islamic fundamentalist movement, knowing that the latter was anathema to the Western States. Thus every time there was some kind of truce, negotiated by the PA with the Islamic organizations, Sharon’s government would resort to an “extrajudicial execution ” — in plain language, an assassination — in order to provoke these organizations into retaliation by the means they specialized in: suicide attacks. Their “F-16s” as they say. This had the double advantage of stressing the PA inability to control the Palestinian population, and enhancing Sharon’s own popularity in Israel. The truth of the matter is that the electoral victory of Hamas is the outcome that Sharon’s strategy was very obviously seeking, as many astute observers did not fail to point out.
Gilbert Achcar is author of Eastern Cauldron (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2004) and The Clash of Barbarisms, new expanded edition coming out soon from Saqi Books (London) and Paradigm Publishers (Boulder, CO).
● Juan Cole’s Visit to Amsterdam University
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY