Something I wrote last October, which I think needs serious consideration (more on the flipside):
For more years than I would want to count at this point in my life I have been questioning the direction and purpose of the Democrat party. I’ve made no secret of my general uneasiness within what has become of the Dems whose leadership has generally underwhelmed me over the last quarter century. Truth is I really don’t fit in with a party that seems to favor its corporate cronies over its purported commitment to basic progressive and populist values and policies. The GOP was never and will never be an alternative for me. The unholy alliance of theocons and neocons is one with which I simply would never wish to associate. Genocidal wars, draconian laws that decimate the letter and spirit of The Bill of Rights, looting the nation’s treasury and generally pissing away the nation’s future for the sake of feathering a few cronies’ nests under the aegis of God and Country are the halmarks of the GOP. The best I’ve been able to say about the Dems is that they are “less bad.”
The question that I can never leave far behind is this: “is less bad good enough?” When lives and quality of life are at stake, the answer is no. As of late I have given the words of the late Malcom X a fresh read, and I have a couple observations. One is that in many respects, when we’re talking about civil rights and human rights in America things really haven’t changed much since Malcom’s day. The images from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina of the dire poverty that has consigned so many of our fellow Americans to a lifetime of marginal existence (what the Marxists would call the lumpenproletariat) and neglect by the very government that is supposed to serve them, will haunt me for as long as I can still draw a breath. Those images should haunt all of us. The specter of racism and classism continues to plague our political and social landscape, just as it has all of my life. The second observation: politicians from one party or another have talked a good game when it comes to promoting progressive ideas and policies – but with few exceptions they don’t walk the talk. That was a problem that Malcom confronted with the issues that were salient to him, and is a problem that we on the left continue to confront. The Dems have assumed for so long that they have the leftists, the women, the ethnic minorities in their back pockets because presumably we have “nowhere else to go.” The result is, as it was in the 1950s and 1960s, a not-so-benign neglect of our issues and values from the powers that be. And as long as we keep registering Democrat and periodically show up to vote when expected, nothing changes, except maybe for the worse. We have a party where its members say the right things more often than not, but then by and large approve laws like The Patriot Act, the bankruptcy bill that will end up burying working families who’ve encountered exhorbitant medical expenses; they’ve been silent when the White House nominated an architect of the current pro-torture policy to the office of AG; when it comes to the illegal war being fought against the Iraqis, many of the Dems want to send more troops and kill of even more people; they’ve been largely silent on the issue of voting irregularities both in Ohio and Florida; and we know that privacy rights are also no longer sacred in Dem circles.
What to do? In Malcom’s last year on this planet he offered up some simple advice that I think we can all use: be organized, and don’t affiliate with either the Dems or the GOP. That’s the general idea behind American Solidarity: organize physically, financially, intellectually. Many of us come from varying backgrounds and have varying pet causes, but let’s face it – those of us who are living paycheck to paycheck, those of us who value liberty, who value equality, who value justice, who value privacy have a hell of a lot in common. Technological advances in the last decade or so make it easier for us to coordinate and to exchange ideas and information than ever before. It’s way past time to start using those tools to our advantage. Blogs are one of our tools, playing the same role that zines played in the 1980s and pamphlets such as Paine’s played during the Revolution some 230 years ago. Blogging is only part of that picture. Cernig fills in some of the details elsewhere. Clearly, unions, thinktanks, civil liberties organizations are going to be salient as well.
Being unaffiliated with the major political parties is also crucial for an American Solidarity movement. The GOP can be written off as a lost cause. The Dems, I’m also skeptical of, but will note this much: if they think we’re registered as Dems, they can assume that we’ll continue to accept the status quo. Malcom was onto something back in 1964 and 1965 when he advocated refusing to back any candidate until it was clear that they were willing to walk their talk. If they turn out to be kosher, then by all means support them, but only to the extent that they are representing us. If they stop representing us, we should be willing to walk away from them. If they know that their constituents mean business, they’ll be more careful to represent us in whatever legislative body they hold office. There’s strength in numbers, especially when those numbers are independent.
Underlying all of this is the assumption that you’re registered and that you vote. If you are making less than 35k a year, and/or if you’re an ethnic minority, and/or you’re a relatively young voter (say 18-25 years of age) you are under-represented when it comes to actual voters come election day. You need to register (ideally independent) and you need to educate yourself on the candidates and issues, and you need to vote – and not only those major elections, but also on the local elections. The percentage of eligible voters who actually do vote is pathetic when compared to other relatively democratic industrialized nations. Understandably, a lot of that is due to the pathetic array of choices we get offered by the major parties; we as citizens too bear some responsibility with regard to voter turnout and need to take that responsibility personally. Becoming an informed voter is going to require some effort, but hardly an insurmountable effort. Newspapers across the globe are available over the internet (I’m a big fan of The Guardian and The Independent – both from the UK, but there are certainly others worth visiting). There are a number of well-informed bloggers that you should make an effort to check out on a regular basis. Keep up with the local newspapers and bloggers. If you don’t have a computer at home, go to your nearest library to access these resources. If you have access to these resources, take some responsibility for educating your friends and neighbors.
Making meaningful social change happen in America will not happen overnight, and will be truly a community effort in which each of us must play an active role. In other words, it’s time to stand up.
Great diary…I wonder if we could get the Democrats attention if say a million of us on a specified day all wrote or sent emails to our senators and other proper authorities saying we were un-registering as Democrats and would re-register as Independents? And not only say we were but do it.
I’m all for that! 🙂
Malcolm X was one of the inspirations to me just after high school. Thanks for reminding me of his fight.
In answer to your diary question – not as bad is not good enough. Bad is still bad.
In answer to Chocolate Ink’s query about changing registration – we did it in 1980 and scared the bejeesus out of the republicans. Thousands of us changed from Republican to Dem, made a photocopy, and mailed them to the RNC over the equal rights amendment. So changing from Dem to Independent and mailing them to the DSCC and DLC would make a statement. Although I’m not sure they are listening.
Just remember to send letters to the Senators that did support us letting them know we are still supporting them.
Didn’t scare them enough. They took an extreme turn right and have been in power for most of the last 26 years.
As usual, James, spot on. Especially with this statement:
In my conversations with others on the subject of “what’s wrong with America” (whereby my take, as you know, is that “what’s wrong” has less to do with any particular party and more to do with the “American psyche” in general), I have said, again and again, “What’s wrong with America is that the people seem to have no concept of ‘solidarity.’ It’s I for me and me for me and fuck the rest of the world.”
This is what Katrina and, above all, the lack of response on the part of the PEOPLE, confirmed for me. I didn’t expect BushCo to respond appropriately, but I had hoped that the people would have gone apeshit over it. They didn’t. (I suppose they’re all thinking, “well, I’m not black and I’m not that poor, so if it ever happens in my city, I’ll be one of the lucky ones.”)
I don’t know what it’s going to take to inspire in the American people a true understanding of what “solidarity” means. If Katrina didn’t do it, what will?
Must say, I see this lack of solidarity expressed every day in so many teeny-tiny ways–just watch what happens next time you go to the movies and have the audacity to ask someone taking up two seats to accommodate his own fat ass whether he and his honey-bun might possibly consider, pretty pls with sugar on top, uh, perhaps maybe like giving up one of those extra seats so that you and your partner can sit together. Sure, Mr. Take-two-seats-for-myself will get up and move if you pressure him to, but he will do it grudgingly, he will hem and haw and act like you just asked him to sacrifice the first born or the farm. How dare you fucking inconvenience me, man?
This business of “I’m gonna go out and get mine and the rest of you can just go fuck yourselves” has become so firmly anchored in the American psyche, I don’t know….I just don’t know. Until you can dislodge THAT kind of thinking (and how many people are even AWARE of the way it works in their own minds and in their own lives?–if they’ve never lived outside this country in places where there is a more solidified sense of solidarity in the populace, I don’t see how anyone could even be aware of the extent to which this I-meism permeates every single aspect of our lives here because it has become so firmly entrenched as to be virtually imperceptible to anyone who does not have a concrete comparison)…until you can get rid of that, this ship is going to continue going down, down, down.
It’s not the politics, people, it’s the people.
I think the reason the filibuster attempt failed was that there were not enough people on board. Sure, we mobilized the blogosphere. But I know that in my circle of colleagues, friends, etc., 90% of them did NOTHING even though they are hardcore liberals who opposed the nomination. We need to find a way to ACTIVATE the rest of the so-called “liberals” in this country.
Face it: In this country it’s I for me and me for me, and, unless “I” see a direct (instantaneous?) advantage for me, me, me, I’m not going to lift a finger.
The sooner we pick up the goddamned mirror and understand that THIS is the fundamental problem, the closer we will have come to solving it. But there again we butt up against the second most devastating problem, also firmly implanted in our “national psyche”: DENIAL. What? Whome? Imeism? Inconsiderate? Unable to to give a fuck about anyone but myself?
Yeah right. OK, so next time you park your car in a way that takes up three spaces instead of one, are you going to think about the guy who might be pulling up behind you in five minutes looking for a spot? Next time you try to cut in front of me at the grocery store you gonna think about the fact that maybe I’m in a hurry too? Next time you take up three seats in the theater, you going to decide to move your fat ass over BEFORE I have to ask?
Yo. Mountain meet molehill, you may say, but the devil is in the details and all these so typically, classically “American” behaviors say it all.
Sigh.
to another influenza pandemic in any way similar to 1918, we could possibly have a rather “egalitarian” Katrina style disaster nationwide, if not worldwide.
The results of which may likely be either a substantial lurch toward greater authoritarianism, or a huge rejection of the current authoritarianism.
I think we ought to see if we can’t prepare accordingly so that we lean the results toward the latter of the two.
ref: The Great Influenza, by John Barry.
as events unfold in the coming months, there will be some very dramatic changes in the way Americans live.
“Preparation” will not mean the same thing to everybody.
But it is necessary to prepare, in whatever way your conscience dictates and your resources permit.
Wise words! Agreed.
There was a reason I left preparation somewhat generic. There’s no great joy involved in scaring the crap out of life long friends, or BT surfers, for that matter.
But I feel obligated to raise some initial awareness, as I’ve seen you do also, which I appreciate.
If one’s denial is then necessary for a person’s immediate survival, then so be it.
As you say, we all have different circumstances regardless of the possible scenarios. And we all have access to google, should we wish to be further informed as to the possibilities.
You’re right on about the cultural aspect – we’ve taken self-centeredness and turned it into an art form. I’m at a loss as to how we go about changing that. All I know to do is to keep working on myself and simultaneously passing what I’m learning on to the next generation – and then I think that surely that can’t be enough. Where to go?
Yeah, and it’s precisely this point, “self-centredness turned art form” that makes my life almost impossible. I feel like “damaged goods” somehow because, with the ten years I spent in Europe at a time when socially conscious behavior was at a premium there (the same period in which I-meism became the height of fashion here, i.e. the 80s!), I am always acutely aware of the contrast–and these little things just drive me nuts. Can’t even go to the fucking movies without having half a heart attack (and by heart attack, I mean it breaks my heart to see, because I consider this behavior so utterly disgusting). Seriously, if my non-confrontational, epitome of respect and consideration hubby would go along with it, next time that happens in a theater, I’d go in, have my hubby sit to the left and me to the right of one of those “let’s take up three seats” folks, then pass pop and popcorn back and forth throughout the whole movie! If they asked, “Say, you think you guys want to switch seats?” I’d say, “Oh no, we’re just fine. Thanks for asking.”
On a more serious note: part of the problem here is the country’s history, the notion of the “virgin wasteland” and the absolute refusal to respect any form of territorial boundary (except your own of course). Don’t fence me in! That whole dynamic of space (any space) being “mine for the taking” is the fundamental core mentality (I call it “founders keepers” heh). And that’s what’s frightening about it because that tells you how deep the shit is that you’re trying to cut through. It goes back to the very beginning of colonialist occupation.
The same dynamic is reflected in the inordinate focus on rights in this country (I’ve got a right to this, to that, to whatever) with little regard for the responsibilities that go along with those rights. We are responsible only to ourselves in this country (and that is the bullshit we are now seeing taken to the height of audacity in gov right now). The notion that we, as individuals, may be responsible to other individuals around us. Heh. Good luck getting most Americans to wrap their heads around that idea.
And that’s why I also think you are right about a) focusing on one’s self and being vigilant about that dynamic in our own behavior and b) passing it on to the next generation. It’s one reason I work mostly with kids–because at some point I realized that there are some tricks you simply can’t force old dogs to learn, no matter how you go about it–they’re just never going to get it.
It’s so sad. Esp b/c it stands in such stark, stark contrast to the mentality that prevailed in this “virgin wasteland” before the unsettlers came. Bitter, bitter irony in the fact that EUROPE, of all places, has a much better grip on the notions of “solidarity” and personal “responsibility” as correlative to rights. Mindnumbing.
Mr. Benjamin, again, you have my heart in your diary! As an Independent, you have to know how I feel with the words you have written. Thank you so very much. hugs
I’d like to suggest Mr. Harry Belafonte.
actually DTF, I happen to like him a lot! I think he is trying hard to lead. I hope he is a success too….
anyhow he has my attention!
Glad this connected with you. It was something that I put my heart into. Whatever direction we lefties and progressives go, it’s gotta have soul.
I kept trying to define this feeling I have had the past few months about the dem reps and it all just was feeling familiar. It was something that had lingered deep inside me before for a long period of time. In reading all these posts the past five days I kept getting that feeling and I finally figured it out.
I felt this way before when I was fighting with myself, trying to come out of denial that my relationship with my husband was over. I fought it tooth and nail and cried and kicked and screamed and then I let go. I think that is what is happening for me right now. I am on the fence, trying to make up my mind if it is time to let go of the Dem party. It is no longer familiar to me, much the same as when I realised I didn’t really know my husband anymore, if I ever really did. I’m not quite there yet but ya know what they say…when ya get sick of being sick and tired you will let go.
Hooray!!!
I liken it to the burning bed syndrome.
No matter how the Dems get fucked, abused, beaten, ignored… they still go whimpering basically, “but I love him”
I say it’s time to kick the bums out. And stand up for ourselves.
There’s a lot of learned helplessness – caused by receiving mixed messages (in this case hearing promises from Dems, and then mostly getting dumped on – AND not really being able to predict when they’ll dump on us and when they won’t). It’s crazy-making. Reminds me of a couple of my college romances where about the only sane thing to do (and also the hardest thing to do) was to walk away and not look back. I think that Dem voters and activists really need to view themselves as being in a codependent relationship of sorts, and that rather than try to change the abuser, it’s a hell of a lot healthier (for the individual, and for everyone connected to the individual) to get the hell out. The first step is realizing that there’s a problem.
I know I ranted it before, but there is no better reply to your post than this:
I can see I will have to visit your blog more often.
What in the hell else can we do?
Well, I agree that party politics is not likely to be the answer, but I think this sort of action can affect the change we are looking for.
it says cannot post in archive. It is a wonderful diary, though, and I have a very strong preference for non-violent conflict resolution.
I think the greatest challenge as regards the US situation is that in the others you mention, the “revolutionaries” had on their side the fact that the occupying power was losing money, and the occupying party did not have access to the same types of weaponry that US has today.
(I am excepting the Ukraine, since their “revolution” apparently had the backing of the US 🙂 )
An example, if Gandhiji had faced an entire British army of General Dyers, armed with pain rays and other mass torture devices, and if London had been making so much money and felt there was even more to make to the extent of employing aerial bombardment, turning every protest into a massacre worse than Amritsar, it is not likely that the independence movement could have maintained that commitment to non-violence. But England was not operating under those conditions, on the contrary, Amritsar taught them that even with their substantial cadre of collaborators, they were outnumbered. It was, after all, India 🙂
I realize that it is controversial to suggest that the struggle to end apartheid in the US was influenced by economic considerations on the part of Washington, engaged then as now in a messy imperial adventure, but I think that the main thrust of your argument, that these historical efforts should be studied, is well taken, though I would advise as dispassionate a study as possible, considering carefully which correlations are accurate, as well as augmenting the study by going back even farther in history and studying corrections that have occurred in fedual states.
traction here on BT, or anywhere else for that matter. And I am beginning to realize why.
I think people who are not familiar with Gene Sharp’s work are focusing too much on the feasibility of particular past actions, in regards to use now.
Well, as you alluded to, those actions were suitable for those times, and may or may not be suitable now, but they remain as examples for stimulating innovative options now.
The main premise that seems to be missing from nearly everyone’s analyses is that of an understanding of how, and why various successful actions of the past worked.
For example, and off the top of my head, is the premise that the more hierarchical the structure of a given government the more subject it is to influence by the people’s withdrawal of obedience.
The most difficult challenge is to convince a nation’s people that indeed they actually do have a great deal more power to affect change than they realize.
I would know nothing of these concepts without having heard Gene Sharp lecture here a couple of decades past, or having read his trilogy on nonviolent action. His protégé has written a very readable book based on the very same concepts,
On Strategic Nonviolent Conflict
Without any awareness of the concepts involved there can be no understanding of the potential options.
but I think that the particular actions would need to be carefully analyzed in light of the current situation, not India in the 1940s or Alabama in the 1960s. And also with the recognition that even then, the initial actions were met with violence.
There are many people today who still bear scars, literal physical ones, from their participation in non-violent protests in the Civil Rights Movement.
And there is also the question of economics, since that is going to be the ultimate determinant of success. You mention people having more power than they realize. I agree.
And on several occasions I have expressed the wish that every person working in the US without papers purchased from Washington would not go to work for just one day.
It would be difficult to retaliate, few are working under their own names, and at the kind of jobs that if they were fired, they could easily get another similar job the next day. And if truth be told, in many cases if they were fired, they could return to their same employer, give a new name, and be hired again.
That is a population sector that has tremendous power, enough to bring the US economy to a stop, in just one day, if they ALL participated.
But there is the rub – with that, or any group, it would have to be in numbers so large that retaliation would be at the least difficult and impractical, and at best, practically impossible!
The concerns you raised are valid, and discussed at length in the GS material.
I would hope you might have the opportunity sometime soon to read the work referenced. I think I would very much enjoy further conversation with you in regards to that.
There is a link to a free pdf download (189 pages)of it within the link above, and in my original diary. Even if one would rather not burn that much paper and ink, you could still download the pdf, and read same at your leisure.
from whence cometh personal power!
at your leisure.