Jeers from Liberal Street Fighter
I wonder if they will have a Sleestak Wing at their shiny new “young-Earth” Creationist museum on the campus of Answers in Genesis in Kentucky:
In the United States, Answers in Genesis maintains a mailing list of 500,000 names and a monthly newsletter that goes out to as many as 120,000 readers, according to Mark Looy, chief communications officer.
Many of them have laid the financial foundation for the 50,000-square-foot, $25 million Creation Museum that Ham is building with donated money on a near-50-acre campus in the northern Kentucky countryside. As of March 31, almost $21 million had been raised, according to the Web site.
They promise a entertaining center for the celebration of psuedo-science, a playground where crowds of children can be ushered into this sick, twisted movement of backwards superstition. At a time where more and more American children go uneducated in science and mathematics, this new complex will enshrine ignorance.
While mainstream scientists shake their heads, marketing research indicates Answers in Genesis may be welcoming up to 250,000 visitors a year after the museum’s scheduled debt-free opening next spring, according to Michael Zovath, vice president of the Creation Museum. Admission fees remain to be determined.
“The 250,000 people going to it will go back to their legislators and pressure them to vote for Jesus,” said Volney Gay, director of the Center for Religion and Culture at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. “There’s a suspicion of science and a suspicion of intellectuals in general.”
Said Ham: “What we see is if you can get information to people, their worldview will be changed, and the way they vote on issues, on a school board or whatever, will reflect that change.”
The destruction of this country proceeds apace. It is scary to watch a zealous minority of psychotic religious fanatics take a country founded on the principles of the Enlightenment back into an ignorant dark ages so damned quickly. They will only find more success as they use the media to drill their message of know-nothingism into the public conversation. More and more, the boilerplate of “faith” is pressed forward by nearly the entire political establishment as the measure of what makes a “good” American.
Inside, the museum will feature 31 rooms, 200 exhibit themes produced by a former Universal Studios designer and 55 video presentations, all offering creation science’s evidence for the Genesis account. There also will be a 2,600-square-foot bookstore with a medieval castle motif, a 150-seat Noah’s Cafe with dinosaur footprints embedded in the floor, an 84-seat planetarium, a 60-seat theater and a spacious refreshment area with palm trees and a waterfall.
The dinosaur replicas, many of them animatronic, are spectacular: Creationists say dinosaurs lived simultaneously with humans because their death came only after original sin. Some of the more compelling effects are in the key rooms depicting what are called “The Seven C’s of History.” They are: creation, corruption, catastrophe (the destruction of the world by Noah’s flood), confusion (Babel), Christ, the cross and consummation (his death and resurrection).
Along the Creation Walk
For instance, soft lighting, gentle sounds and pleasant fragrances will mark the Creation Walk, where Adam and Eve chat with God in the Garden of Eden before they are corrupted to commit original sin by an animatronic serpent. The dimly lit Corruption galleries, by comparison, will feature videos of pain and suffering, noxious odors and the heat, literally, turned up.
“We’re trying to make this the most uncomfortable place in the museum to show how original sin has corrupted the universe,” Zovath said on a tour through the site.
None of this has any more relationship to reality than Sid & Marty Kroft’s kitschy Saturday morning fantasy show. Sadly, far too many believe these fairy tales, and they will stop at nothing to keep isolating America from the rest of the civilized world.
Old gods and superstitions die hard, kind of like a fish flopping around in the bottom of a boat. The problem is that we get fish slime all over ourselves during the process, but the end result is always the same. The fish dies. Creationism, equating science and wish fulfillment as equals, worshipping rather than following Jesus, hate mongering in the name of religion, all these are the fish slime getting all over us as right wing Chrsitianity flops around and dies. It’s our particular destinies to live during this time, so I guess we can take this up with god in whatever way we wish to do so. For me, I thank God every morning and evening to be living during the death of one of the great scourges of mankind.
One of the ways we can help the fish die is to contrast so called Chrsitians with the teachings of Jesus. Check out a blog “God’s Work: Saving Jesus from Christians.” It’s a work in progress. Another way is to learn about Lakota spirituality.
http://rescuejesus.blogspot.com/
Adam is in a beautiful garden with a lovely, naked woman – and …
he’s tempted by an apple. (?)
π
Damnit Janet, you really gave me a laugh. And we need to bring up Lilith in that garden, really a Magdalene sort of creature…
Haha, Adam was gay. Another unsolved mystery brought to you by theology.
Goota love your mixed fruits π
Sleestaks were the things of childhood nightmares, and now that I’m grown, the nutjob fundies are the things lurking inside the dark closet.
I know you think about this stuff a lot, Madman, and I know you are a very critical thinker (which I admire), so I’m wondering if you can explain something I cannot figure out — how do you think the issue of science became defined for people as a “difference of opinion”? I mean, I get that scientists disagree with one another about how to interpret data etc. and that sort of thing totally makes sense to me, and seems to be a strength of the discipline. But how in the hell, in this era of heart surgery, the internet and rocketships, did it become even a remotely common activity to refer to the entire scientific process as simply a method of having an opinion about how things work? There is direct proof literally everywhere you look in our culture that science is fact-based.
I keep wracking my brain and I just can’t figure it out. Is it a problem of language and definitions, in the sense that the fundies don’t really understand the meanings of words like: science, evidence, fact, opinion, belief, and faith? Is it ignorance, being the result of the Republicans assaulting the public school system for so long? Is it delusion, in the sense that they really do honestly believe that either their god is a trickster god who’s trying to test their faith with fossils or that somehow that’s all the work of satan? Is it some kind of mass hypnosis, with a trigger like “God said it, I believe it, and that’s that”? Or is it a simple power trip, and they don’t really believe it, they just use this stuff to push the oppressive social agenda that they want?
Mostly, I think it’s all of that, but I wonder if I’m missing something. Maybe the trouble is that I’m trying to understand “crazy” in the first damn place, but I can’t escape the sense that if we understood it better, we could stop it in its tracks before it spreads any further.
It baffles me too. Oh, and I’m totally with you on the sleestak thing. I remember being utterly creeped out by them. It was kind of funny looking at the pic at the top of this diary and thinking about how much scarier I remember them. Not sure if that’s growing up, or if it’s having the current Republican crackpots running the government as a constant reminder of what’s really scary.
I know! They look so fake now. Not when I was little, though.
Heh, our fridge has been dying a long slow death for a while (since we’ve known we’re moving we’ve not bothered to repair/replace it), and I swear at 3AM it sounds exactly like a Sleestak, which still creeps me out a little.
Good question, and it was ALL of those things.
The soil for this mess is the long tradition of know-nothingism in this country, a steaming pile of fertilizer that we’ve been afflicted with since our founding (many would point out that there is a persistant minority of know-nothings in every culture). After WW2, I think the rapid pace of change, and the overblown “communist threat”, open dialogue and exchange of ideas became really threatening to a lot of Americans, and the right has systematically used carefully chosen words and propaganda to shift how people thought about science and mathematics. As public education has been de-funded (esp. after Brown v. Board), they were able to conflate the more common meaning of the word “theory” (gee, I think my wife is cheating on me … what do you think Bob?) with the scientific meaning:
(As an aside, the scientific meaning of the word is listed as number one on that webpage, but the right depends upon the definition listed fifth: “An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture.”)
In a culture where parents proudly display “My Kid Beat up Your Honor Student” bumper stickers, this is a recipe for creeping ignorance, and I think it was a campaign that was deliberately planned and marketed. I also think it was helped along by the academic fad in a sort of lazy relativism, where “authorities” became reluctant to state anything catagorically about just about anything, and when they did it was in language so opaque that even well-educated people needed a translator.
As for how to combat this problem, we need to really become serious about teaching children the language of science: mathematics. Most Americans have NO idea how to evaluate the psuedo-science that fills modern publications and advertisements, because so few of them learn how to question such things critically. Trying to learn science without a pretty solid “vocabulary” in math is setting children up for failure. We treat mathematics as some kind of scary magic, instead of a language. It’s one of the few languages that people can use to communicate across cultures.
To go on from simple arithmatic to algebra and geometry teaches children to think critically, yet we seem unwilling to actually train teachers who love and can teach it. How many of us had math and science taught to us by the school’s PE teacher, or someone who had majored in something else when they got their teaching certificate?
Having failed to provide far too many children with a solid base in math and basic science left a huge void for the idiot right to fill with a bunch of nonsense.
The intentional conflation of distinctly different definitions of words is something that I think is a bigger problem than many other folks on the left seem to think, so thanks for bringing that up in your excellent reply. Language matters. It has a lot of power to determine how we conceptualize our world, and thus also how we are capable of expressing ourselves within it.
Nice observation, and that sticker as an example elucidates the multiple prongs of the campaign — not only exalting ignorance, but also their notion that “might makes right”, which seems to be a central thread in their tapestry.
I think you’re right about education being the primary defense mechanism for us. Knowledge is not only power, it’s also freedom.
the right seems really good at “painting” horrible ideas on their canvasses, then dressing them up w/ great lighting, well-chosen placement and beautiful ornate frames. Then the plant a hot blonde and a professorial looking gentleman in front of it to convince you to buy. Liberals seem to think it’s enough to put beautiful, elaborate and wonderful ideas on the canvas, only to prop it against a poorly pointed dark brick wall off in the corner, while our “artists” sit darkly in the corner mumbling incoherently and drinking absinthe. I know this sounds like yet another rant about “framing”, but I think it’s more about being willing to fight for and champion what you’ve come to think as right. It’s not enough to have great ideas, you have to PRESENT them (just ask Tesla about why he is less well-known than Edison, even though it was HIS idea that powers modern life).
I agree with Grover Norquist on exactly one thing he said: ‘Bipartisanship is another name for date rape’. It’s not enough to have good ideas, or the BEST idea. You have to FIGHT for those ideas, promote those ideas. We on the left have been too willing for far too long to compromise too fast, to try to find “middle ground” at the outset of every political contest. Anybody who’s haggled at a flea market knows how stupid this is. I’m so damned sick of Democrats and Liberal activist who blather on about finding “middle ground”. The center is where you end up AFTER you’ve beaten the shit out of each other.
Sorry for the rambling mixed metaphors …
Mixed metaphors, mixed cocktails, they’re all survival tools right now. (I love Tesla. Reading his biography made me cry.)
Seriously, I completely agree with the need to fight, and fight hard. This is life and death stuff here, it’s not some frou-frou entertainment. A dear friend of mine said something like this to me the other day, which sort-of summed the whole thing up for me, “What’s this ‘tolerance’ bullshit strategy about anyway? I don’t want to be tolerated! Look, either love me or fuck off.”
The “might makes right” thing really encapsulates the whole thing for me, too. Once one embraces something like the following: 1) there is a Supreme Being; 2) it is knowable; 3) I know what it is; 4) and my Supreme Being can beat up your Supreme Being; then one is on a massive “might makes right” power trip. And when people’s behavior flows from that belief system, we get exactly what we have now, a global social system rooted in fiction, Othering and domination.
I think we need to find increasingly effective ways of challenging those assumptions, and I’m deeply concerned that we on the left are not doing it quickly enough as well as not fighting hard enough.
the first and most effective thing is to CONFRONT it. The Hillaryesqe idea of pandering to them (“we all agree abortion is a tragedy”, for example) serves only to reaffirm their beliefs as based in some unassailable Authority. The game is lost, right there.
PT Barnum was right.
Oops! Wrong Fairy tale. All of these fundie cultists spread silliness whatever their particular brand of belief they boost.
I think they’re in caves consorting with the dinosaurs.
Much of the problem is the content of science instruction in early grades. As a response to Sputnik and the great race to the moon, a wonderful curriculum was developed, called Science, A Process Approach. Children learned the tools of science: Observation. Inference. Hypothesis making. Collecting Data. Testing of hypotheses. etc. Working back and forth from induction to deduction and back again. Working from and building to theory.
Then, the great backlash. NO! Children should learn facts, the what of science, not the how of science: the life cycle of trees. Names of birds. All about fish. Types of rocks. Not how science looks at these things, not how scientists think, nor of the general strategies that they use. Allowing children to draw their own conclusions would be dangerous.
As a result, safe content has been chosen, but there is little excitement built, as most children do not DO science, they memorize “facts about science”.
It is really sad. Most children are natural scientists, with their curiosity about how things work, why things are the way they are. They need fewer answers, and more instruction on how to come up with their own answers.
That way, we might see a lot more respect and understanding of science among adults who will never be science majors.
VERY good point. Thanks.