Raw Story has a scoop on a soon to be released Vanity Fair interview with Bush’s quail-hunting sidekick. I was shocked to hear that Cheney agreed to an interview with Vanity Fair because their editor, Graydon Carter has been a vociferous critic of this administration. Cheney helping his sales is an indication of just how desperate things have become.
The first interview with Vanity Fair took place in February, shortly after the Vice President accidently shot his 78-year-old hunting companion, which wasn’t reported to the press until the following afternoon. Purdum writes that the Administration is in “shambles,” and suspects that that’s partly why the Vice President agreed to chat with a “magazine whose editor’s criticisms of the administration are loathed by the vice president’s wife and elder daughter.”
Even though Cheney agreed to sit down twice with Todd Purdum, he wasn’t willing to answer all his questions on the record.
“Asked how he could have possibly objected to Senator John McCain’s amendment banning cruel and inhumane treatment of prisoners and detainees in American custody, Cheney declines to answer on the record, because, his aides explain, the issue touches on sensitive, classified matters,” Purdum writes.
I don’t care whose perspective you look at, whether it be opponents of the Bush administration, Republican congresspeople up for re-election, or Bush himself, there is nothing further to be gained by Dick Cheney’s continued presence in the White House.
When you have an 18% approval rating, your chief of staff in on trial for perjury, you’ve just shot someone in the face, and the war you started has turned into a disaster, it’s time to step down.
The Vanity Fair article gives more evidence that Dick Cheney is responsible for the Iraq fiasco and for the bad intelligence that justified the war.
Also in the article, an unnamed former senior intelligence official tells Vanity Fair that Cheney’s relationship with the CIA turned sour with regards to whether or not Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
“But Cheney is not quite like any other vice president,” Purdum writes. “He runs a larger, more active national-security staff than any of his predecessors, and a former senior intelligence official told me that, while Cheney’s initial pre-war visits to ask the C.I.A. about Iraqi W.M.D. seemed supportive, the incessant demands of his staff to find evidence that wasn’t there became ‘probably a different matter.'”
Does anyone still believe that George Tenet told Bush the case for war was a ‘slam-dunk’? I don’t. I know he said those were the two dumbest words I ever said, but that was after he received a Medal of Freedom. And to contradict Woodward’s version would open up a big can of worms. In any case, when you have been exposed as a liar, as a warmonger, and as an incompetent…when your very visage turns off 82% of the voters and drags down your party’s prospects…when the whole world despises you, doesn’t trust you, and won’t work with you…you should just resign.
New information that Cheney was aware of the sensitivity of Plame’s position but wanted her name leaked anyway only bolsters the case for resignation.
It’s not even a partisan issue anymore. It’s no longer in any one’s interests, except Dick Cheney’s, for Big Time to continue in office.
But without him, who would pull Bush’s strings and make the puppet dance?
dunno. Maybe you could do the job. Oh wait!! Are you Canadian?
“there is nothing further to be gained by Dick Cheney’s continued presence in the White House.”
It depends on your definition of “nothing” since Cheney is helping to bring Bush down to the ground. Besides he has been sealing himself into a world of his own and may soon lose his ability to make contact with the outer world altogether. There are so few boo-free zones for his speaking engagements. Let him sit there and stew. He is probably making attempts to punish Stephen Colbert right now, to have him audited, followed, phones tapped while Colbert walks between the raindrops.
Today, on DemocracyNow!, Amy Goodman aired Colbert’s speech at the press club dinner. It was an absolute scream. He was 3 feet from Bush and kept addressing him directly… Bush had no choice but to sit there and take it. Colbert was masterful… I laughed out loud several times. The transcript can be found at the link… you can also listen, or watch.
As for Cheney, I read an article recently (can’t find it right now) about how incredibly paranoid he is… he always travels with a chem/bio suit, never takes the same route to work, stuff like that. Instead of coming to grips with his mortality, like most people who have had so many heart attacks, he’s deathly afraid of his own shadow. That hasn’t made him any less arrogant. I agree with Booman; he’s gotta go. I know he’s hurting Bush, but he’s hurting our country more.
from a link at Salon.com last time with my son and we were overcome. We had the same reaction as Jon Stewart “I’m immensely proud of him but HOLY —-!”
Cheney power is being diminished little by little. I mean hasn’t his approval rating gone down to 17%?
Before he goes, he’ll need to confer his title as War Profiteer In Chief.
If Cheney is dragging down his party and Bush, that’s excellent reason for him not to resign. It IS a partisan issue, in the sense that Bush is responsible for what happens on his watch, not Cheney. Bush has the power to put Cheney on a leash anytime he wants to. He obviously does not want to.
Cheney’s resignation would change nothing. To think otherwise is to buy into the spin that poor good Bush has been forced somehow to work the evil that Cheney instigates. Bullshit. The buck stops in the Oval office, not whatever undisclosed loonybin Cheney presides in. To call for Cheney’s resignation is to play into the hands of the RNC by scapegoating the VP as a way of distracting from the true villains: Bush and the Republican Party. The only departure from office that matters is Bush’s — together with Cheney’s. Let’s not get distracted from that reality by the brainless babbling of the beltway pundit class.
I agree. Bush would never accept his resignation anyway in my opinion as that like Rummy would lead people to think he made a mistake and that ain’t gonna happen. Besides that Cheney and Rummy are the driving forces behind the drumbeat against Iran and again bush is in whole hearted agreement with permanent war. Maybe for different reasons than Cheney/Rummy but for war none the same.
They only have several years left and if cheney resigned that would be too much of a political shake up for the party and distract them from their nefarious schemes.
Very exciting news about the Vanity Fair interview! Scott McClellan resigned in the same month his VF profile appeared…