Do a majority of Americans really think unlimited government access to phone records is okay by them?
If the Washington Post can be believed, “Most Americans Support NSA’s Efforts.”
Below the fold: who are these “most Americans?”…
In an overnight poll conducted by WaPo and ABC News, “63 percent of Americans said they found the NSA program to be an acceptable way to investigate terrorism, including 44 percent who strongly endorsed the effort,” Not surprisingly, WaPo doesn’t tell us what the poll questions actually were or what the multiple choice answers were. It does, however, admit at the bottom of the article that: “A total of 502 randomly selected adults were interviewed Thursday night for this survey. Margin of sampling error is five percentage points for the overall results. The practical difficulties of doing a survey in a single night represents another potential source of error.”
I want to talk to the statistician who claims that 502 randomly selected adults, called at home at night, who may or may not have been familiar with the story or the issues involved, or have understood the questions. can give an accurate snapshot of what “Americans” actually think within any margin of error. What pool of “adults” were the 502 polled selected from? The same pool that logs online to vote in those instant polls that ask, “Do you believe Nancy Holloway is still alive?”
WaPo’s Richard Morin is on MSNBC with Natalie Allen echo chambering the poll results. He’s making all kinds of claims about what the poll says without giving any granularity as to how it was conducted. And the rest of the talking heads are citing the poll results as if they were Gospel truth.
We need to start insisting on transparency in poll reporting. Who was polled, what questions were asked, what the answer choices were, and an honest assessment of any given poll’s statistical accuracy.
As best one can tell from the information WaPo has provided, the overnight poll on the NSA call database story has no scientific legitimacy whatsoever.
Shame on them for even publishing it, and shame on the news networks for giving it legitimacy.
#
Hey, here’s a poll question for you: who has less credibility, WaPo or the Bush administration?
#
Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes from Virginia Beach, Virginia. Read his weekday commentaries at ePluribus Media and Pen and Sword.
Agreed, and thanks for the post. As to your poll, that’s a tough one.
Bush has less credibility than the WaPo but just barely.
My teenager answered and took the poll for me so she could keep her important coversation on call waiting. I think they need to call back and double check their figures!
Well, best I can determine from combing the sources, this was a complex 47 question poll they conducted over the phone.
Brother.
Thanks for the insight. As to your poll, I can’t answer. Since nieither has ANY credibility, it is impossible for one to have less than the other.
They fabricated WoMD evidence. They fabricated orange alert after orange alert. They corrupted the election process. They corrupted the 2004 exit polls results after the fact.
After you’ve done all that, what’s fabricating an extra opinion poll or two? Bush doesn’t have 51% approval of the way he parts his hair, let alone the way he handles privacy.
This phone poll came back too quick. The story only broke yesterday. They needed to lie and say the “people supported” tapping everyone having their phones tapped, so they fabricated consent.
I thought that was a quick poll for a story that just broke yesterday. Besides, I don’t think many Americans understand the implications of what this means.
They’d be less complacent (though I actually think this poll willbe history after teh weekend or so) if some of our independent journalists received more corporate media space.
Greg Palast’s THE SPIES WHO SHAG US looks today at private database collector & purveyor, ChoicePoint Inc & connects the dots.
Thanks for the link. Very important info.
Your poll should have a third box marked Both!!