I know it’s easy to assign blame to others for the mess that has currently engulfed the Middle East. Easy to blame Hamas and Hezbollah for kidnapping Israeli soldiers and sparking this nightmare of violence. Easy to blame Israel for its brutal overreaction to the kidnappings by bombing, bulldozing and killing innocent Palestinians and Lebanese. Easy even to blame President Bush and his administration for their incredibly moronic foreign policy which seems to take literally the Maoist dictum that power flows from the barrel of a gun.
After all, each of the foregoing actors have taken step after miscalculated step to bring this current conflagration of death and destruction to a fever pitch. But the truth is that none of these are the ultimate cause of the current conflict. That responsibility lies elsewhere.
Because, in truth, all of us are to blame. We, the People of the United States of America. We’re the guilty parties. It’s our fault.
Cont.
MY INDICTMENT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
COUNT 1
We have known for 50 years that foreign wars of occupation do not solve problems, but only grow new ones. We had all the evidence we needed in the examples of Vietnam and Afghanistan. The after effects of Vietnam plunged all of Southeast Asia into a nightmare of war and genocide for a generation, from Laos in the north to Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge in the South. And we all know the end result of the Russians defeat in Afghanistan: the rise of the vicious Islamic fundamentalist regime of the Taliban, and the birth of Al Qaeda.
We knew, and yet we allowed ourselves to be deceived and seduced into an invasion of Iraq, which served no purpose other than to enrich the coffers of certain defense contractors. Too few of us in positions of power or influence (and too few of us, period) stood up to denounce George Bush’s grandiloquent folly of invading Iraq, and his dream of bring peace and justice to the Middle East through the blunt instrument of American Military Power. And what was once a precarious regional stasis has now been transformed into an orgy of regional chaos and bloodletting all across the region in Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Israel and now Lebanon.
We allowed our own fears and misguided desire for vengeance after 9/11 to give President Bush and his neocon enablers free reign to wage his misnamed “War on Terror” as they saw fit. We allowed ourselves to be persuaded that torture and brutality, missiles and bombs, and the deaths of innocent Iraqis (a country and a people that had no relation to the atrocity of the 9/11 attacks) were righteous acts and the correct strategy to defeat our new enemies.
And in doing so we laid the groundwork for the fruits of that criminal waste of lives and property: a civil war in Iraq that we can do nothing to stop, a budding crisis with Iran over its nuclear program, border skirmishes between Iraqi Kurds and Turkish and Iranian forces, the breakdown of the Palestinian and Israeli peace process, and the resulting violence in Palestine and Lebanon involving the Israeli Defense Force, Hamas and Hezbollah..
Yet, this was only the most recent in a long line of mistakes, errors in judgment and outright misconduct that we have made collectively, as a people, as citizens of these United States.
COUNT 2
We abandoned the peace process between Israel and its neighbors. Each time the United States has actively worked for, and promoted peace, in the Middle East we have had encouraging, if modest successes. The Camp David accords that were the work of President Carter, and ended the decades long strife between Israel and Egypt. The Oslo Accords which were supported by the first President Bush and President Clinton did not succeed in bringing a final solution to the Israeli/Palestinian problem, but they brought peace for a time, and hope that future negotiations would lead to a final resolution.
Yet, since that time we have abandoned any policy of encouraging negotiation and diplomacy. We have left Israel and the Palestinians to their own devices, and have failed to stay engaged in seeking peace. Rather, we have encouraged the most hard-line elements in Israel to spurn peaceful processes and engage in an aggressive policy of settlements and military oppression. Then when the inevitable terrorist response by radical extremists occurs we condemn the Palestinian people as a whole, and throw the full weight of our support behind Israel’s military reaction. In short, we are now enabling a cycle of violence.
It is not enough to say that this is solely the fault of the Bush administration’s hand off approach to the Palestinian problem. It has been a recurrent theme in America’s relationship with Israel over the past half century. We promote peace for a while (usually after some explosion of violence in the region), achieve some small diplomatic success, and then put the issue on the back burner, again. Rarely has there been a consistent and vigorous focus on promoting peace by the American government.
And that falls squarely in our laps, ladies and gentlemen, because we have not demanded that our politicians keep their attention focused on dealing with this ever smoldering powder keg. We, as a people, have never demanded that our government in Washington use its full power and leverage to keep all of the relevant parties at the peace table. Diplomacy and negotiation between peoples who have such mistrust and anger toward each other is not an easy or particularly rewarding task. But it is infinitely preferable to violence and war.
Indeed, just look at the Balkans where the US and its European allies have done a much better job of staying engaged. That region is still filled with many land mines (both literally and figuratively) but it is at peace. An uneasy, uncomfortable peace, yes. But peace nonetheless. There are no more rape camps and massacres, no more snipers indiscriminately killing ordinary people as they try to get water or food. The Serbs, Croats, Macedonians and Bosnians still do not love one another, still harbor resentments and vendettas for centuries old offenses, but they are no longer at war with one another.
We can blame Bush all we want, but he is not alone in condemning the Israelis, Lebanese and Palestinians to generation after generation of death and war. We are just as much to blame, because we are the ones put Bush and the Republicans in power, and we are the ones who turn away from the Israel’s conflicts with its neighbors as soon as the media quits broadcasting images of buildings being demolished with missiles, and dead bodies being pulled from the rubble.
We have the power to force our politicians to take positive actions for peace, through the ballot box and through other forms of activism, but we have fallen down in our responsibility to our fellow human beings who reside in the Middle East. And trust me: they are holding you and I responsible for our government’s policies toward Israel and the Palestinians.
COUNT 3
Our biggest misdeed has been the failure of our imagination. We have permitted those among us who hate to dominate our discourse regarding the Middle East. Republican politicians and lobbyists, conservative talk show hosts, the mindless bobble heads at Fox News, and the editorial pages of the majority of our newspapers have tarred every Arab and Muslim in the world as a terrorist or Islamofascist. These demagogues have encouraged among us a narrow, bigoted view of the peoples of the Middle East. A view that is demeaning, both to those at whom it is directed and to those who, out of fear or anger, swallow this demagoguery as the one and only truth.
These hate-mongers and warmongers have been allowed to dominate our national discussion because too few of us have stood up to their demonizing, racist screeds. We’ve been afraid of being called unpatriotic, or “liberal pacifists” or even “traitors” and “terrorist sympathizers.” Republican politicians call for nuking entire Arab countries, but pay no political price for such sentiments, because we have failed to make them pay that price. Instead of driving people like Michael Savage and Ann Coulter, who call Muslims vermin and call for their eradication, off the airwaves, we have stood by and allowed our once great nation to descend once more into mindless bigotry. Is it any wonder that our soldiers in Iraq employ racial epithets like “camel jockeys”, “towel heads” and “hadjis” to describe the very people they have “liberated” from Saddam Hussein?
Too many of us have failed to see past the lies and propaganda from the right wing apologists for never ending war in the Middle East to the truth of our shared humanity with the very people who are now being killed, maimed or made homeless. Too many of us have accepted as true that only military force can bring victory in the “War on Terror.” Indeed, too many of our fellow citizens accept that any action against the peoples of the Middle East is justified by that very non sequitor.
It is our collective failure to empathize with the very people whom we have victimized which has led us to this point.
CONCLUSION
We, the American people, are collectively guilty for what is being done to our fellow human beings today in Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Gaza and elsewhere in the Middle East. We make up the greatest, most powerful nation on earth, yet we have allowed that power to be hijacked by those who would rather wage war than encourage peace, who see violence as the only means to achieve their ends.
We have failed to require our leaders to promote peaceful negotiations as an alternative to war. Indeed, we have willingly elected the very politicians who have waged illegal wars on innocents, and brought the entire region of the Middle East to the brink of disaster. No one can hold us blameless for their crimes anymore.
But it is not too late to change our Nation’s path, and begin to make amends for our many failures. Our first opportunity for that comes this Fall. We can choose to elect people who will promote peace in our dealings with other countries, and who will truly see the use of our military power as a last resort, or we can return to power the very people who see war as the first, best and only option in our foreign relations. In short, we can choose the path of peace or the continuing death and destruction and hatred of war.
It really shouldn’t be all that difficult a decision.
Also posted at Daily Kos.
on a truly awful situation. In the best of all worlds, we can remedy the situation, but my support for the Israeli state is diminishing rapidamento. Try read this article for a dark look at this aspect. http://counterpunch.org/
.
Reading through Haaretz yesterday …
I came across this link to a Canadian site —
THE TRUTH ABOUT ISRAEL :: Stop US military aid to Israel
TEL AVIV (Haaretz) July 12 — The IDF had sent troops across the border to search for the missing soldiers, marking the first incursion into Lebanon since the withdrawal in May 2000. Army Radio reported large numbers of troops, as well as aircraft, were taking part in searches on the Lebanese side of the border. According to Channel 10 television, the IDF later said that it had lost all hope of retrieving the abducted soldiers with ground forces.
The IDF also ordered troops deployed on the Lebanon and Gaza borders on high alert in the event that armed groups may attempt to fire Katyusha and Qassam rockets into Israel.
GOC Northern Command Udi Adam told reporters that Israel plans to “push back” Hezbollah guerrillas controlling southern Lebanon, adding that the IDF has “no intention at the moment of involving Syria,” which has great influence over Hezbollah. “We think at the moment the debate is beween us and the government of Lebanon.”
A Letter sent to Haaretz forum
Compare to this letter send by a reader from the U.S., who apparently thinks Sharon is still Israel’s PM :: I wonder who The Terrorist is?
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
William Rivers Pitt | Cheerleading the Apocalypse
“The fighting between Israel and Lebanon over the course of the last few days presents perhaps the most dangerous moment since the Cuban Missile Crisis. The leadership of Israel and Hezbollah spend the blood of innocents to prove how very tough they are, and the lords of unreason hold sway over all. Syria trembles on the edge of significant involvement, with Iran waiting in the wings,” writes William Rivers Pitt.
The last couple of sentences, above Pitts, are a Hoot, if you can forget the Fact the idiots Really Mean what they’re posting!!!
i don’t get the point here. who’s this mythical ‘we’ that put Bush into power? we, the people who voted against him? we, the people who protested the invasion of Iraq before it started?
i’m responsible for Zionism? i’m chosing the path of destruction and hatred because i haven’t driven Coulter from the airwaves and transformed the world’s swords into ploughshares? i’m responsible for the fact that sword-making is so damn profitable to some?
it seems like ‘we’ are at fault because someone in the Middle East or elsewhere might be saying “it’s the Americans’ fault.” if person x kills person y for something person z did, has x made y guilty of z’s crime?
this, in my view, just isn’t a workable philosophy.
How did he put it? “We are the world?”
I like and totally agree with your signature line.
well, yeah, he did say that. who’s the we?
if, for example, i’m talking to a couple friends and we all agree that we are the world, what happens to all the other people who decide the same thing, but have a different idea about how the world is and should be?
i believe, to paraphrase Frank Herbert, that life cannot be a source of decent regard till we resolve to nurture those qualities of decency. still, this decision does not confer omnipotence. it is the rare person who can actually bear to take on the sins of the world, so to speak.
and while we might take upon ourselves the responsibility of struggle, realistically, it seems worth recognizing that there are individuals and structures we are struggling against. lots of people, for example, did learn a lesson from Vietnam; but a group of powerful people have worked to obscure that lesson as thoroughly as possible. to them, it was a dangerous syndrome that threatened the health of the imperial state.
these people feed and are fed by historical forces, flows of arms and resources and emotions. war has dominated this planet for 5,000 years. so, to say that ‘we are at fault’ is to invoke a very deep, even spiritual, notion of ‘we’. and while i think it is necessary to individually assume the responsibility of cultivating in ourselves what we seek in the world (as Our Lord said, I’m looking at the Man in the Mirror…), i think we should be careful about getting so dramatic about it that we lose sight of real distinctions between individuals.
though the crimes are performed by few and approved by many, they are also resisted by some. there’s no need to blame ourselves for not already prevailing against a tide of history that is almost beyond comprehension. this is a period of intense transformation and we’re not going to change that. all we can do is ride it and work to realize the positive potential implicit in the change.
how to do that?
blog?
sure, that too.
If we want to blame someone, we really should start with the Brits. There’s much you’ve written here Steven that I whole-heartedly agree with, particularly the emphasis on the lack of IMAGINATION on all sides that has condemned so many to lives of insecurity, misery, and death on both sides of the Wall.
I wrote yesterday that the near instant acceptance in the US for attacking Afghanistan & then Iraq was the result of the 40+ years of indoctrination that we’ve been subjected to vis a vis Israel & the Palestinians. We were well ‘softened up’ to parrot a narrative whose only parameters are “right to self-defense” vs. “terror.”
It’s a narrative that has no winners, many losers, & apparently no end . . .
A black & white world of good/evil, of legitmate self-defense/terror leads to the equally black & white either/or proposition of doing nothing vs. all-out war, and we’ve demonstrated a total lack of imagination for any other option, diplomatic or otherwise. Demonizing an entire people makes bombing & slaughtering them all the more possible, & that racism is deeply embedded in the narrative of history we tell ourselves.
Here’s a second reccomendation for Kathy Christison’s article today that Keone linked to above,“The Insane Brutality of the State of Israel” Atrocities in the Promised Land”, an ex-CIA analyst who, along with her husband Bill, has indeed crossed over from the forces of darkness to those of Peace & does much to fill in the gaps of the offical story. Their article in Dec. ’05’s Counterpunch on Iran & the Middle East is still worth looking up & reading. She closes today with:
The “peace process” (which began with Arafat going behind the back of the Arabs & negotiating a deal in secret — not a good way to gain consensus) has devolved into continuing expansion via the settlements, while its language concentrates on “terror” & “controlling violence.”
Here’s an alternate narrative of the Peace Process that takes a less benign view of what happened:
Those are negotiations that we presided over, allt he while feeding the purse of the stronger party, and trumpet as Good Will? Is it any wonder that such despair has strengthened Hamas? Or that the last Israeli military adventure in Lebanon basically created Hezbollah?
Yes, Steven, we are deeply implicated in all this.
This weekend I had to explain to my daughter that IF this country is attacked (she was asking about nuclear attacks…) That missiles don’t single out those who support Bush. They destroy ALL.
Just as our bombs killed ALL in Iraq.
Yes, Americans didn’t rise up and stand up.
It’s emblematic of the madness of the current regime and the mindset of the maniacs that support it that such a dialog with your child takes place.
It’s Our Fault
That’s what I am saying on this post here.
Run-Up To Iran War Now On In Full Force
And it IS “our” fault.
The only question left as far as this is concerned is to define the word “our”.
Is it the “Who ‘we’, white man?” our of Tonto under duress?
Is it the “we” who voted for Butch?
Or is the the ‘we” who knew better…who have known better since the back of JFK’s head was blown off by some as-yet-to-be-positively-identified “theys” (Followed by several other important heads)…but pacifically trod through our everyday lives making believe that everything was alright.
The “we” who allowed McCarthy and McGovern and Dean and most of the other attempted Dem truth-tellers to be one way or another “ARRRRGHED” to the back of the bus, the “we” who allowed halfwayers like Humphrey and Kerry and the little tank driver from Massachusetts to be foisted upon us in lieu of real change, the “we” who form the blog-people…I like to call them/us the bleeple…who endlesly argue over who’s a troll and how polite we all should or should not be and how to toe the pragmatic line as it turns out that Chicken Little and Ducky Wucky weren’t so far off the mark after all.
ALL a’ you Turkey Lurkeys.
Listen up.
The sky IS falling.
Question is…whatchoo gonna DO about it?
Blog?
I hope not.
AG
Arthur, you yourself suggested what we can do in your diary about the jazz/blues concert in Riverhead. You said we won WW2 because we know the blues or know how to swing. I agree. I used to say that ‘we’ won the war because we know how to improvise and don’t rigorously plan things for perfection. Germany lost WW2 for the same reason they started it: they were going to make the(ir) world perfect. Military historians came up with similar conclusions I believe.
There you go!
Blogging is no more a freely improvised setting. As the rules hardened, so did the swing. Only here, as far as I can see. Dkos is gone, MLW is going…there are very few major blogs where one can still riff fairly freely without fear of what good jazz players call “The Change Police”…the orthodox, by-the-book-and-follow-the-rules harmony guys…busting in, bans a-flaming. (Jazz musicians call the chord progression “the changes”.) That’s why I wrote “Blog? I hope not.” after “Question is…whatchoo gonna DO about it?”
Sure, we can all individually choose to swing. To improvise. Not enough people will choose to do that to make much of a difference, because to tell you the trutrh, there are simnly not that many people in any position of even small power who CAN swing.
Democratic Party? Not as it stands now. Clomp clomp clomp ain’t swing. Step out of line and get cut off at the knees.
Hacketted.
So I ask again:
Whatchoo gonna DO!!!???
It is a serious question, no matter how casual it sounds all dolled up in street talk.
What do we do?
All answers welcomed.
Because I am OUT of answers after this last “new reality” attack in the Middle East.
Fresh out.
Later…
AG
MLW another chance. My feeling is that MLW is more emotionally nurturing than other sites (and potentially more bruising emotionally??)
I don’t think we should be focusing on what to DO. What did Mandela DO when he was in prison? He kept believing in himself and his cause. He just exercised his mind. What did slaves DO when they were abused? They tried to retain some dignity and fought whatever little fights they could win. They sang the blues.
MLW has beco0me “emotionally nuturing” to the point of suffocation.
Too much complaint.
“Waaaahhhh!!! I’m HURTING!!!”
Sorry.
Some mothers don’t complain.
A little tough love is in order, there.
Too many meds, not enough fight.
The eternal Pharmabattle in blog form.
AG
P.S. The blues ain’t complaint.
Not IMPOTENT complaint, anyway.
Methinks your idea of who “we” are is overbroad. I’ve never really been one to shrink from accepting some responsibility for things I’ve failed to oppose as vigorously as I should have, but these broad-brush nationalism based accusatory sentiments that seem to be proliferating of late are, in my opinion, missing the point and are ultimately detrimental to the resolution of problems.
Existentially, we all are responsible for everything (and nothing), but such arguments serve no purpose except to expend gas and impress the willfully ignorant. If, on the other hand, we want to speak of responsibility in a way that promotes a more cogent and engaged approach to citizenship, then we have to do the actual cognitive work of distinguishing within the national or racial or religious denominational or ethnic or gender “WEs” which portions of those pouplations are the one’s whose behavior is specifically objectionable and why.
All the broad-brush judgmentalism going around just misses all this and ultimately leads nowhere.
IMHO.
SBJ, what you said.
…you completely ignore Noam Chomsky’s “Manufacture of Consent”.
Americans are the subject, have been the subject, of one of the most sophisticated and relentless propaganda campaign in the history of the world.
The propagandists start with the basic premise that we are all dangerous children who can’t be trusted to make our own decisions. So we must be manipulated into thinking that what we want is what the elite wants.
Bush and Cheney, with the willing complicity of the media, sold the Big Lie that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11.
Think, Steven! What major wars was the United States involved in since the end of the Vietnam conflict? Grenada? Panama? Iraq War I, in which I was a participant, might count, except that it was really more of a police action–we didn’t invade Iraq, we just pushed Saddam out of Kuwait and then boxed him in so he couldn’t do any more harm outside his own borders.
Americans, when left to their own devices, are rather reluctant to go to war. Support for Iraq War II is going down the drain with just over 2,500 troops killed–it took over 38,000 killed in Vietnam and massive protests in the streets and on the campuses before public opinion turned against the Vietnam War (in 1968). That’s heartening, because it means despite the relentless propaganda campaign, people are still able to think for themselves.
If it hadn’t been for 9/11, Bush never could have gotten the nation to endorse his invasion and occupation of Iraq. Once the public wiped the scales from their eyes, they turned against the war, and poll after poll shows the majority is against it.
As for Israel–well, Booman himself has said that you’re not going to win any political points in the US by going against Israel. Again, the population “thinks” that blind support of Israel is a “good thing” because that’s the only view that’s presented.
Steven, I find your view of the relationship between “the people” of the United States and its government to be rather naive. How much effect do you think we have on the government? Our government is pay-for-play. A highly-paid lobbyist can make an appointment to see a senator or congressman any time damn time he wants; but not me, because I’m just ordinary Joe Citizen.
And “we” did not abandon the peace process, Bush and his cabal of neocons abandoned it because it didn’t fit in with their plans for military domination and colonization of the Arabian Peninsula.
And more than half of the nation did NOT vote for Bush in 2000 (and, I suspect, not in 2004 either). If you want to start laying blame, better go back to the Founding Fathers and blame them for designing the Electoral College. If Presidents were elected by the popular vote, Gore would have been President on 9/11 and we wouldn’t be in this muck.
Saying that —
— makes it sound as though we we could, in fact condemn the Israelis, Lebanese and Palestinians to generation after generation of death and war. This just isn’t within our power, because they could thwart us at any time by neglecting to kill one another.
He, and we, are indeed not alone in our responsibility.