Originally posted at Liberal Street Fighter
Suckling profits from the very life’s blood of people in the Third World wasn’t enough for multi-national Pharmaceutical companies. After all, there is a growing population of poor to exploit here:
The pharmaceutical industry is beginning to reap a windfall from a surprisingly lucrative niche market: drugs for poor people.
And analysts expect the benefits to show up in many of the quarterly financial results that drug-makers will begin posting this week.
The windfall, which by some estimates could be $2 billion or more this year, is a result of the transfer of millions of low-income people into the new Medicare Part D drug program that went into effect in January. Under that program, as it turns out, drug-makers are in a position to charge higher prices for the drugs given to those people than when their medicines were covered under federal-state Medicaid programs for the poor.
The details, and the huge sums of money that will be paid out to these already obscenely profitable and greedy industry are stunning:
It is too early to calculate the full effect of the shift of the former Medicaid patients now covered by Part D. But analysts expect it to generate hundreds of millions of additional dollars this year for the drug companies, which have long chafed under the pricing restraints of the state programs.
Drugs tend to be cheaper under the Medicaid programs because the states are the buyers, and by law they receive the lowest available prices for drugs.
But in creating the federal Part D program, Congress – in what critics saw as a sop to the drug industry – barred the government from having a negotiating role. Instead, prices are worked out between drugmakers and the dozens of large and small Part D drug plans run by commercial insurers.
Since Part D went into effect, the pharmaceutical industry has raised the wholesale prices of its brand-name drugs an average of 3.6%. Although the actual amount spent depends on what each insurer negotiates, in many cases the drugs for those 6.5 million people who used to receive their medicines through Medicaid will cost more now.
Initially, the added costs will be paid by the insurers administering the new Medicare drug program. But when it comes time for the insurers to settle accounts with the government, the costs of the drugs for the 6.5 million transferees will end up being passed along to federal taxpayers, according to analysts and health care economists.
The windfall for the drugmakers was made possible by a provision of the 2003 Medicare law that exempts Part D drugs from “best price” rebates that the drugmakers have been required to give to the state Medicaid programs since 1991.
This isn’t purely a Republican boondoggle. Certain Democrats were only too happy to help Big Pharma clean up.
Lieberman dutifully recites his opposition to “tax cuts for the rich” and “privatizing Social Security,” and his support of “universal health insurance” and “affordable healthcare.” When he utters those phrases, unfortunately, they ring hollow to many rank-and-file Democrats.
Actually, the syndrome afflicting him is found among entrenched veterans of both parties, especially those who appear more concerned with connections and contributions than values or ideals.
Sen. Lieberman has long been known to cultivate the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, which provide jobs in his home state and contributions to his campaign fund. But he has literally been sleeping with one of their Washington representatives ever since his wife, Hadassah, joined Hill & Knowlton last year. The legendary lobbying and PR firm hired her as a “senior counselor” in its “health and pharmaceuticals practice.”
This news marked Hadassah Lieberman’s return to consulting after more than a decade of retirement. “I have had a life-long commitment to helping people gain better health care,” she said in the press release announcing her new job. “I am excited about the opportunity to work with the talented team at Hill & Knowlton to counsel a terrific stable of clients toward that same goal.”
We are a deeply sick people, so blinded by our belief in the so-called “free” market that we place business plan and profits before human life, we allow needless suffering so that some few will reap large rewards. We participate in this badly broken system, and continue to support politicians who serve only to make it worse.
It’s sick.
every system will eventually seek some kind of balance, and as rapacious capitalism runs more and more amok, the eventual pushback could become VERY dangerous. Leave people with no hope and no recourse, and create a perfect crucible to produce civil unrest. If the left doesn’t find a way to produce a new progressive populism that will combat these trends, one can count on an eventual populist demogogue from the right, and all of this negative energy will be misdirected at some scapegoat population. We are running out of time to deal with these issues in positive ways.
notably my mother.
And, if you don’t wish to crosspost it to MLW, Madman, I’d like your permission to post it verbatim over there — though of course I WOULD prefer you do it yourself, so I can have the pleasure of promoting it to the front page.
Here is how I prefaced it in my email:
I then ask them to contact their (Michigan) representatives and scream bloody murder over this; they are ALL a decade or less from BEING on Medicare and Social Security (and disability, for a couple).
Please, gawd, may at LEAST some rational self-interest spur these deluded loved ones of mine to investigate this shit, maybe they’ll stumble on some other truths…
This might just be an EXCELLENT tool for reaching the few wavering members of the Christofascist Neocon Zombie Brigade. That is, if they truly care in the LEAST about the actual edicts Jesus issued, rather than cobbling together bits and pieces from the Old Testament to rationalise and defend their hate-mongering horseshit.
Anyway, thank you so much, Madman. Really top shelf stuff you’ve given us here.
(Think about crossposting to MLW? ‘course, if you don’t, I WILL steal it.)
: )
please feel free to “steal” it, just include a link to LSF when you cite it.
I’ve set myself a limit on registering at any more sites. I was spending WAY too much time blogging and not enough time enriching my life in the real world, so I’m trying to limit my temptations. Getting banned from Dkos actually had a very positive effect on my life.
Thanks for the kind words.
Exactly right. Not nearly enough people realize this.
It seems so painfully obvious to me (and reminiscent of the political situation during the Dust Bowl era), yet people look at me like I really AM a madman standing on a street corner w/ a “The End is Near” sign when I talk about it.
The winger attacks on immigrants, not to mention the mainstreaming of neo-nazi racists into the anti-immigrant movement, demonstrates frightening signs that we’re already moving in that direction. A strong primary run for the Republican nomination by George Allen or Sam Brownback could make it a reality in only a couple of years.
Sadly, the only progressive populist on the horizon who seems interested in offering some leadership is Senator Feingold. As we saw in Iowa with the anti-Dean Osama ad, we can look forward to his own party trying to cut him off at the knees, saving the wingers the trouble.
There is SO much that goes on within the health care system than the public never gets to hesr about at all. I spent the best part of a 45 year long carreer ain the long term care arena where most of the people were chronically and/or mentally ill and/or frail elderly, and all low income/poor. As for making drug profits off the back of the poor, here just a slice of a very common pie.
At one of the last places I worked as an RN,about the ONLY thing I had time to do in an eight hour shift was set up meds, pass meds, record meds, and order more meds. Most of the people were on 5 to 15 different prescription meds, swallowed four times a day or more.
One responsibility of an RN is to make sure people are not having side effects,adverse reactions, pr danmgerous interactions betwen drugs. between different meds. Impossible: I didn’t have time to do more than make sure they were delivered and swallowed and then recorded and reordered, received and logged in!
These people didn’t even see a doctor all that often, and when they did, they usually got more meds to treat the side effects they already were on. Meds were changed OFTEN, sometiems soon after prescribed.
Part of the night nurses job was to dump literally millions of dollars worth of discontinued medications down the sewers.
Over medicate elderly peolpe and what happens? They fall and break hips and get hospitalised (more drugs!) and often die soon. but hey, they ‘re old anyway, right? They get mentally confused from overmedication and then frequently misdiagnosed with dementia and then are given more drugs. They come up with other wierd drug interaction related symptoms and often end undergoing unnecessary, painful and risky tests that often involve…more drugs!
For most of these folks the only real contact they had with professional caregivers was the few mintues they saw us while swallowing thier pills or were underging skilled treatments the aids couldn’t do.
By the time I left this kind of nursing, I was nothing more than a drug dispensing machine, snf that took up a full eight hour shift leaving NO time to do a real nursing. And my chronically ill and aged patients were a cash crop for the pharmaceutical companys.
wow, thanks for sharing that.
The elderly who are confined to limited mobility are the people who are also least likely to be found protesting the terrible health care they are receiving.
The reason is fairly obivious. They are too damn sick from overmedication, side effects etc.. to be involved in any protest action.
Also what no one ever points out is how the doctors have their hands covered with cash by insurers to ignore the real causes of a person’s health problems.
Words fail to convey the anger I have for the health care system in America.
Thats one reaqon they dont complain, but there are others. Thanks to constant TV drug advertizing, the odlerly, and all of us) have been programmed to beleive there is no reason to have any pain or discomfort at all. Never a sad day, an anxious day, or a day with the normal aches and pains of aging. No matter how old you are, never go without a erection when one is needed,never get indigestion, never have even one sleepless night. Why ever suffer, when there is a quick fix pill for everything? The kinds of patients I am referring to DEMAND prescritions they see on TV, having totally bought into the advertizing without question. PLus, a whole lOT of patients can be seen in an hour if the primary/only treatment offered is a a quick prescription for a drug.
More than ever before in my career, it seems treating symtoms, rather than addressing the cause of disease, has become the norm.
This isn’t jsut a health care system issue, it has become a cultural issue, IMO. Seems to me America has becocme addicted to the quick fix of drugs, period. I see parallels between this, and how big tobacco once happily (and knwoingly) addicted poeple to nicotine iin order to get filthy rich.
As I stated my anger is so great on this issue it’s better to not even push this hot button because once I get started it takes me weeks to stop and I refuse to let anger rule my life anymore.
I had just finished reading this story about our “health care providers” cashing in on the largesse of the drug cartel when I came upon this diary.
I thought nothing could top the anger I felt about the stem cell research veto yesterday, but now I feel a frenzy of rage growing in me. I’m tempted to change my name to Madwoman.
What will become of all us sickos?
ugh … I don’t know if “thanks” is the right word, but I appreciate the link. That sort of arrangement is part of the problem.
As someone who has recently experienced a life-changing catastrophic health event that has plunged me into abject poverty and has me now dependent on Medicaid for medication and reliant on Social Security for a very small disability stipend (for which I am extremely grateful, just to be clear), I have to say with great sadness that it is crystal clear to me that in terms of long term survivability both health wise and economically, amongst all the “developed”, first-world industrialized countries in the world, my chances are the worst in America than they would be in any of these other countries.
I don’t take this personally; I’m truly grateful that, against all odds I’m still alive and able to receive such support that I am. Yet I’m ashamed for the country of my birth, and I deplore the hypocrisy, ( or the ignorance) of those who claim America to be the “greatest”, the “envy of the world”. These notions might have had some relation to reality in the past, but they are a cruel joke now, a massive hoax on a population unwilling to accept that the leaders they’ve been electing for decades have driven the country into the ditch. It’s embarrassing, to say the least.
Health care and quality of life for those on disability is my next huge political goal after closure on Iraq. It’s a family thing. My son may never be employed. There are people with his particular genetic syndrome who can use their hands enough to be employed in different areas, I know one gentleman who is an engineer who has it…..yet others have a very hard time because the job market is so limited for them. It is ghastly what our disabled citizens live on and live in. I also have a disabled cousin who has something very similar to my son but a geneticist observed them both and said that my cousin does not have the same syndrome that my son has, he was not sure exactly what had affected my cousin….only that it was a genetic anomaly. I asked him if perhaps there wasn’t a gene in my family that mutated easily and he did agree that that was very possible. I have watched my cousin struggle all my life and it has been very frustrating in ways. We all support him but really he would love to have enough to be just a bit more independent and not have to rely on the family so much. So health care and the quality of life for those on disability is an enormous political issue for me. Just wanted you to know that I’m pulling for you!
Um, no “we” aren’t. Allow me to quote from that well-known far-right wing mouthpiece, Mother Jones, emphasis added:
So…an overwhelming majority of Americans favor universal health care and yet Dr. Benjamin breezily assures us that “we” are a “sick people”.
Your anti-Americanism is poisoning everything you write, James. It’s clouded your judgment to the point where you can no longer write a nuanced statement nor separate fact from fantasy. If something’s wrong with America’s political system, it must not be that the great mass of people have been systematically and ruthlessly disenfranchised–no, it must be some moral failing, some sickness in our souls. Hm, nice big heaping helping of Puritanism, anyone?
Now, if you want to write that the American political system has been so corrupted/tainted by campaign contributions (bribes) from the private health insurance companies and big pharmaceutical companies that it cannot and will not give the public what it wants–universal health care–then I would agree with you.
But you didn’t WRITE that nuanced, accurate statement. Instead, you cast “we” (meaning all Americans) as a people sick in their souls and diseased in their minds.
One thingn is perfectly clear: if the will of the American people was perfectly expressed in our political system, Bush’s tax cuts for the rich would be repealed and the United States would have a Canadian-style system of 100% universal health coverage–health care as a right.
But we are a “sick” people? That conclusion only stands if you ignore the inconvenient facts.
Mother Jones: Healthcare for All? What Americans Think About Universal Coverage by Ruy Texeira
Did James Benjamin write this diary or comment in it? I’m confused.
My apologies if I’ve confused the two.
no they are two different people.
that was me, not James.
As a Representative Democracy, what our elected leaders do in our name may as well be done by us. If Americans weren’t so willing to be tricked by crap like Harry & Louise I’d be more moved by your insistence that “an overwhelming majority of Americans favor universal health care”. What most Americans want is universal care for THEMSELVES, but they are easily diverted when somebody points out that “universal” includes poor or brown or unemployed or drug addicted OTHERS, then suddenly it’s NOT a good idea, it suddenly becomes “socialism”.
We are a sick people b/c, despite a fight between a general populist good and the demands of the rapacious rich, too many of the general population vote along with the rich and greedy.
The whole idea of our system of government is that through our process of electing representatives we can arrive at some approximation of the public will. We all see that this doesn’t work, yet we still buy into “electibility” issues, or shut up when someone accuses us of being “purists” or “anti-American” instead of actually fighting for representatives who actually reflect our values.
There is NOTHING more American than a belief that all natural born persons should have equal protection under the law, and that our SHARED government systems be utilized to provide for BASIC access to life, liberty and a chance at happiness FOR ALL. Sadly, many citizens in this country are unwilling to make that commitment when told they have to share it with some unwanted class.
I’m not interested in being “nuanced”. “Nuanced” is what the do-nothing Vichy Dems do day in, day out. This is a time for strong statements of belief. I’m sorry that my polemical style bothers you. Go read some dreck by Delaware Dem or one of his ilk if I bother you.
…for the case of mistaken identity. I’m new to this and don’t have my official blogosphere players’ cards.
Your reply to me is dismissive and takes into account none of the facts I have just provided you, Madman. This breezy dismissal of the facts, and a refusal to discuss them, is something I’m sure is standard operating procedure on right-wing blogs, but I’d hoped that in the “reality based community”, facts would matter. (For example, it matters to me that you are Madman in the Marketplace and not James Benjamin.)
I am interested in being truthful. Truthfulness requires a careful gathering of facts and a weighing of the evidence, and making intelligent distinctions between “we” and the elite who run our political/economic system (largely for their own benefit).
So you are not interested in presenting the people who read your diaries with a truthful presentation, but are instead interested solely in rabble-rousing?
I see. But there is one fatal flaw in your reasoning: you are rousing people to action based on the idea that the American people are “sick” as a people. You have given people a completely FALSE impression of what the people really want. Rather than discussing the ways that our political system thwarts the will of we, the people, you instead blame we, the people and call us “sick”.
Polemics are intended to rouse people to action. Ok, maybe a few dozen people reading this will come to your side, based on your false statements, unsupported by actual facts.
But then what? What action would you recommend they take?
Should you disseminate your views more widely and let the American people know that they are, in your view, “sick”? I’m sure that calling people “sick” to their faces even after they’ve already said that they support universal health care as a right will be deeply persuasive (not).
So your polemical writings are intended for a handful of people who already agree with you. They are obviously not intended to persuade a wider audience. In fact, there is no need to persuade the American public to support universal health care, since 70%-80% of them ALREADY support it. And they don’t support it just for themselves, but for EVERYBODY.
It’s clear that you’ve already made up your mind: Americans are a sick people, irredeemably racist, and if they said they wanted universal health coverage AS A RIGHT in response to those polls, then they were just playing an evil trick. My recitation of facts will not change your view one bit–and unless I change my views and accept your writing uncritically, then I am not “welcome” to read or comment on your diaries. You are not interested in a discussion of ideas, but rather are writing for an echo chamber.
I don’t know who Delaware Dem is, by the way. I’m also not familiar with his “ilk”. Do his ilk put facts in their diaries and then draw their conclusions from those facts? If so, I might enjoy reading them. Once again, I’ve not received my “blogosphere all star” player cards. When I do, I plan to trade my Armando for whatever I can get for it.
you presented no “facts”. You presented a POLL. You may as well have spread some chicken entrails or got someone to speak in a ghostly voice while you rattled tamborines under the table with your feet.
Statistical analysis of a system requires a random and uniform distribution for the studied sample. That every public opinion poll requires pages of explanation of the various “weights” and adjustments used to “correct” for problems in their samples renders them all, to one extent or another, psuedo-science. Merely changing the way questions are asked can radically change the results of any poll. Check out Frank Lutz if you want to see the art with which pollsters manipulate the polled.
That was your sole FACT, and to that I’m supposed to submit.
What we can see as FACTS is decades of Americans voting against the general welfare in favor of narrowly targeted appeals to the ways in which they identify themselves. Politics as targeted selfishness. Nearly any attempt to broaden any discussion to include the general good gets derided and shut down as “communist” or “socialist” or being in favor of a “nanny state”.
Polemics can serve not only to persuade, but to “slap” someone into looking at things in a new way. Strong speech provides broad debate. That we are so unwilling to abide strong speech from the left in this country has produced the sorry mess we find ourselves in. As the right becomes more eliminationist and violent in its speech, us lefties are told more and more loudly to SHUT UP, with our own supposed allies HELPING the right to quiet any balance in the debate.
Again, if you don’t like it, ignore it, but I DON’T have to blandly accept wishy-washy assertions of some bs poll as a “fact”. Fact’s are tangible, measurable things, measured by units whose calibration we can all review and agree upon. Polls, on the other hand, are none of those things. Polls are parlour tricks, produced by faux spiritualists promising Rosamund that Harry really IS in the room.
Polls are statistical samples designed to measure public opinion. Their use over the past fifty years has been refined until they are about as exact a science as you can get in the social sciences. The fact that their weighting and results are carefully documented, as you yourself admit, by reams of analysis, show that they are not mere pseudoscience but soundly based in statistics. Or is math just a “pseudo-science”, too?
Actually, one of the strongest arguments proving electoral fraud in Ohio in 2004 is the fact that exit POLLS do not match up with the ballots actually counted. This is the FIRST time exit polls have ever been so wildly inaccurate…they are usually right on the money.
Comparing public opinion polls to the spreading of chicken entrails is wholly false. The latter is voodoo mysticism, the former is actually very accurate and highly useful.
Or do you, like President Bush, dismiss people as a “focus group”?
Most opinion polls have a margin of error of +/- 3%. If you want to dismiss them out of hand, then you must dismiss ALL of them–including the polls that show that President Bush has a dismal approval rating of 34%. That’s Nixonian territory. But I guess Bush’s approval rating could easily be 99%, right? I mean, polls are just haruspicy (art of reading animal entrails), right?
As a former physics major, I can only state that any “science” whose textbooks ALWAYS start with a long, windy chapter about how they really, really ARE sciences … ISN’T A SCIENCE.
A statistical analysis of physical phenomenon, say collisions in the target area of an accelerator, require REAMS of data. Millions of data points. I had professors who used to read about the studies that medical researchers or social “scientists” had done that involved a data set with only a few hundred or thousand subjects, reports that would set them off on RANTS about how pathetic such studies were.
Oh, and those margins of error are faux constructs woven out of self-referential reliances on OTHER similar studies that used the same bs assumptions or “weights” to make their samples appear more random and uniform.
One other thing: exit polls measure things that ALREADY happened, and can involve much larger sets of truly random data. OPINION polls rely upon FUTURE behavior that is reported by self-selected volunteers, answering questions that can be manipulated to produce the desired response. While I will admit that an ethical pollster like Zogby might produce a more detailed shadow of what people believe than say someone like Luntz, it’s still a form of hocus pocus.
Whatever they are, polls certainly aren’t “facts”, and they are only marginally “science”.
They are sophisticated ways of manufacturing consent by the manipulation of language and playing upon people’s need to think well of themselves.
with your constant throwing around the “Anti-American” label. I fail to see that it’s added anything even remotely constructive to the various threads you’ve participated in.
We are “sick” as a people is not anti-American?
If you are tired of my response to anti-American statements, Dr. Benjamin, then stop posting them.
And what does it mean that you’ve “had it”? Does that mean I’ll be kicked off Booman Tribune? Going to write a sharp email to Booman demanding that I be consigned to oblivion? Eh, whatever.
No, what it means is that I find your commentary tedious and not worthy of my time. Nothing more. Nothing less. You act like a schoolyard bully and then seem surprised that someone might actually call you on it. And why would I email Booman about this? This crap isn’t worth his time.
That really isn’t a threat. Given your breezy contempt for fact-based argument, your threat to not argue with me is, in fact, a gift. Threatening to give somebody what they want is sort of an unthreat.
I notice that you have chosen to focus on a personal attack on me rather than answer the facts cited in the Mother Jones article by Ruy Texeira (or is Mother Jones now part of the vast right-wing conspiracy)?
I understand that you’re angry because I’ve called out DuctapeFatwa on his virulent anti-Americanism, and I intend to call out everyone here who is demonizing the American people.
If the American people are so damned stupid, then what’s the point of trying to effect change through our political system at all? As DuctapeFatwa himself wrote, “You can’t reason with Americans”. So why even try? And if you can’t reason with Americans, then you can’t persuade them to change their behavior. Which means you must either give up on Americans, or else force them to change their behavior.
I’m not surprised that you have decided to attack me. My surprise is how long it has taken you and the other members of the “Americans are evil” posse to round up your tar and feathers.
If you choose not to reply to any of my comments in the future, that’s OK by me. I never desire nor require your response. But unless and until Booman decides that I am not allowed to post on this site, I am free to comment on any diary that is posted here. You do understand that, I hope?
I wasn’t threatening you.
I have no worries on that score, I assure you.
Your tone was threatening, but as I’ve already stated, it means nothing to me one way or the other. Your attack on me is just the beginning, I realize that–I knew what I was getting myself into when I called out DuctapeFatwa on his anti-Americanism, and pointed out the (factually unsupported) anti-American conclusion that Madman leapt to in the last two sentences of this otherwise factual and informative diary.
Well, since we’re using right-wing tactics and quotes now, “bring it on”, I suppose.
Oh good grief. I wasn’t even verbally threatening you. Nor was I “attacking” you. Was I being curt? Yes. I was expressing frustration at seeing the same tactic used by right-wingers aimed at fellow lefties. I really had hoped that self-proclaimed liberals and progressives would be better than that. It was too much to expect, perhaps. I’ll simply have to remember that it is now apparently acceptable to be “liberal” and to shout others down as “America haters” etc.
This is obviously going nowhere. Have the last word, and a cookie for trouble.
…what kind of cookie?
I’m very particular.
I’m partial to chocolate chip, preferably home-made. If I can’t have those on hand, there’s often some fig newtons.
…by the Geneva Conventions.
Chocolate chip is ok if there’s some walnuts in there. Would it kill you to bake a batch of raisin oatmeal? The soft, chewy kind.
Raisin oatmeal? That’s normally my wife’s forte, but I can be talked into it.
I don’t have to demonize the American people, far too many of them do just fine on that score themselves. If that wasn’t so, why are the likes of Coulter-geist, Hannity and O’Reilly so popular?
Bill O’Reilly’s audience is small, elderly, and declining. Or is Keith Olbermann part of the VRWC, too?
Also, the average age of O’Reilly’s audience is seventy-one years old. That’s rather a skewed demographic–think of people who were young adults when Jim Crow Laws were still in force in the US and you’ve got his audience.
O’Reilly’s total viewership is just a tick over one million people. Out of a nation of over 295 million people, O’Reilly gets 1.1 million viewers (when he’s lucky). 1.1 million elderly viewers whose political opinions were formed in the 1940s and 1950s, and who constitute four-tenths of one percent of the total population.
As for Coulter–her books are “best sellers” because right-wing sugar daddies like Richard Mellon Scaife buy her books by the truckload and then give them away. I was at Barnes and Noble yesterday and her latest book was not selling AT ALL…but they were sold out (again) of the latest Lakoff book….
Source for facts ‘n figures:
http://www.sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com
sure, they’re running their course now, but they’ve had a DECADE or more to run riot. They had MUCH higher ratings not long ago. They still get quoted and invited to appear on NUMEROUS other chat shows, where they can spread their hateful rhetoric.
I just spent part of my Sunday wasting my time “arguing” with an otherwise nice guy who regurgitates Hannity agitprop from memory. There is no “debate” involved in talking to this guy. He’s impervious. He DELIGHTS in the idea that his scary, uninformed, bigoted and narrow-minded “beliefs” infuriate someone who tries to engage him. He’s just peachy with what Bush is doing to the world. He thinks ANYBODY receiving welfare is lazy. He thinks that anyone without healthcare is probably too lazy to keep a real job where they would get coverage. THERE ARE COUNTLESS PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY JUST LIKE HIM. I tried appealing to his self interest. I tried quoting stats revealing how his tax dollars were being stolen. I tried appealing to his compassion. An old college friend, in town for a visit, MARVELED at how impervious this man was to every gambit I tried. No matter what I said, he just tossed up another straw liberal to set aflame. Oh, and since I’m sure you’re thinking it, I’m much less inflamatory at first when I’m talking one on one … writing polemics is very different from the dynamic of face-to-face confrontation, but BOTH methods have their place.
Watch “Washington Journal” and listen to the hateful spew coming out of the mouths of the “Support President Bush” callers. Read the emails that Lou Dobbs gleefully puts up on the screen attacking immigrants. This is a large population of highly motivated and carefully cultivated voters who WON’T LISTEN TO REASON, who support hateful policies. They are further propped up by an even larger cadre who don’t follow the news, don’t care to become educated about the nuances of the issues, who revel in platitudes and empty nostrums.
There are a lot of them out there, and they outnumber the rest of us. The ONLY hope is to make impassioned, even inciting, statements of belief and standards. Get them riled up, but also rally all of the people who feel they have no voice, who sit in a cube next to a Dittohead and suffer through daily rants. The namby-pamby centrists calls to be reasonable ONLY serve to help the rabid right.
I work in a largely Republican office. They love Bush for all the reasons I hate him. They love his arrogance, his swagger, his stubborness, his dismissiveness, his lack of refinement, his tough talk. When I cringe as the eternal frat boy embarasses America in front of the whole world, they revel in it.
If the “Madman and Ductape are anti-American” faction can’t come visit my office, just listen to the mindless crap from the Republican line on CSPAN every morning.
It is not a small, radical fringe that loathes liberals, the UN, foreigners, immigrants, non-Christians, unions, etc., etc., etc. This is the face of much of America. These same Americans are generous and kind to those they see as their own kind, but will cluck their tongues over Katrina victims who have only themselves to blame.
Most of the rest of America isn’t concerned enough about abstractions like civil liberty or imperialism to pay any attention.
A great many Americans voted for Bush. It wasn’t an innocent error. By ’04 they knew exactly what they were getting, and while some of us did everything legally in our power to save America from fascism, just as many flocked to the polls and proudly pulled the lever for GWB.
Am I anti-American ? I’m anti those American, and I want my country back.
well said
They want us sick, uneducated and afraid.
I firmly believe that many of our illness could be cured. And cured cheaply. But that would impact the health insurance INDUSTRY.
They don’t look at what would impact the health of humans… they are looking at their wallets. They’d rather we stay sick… horribly sick… that’s how they get rich.
They can’t bill you if you’re well.
The law went into effect July 1, will require citizens to prove citizenship for Medicaid and Medicare coverage. This was spurred by Southern GOP Congressmen and Minuteman vigilantes and the Ku Klux Klan. That Federal law is the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005, those applying for or renewing their Medicaid and Medicare coverage are required to provide “satisfactory documentary evidence of U.S. citizenship” in order to receive or continue their medical benefits. This law affects some 53 million Americans.
…even non-citizens. I was in a car accident in Italy and was covered without paying a single Euro (and received better treatment than I would have in the United States, I think).
As pointed out by Ruy Texeira in the Mother Jones article I cited above, Americans support universal health coverage by a wide margin (70%-80%, depending on the poll) as a right, rather than a privilege.
What is not clear is how many Americans would support universal health coverage for those who are in the United States illegally.
Two things are clear, though: