My contracts professor in law school, a man I will always remember for introducing me to the concept that, as he put it, “all professions are an organized conspiracy against the layman,” also had an explanation for why some outcomes are foregone conclusions. He said, “it‛s no big deal for the magician to pull the rabbit out of the hat after he‛s put it there.” I‛m sure magicians will bridle at the simplicity of this explanation, but it has much broader application to the world at large.
So, it came as no surprise to me that Iran, a state whose leaders’ two avowed geopolitical purposes are wiping the state of Israel off the map (along, presumably, with its inhabitants)and the development of nuclear weapons (the latter being instrumental in the accomplishment of the former), is holding a “conference” on whether or not the Holocaust ever happened. No kidding: they’re really holding a conference to investigate the existence of this inarguably indisputable, historic event.
A clue to the agenda of this gathering (other than who’s sponsoring it) is that a keynote address is going to be given by none other than the noted American authority on the proper place of Jews in society, David Duke, the former Grand Whacko of the Ku Klux Klan. Who better, don’t you agree? One of the seminars at the conference is reportedly called “Gas Chambers: Denial or Confirmation”
Iran’s president, Ahmadinejad , has publicly and loudly announced, at every opportunity, that the Holocaust never happened. In other words, he’s stuffed that bunny in the hat. And now he’s going to hold a “conference,” the central premise of which will be that—guess what—the Holocaust never happened (ta-da: behold—the rabbit). Amazing, isn’t it? This is the equivalent of the religious right in the U.S. sponsoring a “conference” entitled: “Gay Marriage: Is It A Good Thing?” or PETA holding a conference called “Killing Animals: Is It Really Humane?”
For me, the verifiability of the Holocaust was as tangible as the tattooed number my father bore on his forearm for most of his life, a vestige of his captivity in Auschwitz, and the absence from my life of both sets of grandparents, and many uncles, cousins and aunts, all thanks to the ethnic cleansing practiced on my family by the Nazis. Needless to say, I don’t take kindly to Holocaust deniers. Sadly, though, we live in a society where denial of verifiable fact remains the option of the lunatic fringe. Evolution? Can’t prove it to the creationists. Global warming? A hoax, according to a United States senator and the oil industry. An embryo isn’t a human being? Blasphemy, according to “pro-lifers.”
How does one deal with people who insist on believing that it is pitch black outside at high noon, or worse, who manipulate (or ignore) facts to fit their agenda? The answer is, one doesn’t. Intelligent discourse relies on the existence of intelligence, and belief, whether it’s religiously or otherwise irrationally (as opposed to logically) based, is immune to intelligence. This also, by the way, is why it is a fool’s errand to argue with the likes of Rush Limbaugh or Anne Coulter, and why George Bush will never be able to be convinced that the U.S. should pull its troops out of Iraq.
The Iranians are taunting the West (read: America) by holding this conference. They claim they’re testing our tolerance for freedom of speech, especially in light of what they perceive to be the abuse of that freedom symbolized by the Muhammad cartoon imbroglio . They started their taunt with a “contest” seeking the best Holocaust cartoons . One of the entries depicts Hitler in bed with Anne Frank, suggesting to her that she “put this one in your diary.”
The irony of a totalitarian regime flaunting a freedom that doesn’t exist under its rule obviously escapes them. And, of course, it represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the uniquely American constitutional guarantee, which, as everyone familiar with the “yelling fire” exception knows, is not absolute. Nor, one can only hope Mr. Ahmadinejad will learn, sooner or later, does it protect a madman who attempts to rationalize genocide by revising its history.
“Gadfly” is Marty Aussenberg, an attorney practicing law in his own firm in Memphis, Tennessee.
Mr. Gadfly, I am sorry for the losses your family suffered. Thankfully my own family did not suffer those same losses. But I have lived in Israel and spoken to many survivors of Nazi camps, including those who still bear tattoos.
I want to say two things and they seemingly conflict. The first is that I believe what I have heard from those first-hand witnesses about the atrocities and inhumanity perpetrated against Jews by the Nazi government. Therefore I am not denying what occurred.
The second thing I wish to say is that it seems to me the propaganda smearing what Iran is doing is completely unhelpful and indeed counterproductive.
The United States, since around 1956, has politically, militarily and financially backed the nation of Israel in an unequivocal and lopsided manner that has no parallel in the relationships of the US with other allied nations.
This one-sided support for Israel has come at the expense of support for the wider Middle East and including the Palestinians, including now the democratically elected Palestinian government (2006).
The United States has turned a blind eye towards a military occupation of millions of people, the violation of dozens of UN resolutions, a de jure system of apartheid and discriminatory laws, several invasions and occupations of neighboring countries and the development of a nuclear arsenal outside the purview or oversight of the international community.
Even if I were to agree with the statement that the nation of Israel has a “right to exist”, the policies and conduct of the government of Israel could not be as they currently are without the enormous support from the United States government.
For both legitimate and rational reasons as well as because of hate filled propaganda, this inbalance in the Middle East has in the past and continues to destabilize the region. Quite simply put, a non-peaceful Israel has and always will have a destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East.
Aside from practical “realpolitik” reasons, the United States and other nations’ support for Israel’s existance and modus operandi is based primarily on the moral consideration that Hitler’s genocidal efforts require Jews to have a safe haven in their homeland.
As much as we would like history to be a black or white issue, with unassailable facts and statistics, it is not. This includes what is referred to as “the” Holocaust (a term I dislike as it downplays other holocausts and genocides).
Having spoken myself to survivors of Nazi death camps, I do not feel like the bulk of accepted historical record of what happened to Jews in World War 2 needs any buttressing to establish its veracity.
That being said, I find it deeply disturbing and horrifying that questioning or analyzing the historical record on this subject is not only illegal in many countries but is and has been a prosecutable offense. If the historical record is able to stand on its own (as I believe it is), then questioning it should be the past-time of cranks and nuts alone.
Unfortunately, criminalizing historical research does not squelch further inquiry but instead makes it seem like there is something indeed to hide. If the primary moral foundation for the apartheid legalism in Israel is founded upon the devastation of “the” Holocaust then establishing a solid historical basis for proof of it becomes not just an academic whimsy but an errand of vital importance.
If the historical record of “the” Holocaust is firmly established and well-documented (as I believe much of it is) then that is all the defense necessary. Outlawing and ridiculing those who question it only provides cover for those who use denial as a furtherance of hate.
More simply put: if the Holocaust happened, then let the record speak for itself and then the deniers and haters will be exposed as fools and racists.
I deplore the fact that members of racist and discriminatory organizations are participating in this conference. I do note however that there are others in attendance, including American (anti-Zionist) Jews.
All things being said, and I have been to Yad Vashem, I do not think the currently accepted version of the Holocaust is entirely accurate as it is now depicted. It deeply pains me and saddens me to know that this statement means I am automatically lumped in with “deniers” and anti-Semites and those who participate in hate. That being said, the truth is the truth and it is my only defense.
On one more note, although you referenced a hateful cartoon submitted to the Iranian cartoon contest, I do note that the winner of the said contest was neither hateful nor racist, merely accurate.
I have nothing further to add except that I deplore all hate, all murder and all wars without exception for race, ethnicity, religion or cultural affinity.
Pax
Care to elaborate on the following?
“All things being said, and I have been to Yad Vashem, I do not think the currently accepted version of the Holocaust is entirely accurate as it is now depicted. It deeply pains me and saddens me to know that this statement means I am automatically lumped in with “deniers” and anti-Semites and those who participate in hate. That being said, the truth is the truth and it is my only defense.”
Nope. Jews suffered mightily at the hands of the Nazis and their allies and that’s all that needs to be known.
Pax
You’ve posted something that sounds like Holocaust revisionism on a fairly high-profile progressive blog. Surely, if you’re willing to make such controversial statements in such a public venue, you should be willing to back them up.
If I may say so, Soj, you’re an amazingly gifted thinker and you have a way with words. I find myself agreeing with most things you write to the extent, it seems, that you put the effort into clearly explaining yourself. In this case, I would like to voice my 100% agreement and solidarity with what you wrote above.
I, too, personally know victims of “the” holocaust. But, I also have met too many ignorant Americans (sorry to pick on one broad group, all you non-ignorant Americans) who think that the US came along and rescued the world from the Nazi’s. Sorry, but the Canadians stormed Normandy; the Russians lost 10 million soldiers and citizens holding the eastern line; and the mythologized history of WWII largely ignores that reality. Did anyone even count how many innocent Africans died in those 5 years? European jews were victims of a planned and orchestrated atrocity. But, as you’ve so elequently shown, that in itself is not the whole truth, and the search for a more complete understanding should never cease.
.
about the denial of Nazi policy of extermination of Jews and minorities in Europe during WWII. The diary title is not factual and the accusation holocaust revisionism is more closely linked to political propaganda and a neocon agenda to nuke the Iranian people. Or is Olmert’s denial of Israel as a nuclear power truthful? I’m confused.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
.
Jewish groups in the US have petitioned against his use of the word “apartheid” – the system which underpinned white minority rule – to describe Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.
In other interviews, Mr Carter – whose Camp David summits helped end the decades-old conflict between Egypt and Israel – has rejected accusations of anti-Semitism which some critics have levelled at him.
The achilles heel of Israel’s crimes against humanity is the confiscation and illegal occupation of Palestinian land. The state of Israel seizes every opportunity for propaganda moments and elude accountability.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."