According to Steve Clemons at The Washington Note, the recent resignation of the Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Prince Turki al-Faisal, resulted from (among other things) his disagreement with the former Ambassador, Bush family confidant and current Saudi National Security Adviser, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, regarding which policy to pursue vis-a-vis Iran. Prince Turki is an advocate of the realist position which believes negotiations with Iran’s regime is the best option, and that military action would be disastrous in the present climate of sectarian strife. Prince Bandar? He’s a Cheney man, through and through:
Sources also confirm to TWN that Ambassador Turki’s decision to resign not only had to do with his refusal to tolerate the unprofessionalism of Bandar and Massoud — but with the signals that Bandar and Massoud have sent to Cheney, David Addington and others on Cheney’s national security staff that Saudi Arabia would “acquiesce to, accept, and not interfere with” American military action against Iran.
While reports of how far Bandar has gone in supporting Cheney’s desire for military action vary, insiders report that Bandar has “essentially assured” the Vice President that Saudi Arabia could be moved to accept and possibly support American military action against Iran. Another source reports to TWN that Bandar himself strongly supports Cheney’s views of a military response to Iran.
This is the core of the deep divide between Prince Turki and Bandar — which is also a divide between Foreign Minister Saud and Bandar as well.
The tension is about Iran and how to contain Iran. While Bandar and Rihab Massoud allegedly have affirmed Cheney’s views and are perceived to be Bush administration sycophants, Turki was charting a more realist course for Saudi interests and advising the White House to develop more serious, constructive strategies toward the region that would produce stability and not lead to “a terrorist super-highway stretching from Iran through Iraq and rushing through Syria and Jordan to the edge of Israel” — as one source stated to TWN.
It seems internal politics in Saudi Arabia may be the key to whether or not Cheney’s desire to “take out” Iran’s nuclear facilities via US air strikes and other operation by the military (i.e., the use of special forces units) will come to fruition. Currently, President Bush is consumed with the question of what to do in Iraq, but the Vice President and his supporters still hold out hope for the military option as the “be all, end all” solution to Iran’s nuclear program. If Prince Bandar ends up as the next Saudi Foreign Minister, he would provide a strong ally for Cheney on this issue.
Steve Clemons opined recently that Prince Bandar may have overplayed his hand, and Prince Turki’s resignation may incline King Abdullah to resolve this dispute within the Saudi Royal Family by elevating Turki to the foreign ministry post. I hope he’s right. The last thing we need is Saudi Arabia enabling Bush to bomb the crap out of the Iranians. We are perilously close to a full blown religious war between Shi’ites and Sunnis in the region, as it is.
.
Saudi’s can be bought:
Saudi Royalties: Blair Halts BAE Fraud Probe in Yamamah Contract
Tony Blair: National Interest Mandates SFO Inquiry to be Halted
Lord Goldsmith consulted the prime minister, the defence secretary, foreign secretary, and the intelligence services, and they decided that “the wider public interest” “outweighed the need to maintain the rule of law”. Mr Blair said it would be bad for Britain’s security if the SFO was allowed to go ahead, according to the statement made in the Lords by Lord Goldsmith. The statement did not elaborate on the nature of the threat.
This stinks in collusion with ally Bush/Cheney to keep Saudi Arabia from entering Baghdad theater of operations.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
What a tangled web. I thought that the adminstration’s desire to attack Iran was driven by the wishes of Israeli hardliners. According to this information Saudi hardliners are advocating the attack on Iran.
If the Israeli and Saudi interests are in alignment on this issue, I think there is little chance that Cheney and friends will refrain from military action against Iran.
We’re screwed.
Not necessarily. Iraq is such a mess, and the election results dealt such a blow to the GOP, that I don’t see any military action is likely re: Iran in the near term. And the decision regarding which way the Saudis jump is still up in the air. Time will tell, but conditions would have to change dramatically at this point.
I suspect Bush planned to attack Iran if the GOP retained control of Congress. That would have given him poltical cover for any further military move. At present however, many member of his party would balk at another war, since the currewnt one is what led to their downfall.
Nonetheless, it pays to be vigilant.
Makes sense. Hope you are right.
Now also posted in Orange.
Does this diary have a different title over at orange? Just wondering.
Randi Rhodes did a great segment last evening on this. She connected the dots way back. The other one that called all this out early on was Michael Moore in F911.
Great diary. The only thing this all has ever been about going back to the first discovery is oil.
Yes
But this is insane. They may “accept or support” an airstrike against Iran? What the hell does that mean? If they want to see Iran disabled, why don’t they do it themselves? We’ve certainly sold them enough F-16s to do some airstrikes. Do they really think they’ll be able to keep their hands clean, sit back, and tut-tut about this?
And if Iran sees their “acceptance or support” of this action as provocative or at least enabling, wouldn’t Iran be justified in invading Saudi Arabia? In mining the Strait of Hormuz? In attacking Saudi oilfields?
And if Bush (sorry, I mean Cheney) gets trigger-happy, the Saudis better hope the wind is blowing west to east the day the nukes get dropped.
is that one rarely even gets to the fine details.
Saudis better hope the wind is blowing west to east the day the nukes get dropped
(South)west to east in winter. (North)east to southwest in summer. Generally.
The Bush people haven’t a clue: They make their own reality.