I have spent the last week without any contact with the internet. No blogs, no online news sites, no email. My family and I accompanied my wife, her brother and her mother to Florida to participate in a memorial service for my father-in-law hosted by the Hurricane Research Division of the National Ocean and Atmospheric Agency, other wise known as NOAA. I’ll write more about that event in a few days, because he was, as I learned, a very important scientist, a genius in the field of meteorology whose work fundamentally altered our knowledge of the formation of cyclones and hurricanes, and how to track them. He deserves to be remembered, not just by his colleagues at NOAA and other meteorologists, but by all of us, because his dedication to his chosen field of endeavor, to science, has changed lives — indeed, it no doubt saved many lives.
But for now, I’d like to share with you another experience — what it feels like to be without any source of information other than cable television news shows. It was a window into a world I had forgotten existed, a world I had abandoned many years ago when I learned that the internet provided far more information about the world, and about what I wanted to know about that world, than television ever could. A world in which I was, like Moses in Exodus 2:22, a stranger in a strange land.
(cont.)
We left on Sunday afternoon to fly to Ft. Lauderdale (on Jet Blue Airlines via JFK in NYC) and finally arrived in our Miami hotel about 12:30 am on Monday morning. Jet Blue has had a bit of difficulty over the last week with canceled and delayed flights. I not only learned of this first hand, but since each Jet Blue aircraft we flew on had a small television screen located in the seat backs of each chair directly in front of us, I also learned it was a major story on CNN, Fox News and MsNBC. That and discussion of the legal battle over the corpse of Anna Nicole Smith.
In fact, Anna Nicole Smith was the topic du jour on all the cable networks for most of this past week (Jet Blue’s troubles were soon relegated to the backwaters of CNBC business news reporting).
I barely knew who this woman was before she died (some D-List celebrity former Playboy model/porn star/gold digger from what I gathered who had on again, off again problems with her weight) but no matter. Anna’s death, and the battle over who had the right to bury her dominated television news. I learned that when she died in the Bahamas she left behind an a ex-boyfriend who hated her new Svengali-like boyfriend (who shares a name with shock radio jock Howard Stern) both of whom claim to be the father of her newborn daughter. I learned she was estranged from her mother, and that her a 20 year old son Daniel recently died of a drug overdose in November.
I also learned she had a multi-millionaire husband whom she married when he was 89 years old who promptly died after 13 months of presumed marital bliss with Ms. Smith, leaving most of his massive estate to her. I learned she had lost a court battle over her husband’s will in a lawsuit brought by her husband’s son, and that she then filed bankruptcy and had that decision overturned. I learned Ms. Smith may (or may not) have had an affair with a prominent Bahamian government official which was causing a bit of a a scandal. I learned her daughter’s name was Daniellynn (“Daniel” from her recently deceased son and “Lynn” from Anna Nicole’s own birth name “Vicky Lynn Hogan”), and this baby girl stood to inherit millions of dollars — maybe.
I especially learned that cable reporters and anchors loved to compare Anna Nicole Smith to Marilyn Monroe, as in “she was our generation’s Marilyn” or “she idolized Marilyn” or “she once sang Diamonds are a girls best friend at a party to honor Marilyn” or she “looked just like Marilyn” or “her tragic death was much like Marilyn’s …” I even got to watch them put pictures of Marilyn and Anna Nicole side by side on my TV screen in order to show the similarities in their facial features and “figures.”
These reporters didn’t speak much of the vast gulf of talent between the two, but then one shouldn’t speak badly of the recently deceased. One shouldn’t, that is, unless you are talking about their drug abuse and posting pictures of what was in her fridge when she died (purportedly vials and vials of methadone prescribed by her personal physician). In that case, we heard a great deal about Anna Nicole’s wild night life, her poor mothering skills, and her (according to one psychiatric expert) narcissism and co-dependency issues.
There was really only one story that gave Anna Nicole a run for her money last week. No it wasn’t the Scooter Libby Trial, or the situation in Iraq or Afghanistan, or the crisis with Iran, though I did see CNN hyping an exclusive interview by Wolf Blitzer with Secretary Rice in which she said she’d love to talk to Iran if only they would just agree to all of our demands as a precondition to those talks. And it wasn’t even the kerfluffle between the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama campaigns over the statements made by David Geffen, an Obama supporter, that the Clintons “lie all the time” (although that was the most significant political story last week, if you measure significance by how much airtime is devoted to its coverage).
No, the only other story to throw a scare into Anna Nicole Smith’s dead body was the Britney Spears shaves her head and enters/leaves/re-enters rehab reporting. Oh, those pictures of a bald Britney! The eye witness reports of the hair stylist who refused to shave her head! The paparazzi, like so many locusts, clustering around Ms. Spears bewigged entrance, then exit, then entrance again into the Promises Malibu Treatment Center. The cancellation of her custody hearing with K-Fed, her 2nd ex-husband and the father of her children. The sad/snarky/bored with it all commentary about how her career is in a death spiral. Oh, and she got a tattoo, too.
Luckily the trial regarding who had the right to bury Ms. Smith was yesterday, and it was broadcast live on all the major cable networks. That’s right. The legal hearing in a Florida courtroom to decide where and to whom the corpus was literally to be delivered for burial was so important that we got to watch it live while flying home yesterday, and while stuck in JFK International airport on a 6 hour layover. Every broadcaster was having coniption fits about the judge’s behavior which to them seemed like a buffoon on steroids (trust me, as a lawyer I’ve seen much worse — being appointed to the bench brings out the inner egomaniac in a lot of people).
I was fascinated. Not in the sense of being entertained or enthralled, but more in the sense of a passerby on a freeway who slows down to look at the aftermath of particularly ugly accident. You look on in amazement that such a thing has happened (and is happening) before your very eyes, but then you drive on.
Except, I had no other option but to look. If I wanted to find out any news at all I was forced to endure this endless inane absorption in trivial pursuits by our major media companies. You see, they (i.e., CNN, Fox, MsNBC) still ran a text scrawl at the bottom of the screen with tidbits of the other important news of the day running along beneath the courtroom “drama.”. That scrawl was my only small window to a world beyond the Anna Nicole Smith.
Not that the scrawl was particularly useful or informative either. It seemed to consist primarily of bland statements about helicopters crashing in Afghanistan or bombs exploding in Iraq, or the quotes of officials and politicians, all taken out of context, or, to be more precise, lacking any context in which to place them. And, lots of information about Britney Spears, of course. Did you hear she got a tattoo?
It was a frightening reintroduction to the world that too many of our fellow citizens live in; a world where what is considered the most important news of the day is whether Anna Nicole Smith would ever be embalmed, and whether Britney Spears is a worse parent than her estranged husband Keven Federline. No wonder evangelicals have created their own alternative news outlets, and are more willing to believe what their pastors say about current affairs than what Brian Williams or Katie Couric might report. Our TV news media has come to resemble the front page of the National Enquirer, where the lead story is always the most salacious or violent one. It’s all about sex and stuff getting blowed up real good, all the time. It makes me wonder if the Iran War will happen merely because the networks need some new and exciting programming for the May “sweeps” period.
After a while, I just gave up. I was being titillated and seduced, mesmerized and distracted by the TV screen, but I wasn’t being informed. I wasn’t told that the UN inspectors for the IAEA had stated US intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program was as bad as, or worse than, the WMD intel the Bush administration gave to weapons inspectors in Iraq in 2002-03. I wasn’t informed that Australians protested over Cheney’s visit to their country. I wasn’t informed that American colleges had too few science majors enrolled, threatening our future competitive edge. I wasn’t informed that scientists are concerned global warming may lead to an increase in childhood fevers and disease.
I wasn’t even told that former Senator Daschle had endorsed Obama for president. I did see a brief story about the atrocity which is our military’s aftercare for wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Hospital, but that was old news for a denizen from the liberal blogosphere, like me. As for the Scooter Libby trial? Only a small portion from Keith Olbermann’s smorgasboard to whet my appetite, but hardly an entire meal. Then even he went on to elucidate me regarding the fine points of the Anna Nicole Smith trial.
But ask me anything you want to know about dead, former playmates of the year, and crazy former Madonna smoochers. I consider myself an expert now. Unfortunately.
Also available in Orange
Your tale is somewhat reminiscent of Clockwork Orange. It sounds like they may as well have levered your eyelids open while you had to watch all that garbage.
Or in our case, Burger King and CNN.
Shocking, isn’t it, Steven?
Been there…regularly. Seen that.
I travel a lot. Fairly low level. Motel 6 style. The dues we pay to perform real art.
Mass hypnosis.
Mass disinformation.
WMDs.
Weapons of Mass Delusion.
Bigger and better than ANY previous disinfo systems.
Harder to escape than Roman Catholic religious training at a young age.
Or Communist/Nazi training at a similar age.
I am going to write a post here that runs off of yours.
Thanks.
AG
P.S. And remember…the mass media IS the enemy. The face of the enemy.
Its names…and faces…are legion.
NEWSTRIKE!!!
It is the ONLY way.
NEWSTRIKE!!!
It is the ONLY way.
In order to strike, you have to have a position that you wish to force negotiations toward. I think it is important to formulate and announce before the potential action strike what exactly would that position be??
I have stated my “position” on this matter exhaustively. Here, on dKos and on MLW. Do a search. (Although I may not exist on My Left Wing anymore. I complained about the growing lack of of political content and equally fast growing kudzu of personal complaint over there and got banned. So it goes. Unlike, dKos, which KEEPS banned posters’ posts [Because they may be valuable someday?], MLW apparently pursues an unperson policy. So THAT goes, as well.)
Long story short?
1-Free our OWN minds from the constraints of decades of literal hypnosis. ALWAYS a good thing.
2-Attack the media at its corporate root. Its pocketbook. The blogs are populated by precisely the demographic most prized by the spinmeisters and ad execs.
My estimate?
95% white, college educated, middle class and above, 20 to 60 years of age. If I am off even by a third that is still a MAJOR cross section of consumer America.
Get a real NEWSTRIKE!!! started…complete with boycotts of the sponsors?
OOOOOO!!!!
Panic in the boardrooms!!!
AG
Now a stand-alone post. Expanded a great deal.
Bread and Circuses. Media. Its name Is Legion. Some Chomsky As Well.
AG
Welcome back Steven, I am looking forward to hearing about your father-in-law.
The embarrassing orgy of ANSmith coverage(in between Brittany)seems to have completed the absolute national disgrace known as our MSM…very very scary isn’t it. Anyone who still believes that CNN is the ‘most trusted name in news’ would have to be delusional….and completely uninformed and that applies of course to all ‘news’ channels and no doubt the big 3 evening news as well.
Speaking of the news and the public being so vastly underinformed according to a poll done on American(of course) deaths in Iraq most people here actually got that close to being right saying around 3000.
However when asked about how many Iraqi’s have died in the last 4 years….most thought around 9 thousand and to add to that obscenely low number some also said that civilians being killed were well just part of war ya know.
9 thousand instead of the over 700 thousand that have died(and who knows how many permanently crippled up and wounded for life) to say nothing of the 2 million displaced and the 2 million who have fled the country.
Welcome back Steven.
Your experience ties right in with something I read today while researching the history of The New Republic. It comes from Walter Lippmann’s 1922 classic Public Opinion. Here he is wrapping up his introduction and explaining how is going to lay out his argument. It’s a kind of pre-Straussian, philosopher king argument that is embraced by the non-reality based types in neo-conservative circles. But he has his point about the media:
Good quote. I quoted this same text in my article on the media in my book. Lippman’s text is also an argument for the formation of what became the CIA – “an…expert organization for making the unseen facts intelligible to those who have to make the decisions.”
my thoughts exacty and I said as much only an hour ago.
We finally got basic cable recently, mainly because the broadcast signal was getting so bad, and it only cost 5 bucks more to add tv to the phone/internet bill. Until then I’d only had occasional glances at cable in motel rooms and other peoples’ houses once in a while. But I believed I must be missing some good stuff.
What a disappointment. I thought at least there would be cnn for a newsfix any time, but that turns out to be total crap, much worse than even the local network news. And the rest of the news is even worse, if that’s possible. And the “entertainment” is at the same level. I’d expected good stuff from Bravo, A&E, Discovery, etc, but it’s all just military worship, back to back reruns of CSI, cheap sensationalized “science”, really bad movies, and mindless blabber, blabber, blabber.
I don’t know — there’s something really deeply wrong with this country.
I’ve had similar experiences in the past several years while moving and settling in to new places. Until the Internet connection gets re-established and everything in its place, it is a very different world indeed. If all you have to judge the world by is what’s on cable (or even local) TV news, you would think that very little notable is actually going on of any importance. Entertainment News (including entertaining political stories,) Sports and Weather. With “Breaking News” anytime we can find LIVE TV helicopter footage of a car chase or a plane having trouble landing, etc. Every “issue” always has both sides of the opinion spectrum represented, so as not to alienate the Believers. Then you get to decide what the “facts” are from the 3 minute segment on the trivialities of the issue. It sure is blissful. Just go shopping and keep up with the Jones’s. Solve all problems with a prescription medication during the commercial breaks. All is well with the world. That’s the purpose of life isn’t it?
…where after a hurricane, you can’t get anything but AM radio for two weeks. (They are A LOT slower at fixing power outages than we are interested in the Northeast.) You get starved for news and diverse opinions.
I’ve also had that sort of “deja vu” in Europe. For the two weeks after Katrina, we were in southern, rural France. We occasionally got BBC (which had far better coverage and knew more about what was happening in the Superdome than the president). At least the International Herald Tribune has a little news and the NTTimes crossword puzzles.
But your diary reminds us that we live in a pretty artifical world!
I can’t imagine how you stood this for a whole week. This past week I was dependent on mass media for only 30 hours when my net access blew out..and I nearly went nuts. I actually felt scared because I didn’t have any way to know what was going on in the world, and was totally cut off from all online allies and safe places. I literally could NOT watch the celebrity coverage. I turned the TV on every few hours just to see if anything was breaking anywhere, and that’s all I could tolerate. If I lived alone, I would not even have a TV, as long as I could have the internet.
Glad to see you back, Steven.
Welcome back, Steven, you were missed. I hope your family is healing as much as possible from your loss.
that’s why I like newspapers..
To the best of my knowledge, nobody has done a really satisfying deep explanation of why the American media has gotten so corrupted in just the last 15 years. It’s easy to blame it on evil corporations and media consolidation.
But it must also involve reciprocal blame on the part of the masses.
Television IS, after all, a fiercely “market driven” business.
There are serious attempts to present real news, such as 60 Minutes, Bill Moyers, Charlie Rose, and so forth. If that’s what people really wanted, we’d have a lot more of that.
I tend to think that Americans are going the way of many imperial peoples, corrupted by wealth and the glorification of wealth, corrupted by victory and the glorification of victory, fatally weakened by the nation’s very strengths.
I agree with Chalmers Johnson. I think it’s too late to save American democracy. I foresee very great destruction in the United States within a few years. And the American people will NEVER look inward for the cause. They will ALWAYS blame some demonized external foe, some demonized internal faction.
I tend to think that it’s quite simply that a large enough plurality of Americans would rather be entertained than informed — because learning is no fun, you know — that the media outlets are simply providing what the largest segment of the market wants.
We live in a world in which people feel more personally affected by celebrities and corporations than they do by the government, and where pop culture has been elevated to the same status as world news. The result? Infotainment, incredibly marketable, with very little actual content. Americans will buy the news that they want to hear.
I think the public, or at least a large subset of it, is very much responsible in this, we agree on that. I won’t comment on whether I think it’s fixable at this point, because that question just depends on what you mean by “fixed”.
Not sure yet why the American media became so corrupted, but I suspect that it is a combination of factors. First was when the original generations of the families that started the big city papers died off and the Newspapers became driven my stock markets. Next was TV. Those two things came together with the rise of the Conservatives and the Libertarian wing of that group.
I was searching for some information about a birth in 1945 or 46, and went back to the Fort Worth newspapers for that period (on microfilm.) The first shock was that Fort Worth supported three big newspapers. The second was that the front page and front section of each was loaded with international news. (An awful lot of it about Southern Asia, the Middle East, the Mediterrannean, and partucularly Israel and Egypt. A lot like today. But a lot more news.)
Since 1960 the newspapers have been shutting down and leaving very few two paper cities. They have also been shutting down foreign bureaus, and just occasionally sending a flying team of reporters to each international hot spot. But then came the Reagan Revolution and the Savings & Loan crisis. Private businesses could make the owners instant multimillionaires if they went public, but the buyers normally had to borrow the money, usually at high interest rates.
When an owner has bought a newspaper with money borrowed at 11% to 15%, the newspaper has to return even more. So advertising rates increase and costs are cut. AP and UPI have been in bad trouble financially since the late 70’s because the newspapers quit using them. Why compete with TV to set the daily news agenda? TV is all day, and a newspaper is once a day. Morning papers disappeared, also.
The result is a lot less news in newspapers, but higher ad rates. Why bother to read them?
I read the other day that several Fleet Street newspapers were going broke during the time when Great Britain has confiscatory income taxes for the wealthy, so they converted the papers to foundations that were not taxed – or privately owned. Those papers (according to my article – which I can’t remember where I read – Sorry) are doing a really good job of providing news and jobs.
I read two newspapers daily. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram and the Dallas Morning News. Both are going down hill. DMN just laid off a large number of editorial employees. The paper has suffered, and I expect it to start losing customers at even more rapid a rate. That loss will be reflected in lower ad rates.
Neither paper has done a decent investigatory report in the ten years I have been reading them. Both papers have found a political role as booster for large development or redevelopment projects where the taxpayers pick up the costs to make a few private developers wealthy. The Dallas Trinity Rive project, the new Dallas Cowboys stadium to make the owner of the Cowboys more wealthy, the Fort Worth downtown Trinity River project that is taking private property and handing it to developers to create a new lake and hotels and stuff (project run by a highly experienced project manager? Nope. By Congressman Kay Granger’s son. Kay Granger was Fort Worth Mayor before she got elected to Congress as a Republican.)
TV news has also cut back on foreign bureaus in the last 25 years, particulalry since the fairness doctrine was eliminated under Reagan, and even more so since CNN was created on cable. TV has the same problem newspapers have had since they left family ownership for the financial market. The TV chains have bought stations using borrowed money at high interest rates, so they can’t afford too much news. First thing that chains do is cut staff.
Tell me – what news organizations had the money to really investigate the Presidential Elections of 2000 in Florida or the Ohio one in 2004? That kind of manpower is damned expensive, and such an investigation would take six months to a year minimum. The news organization that committed those funds would never get them back, and still have to pay high interest on the loans used to buy them in the first place.
Note that your serious attempts to present news are Public TV. KERA here had to sell off the second channel it had to a Christian Broadcaster in order to get enough funds to start broadcasing in high – definition. with the one station it had left.
So let’s look at the Firedoglake liveblog of the Libby trial. That’s volunteers with donations to cover the apartment. It is a short term one time thing. The internet doesn’t create the revenue needed to support investigative reporting. As an academic Economist, Finance major and an accountant, I can tell you right now that you don’t build a heavily expensive team of investigators without assured future flow of adequate funds.
The problem seems to be money. The older media are finding their revenue reduced, and then a lot of it siphoned off into the financial markets as interest. The Blogosphere simply hasn’t come up with reliable and trustworthy source of revenue to take their place.
I noticed when I donated $10 to Digby (The best analysis in the blogosphere) that I was actually signing up to donate that same $10 every year at the same time. That will help him solve the reliability problem, and if I had more money, I would donate more in a regular, reliable stream. Public Radio and Public TV have long had their Easy Checks method. But neither of those are really adequate. I get about 100 to 200 hits a week at Politics Plus Stuff but if I ever get a check from Google I’ll be shocked (and then send it on to Digby.)
That’s the system the conservatives have left us with. I’d really like to see every town of over 99,999 people with a newspaper foundation, and perhaps an investogatory journalism foundation. Something the politicians can’t touch. I’d also like to see a sharply increased progressive income tax that was at least 50% on all family income earnings and capital gains both) above half-a-million per year, together with a return of the Estate tax at at least a 50% level for all estates over $5,000,000, both indexed to inflation.
If someone wants to start a business, then there are numerous ways to gather capital from several people. It is not necessary for a single person to have to finance a start up.
As to how to get the blogosphere into investigative journalism, I’d say start with local stuff. People aren’t going to pay for investigative journalism unless they get something out of it. At a local level, with costs pared down, that might be possible. Possibly an association with a local paper or alternative paper. I just don’t yet know how to finance it. Yet.
Then get such local journalists to associate state-wide or regionally. An online wire service might be able to pay for itself. I’d love to have someone in Austin feeding me news of the current Legislative session that was important to Dallas – Fort Worth that the newspapers and TV didn’t have. But I couldn’t pay much unless I had a revenue stream from the blog.
These are just ideas, not well thought out. I just started typing and the next line popped into my head. But the core of it is revenue stream vs. Costs to pay for investigative people.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
That’s one of the best comments I have EVER read on a blog. FWIW, I’m humbled that my own comments rarely if ever rise to this intellectual level.
These ideas are very important, and you obviously have good writing skills and a very impressive knowledge base. I hope you’re putting this into a book and trying in other ways to get this out in all directions.
The idea of many local newspaper and investigative journalism foundations is brilliant!
Start with George Soros.
Next is Warren Buffet.
Next is Bill Gates.
Next is the brilliant Bangladeshi fellow who just won the Nobel Peace Prize for micro-investments (shame on me I can’t remember his name tonight).
YOU HAVE A BIG IDEA! I can’t remember seeing a better, bigger idea on the blogosphere.
Run with it!
Thanks.
Actually, this was off the top of my head. I tried to answer the question and threw the first line out, and then like poetry, the second line popped up, and so on. I’d get stuck and go back to the question I was trying to answer. That would kick off the next line, sometimes a slightly different direction. [I’m writing this to see if anyone else recognizes the process. I used to write (bad) poetry this way, sometimes in a topless bar. Always got the more intellegent dancers to ask what I was doing and start a conversation. I’m way too old to do that anymore.]
I’d start a Dallas-Fort Worth blog of this type if I could get a decent set of software to attract writers. Any suggestions? Something cheap that could be used for a newspaper type thing like Huffington Post?
The revenue side might be a Craigs list kind of thing with local businesses paying for advertisements. Then getting comments on the effectiveness of the services. Writing might by connected to local journalism classes.
The first key would be that it is local. The second would be that it be a foundation or a non-profit. I’m not sure how to choose the Board of Directors, but that would be extremely important.
I keep thinking that making a connection to a newspaper and to Journalism courses would get people to practice both writing and editing, and the newspaper could offer scholarships and jobs. They might also pass advertising down to get broader distribution, but they’d have to pay for it.
Just a random thought, but getting advertisements from the political parties might be a possibility, but they can’t be more than about 10% of revenue so that they don’t dominate editorial decisions. It seems to me that this would be a much cheaper way for candidates for office to reach key opinion-leaders. In my county it would be dangerous because the Republicans dominate the county offices. But a fairness doctrine could be put into place. Hey, I might even listen to Greens and Libertarians! Now, Naderites? I’d have to give that decision to someone who has less dislike for the turkey.
There might also be tie-ins to the local NPR and PBS stations. Exchange free advertising for the opportunity to have some debates controlled by the blog-paper. [Name’s got to change.]
Hey! I really appreciate the enthusiam, and frankly I really need it to keep working on it. But I need additional ideas, also. Someone needs to throw ideas out.
Not criticism right now – just more ideas. This is brainstorming time. Criticism has to be delayed.
This would need a much better business plan before Gates or Soros might be interested.
Ha. I also wrote poetry in strip clubs. And once I showed up with a chess board, with no takers after several hours. And I’m also now much too old for that any more. He he.
I’m humbled to meet someone significantly more long-winded than me, which is rare.
I don’t have the juice for intelligent business planning any more tonight.
But for what it’s worth, I really do think your idea of a network of local foundations (see–I just expanded your idea for free) to support investigative journalism is really sharp. Think big. Why not go right to Soros? He has the resources to assemble development teams. What is always in short supply is good ideas. And you’ve got one.
Hmm. A Network of investigative journalism foundations.
And they could raise revenue partly by selling the results of their investigations to TV, Radio and Newspapers. Or take advertisements – but that runs the risk of catering to the advertisers.
Also publish in blogs and books. Using the Kos/Firedoglake model of supporting books that need to be published.
The Boards of Directors would need to be structured so that no single group (political, Religious or corporate) could take over and direct the investigations towards or away from important stories.
And I’ll deny being long-winded to my last breathe. [G] Even in the face of good evidence.
OK. I’m still working on it. Here is the most recent iteration, at my blog Politics Plus Stuff.
I’m getting closer to a decent business plan. That’s what Gates or Soros would want to see. The business plan is the first step, the grants is a second step, and the software to set up the web presence is the third step. [Scoop? What does Ariana Huffington use? What would Kos suggest?] After that, get the people to volunteer to start the foundations and hit up the blogosphere for more funding. From right now, I’d expect something next Fall.
Succesful operation has to follow that, and then the system could be grown.
And I don’t have a clue how to fit political news and such into this right now. Here is my post at The Next Hurrah. Don’t know how they will react there.
Your encouragement is much appreciated.
“it’s dead already, it just doesn’t know it’s dead”.
democracy here ended at least fifty years ago, basically at the end of WW II when the war profiteers panicked because they were going to have to pull their clammy lips from the teat called the U.S. Treasury and figure out a different way to make money– some did, but some others got together, pulled in some congressmen and “very creatively” invented the evil, godless Soviet empire. the resulting arms race cost we the sappy taxpayers trillions of dollars.
when that turned out to be nothing but a paper tiger, a new boogeyman had to be invented– presto! the communist threat in S.E. Asia… when that turned out to be a zero, next in line were the
ISLAMIC FASCISTS.
We abandoned the wonderful world of TV last Sept. after I asked WTF are we paying 70+ bucks a month just to watch The Daily Show and Link TV once in a while.
Since we’re outside the demographic now anyway, I doubt the moguls care we’re gone.
We haven’t missed it at all.
Welcome home, Steven! Are you a Heinlein fan by any chance?
I enjoyed his novels when I was younger, but the philosophy and politics he espoused are no longer my cup of tea.
Have you followed BattleStar Galactica?
I don’t have cable, so I bought season one after glowing reviews. It was atleast as good as Star Trek, so I spent the money on season 2.0 and 2.5.
They seem to be hitting their stride. Season two is excellent.
Of all the Star Treks, I liked Deep Space Nine the best. I think it was the darkest, but by a long shot the most interesting. But BattleStar Galactica has even better writers.
The best Science Fiction TV rides on the best writers. Always. And BSG has them right now. I’ll bet good money that they haven’t goone Hollywood and decided that to write for the young demographics the writers shouldn’t be over age 40. Good science fiction is too difficult for younger writers to handle well as a general rule.
It sure isn’t “news,” is it?
It’s entertainment, and shitty entertainment at that.
Looking forward to learning more about your father in law.
LCD programming.
LCD = Lowest Common Denominator.
I think this is a really important diary, Steven. I don’t have much experience with CNN, but a few months ago I started watching it in the morning when I went to the gym. I was surprised and amazed at how bad it was — how little “news” was presented. At the time, I wondered if it was only that bad in the morning, but from your diary I get the sense that it is pretty much contentless all day.
The thing is — I don’t get why this should be the case. Oh, I understand all the arguments for why hard information sells much worse than entertainment in our society. But CNN is a news channel. Even if real news isn’t everybody’s cup of tea, you think that they would do better by providing a product that would be satisfying to the (admittedly minority) section of the population who wants it. After all, there are plenty of venues for people who want to hear about Anna Nicole Smith. I wonder, in fact, if this isn’t part of the reason that Fox news is so successful. They may be biased, but in comparison to CNN, they aren’t any less newsy.
Despite all the blogs out there, I shudder when I think about how few real news sources there are in our society. Basically, three decent newspapers (NYT, WaPo, and LA times) and that’s IT. If these guys shut down, we wouldn’t know a damn thing about anything. It’s scary.