Brendan does a good job of laying out the basic sentiment in his post In Which Harold Ford Has His Buttocks Handed to Him. Someone invited Ford to post at TPM Cafe and the comments are not pretty. It’s actually more like a carwreck, which is exactly what is going to happen to blogactivism if we are ever forced to swallow a DLC candidate as our presidential nominee. Most of us will just turn out the lights and go find more productive things to do.
Ford Jr. makes a call for common ground but then pulls out this gem:
It’s no secret that in some parts of the progressive blogosphere, the DLC has attained bogey-man status based on what I can only describe as a distorted view of the organization’s history, and its alleged present status as a pillar of the Washington political establishment.
Ford is here suggesting that the DLC does not enjoy the status of a pillar of the Washington political establishment. Let’s examine this for a moment. We first have to identify what the Washington political establishment is before we can determine whether the DLC is a pillar within it. The establishment is made up of people that are serving or have served in organizations like the National Security Council, the Defense Policy Board, President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. It’s made up Congress’s chairmen and the powerful lobbyists that write their laws for them. It’s made up of the Bigfoot press at Time, Newsweek, the Washington Post, New York Times, and elsewhere. It’s made up of talking heads like Pat Buchanan, Chris Matthews, Donna Brazille, Mary Matalin, and James Carville.
And it most definitely includes the former first lady and junior senator from New York, Hillary Clinton. There are other pillars at the Pentagon and in our intelligence agencies, and in the party mechanisms of both parties (Schrum, Rove, Bartlett, Axelrod, Emanuel etc.).
These people and institutions, collectively, have failed us during the Bush years. That is why we have a blogosphere and that is why the blogosphere holds most of these people and institutions in suspicion, if not outright contempt.
Nowhere is that contempt greater than it is for Joe Lieberman, The New Republic, elements of the Washington Post, and for the DLC which is so intimately connected with these people and organizations.
They have led us astray. They have given us journalmalism instead of reporting. They have refused to demand lawful behavior from our leaders. They have been complicit in a fraud on the American people (the case for war in Iraq). In every way, the blogosphere stands in opposition to these failed institutions…the DLC, primary above all, because it is ostensibly a left-wing organization.
Let’s look at the DLC’s leadership:
Harold Ford, Jr. is chairman of the DLC. U.S. Sen. Tom Carper is vice chair of the DLC; U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is chair of the DLC’s American Dream Initiative; Al From is founder and CEO of the DLC. Bruce Reed is DLC president; Pennsylvania State Representative Jennifer Mann is chair of the DLC’s State Legislative Advisory Board (SLAB); Columbus (OH) Mayor Michael Coleman is chair of the DLC’s Local Elected Officials Network(LEON).)
Harold Ford is an employee of FOX News. According to Progressive Punch, Tom Carper is the 47th most progressive member of the Senate (Lieberman is 46th). Al From is…well…Al From. And Hillary Clinton is their candidate.
Hillary is bobbing and weaving and trying to shore up some support on the left by sending out people like Harold Ford to offer olive branches. But, as Brendan notes, all this accomplishes is the passing off of petards. People will not stand for this.
As the good people of Nevada explained, you can not represent us and give legitimacy to Fox News (let alone accept a paycheck from them) at the same time. The DLC is dead to anyone that has payed even a remote amount of attention over the last six years. Forget policy. It’s not about policy. It’s about dishonesty and complicity in a stunningly failed foreign policy and it is about cowering wimpishness in the face of an executive power grab, lamely served to us as being tough on defense.
The war in Iraq will have consequences. One of those consequences will be a renewed vigor on the left, as it has devised tools to overcome the crap served up to us by the Washington political establishment. The only way the progressive backlash can be avoided is if it is stopped in its tracks by the nomination of Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee. If that happens, it won’t be possible to stop a massive splintering on the left and will not matter how many people write STFU diaries or invoke the ghost of Ralph Nader. People should be well advised to oppose her nomination NOW, so that we go forth with unity and take the White House AWAY from the establishment that got us into this mess.
None of our candidates are saviors and they each have their own taint with the establishment. But they are not all DLC/Harold Ford/Joe Lieberman warmongering Fox News Democrats.
Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
billjpa
Tell it, Booman!
The DLC is becoming an anvil. Let them keep it and go down with it – those with senses left should distance themselves.
I personally love you all here. I personally am here to fight the good fight with each of you with this and other things. I am an independent that is very unhappy with the dlc. I do not nor have I have ever loved the dlc. I thought that something that clinton did in his time wad bad/good effects on the whole of America. I am not a true lover of him. Nor am I a true lover of hillary, either. I hate to say it again, but ford is from my state and I detest him….
I think it is wrong, even it she was not a dlcer to be nominated for we do not need another clinton in the WH…..
They have to be made to understand they had their chance to fame now it is time to step aside and we as a nation must move on from them them and the likes of them. It is just that simple to me. We do not need dynasties in the house that belongs to each of us here and to all of America. I have had my belly full of the kings and queens of our WH. They, no matter who they are, must be made aware it really is our house and they are only renting it for a few years from us. Some times we have to evict ppl from it, if they do not do like we, the owners tell them to do..
I do not like hillary clinton, and I have never liked her from the get go. I tolerated bill for the time he was in Washington, cause he was better than poppy bush…God, I shutter when I think of that scenario! Anyhow, this has really gotten to be serious with me as a voter. I am really not a happy camper with politics of today…
Good to be able to chat with you today. hugs to all.
I agree with your diary, Booman, but I want to amend it with the following: we must also be incredulous of those who employ the DLC’s rhetorical strategies, mainly triangulation and a commitment to something vaguely called faith. I am obviously thinking of Barack Obama, who employs triangulation again and again. He may not be an official member of that organization, but he certainly follows their lead. In fact, I would argue he has triangulated his way out of the organization, especially as he and many others refer to him as a “new, ‘New Democrat.'”
Once again, Boo my man, I am in total agreement. It is an utter mystery to me why so many in the left blogosphere support Hillary. Can somebody explain that?
The TPM thread is a serious disaster. And Ford, Jr., did not bother to respond to any of the comments. I guess an impasse has been reached. The manner whereby Ford, Jr., addressed TPM’s users resembled the haughty tone whereby Obama addressed members of DailyKos. I find this parallel very interesting.
If anything, the future Democratic party will have a much sharper division between the left wing and the DLC factions, those who believe we can get back to basic liberal-socialist values and those who believe Republican-Lite is here to stay.
It looks as if this fight will be fought in the primaries and that fight has already begun.
Thanks for the clarifying perspective on ourselves.
Seems like Gore is staying out of this election because of a connection with those in the DLC – could that be?
Today is even better at the cafe.
Jo Ann Mort and Ed Kilgore are trying to defend Ford, and are getting the same treatment. And sometime later today, Ford is going to be “blogging” again, doubtless another 1-way conversation.
As a little “i” indpendent… Your last couple of paragraphs pretty much sum up what I see and hear, coming from the left side, about any of the more conservative candidates that keep getting fronted by Democratic conservative groups.
There are very few Democratic Bloggers willing to face the reality that the only thing Naderites lost was their own campaign, no the Democratic campaign. And some Democratic supporters are willing to repeat this tragedy.
Whereas bush has been a “Unifier” of the left, Clinton (or any other radical American Centrist) would be equally devastating in dividing the left as a Democratic candidate.
if your guess rhymes with Farold Hord, you’re right!
The illustrious chair of the DLC, who voted for torture, repeal of habeas corpus, and the bankruptcy bill, apprently didn’t “nearly the time that many seem to expect” (according to Andrew Golis via personal email to me).
I have no doubt Golis is a straight shooter, and take no issue with his explanation. I will point out that senators like Kerry, Feingold, and Webb (to name a couple) have found plenty of time int heir busy schedule to blog at sites like kos and firedoglake, and interact in real-time with readers there.
It strikes me that if Ford was really interested in “finding common ground” he would have taken his lumps and engaged with the people he wants to persuade. What yesterday and today illustrate, to me, is more of the top-down lecturing from the political elites that we’ve all gotten so sick of.
I’ll retract this if Ford appears before 5:00 PM. It’s 4:42 EST.