David S. Broder (born September 11, 1929) may simply be upset that Mohammed Atta ruined his birthday. Or there could be something more profound that’s bugging him, like the fact his birthyear will always be associated with great quantities of depression. I don’t know. But his latest offering in the Washington Post is as dishonest as it is fatuous. There is no need to quote him at length…this should suffice.
Here’s a Washington political riddle where you fill in the blanks: As Alberto Gonzales is to the Republicans, Blank Blank is to the Democrats — a continuing embarrassment thanks to his amateurish performance.
If you answered ” Harry Reid,” give yourself an A. And join the long list of senators of both parties who are ready for these two springtime exhibitions of ineptitude to end.
This is roughly the same as saying, ‘As Duke Cunningham is to the Republicans, Harry Reid is to the Democrats.’ In other words, it is truly a WTF moment that should leave all sentient beings scratching their craniums. The charge is so grossly off-base and unfair that one must go in search of an explanation for this fatuity. And it doesn’t take long.
Hailed by his staff as “a strong leader who speaks his mind in direct fashion,” Reid is assuredly not a man who misses many opportunities to put his foot in his mouth. In 2005, he attacked Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, as “one of the biggest political hacks we have here in Washington.”
If David S. Broder is the Dean of Washington journalism, then Alan Greenspan (and his wife, Andrea Mitchell) is the Dean of the Cocktail Frankfurter set. Greenspan and Mitchell have been known to auction themselves off as tea partners. And their guest lists are legendary. Take this one, which was used at the White House rather than, per usual, the Greenspan’s palatial estate.
In the Blue Room on Jan. 23, with President George W. Bush as host, several dozen of Greenspan’s closest friends gathered to toast him before his retirement as chairman of the Federal Reserve.
But it was the list of guests, old friends whom Greenspan had specifically asked the White House to invite, that highlighted his stature as both an icon and an iconoclast.
At one table was Vice President Dick Cheney, the hard-nosed combatant of the Bush White House, whose friendship with Greenspan began 30 years ago during Gerald Ford’s presidency.
Just a few tables away was Robert Rubin, a Treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton and a man so disliked in the Bush White House that many officials use his name as a put-down – “Rubinomics.”
The guest list also included Vernon Jordan, the millionaire lawyer and ubiquitous adviser to Democratic leaders, and Peter Peterson, a Republican who has infuriated the White House by lambasting Bush’s budget deficits.
The list underscores how Greenspan, despite being a lifelong Republican, had a knack for building close friendships across the political spectrum and, almost unheard of in today’s bitterly divided capital, made few enemies in his 18-year tenure.
Calling Alan Greenspan a political hack is a serious and, evidently, unforgivable offense. It makes everyone uncomfortable and upsets his wife. This wreaks havoc on the seating arrangements at numerous cocktail frankfurter gatherings. Of course, Andrea Mitchell is capable of creating her own angst:
Like a great many prominent journalists — certainly in Washington, but no less so in other centers of power, wealth and celebrity — Andrea Mitchell of NBC News wants to have it both ways. On the one hand, she wants to be the prototypical, hard-nosed, gumshoe reporter whose specialty is ” ‘talking back’ to presidents and dictators,” but on the other, she wants to be part of the parade, on first-name terms with the powerful, wealthy and famous, invited to their dinner parties and salons, courted and cosseted by them. Thus at the end of this memoir she describes prowling “the VIP section” at the 2005 inauguration of President Bush, which she attended with her husband, Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve:
“In a prominent seat, next to the CIA director, was Alan. . . . As his wife, I could have sat with him among the official guests instead of covering the event as a reporter. But for me, this was a dream assignment: we had a live broadcast, hundreds of prominent politicians with no way out, and no one stopping me from snagging interviews. . . . Knowing me as he does, Alan understood that it wasn’t even a close call. But looking across the way at him, I was struck by how different our roles were on days such as this: he was inside, looking out, while I was outside, looking in.”…
…”I enjoyed being a fly on the wall at a private dinner in the White House; at the same time, I felt that the ‘designated shouter’ from the press corps was a little out-of-place upstairs, sitting with officials whom I covered. I knew I could neither ask questions, nor quote anything that was said to me. It gave me an uncomfortable feeling that I might be gaining unusual access, but losing some independence.”
Mitchell and Broder are a special breed, and they stick together. Consider their reaction to Bill Clinton receiving a blow job.
“He came in here and he trashed the place,” says Washington Post columnist David Broder, “and it’s not his place.”…
…NBC correspondent Andrea Mitchell adds a touch of neighborly concern. “We all know people who have been terribly damaged personally by this,” she says. “Young White House aides who have been saddled by legal bills, longtime Clinton friends. . . . There is a small-town quality to the grief that is being felt, an overwhelming sadness at the waste of the nation’s time and attention, at the opportunities lost.”
Clearly, Clinton’s dalliance was more than enough to put the A-List off their martinis and…in a way that, say, blundering into Iraq cannot compete.
Who is Harry Reid to insert his ‘displaced aggressiveness…[on] the part of the onetime amateur boxer’ into this scene and call someone a hack? There can be no revenge too sweet. And Broder delivers.
Never mind that Broder misrepresents what Harry Reid said, nor that his column uses the comments of Senator Chuck Schumer as if they were the comments of Reid. What’s important is to protect the hive. And what a hive it is. Here’s a good list, from Katherine Graham’s last dinner party (to celebrate George W. Bush’s 2001 inauguration).
The guest list included Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Steve Case, Alan Greenspan, Colin Powell, Commerce Secretary Don Evans, Henry Kissinger, Vernon Jordan, and Ethel Kennedy. There were a few media types: Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters, Andrea Mitchell, Al Hunt and Judy Woodruff, Ben Bradlee and Sally Quinn, Jim and Kate Lehrer, George Will, Howell Raines, Margaret Carlson, and the top brass from The Washington Post – all invited to welcome Dubya to the nation’s capital.
If you call any of these people ‘hacks’, or ‘losers’, you can expect a serious backlash. You may even be compared to Alberto Gonzales.
Also Spach Broderustra.
I’m glad you wrote about this. I was appalled by Broder’s column this morning. The Bush administration is totally f’ing up, the attorney general just gave a pathetic lying performance before congress, and David Broder is upset at….Harry Reid?!?!?!? For what? For having the gall to keep his caucus together and pass a bill to end the war? For occasionally telling the truth?
I wonder if there is a single column where Broder shows similar disdain, and anger, towards Bush. Oh no, probably not. Bush is OK. If only he didn’t show so much “tolerance” towards incompetence. Nice guy, that George.
he’s mad that Reid called one of his buddies a ‘hack’.
Another example of Broder being more enamoured ofhis own word plan than any reflection of commong sense. Auction themselves off? Ah yes, the time-honored concept of selling oneself to the highest bidder.
If Broder were held to any journalistic standards, the WaPo ombudsman should be tearing him a new one right about now. At the very least, it’s heartening to read the comments over at WaPo’s website and see plenty of people giving him shit.
Broder is a senile bitter old man, and a whore.
And if this is all because of the “hack” comment, he doesn’t have any ethics either.
Whenever I read his column, I put on my “Grampa Abe Simpson” voice. “When I was boy, we called turkeys waaaalking birds…”
Coming fresh off Bill Moyer’s program last night, which again exposed the “inside the beltway” media and their unitary mindset when it comes to dealing with the Washingtonian elite, can you really say that a column such as Broder’s is really such a surprise?
He is a perfect example of just the kind of mental laziness in our media which has propelled us into the position we now find ourselves.
Harry Reid is expressing the very feelings and frustrations that are now permeating this country due to the ineptitude, arrogance and criminality of this administration.
Broder is nothing more than a foot soldier for a completely failed policy. He is one of many “bubble boys” who are scared shitless that they are going to lose their precious seat at the table of beltway preference.
I sent him an email.
“Please shut up. You are an embarrassment to yourself and the Washington Post. The only person who might be more clueless is President Bush. If you had an ounce of dignity and/or honor, you would retire and never write again.