The reconciliation bill between the House and Senate’s versions of the Iraq Supplemental funding legislation passed the House of Representatives last night:
The bill is now on track to clear Congress by the weekend and arrive on the president’s desk as the first binding congressional challenge to Mr Bush’s handling of the conflict, which is now in its fifth year.
“Our troops are mired in a civil war with no clear enemy and no clear strategy for success,” said the House majority leader, Democrat Steny Hoyer.
Republicans promised to stand squarely behind the president in rejecting what they called a “surrender date”.
“Al-Qaida will view this as the day the House of Representatives threw in the towel,” said Jerry Lewis, a Republican congressman on the house appropriations committee.
The legislation approves a further $124.2bn (£61.9bn) to fund the war but demands troop withdrawals begin on October 1, or sooner if the Iraqi government fails to fulfil certain conditions. It sets a non-binding goal of completing the pullout by April 1 2008, while allowing for forces conducting certain missions, such as pursuing terrorist networks or training Iraqi forces, to remain.
Two Republican congressmen – Wayne Gilchrest and Walter Jones – joined 216 Democrats in voting for the bill. Thirteen Democrats joined 195 Republicans in rejecting it.
By the way, one of the two GOP members to vote with the Democrats was Walter “Freedom Fries” Jones, who long ago abandoned his support of Bush’s Iraq misadventure, possibly because, unlike Our Dear Leader he actually attends military funerals. The other, Wayne Gilchrist of Maryland appears to be a bit of a maverick as well. He won his last election with 68% of the vote so it’s not like he’s in a district that will swing back to the Democrats anytime soon.
Democrats who voted against the bill, or who did not vote, include the following:
(cont.)
Against:
Dan Boren, OK
John Barrow, GA
Lincoln Davis, TN
Dennis Kucinich, OH
John Lewis, GA
Jim Marshall, GA
Jim Matheson, UT
Michael R. McNulty, NY
Mike Michaud, ME
Brad Miller, NC
Gene Taylor, Ms
Maxine Waters, CA
Lyn Woolsey, CAPete Stark, CA, was present but didn’t vote.
Jim Costa, CA, and Nick Lampson, TX, also did not vote.
Kucinich, Lewis, Waters, and Stark are in the Progressive caucus, so I assume they were simply protesting the bill as reconciled in Committee for other reasons (i.e., too watered down for their taste).
Barrow, Boren, Davis, Costa, Marshall, Matheson, Michaud, and Taylor are all members of the Blue Dog Coalition (i.e., Republican Lites) so that explains their votes against the bill (or in Costa’s case, a non-vote). I guess they support more troops getting killed no matter what.
I have no idea why Brad Miller and Lyn Woolsey voted against the bill. Miller’s from North Carolina, but Woolsey is from a decidedly blue state. Maybe someone smarter than I can read the tea leaves behind their votes on this bill.
I suppose Nick Lampson abstained because he’s from Texas and didn’t want to go on the record supporting this legislation, but also didn’t want to offend anyone who was in favor of it. Sort of a fence sitter, to be honest.
Now the bill goes to the Senate. And then to Georgie Boy’s desk where he can proclaim again and again why the Democrats are Defeatists and Don’t support the troops, blah, blah, blah, when he vetoes it.
Why not send the “blue dogs” the latest Harris poll?
28%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That id TWENTY EIGHT PERCENT!
Hello!!!!!!! billjpa
Hell with Broder. The troops went into Iraq on my birthday for years ago!
Man, these people make too much money for me to ever take them seriously any more. It used to be a mark of honor that a journalist didn’t make a lot of bread, or if he/she did, it was because they were good. They cut the bullshit.
Anyone else was nothing less than a hack or a Winchell.
Broder’s a hack. He doesn’t have to worry about what’s going to be on his plate the next day.
Lewis, Kucinich and Waters for sure, and I assume Stark voted against it because regardless of the timelines for withdrawal, ultimately it is a further spending bill to continue to fund the war. They have all said that they will not in good conscience vote to spend another penny on this war. They voted this way with the full knowledge of leadership, and made sure that there would be 218 without their votes. I think Lyn Woolsey had the same rationale, but I don’t know it for sure.
stark voted ‘present’.