Krugman, from behind the firewall:
Last month the provincial government in Kurdistan, defying the central government, passed its own oil law; last week a Kurdish Web site announced that the provincial government had signed a production-sharing deal with the Hunt Oil Company of Dallas, and that seems to have been the last straw.
Now here’s the thing: Ray L. Hunt, the chief executive and president of Hunt Oil, is a close political ally of Mr. Bush. More than that, Mr. Hunt is a member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, a key oversight body.
Some commentators have expressed surprise at the fact that a businessman with very close ties to the White House is undermining U.S. policy. But that isn’t all that surprising, given this administration’s history. Remember, Halliburton was still signing business deals with Iran years after Mr. Bush declared Iran a member of the “axis of evil.”No, what’s interesting about this deal is the fact that Mr. Hunt, thanks to his policy position, is presumably as well-informed about the actual state of affairs in Iraq as anyone in the business world can be. By putting his money into a deal with the Kurds, despite Baghdad’s disapproval, he’s essentially betting that the Iraqi government — which hasn’t met a single one of the major benchmarks Mr. Bush laid out in January — won’t get its act together. Indeed, he’s effectively betting against the survival of Iraq as a nation in any meaningful sense of the term.
The smart money, then, knows that the surge has failed, that the war is lost, and that Iraq is going the way of Yugoslavia. And I suspect that most people in the Bush administration — maybe even Mr. Bush himself — know this, too.
Ray Hunt is the son of H.L. Hunt. Their family was the inspiration for the television show Dallas. And, for the conspiracy minded, they are suspects in the JFK assassination. Regardless, these people are not good people. It’s one big ugly mess.
Shouldn’t something like this be on the NYT front page and not in a columnist’s post, behind a firewall? Oh, never mind, it’s just more war profiteering.
Yeah, that might be nice.
no one should be surprised by this turn of events. it’s commonly defined as a lock up period: a predetermined amount of time during which employees and close associates of the company are given a “lock in” period during which to exercise a stock option.
related to the short squeeze: a rapid increase in the price of a stock that occurs when there is a lack of supply and an excess of demand for the stock.
heads up…something’s coming down the pike, and there’s fortunes to made.
follow the money.
lTMF’sA
managing the profit centers to the shareholders maximum benefit…Harvard MBA 101, gentleman’s C’s and all.
lTMF’sA