John Arthur Eaves Jr. is running for governor in Mississippi. He’s a Democrat, but his positions on the issues are a strange hybrid of economic populism and extreme social conservatism. His campaign is not the same as Harold Ford Jr’s. Ford ran as a stalwart friend of business…not so for Eaves.
“Eaves is putting his entire life’s savings into the race to ensure he is beholden to none but God and the people who elected him. He will work for the benefit of the people of Mississippi and not Big Tobacco, Big Oil, or Big Insurance. He will lower the grocery tax and raise the tobacco tax so the greatest financial burden no longer falls on those least able to bear it.”
He is hammering incumbent Governor Haley Barbour for his connections to lobbyists for Big Oil and Big Tobacco, but he is also trying to out-Jesus his opponent.
“Especially drawn to Jesus’ teachings on caring for the more vulnerable of society, he dedicated his career as a lawyer to defending people in Mississippi and around the world against those who would place monetary gain over the need to protect human life. Eaves has taken to heart the Gospel call to care for the least and the last and believes that society is at its best when we all work together for the common good.”
It’s refreshing to see a southern Democrat run aggressively on the Social Gospel, but Eaves takes his religion into other places.
To teach our children strong values and moral character, I believe it is time we bring back voluntary student-led school prayer to Mississippi schools and offer classes on Bible literacy…
…A true Pro-Life commitment must not only include a desire to end abortion but also a willingness to care for all who are vulnerable in our society…
He even brings The Jesus into his discussion of illegal immigration.
If the federal government won’t take responsibility to stop illegal immigration, then as Governor I will. I understand why people want to come here because Mississippi is a great state with great people, and as a Christian I don’t blame anyone for wanting to come.
To really get a feel for the potion Eaves is selling you can read this transcript of a speech he gave at the Neshoba County Fair. Here’s an excerpt:
Haley Barbour has opened the doors of power to the money changers: Big Tobacco, Big Oil, Big Insurance. These groups—who Haley has lobbied for—may talk about helping Mississippi, but they are merely wolves in sheep’s clothing who have been making false promises and pulling the financial strings of our leaders to force us to accept false choices.
They promise that Haley will use his Washington lobbyist connections to get money for Mississippi, but only if we agree to never ask whose pocket the money actually goes into. They ask us to ignore our broken schools and our children getting hooked on cigarettes so that Big Tobacco can make bigger profits. They tell us to ignore the fact that our state government has failed the people on the coast, and instead to give thanks that at least we don’t look as bad as Louisiana.
These moneychangers have led us astray, and the current governor has continued to side with them over the people of Mississippi because, as we all know, where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
Now, that’s Biblical, no?
I’ve talked to a lot of progressives about this race and there seems to be a regional split. The northern and coastal progressives are appalled at his anti-choice, anti-gay marriage, hardline anti-immigration, pro-school prayer positions on the issues. But southern progressives are excited about his unapologetic populism, and accuse critics of elitism, purity trolling, and a lack of realism.
My first instinct is to hope that this guy loses, and loses badly. I have long argued that his brand of populism is the way for Democrats to succeed in the south. But my whole point in making that argument was that we do not need to adopt socially conservative positions to win…let alone bringing up The Jesus and God at every (often nonsensical) opportunity.
The Democrats need to stop running away from their positions in socially conservative regions. A strong and unashamed party can win anywhere. Eaves’ economic message can carry the day without the it being completely subsumed within a Christian framework. But it’s not my secularism that is really offended by Eaves campaign…it’s my commitment to civil rights for women and gays, and my belief that immigrants should be treated with dignity and respect.
However, southern progressives make different arguments. They are desperate to be rid of Gov. Barbour and his radical policies. They’ll take what they can get. And if Eaves has his faults on social issues, other southern Dems (like fmr. Sen. John Breaux) were far from populists (and thus, worse).
What do you think?
And it matters that this guy is anti-choice.
I didn’t read any explicitly anti-choice position there, it just sounded like he was trying to prevent abortion with better social policy. Also true biblical literacy doesn’t work in favor of right wingers. The bible doesn’t say half the things they say it says.
Don’t worry, he’s anti-choice:
Here he is on gays:
That’s why I did a piece at Street Prophets on Why I’m Not A Republican.
Personally, civil liberties are my main concern; economic justice runs second — a close second, but second all the same. I’d rather be a hungry freeman than a well-fed slave.
So yeah, I hope he loses.
There’s another reason to hope he loses, and that’s because it’s easier to take on the right on economic issues than it is to beat them in the malarial swamp of so-called values. If this guy actually wins, he’ll be much harder to replace with an actual liberal later on than would be the case if we had to defeat a GOP bitter-ender in 2012.
I agree. A dem whose this socially conservative is no dem at all and can only do untold damage. If they don’t believe in separation of church/state, civil rights for everyone, uphold Roe/Wade then they are more than worthless they are scary…just as scary as any rethug.
Actually, the opposite is true. It is indeed easier to take on the right on economic issues, and what Eaves has done is taken the social issues off of the table – they’re a wash between the incumbent and the challenger.
Booman Jesus is big politics down here. I never heard of any politician down here that didn’t have Jesus behind him/her. And then the winners, I guess the ones Jesus was really pulling for, put a big ads in the paper thanking Jesus for the win. Oh and they do thank their constituents for voting too.
hey, I know that Family Man…
but even Barbour seems taken aback by the level Eaves is taking it.
I think he’s going a lot further than normal.
I think he’s going a lot further than normal.
I agree.
He’s a Democrat in Mississippi – he has to take it further than normal, much like Mitt Romney ran to Kennedy’s left in 1994. A Republican in Massachusetts is much akin to a Democrat in Mississippi – nothing like the national critter – and just like Barney Frank could never get elected in Mississippi I’m sure that Eaves couldn’t get elected north of Corinth.
I suppose Seligman won because he is a magician?
You don’t have to go this far.
Is this the general election? is Eaves running this year?
Speaking for myself, I always want the Dem to win in a general. If the election is next year, well Mississippi Dems can decide if they want to nominate this guy.
In the deep south talking about Jesus is second nature. To northern ears it grates, but it fits easily in the south, both black and white.
i think you have to live in the south to understand the south.
we cant even get the progressive black clergy in the northeast to embrace equal rights for gays….what makes you think southern christians will anytime soon.
i have sat in a community meeting in the most liberal neighborhood in phila and had black clergy tell me that gays are going to hell and we cant have our children exposed to them.
its like enda…..that guy may be the best we will get now and for a long time.
im not saying clear the field for him…i believe in open and democratic primaries unlike the asswipes schumer and rendell and all you other asswipes reading this who supported an uncontested pa primary for casey (you know who you are).
im saying we could do a lot worse down there.
now if he were running up here in pa i’d nail him to his own cross and stick a baby jesus butt plug up his butt.
How ’bout focusing on educational literacy instead of the Bible? Seems to me that Mississippi is not exactly the nation’s leader in learning OR test scores.
And an anti-choicer won’t ever get my vote or approval.
im very unclear as to if this guy is anti choice as the law of the land or anti choice personally for his own uterus.
Since you asked…
I think this guy would never be elected in Massachusetts or San Francisco, but I also find it interesting that progressives would say that he is adopting socially conservative positions to win. Maybe, just maybe, he is socially conservative and he’s simply running on his values and beliefs. I know it’s exceedingly rare these days, but maybe he’s actually presenting himself honestly – a Democrat who’s social conservative and economically progressive. I know a few thousand people who fit that description, beginning with myself.
Isn’t that the idea of a big tent? People from diverse regions, backgrounds and beliefs working together on issues where they agree while remaining civil in areas where they disagree? Or are there some things that inherently disqualify you from being a Democrat? We know that to be true of Republicans – buck the leadership and you’re the enemy – but Democrats are supposedly the party of inclusion and tolerance. What are the limits on that tolerance? Oppose abortion and you’re out? Oppose homosexuality and you’re out? Occasionally have something positive to say about Israel’s right to exist and you’re out? mention the name of Jesus and you’re out? What’s the litmus test for being a Democrat? Are people like me no longer welcome in the Party?
I’d say that the party has to stand for civil rights unambiguously. It has to stand for unfettered access to medical care (even controversial procedures), and it has to adhere to a common sense interpretation of the Constitution.
The party can tolerate some outliers on the issues, but combining all of them (denying civil rights to gays, messing with women’s access to quality health care and invading their privacy, and confusing or blurring the separation of church and state) in the same candidate? That’s getting to my breaking point.
ya mean like casey?
yeah. Although Casey isn’t quite a worrisome on the church/state issue. And he doesn’t confuse gayness with bestiality.
Maybe, just maybe, he is socially conservative and he’s simply running on his values and beliefs. I know it’s exceedingly rare these days, but maybe he’s actually presenting himself honestly – a Democrat who’s social conservative and economically progressive.
Preach it brother Oscar.
We can elect pro-choice Dems in the south. But if this is the general election (it still isn’t clear whether the MS Gubenatorial is this year or next) then this is the guy MS Dems nominated. Maybe we should respect that.
Besides, the idea of a Dem candidate too Holy Roller for Barbour is just knee slappingly funny.
Gubernatorial Races
There are 3 gubernatorial seats up for re-election in 2007 and 11 up in 2008.
* 2007
o Kentucky
o Louisiana
o Mississippi
* 2008
o Delaware
o Indiana
o Missouri
o Montana
o New Hampshire
o North Carolina
o North Dakota
o Utah
o Vermont
o Washington
o West Virginia
OSCAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
my first love. (from dfa)
i miss you.
respctfully, go to hell. i’m sick and tired of being thrown under the bus so “moderates” can get respect while i never will.
being pro-choice and a believer that women and gays deserve the same basic rights as everyone else is NOT a radical position. 30 years ago, most dems were completely behind the idea of equal rights for everyone. today, i’m told that my rights are less important then making a bunch of bible thumpers feel comfortable. fuck that.
moving to the right has utterly destroyed the democratic party. hello, have you been paying atttention these last seven years? show me where moving to the right has helped the democratic party or progressive causes. it hasn’t. it’s time to stand up to the intolerance in this country, not to use some ancient book of myths to justify more. spare me your prattling about how i need to be more tolerant of those who think they have a right to tell me what to do with my uterus and with whom i can have a relationship.
Mississippi blogger and comments.
You just can’t beat the local Dems. They can judge this for the best.
As national blogosphere was never asked to help I don’t think we should presume to say whether we accept Eaves or not. With any luck he won’t turn into Zell Miller.
I think it’s great. I think it’s momentous that he is taking on the major corporations with social responsibility at the core. I have read recently that that a lot of the Christian world wants to open up and reclaim their social responsibility. The prejudice that took Christianity’s name became all there was. This new rhetoric represents a rebirth of social caring. And that is of core importance — and it is something we can share in common.
I have a dream that progressives and the fundamentalist Christian community get together in something like an arbitration process:
Just put those things on the table which we can agree upon, and leave the rest outside the room.
I think it’s possible we could agree on some really big issues for improvement. Social values like the Christian concerns of this Mississipi Christian politician. I think we could agree on some concern for stewardship of the earth. Perhaps we could agree about health care.
These are huge. Work on these, let the other hot-button issues sit out for awhile.
The areas of agreement would change our world for the better.
And also the opposition to corporations is enormous. It is the corporations who are preventing the action in the other areas — the environment, health care.
We would have to sneak around them to meet with the Christians on these issues.
And of course the corporations today are bringing about fascism in America. They are the biggest threat to our freedoms and our democracy. Any Christian willing to take them on for the sake of social values for real people is my true ally.
Now see this— this is great!
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/10/12/04345/761
And another link in the same post:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1011/p02s01-ussc.html
If he wants to spout scripture, why doesn’t he start a church?
Nobody is forced to attend a particular church.
When religion is slathered onto politics with a heavy hand we all have to live with the burden. I don’t care what he believes, how many times a day he prays, how much he tithes, as long as he keeps it out of politics. These sanctimonious assholes force their beliefs upon the rest of the populace when they mandate the teaching of creationism, close women’s clinics, or substitute the 10 Commandments for the Constitution.
Thumping the bible is like wearing a flag-pin: you just know that there is some dirty secret when religion is used oppressively.
Do we need any more hypocrites befouling government?