Appearing at The Jaundiced Eye, the Independent Bloggers’ Alliance, and My Left Wing.
It’s no secret that I hate Hillary. And everyday she gives me another reason. Her everything but the kitchen sink strategy continues and accelerates and now she’s lobbed a toaster at Obama’s head for stating the obvious.
“You have a real choice in this election. Either Democrat would be better than John McCain. And all three of us would be better than George Bush,” Obama said.
Says Hillary:
“We need a nominee who will take on John McCain, not cheer on John McCain, and I will be that nominee,” she said.
Let me get in my time machine and go back a whole month and half.
Hillary Clinton told reporters that both she and the presumtive Republican nominee John McCain offer the experience to be ready to tackle any crisis facing the country under their watch, but Barack Obama simply offers more rhetoric. “I think you’ll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say,” she said. “He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience. Senator Obama will put forth a speech he made in 2002.”
Oh my gods and goddess. The woman will say anything. No matter how completely unmoored from reality and reason it may be, she will say anything to win. Much like Bush, little things like recently recorded history will not get in the way of her narrative. That’s why her Bosnian fish story stuck in many a craw; because that kind of revisionism is par for the course with this woman.
In other news Michael Moore dissed Hillary, saying:
Well, that sounded good last year, but over the past two months, the actions and words of Hillary Clinton have gone from being merely disappointing to downright disgusting. I guess the debate last week was the final straw. I’ve watched Senator Clinton and her husband play this game of appealing to the worst side of white people, but last Wednesday, when she hurled the name “Farrakhan” out of nowhere, well that’s when the silly season came to an early end for me. She said the “F” word to scare white people, pure and simple. Of course, Obama has no connection to Farrakhan. But, according to Senator Clinton, Obama’s pastor does — AND the “church bulletin” once included a Los Angeles Times op-ed from some guy with Hamas! No, not the church bulletin!
This sleazy attempt to smear Obama was brilliantly explained the following night by Stephen Colbert. He pointed out that if Obama is supported by Ted Kennedy, who is Catholic, and the Catholic Church is led by a Pope who was in the Hitler Youth, that can mean only one thing: OBAMA LOVES HITLER!
Yes, Senator Clinton, that’s how you sounded. Like you were nuts. Like you were a bigot stoking the fires of stupidity. How sad that I would ever have to write those words about you. You have devoted your life to good causes and good deeds. And now to throw it all away for an office you can’t win unless you smear the black man so much that the superdelegates cry “Uncle (Tom)” and give it all to you.
A-fucking-men! Moore sadly notes that he could not cast his vote for Obama, because like Floridians, Michigan residents were excluded by party rules from a real primary. What he does not say, is that he could have voted for Hillary and that if she has her way, that vote would count.
To shrink Obama’s 800,000 popular-vote margin, the Clinton campaign argues for the inclusion of votes cast in Michigan and Florida. Those two states lost their right to send delegates to the convention by scheduling their contests earlier in the year than party rules allowed.
Clinton and Obama agreed not to campaign in the two states, and Obama took his name off the ballot in Michigan. Clinton won both uncontested races, and now says they should count in the nationwide popular-vote calculations.
Florida voters “expressed their views,” Clinton told the Newspaper Association of America in Washington on April 15. “They have had their vote certified by the Florida secretary of state; it’s part of the popular vote.”
That’s what we’re dealing with, in Hillary Clinton. A woman who thinks it’s perfectly fair to include the results of an uncontested primary into the tally. A woman who just makes up the rules — and the facts — as she goes along. Unfuckingbelievable.
not just sniper fire…..she also ducks from the truth.
…just makes up the rules — and the facts — as she goes along. Unfuckingbelievable.
erm, have you just started paying attention?
that’s been the clinton modus operandi, since ’92.
and the “kitchen sink” was added to the mix a long time ago…scorched earth is the goal. she’ll leave a wasteland whether she perseveres or not.
l hope she gets a primary challenger for her senate seat…assuming she runs. imo, when this is said and done, l expect her to quietly go away ’cause if obama wins it all, she’s painted herself into a liebermanesque corner.
it’s all about them, always has been.
Here’s why Hillary needs to be defeated.
As The Financial Times, UK wrote today the campaign gives as a good window to the future – how Clinton will govern …they urge Democrats to choose Obama.
All these people such as Mark Penn, (he has not departed) will follow Hillary to the Oval Office.
Do we really want these people who are the Voices in Her Head?
If only every person who will vote in PA could read this:
No. I haven’t just started paying attention. I’ve been aware that Hillary is a creep for some time. Although, I must admit — and did in my last diary on the topic — that I didn’t realize in the 90s how legitimate some of the criticism of them was.
There is only one immutable law of human nature. People show, not tell, us who they are. Hillary certainly has, and there’s not much there to respect.