Is the Clinton campaign stealing a page out of Karl Rove’s book on “How to Slime Your Opponent in 10 Easy Lessons?” Or is the GOP behind a series of peculiar robo-calls in North Carolina targeting African American households highly similar to ones which occurred during the Virginia primary and in Ohio last year? (h/t to Pam Spaulding of Pam’s House Blend):
As reported yesterday in the Raleigh News & Observer, African-American households are receiving anonymous robo-calls with misleading information about voting. Facing South has now learned that those calls are very similar to tactics recently used in Virginia and Ohio, suggesting they may be linked to a national voter deception strategy.
In one North Carolina call, the caller falsely states that voters must send in a “voter registration packet” before voting. The State Board of Elections released a transcript of the call (you can also listen to it at the Democracy North Carolina website):
“Hello, this is Lamont Williams. In the next few days, you will receive a voter registration packet in the mail. All you need to do is sign it, date it and return your application. Then you will be able to vote and make your voice heard. Please return the voter registration form when it arrives. Thank you.”
Facing South has learned that voters in Virginia received calls with the same message before that state’s Feb. 12 primaries — although, the Virginia State Board of Elections curiously viewed it as an attempt at identity theft, not voter disenfranchisement. […]
Something tells me this has nothing to do with identity theft. That it also occurred in the days leading up to the Virginia primary points the finger of suspicion directly at the Clinton campaign. Virginia was another state in which African American turnout was expected to be high, and after the South Carolina results, was expected to break heavily for Barack Obama (which it did). That similar calls were made last year prior to a November election in Ohio is some evidence that perhaps Clinton are not behind this effort.
However, it may just be that someone in her campaign (or acting on its behalf) hired the services of the group that made those earlier robo-calls. Or this may be just typical GOP dirty tricks since we know they would rather run against Clinton in the Fall than against Obama, if only to bolster turnout of their base, who hate Clinton with a passion. We’ll probably never know for certain, but the fact that nearly identical and highly deceitful calls were made in two states in which black support for Obama is critical to his victory is cause for alarm.
Whoever wins the Democratic nomination, expect to see a lot more of this type of voter suppression effort this Fall. If Clinton wins, she should also expect to see targeted calls to African Americans reminding them how she sabotaged the Obama candidacy during the primaries, with the intent of degrading her support among black voters as well as suppressing their turnout overall (a message to which the African American community would be highly susceptible after what’s occurred during the primary campaign). This would have a very deleterious effect, not only on Clinton’s chances to win the general election, but also on down ticket races.
And I used to think 2004 was the nastiest election campaign I’d ever seen, one which could never be topped. Silly me.
Hell has no fury like a woman spurned as a famous playwright once said. And, the voters sure are spurning Billary. Beware Barrack, an evil woman is on the loose and her anger knows no bounds. Be prepared———for anything.
I don’t think that’s appropriate. And in any case, these tactics go back all the way to before Super Tuesday. It’s not about being spurned, it’s about their strategy throughout.
HRC’s tactics result from her motivations and intentions. She wants to win, badly. Granted her questionable style of campaigning goes back before super Tueday but even then Obama was demonstrating that he could win the allegiance of many of the voters and raise considerable amounts of money. She is a formidable opponent and, maybe, even ruthless. Barrack can afford few mistakes against one so determined.
If, and it’s a big if at this point, the Clinton campaign is behind this robocall thing, how come you think she’d be suitable for the SCOTUS?
She was not a distinguished student at Yale, needed two tries to pass the bar, has only worked for a corporate law firm, has almost no courtroom experience as attorney and none as judge and you think she’s a good pick for the court?
Clearly has no vision. as I said on Orange, her idea of a vision is a “to do” list of bills and polices. And both she and Bill have shown themselves throughout this campaign to have no compunctions whatsoever when it comes to dirty campaigning tricks. Look at the people she chose to hire. Look at the people her husband chose to pardon.
Well, Billy Rehnquist used to run around harassing blacks and Mexicans back in Arizona, so she fits the profile on that count.
Isn’t this the same Hillary Clinton who was kicked off the Watergate investigation for lying?
I don’t think she’d be suitable for SCOTUS. Did I ever say that?
No, I did. Last night, in orange.
Wekk orange is permanently blocked to me at this point so I have no idea what’s going on over there.
No. You didn’t. I already posted a comment indicating my mistake. I didn’t realize you were the author of the diary.
Maggie Williams was on the board last year..
http://web.archive.org/web/20070706100052/http://www.wvwv.org/aboutwvwv/index.cfm?id=3
Coincidence?
Hillary and the GOP have a silent partnership, the stupid. GOP is spending huge bucks to target Obama. They fear him, prefer to go against Hillary.
Out of the gates in this campaign the Obama people were proactive in all states. Every TV ad aired weeks before the vote includes the date of the election. Also there are phone banking by millions into the state to counter robos.
Don’t ask the Supremes about voter suppression. A waste of time. You can’t pick rotten mushrooms from a decayed wood.
Oops. My apologies to Steven D. I didn’t look carefully and thought Booman had written the diary. My comment was directed at Booman not Steven.
I assume Booman is trying to think of a way out of the divided Democratic party that we have in great measure due to the Clintons. I don’t think putting someone like Hillary Clinton on the SCOTUS is a way out.
I respect your opinion. My only response is, do you have a better idea?
Assuming there is a need to respect her role in the party (and you can argue that either way) what role could she play?
No, Booman, I don’t have a better idea. And I understand, as I said, your desire to heal some of the intra-party wounds. But “kicking her upstairs” to the SCOTUS is a bad idea. When we get through this primary, I’ll turn my thoughts to cabinet appointments, SCOTUS, agency heads, etc.
You’ve undoubtedly been following the NC robocall mess that seems to be quite directly tied to Podesta and other Clinton allies. We don’t need someone on the SCOTUS who is involved with this kind of sleaze and disrespect for the Constitution, the law, etc.
Whether it is Hillary clinton(NeoCon-NY) and her campaign or the reTHUGS doesn’t matter, there is no difference anymore, they act the same….
nuff’said…but I think it is the ClintonS they are disgusting beyond comprehension!
Are you sure?
I was over at TalkLeft and there was no mention of it. And over at Left Coaster eriposte was defending H. Clinton and Reynolds. Left me check to see if it’s covered at Salon.
Sure that the robo-calls are happening? Yes. Sure as to is behind them? No, I did qualify that in my post. Clinton or some of her “independent supporters” are the obvious suspects, but then so is the “vast right wing conspiracy” which lately has been cozying up to Clinton, because they fear Obama, imo.
There’s more out on dKos tying it to Podesta and other Clinton allies.
AmericaBlog has more including a link to the original article. TPMuckraker says the Group has quit calling and disclaims any evil intent. Methinks they protesteth too much. All kinds of Clintonistas on the group’s management, and they’ve done this before, acc. to AmericaBlog.
Maggie Williams was on the board of WVWV last year and there are tapes of the calls on TPM.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070706100052/http://www.wvwv.org/aboutwvwv/index.cfm?id=3
I also saw that this might be a felony.