But the bulk of responsibility for the insultingly asinine tenor of the last act of this Democratic primary season must be laid firmly in the laps of the only entity capable of spinning totally irrelevant soundbites, events and analyses into what amounts to a wholesale campaign to destroy the campaign of the only candidate with a snowball’s chance in Tikrit of defeating McBush in November: the American corporate media.
Despite the valiant efforts of Keith Olbermann — and, to a lesser (and less effective) extent, Bill Maher — to inject something resembling sanity and objectivity into the miasma of these media-driven faux controversies, said media has been gleefully complicit in this year’s patented right wing “Swiftboating” of the (presumptive) Democratic nominee. Hell, they couldn’t even wait till the actual nomination took place; as tasty to their ravenous drama-addiction as this drawn-out contest proves, the classic American attention deficit disorder the media both perpetuate and share with their audience will not be denied the opportunity to multitask — hence the breathless declarations, disingenuous hand-wringing and fraudulent analyses of their fictitious controversies in service of two masters, Ratings and Il Duce Corporati.
I have my thoughts as to the veracity of Senator Barack Obama’s stated beliefs and opinions, but once again — as happens every four years come national election season — prefer to restrain my more ruthless insights for the time being, in service of what I hope to hell is the greater good. He may not be the Messiah, but he’s all we’ve got, and I refuse to tie another anvil to his already vulnerable campaign. It will either be John McCain or Barack Obama inaugurated next January; time enough for unsparing criticism once the greater of those two evils has been averted.
I will say this, however: I am absolutely gobsmacked to witness what ought to be the outright laughable and transparent right wing attack machine’s tactics once again transformed into a veritable juggernaut by virtue of its opponents’ apparent total inability to counter it with what ought to be unassailable: the motherfucking TRUTH.
if at all these past several weeks. Two simultaneous family crises — my mother’s open heart surgery and subsequent return to hospital with complications and the death of a beloved uncle — had much to do with it.
But I’ve also been gunshy about blogging this year; too much hate, too little reality-based dialogue, I guess.
Anyway, I think I may be back.
: )
Good to have you back, MSOC. Sorry to hear about your family.
Good to ‘see’ you, Maryscott! Welcome back.
Good to see you back!!!! Sorry for your loss and sending warm thoughts of Love and Healing to your mom.
I agree Obama has showed surprisingly bad judgment in rising to the bait on this (non)issue instead of turning it aside as it deserves. He’s keeping the fires burning on it when it’s time to force the conversation to move on. I thought he would have more smarts than that, but his judgment seems very flawed on this, probably because the emotional connection is clouding it. He has to make this go away. Every minute he spends dealing with this nonsense is a minute lost from defining himself and promoting his own message.
Obama had to answer in some way. This isn’t some little quaint job he is vieing for now is it. What would you all have him do? Ignore it? You saw what happened when Keery did nothing to counter the smears against him. I think Obama has handled the whole peice of shit that has been thrown at him quite honorably. Lets not blame the victim here.
Sorry for you loss MaryScott.
… I’m “blaming the victim,” here.
Let’s call it “assigning to Senator Obama his fair share of the responsibility” in this latest fiasco.
: )
He’s been cowed a few times in this campaign.
Edwards knuckled him under in one of the Democratic debates. It was kind of painful to watch.
He backpedaled on the ‘clinging to guns’. He should have been as unapologetic as they were fainting with feigned outrage, decrying his raw statement. Sticking to his guns would have made the statement the focus, backpedaling as he did made ‘the gaffe’ the story.
He knocked the ball out of the park on the speech after the Wright Controversy broke, and should have just took at as a win,and left it at that. He could then use the questions to shed a light on those despicable characters playing politics while hiding behind religious shields.
He didn’t even have to be an asshole about it.
Glad you back…
His interview with Wright was very reasonable and had a remarkable amount of personal content to it for where the two men had crossed paths literallly and figuratively. Even better was his follow-up the week following after the Wright’s appearance in other venues.