It’s hard for me to think like a Republican, but I try. One thing you can see from the huge surge in Democratic registration all across the country is that the Democrats will now win any election that matches up their base against the Republican base. The strategy that worked for the GOP in 2004 is no longer viable. It isn’t an option for John McCain. And McCain seems to understand this:
IN A WIDE-RANGING INTERVIEW aboard his campaign plane this morning, John McCain said that he is open to choosing a pro-choice running mate and named former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge as someone who merits serious consideration despite his support for abortion rights. McCain also criticized Barack Obama’s presidential campaign for attempts to “politicize” the debate over Georgia and criticized President Bush for failing to recognize the true nature of Vladimir Putin.
“I think that the pro-life position is one of the important aspects or fundamentals of the Republican Party,” McCain said. “And I also feel that–and I’m not trying to equivocate here–that Americans want us to work together. You know, Tom Ridge is one of the great leaders and he happens to be pro-choice. And I don’t think that that would necessarily rule Tom Ridge out.”
If you’re upset about FISA or some other blasphemy out of the Obama Camp, imagine how diehard Republicans feel reading something like that? As Karl Rove notes in this morning’s Wall Street Journal, McCain needs to win Michigan and Ohio or he’s toast. I can’t think of a state in the country where the Democratic Party is in more disarray than in Michigan. We had the disputed primary. The Dems couldn’t field decent congressional candidates in at least four potentially competitive races. And the Detroit Mayor was just indicted. If McCain is going to breakthrough in any major Gore/Kerry state, Michigan is the place to make it happen. But, as discombobulated at the Michigan Democrats are, there is no way that McCain can win a base election there. With an African-American at the top of the ticket, the turnout in Detroit is going to be historic. McCain can only win by tacking to the center and winning over the Reagan Democrats in the Detroit suburbs. Racializing the contest (unfortunately) will bear much more fruit than culturizing it. Picking Tom Ridge as his running mate makes a whole lot more sense than picking a social conservative…especially a Southern one.
McCain would be more competitive in this race if he had not allowed himself to get tied so closely to George W. Bush. His old reputation as a maverick is pretty much up in smoke. But one way to restore it is to make a pick that pisses off what’s left of his base. There is a degree of desperation in this analysis, but looking at the state-by-state polls, McCain should be feeling desperate. He is not competitive in many Kerry states and he is playing defense from Virginia to North Carolina to Florida to Iowa to Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, Montana, and Alaska. McCain needs a game changer that will appeal to moderates in New Hampshire, Maine, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan. If he can’t force Obama into defense in any of those states, he’s going to lose…possibly quite badly.
When you look at the list of pressing challenges facing the country, abortion rights, gay marriage, and school prayer are way down the list right now. McCain would be a fool to pander to the people that still make their political decisions based on those issues. If I were McCain, I’d pick Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. No one can say anything bad about her other than she is a Republican, and she would signal that the Republican Party no longer is the exclusive province of white-male protestant southerners. But, Tom Ridge would be a good pick, too.
I would fear those picks. Romney or Pawlenty or Huckabee or Jindal? They aren’t going to change the underlying dynamics of the race.
Good analysis, Boo.
Ridge and Snow are solid people too, but I would pick Snow over Ridge for one silly reason; He’s too tall. I’ve seen him (and esp. Romney) standing next to McCain and he towers over him.
The photo ops just don’t make McCain look like the guy in charge.
Dumb, but one of those things that will sway the (small) minds of so many voters.
well, my impression is that John McCain is only about 5’9″ or so. So, a lot of people are going to tower over him. I wouldn’t make my decision on that basis. You can compensate for it.
McCain just launch his running away from GWB, “Washington is Broken” Ad – he’s disavowing the hug.
and Obama counters.
Obama is touting the movement is within striking distance of 2 million people (donating $5 each, is more than a sneeze…. but why is
Obama in overkill with the bringing home Clinton’s supporters? It’s being reported her name will be entered in nomination
It’s a PR fiasco in the making. Obama does not have a reserve of 500 delegates, does he?
When there is a very competitive primary, it is normal to have the 2nd place person put their name in for the roll call. Jerry Brown did it in 1992, and I know that as a Brown supporter it did give me some closure. We had a vote, we lost, I gave up the ghost and moved on to supporting Bill 100%.
I don’t think the vote will be close, but Hillary will get some love. The media makes it sound much more divisive than it really is.
Not even. I think he’s 5’7″.
He needs to start getting more calcium in his diet.
Speaking of which, why hasn’t Obama pushed for at least one podium debate? These two sit-down debates totally negate his height advantage.
Not to mention that sit-down debates usually aren’t as contentious, and we need to make McCain explode. Hopefully the campaign is negotiating this and not telling us, but I think it would be a mistake not to have at least one podium debate.
Yes you can compensate for it… by picking Olympia. 🙂
Americans need to feel good about their president. Guys like Romney just remind people that McCain is a short old white haired guy.
I think Romney’s the logical choice. He helps with the base and gives him the appearance of economic know how. He has some Michigan roots. Maybe he only gives McCain a two or three point boost there and a one point boost in Ohio, but that theoretically could be enough.
Ridge would be better in those states you mentioned, NH, Maine, etc. But if there’s protests from the Jesus Campers at the RNC because of a pro-choice VP, doesn’t that intra party division make McCain and the GOP look even weaker? Looking like a loser is one of the worst things in politics…
See what can happen when you don’t “take it off the table”.
From the NYT.
Amazing what happens when the pressure is kept on, isn’t it?
.
See recent diaries:
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
Ridge is dumb as stump.
Nah, he’s not really all that stupid. I mean, he’s no brainiac or anything, but he can keep track of a color-coded terror chart. Can you?
Well, uh, keeping track of 5 or 6 colors is a bit difficult, isn’t it? So, I guess he’s proved himself.
that’s all I’m sayin’…
there are five colors? I was only aware of orange and red, since that’s where they love to keep the pot simmering.
typical liberal. Can’t count past two.
Why does everyone think Tom Ridge is the shit?
The guy was a terribly incompetent Dept. of Homeland Security chief. He politicized the department and was infamous for those dumbass color-coded terror alerts. He is tied to Bush in a big way. He has no charisma or TV presence, unless you like politicians who look like dumb old lugs.
I guess he was a popular governor of Pennsylvania, but I don’t remember that. Ancient history. And what has Ridge been doing the past few years, lobbying work? I think he’d end up being a disaster even aside from his pro-choice stance.
Snowe might help McCain with the PUMA types and indies, but would absolutely hurt enthusiasm amongst his base. Maybe he thinks he can rile them up anyway with Rev. Wright ads, but I doubt it.
Sarah Palin used to scare me until her new scandal broke. Now I think McCain has to go with Pawlenty as the safe pick.