This is what a failure by government to properly regulate and intervene in the “marketplace’ inevitably creates, my friends:
Several of the nation’s biggest banks have failed or been absorbed by healthier institutions, leaving three giant “superbanks” with an unprecedented concentration of market power: Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.
While that may be good news for emerging giants and the failing companies they helped rescue, the new oligopoly raises troubling questions about regulation and competition, analysts and consumer advocates say.
“Bank fees are going up, up, up, and that’s the danger to consumers as more of these banks consolidate,” says Sally Greenberg, executive director of the National Consumer League. “It’s difficult for the average person to get a bank account that doesn’t involve fees, and if you get into financial distress you’re cooked, and you’ll be ‘fee-ed’ to death.” […]
“Consumers are going to be victims of higher and more punitive fees,” Greenberg predicts.
Moreover, many analysts worry about how federal and state authorities, who were unable to prevent the current financial industry meltdown, will be able to monitor the new giant banks that combine a wide range of operations from investment banking to consumer lending.
“Large institutions are impossible to manage prudently, let alone regulate,” says Amar Bhide, a professor at the Columbia Business School.
In the old days, a Progressive Republican by the name of Teddy Roosevelt railed against just such consolidations and monopolies of wealth and power. He saw them as a threat to small businessmen and entrepreneurs who would be starved of capital and kept out of entering the marketplace by those who dominated the field. Which was why he promoted the policy of trust busting, and helped pass the first antitrust legislation in this country.
Teddy Roosevelt would think us all fools, but especially the free marketeers of the modern Republican party for allowing the Lords of Wall Street to pull the wool over their eyes once again. History has many lessons. few people study it anymore, however. They prefer the simpler fantasies of ideology and faith based economic theory. Let’s us hope President elect Obama has read (or intends to study) a few cogent histories of the “Gilded Age,” because I believe they would come in quite handy about now.
Monopolies and oligopolies are inherently unstable. They become incestuous, rigid and inflexible, predatory and prone to failure. They have no brakes, as we learned from the recent massive collapse among the large investment firms of Wall Street, and why should they? They are protected and coddled by government, allowed to bloat like fat spiders on our economy, sucking the lifeblood out of any possible economic revival. They have no purpose other than to perpetuate their own power and the greed of their managers. They are, to borrow a phrase from that inimitable wordsmith, George Bush, a catastrophic success, years in the making by Republican and conservative policies which led to the mismanagement of the banking and financial sector of our economy.
If we let them stay as they are, we are allowing the growth of parasites that will eventually kill us, their hosts, and the futures of our children with them. The time to take action to break them up into manageable and competitive enterprises is sooner, rather than later. Otherwise we will see another wave of corporate socialism in the near future which will make the current mess seem like a child’s birthday party by comparison.
I think it was Bernie Sanders who said that if these institutions are too big to fail, then they are too big to exist.
Money is power and the bankers who control so much of it are powerful to the max. Look at how they can screw up and still get government help in the bail-out. Perhaps, this is a function of how many political contributions they have made over the years and how many politicians they have in their pocket.
Hmmm. Maybe, it’s time for some substantial reform of the whole political process, particularly, when it come to campaign financing.
Regulate banks, not bedrooms.
I have to disagree with this analysis. It was government interference that was the problem. So long as the Federal reserve can manipulate the money supply to create bubbles, distortions in the economy and inefficient use of capital will take place. This will invariably result in recession.
JP Morgan and B of A basically own the government. The Bear Sterns bailout was primarily because BS were indebted to JPM and they could not afford the loss. The 700 billion dollar bailout…supported by Senator Obama and the entire Democratic leadership…was yet another naked example of government interference in the market place.
What we have had is not a free market but a rigged market, where the big boys can go to Vegas and make a bundle and keep it, or lose their shirts and make us buy them a new wardrobe.
Very good observation, Lysander. There has been a long history of privatising profits and socialising losses. But the question of size of financial institutions does come into it – when they get very, very big then governments inevitably make the calculation that they cannot be allowed to fail because of the huge impact on the ‘real’ economy.
That’s true. Inevitably when a huge company, ESPECIALLY a large bank, is in trouble there is huge political pressure for a government bailout. This is no less true in semi-socialist Europe. But that does not make a bailout a good idea.
If, for example, the government had simply allowed all financial institutions to fail, we may very well have had a severe recession for a year or 2, but I believe the economy would have rebounded much stronger than ever. Instead we will have a decade or 2 of malaise and may get a severe recession anyway. The 700 billion does not really save the economy at all. It only redistributes the pain; more for us, less for them. And it was the final straw that stopped me from voting for Obama. (I’m a Ron Paul man)
Japan faced the same problem 20 years ago and the government’s reaction was to save the banks at all costs. Japan’s problem had the same cause as here; easy credit by the Bank of Japan throughout the 80s. They tried to solve the crisis by…EVEN MORE EASY CREDIT!!! and slashing interest rates to 0%. But the cause of the problem cannot be the solution.
Thanx for reading
I certainly agree with the analysis, but you’re not going to try to argue that the Clinton administration did a damn thing to slow down the financialization of the economy, are you?
A major part of the problem seems to be not just a failure of regulation, but the absence of regulation. I may be wrong, but I understand that in the US there was (probably still is) absolutely no prudential regulation of investment banks (the kind that have failed) to ensure that they have adequate capital and liquidity ratios.
This is why I am hanging on to my credit union account. There are times it is slightly inconvenient, but for the most part the absence of fees is one of the most attractive aspects of the whole deal.
Credit union is the way to go. I switched over completely from Key Bank a couple of years ago and have never looked back.
The fall of Merrill Lynch.
Blythe Masters, William Winters, Ahmass L. Fakahany, Osman Semerci are the players. Stupid inbreds from the oligarchy. Its called networking in the 21st century. From where do these losers come? How do they get their positions? Few work their way up, most are born to the capitalist network. Their profit is derived from our pain.